Do you trust critics, /tv/?

No, and RedditTomatoes is shite.

>>83130566
No they are mostly brainlets who washed out of any sort of meaningful career long ago.

Only when they agree with my preexisting opinions.

Critics are like MSM these days, they are nothing but Narratives pusher. just choose anything interests you and watch it. In my humble opinion, even BLACKed.com produces better kinos than this shitfest.

>>83130566
critics have reputations to protect thus are biased as fuck

>>83130566
Well, you have to look at it from their perspective.

If they are paid to be a critic, in today's environment, you wouldn't dare criticize anything with a nigger in it.

You might lose your job.

>>83130566
Nah, but one thing I do know is that I would fug the shit out of that white girl

>>83130566
>Audience score: 58%
>White USA population: 58%
It rhymes.

>>83130566
That's a lot of virtue signalling.

>>83131018
Wait, so it's niggers who hated it?

>>83131018
Are you stupid?

>>83130566
critics become pointless when you realize you are so critical you hate everything

>>83131018
>the absolute state of anon

I trust critics when there is no overt political angle or high chance of the critics being paid off.

>>83130566
Do you trust user ratings/audience scores?

That's honestly even worse.

File: 1hW2V1Yg.jpg (173KB, 1252x1252px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1252x1252px

>>83130566
did /pol/ brigaded the audience score? imagine having that too much free time

>>83132382
Nah, the "people" the show was marketed to hated it too.

Well, you know, there is nothing more fun than watching a movie about racial tension in another country than your own, and then for the movie to call you a racist because people that are not you, and in another time and culture, and another country than you owned some slaves. Really makes my plums tingle.

>>83130566
Critics are on average just as stupid as me so there's no benefit in reading what they write at all.

Just out of interest, how many of you guys posting itt watched it?

only when it suits my agenda or my fave comic company

No, I don't trust them to give scores accurate to my expectations but I do trust them to have their own opinion and express it honestly. This way if I look at how they rate movies I like and dislike I can figure out how I should interpret their review. Everyone has different tastes.

So when I see reviews I think stick out (very high or very low score) I check their other reviews.

>>83130566
Only armond white

>>83132382
Imagine being so paranoid and delusional that you blame everything bad in life on /pol/

>>83130566
>stop being white!

File: Rotten-Tomatoes.jpg (405KB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 2880x1800px

>>83130566
>not trusting rotten tomatoes critics

>>83132798
This image makes me want to die.

>>83130566
TV show was much better

My brother is an aspie and takes reviews very seriously. I personally watch what piques my interest.

>>83132847
The image is the TV show.

>>83130566
yes, audience are plebs

>>83132382
>brigaded
why wont r*ddit fuck off

>>83132901
It looks just like the movie one.

>>83132974
It's from a list of best Netflix original shows.

the only decent guy on RT doesn't review TV shit

>>83130777
This pham

>>83130566
>Dear white people
>Only black people are shown which is even more racist for acting like Asians, Indians, Latinos and many others don't exist

Mulatto here. It sucked- I couldn't watch more than 30 minutes of it and the characters were insufferable.

I liked it better when it was called Higher Learning and didn't suck.

>>83130566
Only if they agree with my opinion

File: 1495168703589.jpg (152KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1280x850px

>>83132382
>Be you
>See Critics score at 100%
>"Hmm nothing wrong here, well earned."
>Look down
>See audience score at 58%
>"WTF?!? Must be part of the far right /pol/ conspiracy!"

Really fires up the neurons in the ole frontal cortex lobe.

File: 1495539972401.png (241KB, 718x708px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 718x708px

>>83132382
> Dear white people is just satire you stupid crackas
> Dear white people is just for everyone
> Dear white people cast explain why blacks can't be racists

Go fuck yourself nigger lover.

File: armondwhite.jpg (17KB, 460x279px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 460x279px

>>83130566
Only the king of /tv/.

>>83130566
What is the look trying to convey?
Why does it make wanna smash theire face's in?

>>83132382

>and there it is
>a fucking shill fgt blaming /pol/ out of nowhere, thus derailing the thread

Time to kys you fucking waste of oxygen.

