What was the editor's problem?

autism

can a kind anon post *that* webm of liam neeson jumping a fence?

>>83238328
The shaky and incoherent filming reflect's Bond's point of view, he's enraged and focused on revenge and the movie shows that.

How is it that /tv/ can spot the shitty editing but professional Hollywood editors cannot?

>>83238810
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCKhktcbfQM

>>83238941
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTNLYNkjU9g

>>83238924
because you dont know the full story, maybe this editing was like that because they were covering the lack of good footage, maybe they were on very tight schedule and they couldnt quality action in time so they decided to save their ass and cover it in editing. just saying

>>83238985
Just because QoS didn't have a finished script and they had to make stuff up as they went along with the filming, this still doesn't give them a reason to NOT properly film Bond and a bad guy running and jumping and properly editing it so it isn't all jump cuts

Kek the bond films from the 60s had better editing than this

>>83238985
>why are 500 million dollar movies like the last avengers so badly edited?
>wow anon, you dont know the full story? what a bigot
wew bro.

>>83239098
>>83239173
dont underestimate the incompetence of hollywood, even in big productions people fuck up hard, sometimes they dont even know what color pallete they will use for a shot and just go 'eh fuck it we'll figure it out in post'

>>83239173
He was just answering your question lad

>>83238328
Man, fuck this fuckin movie.
In the bottom three Bond films.

>>83238328
That's actually hilarious, I just watched this movie for the first time about a week ago, I complained to my girlfriend as I watched this scene that it made me fucking nauseous.