Hacks in the Bag™

BASED REVIEW SCREW

>>83061935
Brutal! Will rlm ever recover???

Hey everyone, look at me!

I care oh so little about the mainstream media I ardently consume everyday

Look at me and wonder!

well, you know...satire is a legit form of comedy. why even get mad at it?

Same goes for that other crybaby faggot, stuckmann
>i don't mind, really, it's cool, i can take it.
>let me explain to you how much I DON'T CARE in this 7 minute video

holy shit they are so buttmad

File: 1479285685069.png (2MB, 2024x1048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2024x1048px

>>83062066

>mainstream media

They sure showed them.

Very cool.

Very cool!

>>83061935
I can't even wrap my heart around anyone defending Collider.

Does anyone with an IQ above 80 enjoy collider?

File: 1461950039601.jpg (38KB, 400x465px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 400x465px

>>83062259
>I can't even wrap my heart

>>83061935
Is the person that wrote this somehow under the impression that RLM relies on "quick editing" in their videos? What does that even mean?

>>83061935
>10 replies
>still no sauce

Collider are disney shills and nerd culture cucks but at least they are upfront about it. RLM are just the same but they try to cover it with le irony xd rreddit humor

I didn't know they were parodying a specific show, as I've seen dozens of similar shows with the exact same format act that way.
The fact these guys think it's directly parodying them speaks volumes.

File: Capture.jpg (34KB, 495x299px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 495x299px

>jacket with a t-shirt
Why do Americans do this?

RLM are just a bunch of nerds who struck gold with the Plinkett videos and have been riding on its coattails ever since. Otherwise nobody would actually care about some star trek obsessed fatso who only likes schlocks and a skinny manlet who unironically thinks Blade Runner is a boring movie.

>>83062636
everyone around the world does it pajeet

>Shills in the OP™

>they're doing cooking segments now

https://youtu.be/rxKYOPJu9iI

>>83062673
No they don't

File: 1495376239756.jpg (17KB, 260x273px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 260x273px

>>83062501
>upfront about it
You mean playing it up for "nerd cred" and sponsorships. Also
>being on 4chan
>complaining about cynical/ironic humor

>>83062668
I love how you give yourself away in the last sentence.

File: 4654564.gif (3MB, 173x267px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 173x267px

>>83061935
>mfw contrarians are now defending Collider
What's next? Are you gonna start arguing that Kevin Smith is a genius auteur who doesn't deserve to be mocked by RLM?

>>83062673
No they don't.

>>83062714
Very cool.

>now

Based Review Screw has been shitting on RLM for awhile now. Pls try to keep up.

>>83062876
Meant for
>>83062797

>Defending what the nerd crew parodied

You can just tell they watch the big Zimbabwe theory.

>>83061965
>>83062876
Go away, Review Screw.

>>83061935
Who?

>>83063035
Exactly.

>people are actually defending manchildren who collect toys and talk exclusively about garbage blockbusters and capeshit with the most surface level and vapid criticism imaginable
This board is beyond saving

>>83061935
Ok so some YouTube panel show is mad rlm made a video making fun of nerd panel shows and these guys have some kind of narcissism problem to assume the satire was aimed at them?

Literally who??? Get over yourselves

>>83061935
I don't know who C movie talk are.

>>83062726
>>83062813
Where are you from so I can prove you wrong?

File: 221981D5-0BC2-4E87-B81F-699F40E55A15-2184-00000301D7250E32_tmp.jpg (45KB, 612x380px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 612x380px

>>83063111
>I loved it. It was everything I hoped it would be.

>>83063035
>>83063070
Le samefag

>>83062876
Ah. So they try to rove their legitimacy by shitting on another show instead of doing anything worth while to build noteriety and thus a fan base.

Boo boo. Look at me. We do things better than those guys over there. Watch us instead. Boo fucking hoo

>>83063111
AT-STs AT-STs AT-STs AT-STs

>>83062372
Jumpcuts I believe.

>>83063167
No matter how you try to spin this shit you can't get around the fact that you're defending fucking Collider. You're pathetic.

>>83061935
What did rlm say to trigger these literal whos?

>>83063205
Le Review Screw

>>83062867
Yes, very cool. Very cool

>>83062673
Are you in the 3rd grade? Who dresses like that?

File: hqdefault.jpg (21KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x360px

Has RLM ever made fun of reaction videos?

VERY cool.

>>83063167
THIS

>>83061935
>biting the hook when they haven't even mention ANY names

very cool

>>83063279
https://youtu.be/BJgLa3eKMYs

>>83063279
Yeah for TFA trailer

File: FBC681DF-D8F8-4FAA-9A68-D1A09E322905-18634-0000135DD6020176.jpg (34KB, 500x440px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x440px

Red Letter Media fans on suicide watch

File: 5D015774-993A-4E74-8B32-8B73FA765790-18634-0000135E761A9BC9.jpg (40KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 600x450px

>>83063323
>DUDE IT WAS A PRANK THEY WERE NEVER MAKING FUN OF ANYONE

Who's more cowardly? RLM or their fans?