>>83130566
This movie was just poorly made, I wasn't even that triggered by its melodramatic racial pride, it was just boring

>>83133803
Based Armond. I always wait for his review before watching something.

I think what this says is that 42% of the US population is racist.

This means Trump shouldn't have won. If we invalidate all the vote by racists he would have lost by a landslide.

>>83133803
>Armond White
>Armond (Almond) is black outside, white inside
>last name is literally "White"
>hates black movies
Isn't that a surprise

>>83130566
The job of a critic is to tell you how good or bad something is for an audience, since every audience member can't look up every opinion of every audience member they sometimes rely on a few critics.
If those critics have wildly differing opinions than the general audience, then they are bad critics.

File: 1495301338151.gif (1MB, 400x226px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 400x226px

>>83133803
>an elderly gay buck black man is the king of /tv/

It's a lot more trustworthy than the audience score, which was no doubt raided by alt right crybabies

>>83134661
Yeah but he's based so who cares.

File: l.jpg (23KB, 520x346px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 520x346px

>>83134697
>muh boogeyman is behind everything ;_;

>>83130566
cinemablend does a good job of critiquing 3D movies from a technical standpoint. i use their scores to determine if i should waste my time seeing a movie in 3D (for those very few occasions when i'm dumb enough to consider spending the extra money.)

in general, though, movie reviewers are shit. they're either too cynical too appreciate anything that isn't arthouse hipster shit or they're too open minded and willing to gush over every bullshit movie

>>83134741
>boogeyman

That means it isn't real. You can go to the RT page and see the 1/2 star spam, same on the IMDB page, and if you go to the youtube trailer you can actually see fat alt right SJWs spamming /pol/ memes in the comment section. I don't know who you think you're fooling, but outside of your containment board, very few people are that dumb.

>>83130629
This but unironically.

>>83134786
I like how it didn't cross your mind at all that the only reason the critics gave it a perfect score is because of their own political bias as well.

File: 2.jpg (6KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 275x183px

>>83134786
>MUH BOOGEYMAN IS REAL

File: Dear White People.png (51KB, 564x856px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 564x856px

I can't wait until white boomer dies out desu

>>83134786
>Ooga Booga

>>83134893
women are a disease

>>83134831
The show shits on SJWs, so I don't think you know what you're saying there. Ultimately critics are people who actually watched the show before reviewing it, while the audience score is just full of hundreds of butthurt internet warriors spamming downvotes without watching what they're "reviewing." Even in the case of political bias on both sides, critics are vastly more reliable.

>>83134893
100% who gave this movie a 1 star rating is white.

The tomato meter is literally just a glorfied thumbs up/thumbs down rating, if you trust that concept as an aggregate you're a dumbass.

>>83135154
It's almost like they put the average rating right below the tomatometer for extra clarification

>>83130566
Critics are like pepper, a good spice but you can live without it.
I tried to watch the first episode of Dear White People and it isn't me. I'm not american and I don't follow american culture, it's tiresome to watch a show and to stop it all the time to google what an actor did 20 years ago so you can understand a small joke with no future importance to the joke.

File: 1460282807647 (1).jpg (19KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 225x225px

>>83130566
>dear white people
>all of them are race mixed
>not a single "pure black" from africa
Credibility : 0

>>83134989
>Even in the case of political bias on both sides, critics are vastly more reliable.
Yea because GhostJUSTers totally proved that. Critics haven't been reliable since they've decided to judge movies and TV shows through their own political bias lens. Which wouldn't be bad in and of itself if there was an actual balance to the political bias, but there isn't. The vast majority of professional critics are very left-wing and if movies or TV shows don't line up with their left-wing views then they're most likely going to get a negative score.

I've never seen Dear White People. It's possible it just has an obnoxious title but is actually a good show.

Have you never seen a good movie or TV series on the general topic of race relations? How about Crash? The Wire?

