Why Stanley Kubrick though?

File: lines234.jpg (67KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 800x800px

he was a perfectionist that had incredible attention to detail

Kubrick literally shitposted in his movies by putting in things that would be read into too much by numales

Because of 2001 and his long lasting good relation with Nasa. The Zeiss lenses he used for Barry Lyndon were the ones used by the Nasa for the Apollo program.

>>83194697
Yeah, because everyone knows the director is the mastermind behind every decision made on a film

Everyone also knows that hiring a high-profile film director to film a fake moon landing is not only viable, but optimal

You really find hard to travel like 600.000 kilometers and film this shit?

>>83194936
>hiring a high-profile film director to film a fake moon landing
This is my biggest problem with it. Wouldn't there be someone in the military with the skills to direct a fake moon landing without having to bring in a high-profile director (maybe the most high-profile of all time) who could talk to anybody about it?

File: Sniper[1].jpg (46KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x338px

>>83194697
>attention to detail

I feel he got lazy with Full Metal Jacket.. The sniper that had the whole squad pinned down was a gook with AK-47.. I still can't get over it. What the fuck

>>83194697

Then why is the flag waving, dumbass?

>>83195986
well he made some mistakes obivously. its a lto harder when you are filming something thats supposed to be space

>>83195986
>>83196186
momentum from when they actually touched it, in an atmosphere without wind resistance. when they werent near it it didnt move
mythbusters did this already

>>83196608
Why did they never do 9/11?

>>83194149
>kuckbrick
DUDE DEEP LMAO

File: omyfuk.png (37KB, 493x276px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 493x276px

>>83195828
I take it you have no idea what actual war is like, especially when you don't know exactly where you are being fired at from.