>>83063420
Ok seriously what the fuck is it with Americans dressing like special needs children?

>>83061935
is this actually satirizing a specific youtube channel? I was under the impression they were just generally poking fun at nerd culture reviewers and podcasters and the obsession with specific popular franchizes and the cult of consumerism that drives it.

>>83063503
Me too. I'm just inferring this from op post. Didn't watch their video. Don't plan to not unless they say something of value.

>>83061935
lol RLM gets hundreds of thousands more views than Collider.

>>83063420
This is Jay in his element when he's not putting on a pretentious prose.

He's just another manchild.

File: 1493318171068.jpg (63KB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 854x480px

>being passive aggressive about RLM

>>83063628
>not muh friend simulator

I've never watched anything from collider until today because of this thread.

It's basically E! Entertainment News but for NEEERDS.

File: 1483281033014.jpg (18KB, 580x350px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 580x350px

>>83063725
>simulator

someone actually link the video OP is talking about

>>83061935
Mike Stoklasa directed cuck porn back in the early 2000's.

>>83063276
Nice reading comprehension, ace. I never said I did it.

>>83063817
There isn't one, you gullible bastard.

Elitist normies are far worse than normies themselves

Even if RedLetterMedia themselves arent elitists, they're fans certainly fucking are

>>83061935
I don't know who these faggots are, but I'm never watching them. Also Mike is probably the least bitter of the crew aside from Rich Evans.

>>83062325
The owners, I guess.

>>83063167
Incidentally, I rewatched the Phantom Menace review today and even then Mike literally says the way the prequels should have been done was to just redo the original SW plot, which this did.

>>83061935
I bet you like Chris Hardwick

>>83064076
>Also Mike is probably the least bitter of the crew aside from Rich Evans.
I think you mean Jay, not Mike. Jay is the only one to have a genuine love for films and an open minded attitude towards anything that isn't an 80s blockbuster.

>>83063167
Kek

>>83063470

its casual conformed dress code that is psychologically reinforced by social passive aggressiveness and the reactionary need to oppose certain appeal to not stand out/appear more or less masculine than others.
These souls have not cared much about self image in their lifetime and will do the minimum.
But this is average self developement in poor places

rlm showed real face of reviews.
pissed people everywhere
Very Cool!
Very Cool!

>>83061935
kek

>>83061935
>being this triggered by some guys in Milwaukee

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>83065519
>now they're just some guys in milwaukee

>>83065758
Lol

>>83065758
>>83065984
Literally the same person

File: IMG_3874.png (604KB, 600x753px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 600x753px

>>83061935
>rlm makes a general attack to these tool bag shows
>mentions no names
>one show gets so trigfered they start spamming /tv/ with a funnyjunk teir meme

I cant wait for rlm to respond because now their going to shit on them harder.

It's painfully obvious they're out of ideas for content and just make fun of people and superhero movies now.

>>83063274
very cool

File: 1472095159371.jpg (34KB, 418x352px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 418x352px

>>83066152
>painfully obvious

Collider shill detected

>>83066152
Pretty much

>>83061935

>Attempting to claim any sort of intellectual superiority
>You're show

Every time

>>83061935
I ont care or those console wars, just acme in o say say that thats written so badly and is so full of gramatical errors that reading it made me cringe and I'm not even a native speaker

>>83061935
>goes on twitter rant like a 5 year old
>comic sans text

You can't make this shit up.

>>83061935
So basically they gave RLM more material to work off of.

Nice, i cant wait for the next nerd crew vid.

Why do people always point to Mike's first reaction to the Force Awakens which was like an hour after watching it, and never his Plinkett review where he admits after having more time to think about it, it wasn't as great as he said

collider is straight garbage

i used to watch some schmoes despite the fact that i always found harloff to be a complete dbag

but collider makes me ill

>>83067260
Because people need memes to identify why they agree or disagree with peoples

>>83061935
>RLM never specifically called them out
>still autisms out

Haha ooohh boy. Poor collider. This is what insecurity looks like.

>>83062636
Virginal nerds do it because they're still hung up on wanting to look "classy xD" (which most of us asocial retards grew out of in middle/high school), but they're unable to go through a day without wearing a graphic tee that signifies their nerd cred.

>>83067260
Because that Plinkett Review was garbage.

File: IMG_4189.jpg (42KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x280px

>>83061935
VERY cool

>>83063420
Why is Jay grabbing that big guys dick, what the fuck

File: main-qimg-7459f1c265e4d3c87718656bb76db2f0-c.jpg (19KB, 572x415px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 572x415px

>>83061935
>corporate shills who get paid off by big studios to haulk thier shit gets triggered by guys who only get 1k a month in Patreon donations

Pottery

>>83062259
Shills.