>title is mocking the type of person who says things like "dear white people:"
>show is about how people are individuals and it's nonsensical to speak in broad categories and labels
>dumb fuck alt righters and their culture of outrage actually believe there's a media conspiracy against white people so they miss the joke
>embarrass themselves with millions of man hours bravely internet battling the show that isn't even about the thing they're crying about

It's like when a kid throws a temper tantrum over something they misheard

>>83135325
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/annie_2012/

Black remake of Annie got demolished by critics

100% of any large group will never agree on anything. If it was 97% at least it would be believable. The 100% is a bullshit nod to that stupid 100 nigga text meme

>>83134989
>shits on sjws
>urban land ape doesnt taste and fling its own shit onscreen.

I don't read or care about critics.

If a movie looks interesting, I'll see it. If I think it looks bad, I won't see it.

Also, I am seriously fucking tired of people looking at the Tomatometer instead of the Avg. Rating. It's right fucking below the meter.

I do not trust Jews

>>83134713
>based black man

You have to go back

>>83134281
lrn2grntxt

>>83134438
niceme.me

>>83135396
I see you didn't watch it.

>>83136162
Neither did anyone here.

You can just make shit up.

>>83132798
>trusted critics

File: Hillary Loser.jpg (453KB, 1349x1349px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 1349x1349px

>>83135396
See >>83133802 and

>muh alt-right

Trashed.

File: thoughts.jpg (495KB, 1440x1800px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1440x1800px

>>83130566

Really makes you think.

>>83136486
kek, BvS's score is lower every time I see it.

File: smug.gif (1MB, 320x213px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x213px

>>83136511

The point is that people actually prefer it

And yet "critics" have an opinion which is completely detached from the enjoyment of normal people

Pic related: critics.

>>83136694
>The point is that people actually prefer it
Yeah, the average person likes shit. It's not the breakthrough you think it is.

>>83130566
No, modern critics and reviews are nothing but a political correctness score.

>>83130566
Not even in the slightest.

>>83136739
>the opinions of a few liberal metropolitan circlejerkers are more important than the opinions of normal people

Go back to R.e.d.d.i.t.

>>83134697

>is it possible that the hundred-odd critics who gave it a good rating are toeing the cultural line to protect their careers in a hyper-liberal environment?

>no, clearly the thousands of viewer ratings which were less favourable were doctored by /pol/ somehow

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-24 at 17.28.25.png (81KB, 735x501px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 735x501px

>>83130566

You're telling me you don't think Get Out is literally the fourth best movie in cinematic history?

This is the judgement of professional movie critics buddy. These people are basically professors of cinema.

If they tell you this is one of the best movies of all time, it's settled science.

>>83136892
It's essentially an oligarchy vs. democracy argument

Plato famously thought society should be ruled by "philosopher kings". Liberals clearly think this as well - see their reaction to Trump. The number of people who have been saying "this is a reason why we shouldn't have democracy" is astounding.

I guarantee you that a lot of the audience score is composed of alt right Youtubers, Twitter users and /Pol/.

They did the same thing when they though R1 was a white supremacist bashing movie.

>>83136962
what the fuck is get out?

>>83137038
The main difference being that critics don't have power or security. Their position is vulnerable and depends on them remaining popular.

>>83131018
Oh dear buddy.

>>83137084
Cinematic masterpiece that reveals white devils to be the baseless animals that they are

>>83136962
This post is the most exquisitely crafted irony I've seen in a long time. At first glance, anon appears to hold a retarded viewpoint (which some people actually do share) but barely even pretends to be legitimate in his beliefs. The accompanying image, calling opinions science, and the Reddit spacing come together flawlessly. 9/10.

No, the only score I check before deciding to watch a movie is IMDb.

>>83137067
See
>>83136892
and most other posts ITT.

>>83137084
It's a horror with elements of comedy focused on what the director's view on American race relations is

File: 1493960315124.jpg (101KB, 941x941px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 941x941px

wasn't this move a satire on the people that /pol/ actually hate but they raged anyway simply due to triggering the title because they are hyper-reactionary faggot cunts

>>83137247
That's the movie, I'm pretty sure this thread is about the show which is completely different.

>>83137136
But that's exactly the same with a political ruling class, you idiot. Why do you think single-party states employ propaganda? Because they have to remain popular, otherwise they will be overthrown.

Metropolitan liberal movie critics have to retain the support of enough fellow-minded metropolitan liberals in order to stay in their jobs; single-party states have to retain the support of enough wealthy affluent people as well.

>>83137247
no one actually knows for sure. we arent black enough to watch.

>>83136892
>doctored by /pol/ somehow

Go on Rotten Tomatoes, vote the movie 1/2 stars.

>doctored somehow

>>83137371

But the ruling class have security. A leader exists within a structure that insulates them from harm. Look at Trump, wildly unpopular, but he's the rightly elected US president, his leadership is sanctioned by the courts of the land, it's quite likely that he'll serve out the 4 years of his term and even if he doesn't his departure will be through instruments of the system. A critic, on the other hand, can have their career effectively ended by a Twitter storm.

>>83136486
>DC movie
>audience score doubles the critic score
I can't handlle the purity of this coincidence

>>83134893
i hate white peole

>>83132765
>Imagine being so paranoid and delusional that you blame everything bad in life on da jews

>>83135396
>man hours
are you a fucking bigot? how sexist of you, i can't NOT believe you just said that

>>83135302
One of the dudes is pure black and it's even a point that is used against the mixed dudes, he even says his ancestors were better because they weren't enslaved

>>83134602
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjtR-FhDsJM

>>83135207
Doesn't change the fact that people don't care about the average rating.

File: 1495225143585.png (23KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 200x200px

>>83131018
brilliant.

>>83137247
The movie was fine, the show is a shitfest.

>>83137525
Which is why they have to tow the line to keep their jobs

>>83137247
if only everybody were as enlightened as you gentle sire this world would be a better place

Kill the cumskins

>>83137525
>But the ruling class have security.
So do liberal metropolitan twats, writing from their tall city office blocks. Or maybe in the expensive coffee shop in their gentrified neighbourhood.
>A leader exists within a structure that insulates them from harm.
Which is exactly the same as liberal metropolitan movie critics. They don't exist in the same world as the working class, where they would probably get beaten up (or mercilessly mocked) for having such faggy opinions.
>it's quite likely that he'll serve out the 4 years of his term and even if he doesn't his departure will be through instruments of the system. A critic, on the other hand, can have their career effectively ended by a Twitter storm.
Trump can very definitely be impeached if he says or does the wrong thing.

>>83137543
It's more than double the critic score.

>>83137156
>>83137215
sounds complete shit

>>83131018
jesus fucking christ this makes me think

>>83138036
>Which is exactly the same as liberal metropolitan movie critics

It's not though

>Trump can very definitely be impeached if he says or does the wrong thing.

Yes, he can. But it would be a huge endeavour, it would need a concerted effort by multiple powerful arms of government. A film critic who falls from grace needs only the word of his boss to end his career, and the Hollywood set have shown themselves to be more than willing to cut loose anyone who might bring them into conflict with the PC left.

>>83138086
It's mediocre but it hits the talking points so people act like it's a good/great movie. It's not even a good horror, the scares start really late in the movie and are entirely stupid. If you want a comedy horror watch Halloween 3 or some shit, if you want a political satire watch Brazil.

>>83138214
Hollywood isn't PC, people who are PC regularly whine about Hollywood.

>>83130629
>Le general consensus man
Truly the lowest form of life

>>83133803
I thought it was idris elba

>>83138257

And Hollywood falls over itself to cater to them, because they're its audience

>>83134661
>identity politics reversed
I thought neocons were a dying breed

>>83134602

Danisha looks like a Tim&Eric still

>>83131018
>the city of anon

>>83131018
>>83131018
nice attempt, but the most recent census puts non-spic whites at 63.7%

I watched it. It was pretty good. I guess snowflakes couldn't stomach a few words

>>83130566
Dear White People,
Shut the fuck up! We got half a mind to come kick yo ass and the asses of all y'all motherfuckas in West Plains NJ. Drop yo faggot ass shit with that "I hope you ain't sad no more, I'm sorry for all the things white people done, bullshit". You can't apologize for 400 motherfucking years of oppression with some half-assed school project and expect everythin' to be peaches and cream! If we ever see you we will kick yo fucking ass so hard that candy'll come out!
Sincerely,
The Black People
P.S. Fuck yo dads lawnmower, we don't even got that shit no more.

>>83130566
>100%
what happened to that meme black guy who gives negative reviews to break 100%?

>>83139674
unfortunately he doesn't do TV shows

There seems to be a dearth of actual critics, by which I mean people who understand how films work, have knowledge of culture and art history, and can actually articulate their views.

Critics these days are rubbish. Most reviews read like blog entries and they are seemingly incapable keeping politics (the rabid, obnoxious kind) out of their writing.

Generally I check out some IMDB reviews and decide for myself if I want to see something or not.

>>83130566

What the literal fucking point are critics for when we have audience scores?

>>83139841
>There seems to be a dearth of actual critics, by which I mean people who understand how films work, have knowledge of culture and art history, and can actually articulate their views.
But these are shit too.

>how films work
pfhahah

>>83139896

aside from botting and of course critics getting bought.

>>83139913
Not an argument

>>83139841
the art of reviewing has been lost, for sure.

>>83139896
Click on the audience score, it's flooded with one-half star votes from people who didn't write a review. Critics are also practiced at explaining why they felt the way they did, so their opinions are more valuable.

>>83139942
Its a thing called a statement, I don't give a blinding fuck what you think and wouldn't want to waste anytime convincing you either way.

Is it true that black pusy taste like shit?

>>83138511
>I thought neocons were a dying breed
Where the fuck did you get that idea?

>>83140064
Not an argument

File: 1494115778494.jpg (46KB, 509x535px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 509x535px

>being this triggered

>>83139841
this is why the imdb message boards getting shut down sucked. and it wouldnt shock me to hear that it was ((their)) decision. it would have good bad ridiculous opinions, but it was the best way to actually get opinions

>>83140202
Not an argument

>>83140014
>Critics are also practiced at explaining why they felt the way they did,
>why did you give Get Out 100%?
>Cause fuck white people

>>83140082
>>83140082
>>83140082
>>83140082
Can any burgers comment on this?

>>83140247
It's not about being triggered. It's about the hypocrisy and how obvious it is. It's insulting. Movie or show with black people, better give it a perfect score or I'll be called racist. It's bullying from the left. It's freaking annoying and people are beginning to get fed up by it. This isn't equality, it's pandering.

>>83140082
it's not great

File: c.png (443KB, 962x825px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 962x825px

>>83132798
coincidence?

>>83133802

> Huff-Po

Trash.

File: 1484900965851-tv.jpg (52KB, 1024x512px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1024x512px

>>83132382
>Is a insecure redditors blames everything on /pol/ episode.

Please kys.

>>83132382
wow pol is behind everything like the jews

>>83134661
have a problem with that? sweetie

>>83137247
More or less
One of the main characters is a white dude and he's arguably the most sympathetic of them all

>>83137247
Yes, but we're talking about the TV show, which is sort of a sequel except the director is
>>83133802

>>83130566
What is that look on their faces supposed to convey? Gimme dat?

>>83142737
have a gold

>>83133802

in the movie when Sam says that black people can't be racist, the black dean says that's racist and she's full of shit

File: 1495621194825.jpg (35KB, 670x386px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 670x386px

If the movie features some social justice cause prominently, I negate a fourth of the score.

>>83130566
Why are they making those faces?

>>83143816
I will do this from now on. Also I found that I like things that are rated 70% more than I like 90%.

>>83130566

Trusting critics is like trusting yelp. Sometimes a place can be very bad or very good and it's obvious to everyone. Other times someones personal experience is theirs and theirs alone and there's no point listening to them.

>>83130566
>critic score 100%
>100%

Thats how you know its bullshit because barely any movie actually gets that rating ever.

>>83132382
They actually did, idk why people are getting so mad at you

>>83130566
After Speed Racer, no.

>>83143816
>white teen
???

>>83144651
by American standards

File: 1493692258958.png (154KB, 1003x311px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1003x311px

>>83142737
>Reddit

What did he mean by this?

I really like the movie and the series [spoilers] specially episode 5 [/spoilers]