File: gwyneth14f-2-web.jpg (105KB, 750x1005px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 750x1005px

>>83061935
Well the next Nerd Crew should be up soon.

Thanks for the material collider.

>>83063279
In TFA Plinket video, they show a big screen of people reacting to the trailer and spazing the fuck out.

>>83067260
Because people can't change their mind never ever or they become a flip flopper which is like totally uncool man

>>83067921
Why so many limes?

>>83068070
You don't want scurvy, do ye, lad?

>>83061935
these guy's aren't any good t bh

>>83067921
Did she really say this or did someone photoshop it?

File: m83583d.png (616KB, 730x836px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 730x836px

>>83067260

>>83063338
That's always been the case.

File: 1479038499740.jpg (45KB, 550x572px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 550x572px

>>83061935
Lol. Colliders butthurt is palpable

File: 1467411335574.gif (993KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 250x250px

>>83061935
>actively defending people who tow the corporate line and have no honest opinions of their own

>>83068318
>better in theory than in praxis

The fuck?

>>83068318
You can almost see down her shirt.

wait who's side am i supposed to be on? which is the bitter old man and which are the ones minding their own business?

>>83068582
man remember when people just liked obviously good things and disliked obviously bad things
now half this board semi-not-really-post-ironically likes Zack Snyder films and has to pretend to like children's internet entertainers for unclear political reasons, i don't understand anything any more

this image was clearly made by some anon. it looks fake as fuck.
but this is the autism of /tv/ RLM threads I guess.

>>83061935
seems like it hit a nerve

>>83066909
>that
>comic sans

RLM are the living embodiment of the smug, detached Gen-X ethos.

I'd venture to guess none of them has felt a single sincere conviction about anything since childhood. They exist as polyps upon the colon of culture, satiating themselves on the perceived failures of others (i.e. "The Man") while adding nothing new to the discourse aside from ironic complaint.

They're a group of insecure, lost, rapidly aging burnouts who silently believe they could do a better job of making films than the professionals in the industry. Yet they lack the ambition and ability to actually enter the very industry they're obsessed with. They choose instead to fuck around and make student film piss-takes well into middle age.

They are awful, awful people. I've met thousands just like them, and the last thing we need is for these people to gain any attention for their navel gazing.

Please, /tv/, do not aspire to become anything like these people. Theirs is a lonely road leading to depression and a life devoid of real purpose.

I hope they disappear and their disaffected followers stop subsidizing their lifestyle. Perhaps that would force them to do something productive with themselves.

>>83063211
Star Destroyers
I'm gonna cum

Gib link

>>83069425
Nice memes

>>83063898

Then what the fuck is everyone talking about.

>>83069811
>shitposting

Welcome to /tv/ newfriend

>watch ScreenJunkies almost every day
>subscribed to SJ Plus, a $40+ a year package to 10+ original content shows
>tweet at SJ during their live shows

Do I deserve to be on /tv/?

File: give_a_man_a_warning_anon.jpg (25KB, 326x300px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 326x300px

>>83070252

>>83070312
>overmeme
you're not any better

>>83070371
>half the people on here belong here

>>83069693
literally all true

File: image.jpg (280KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1920x1080px

>>83070480
>literally

Oh youre one of those fags.

File: IMG_2675.jpg (64KB, 1242x326px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1242x326px

>>83062978
Fuck off retard

>>83063111
>talk exclusively about garbage blockbusters and capeshit

That's basically Mike, dude.

>>83065758
where else would they be?

>>83067260

Because that Plinkett review was as forgettable as TFA itself.

>>83070789
The people that cultivated internet film culture

>>83062673
no they don't you weirdo man child

>>83061935
wtf I want to offer my daughter's virginity to the review screw boys now

>>83071521
People all around the world does it. Unless you live in Ghana or some shit you uncultured shut-in.

And for the third time, I never said I, ME, personally did it.
Dumb twat.

>>83067473
honestly if they just wore a plain fitted shirt with no nerd cred nonsense on it under the blazer it'd look fine enough. still dressing like a high schooler but in a way that doesn't desperately scream "please respect me as i shovel my nothing opinions down your throat and tell you to buy things".

>>83062325
MCUcks

>>83067260

That 'review' spent most of its time bashing the prequels and saying how much better TFA was.

>>83061965
/ourguy/

>>83067260
Because every sane, intelligent person realized five minutes into TFA that it was garbage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2Jn0ZihMgw

rlm butt fucked the internet

>>83061935
What is this image about?

What's the context??

>>83070877

Because thats what TFA is, its not awful like the prequels, that are so bad you can't even remove some of the dialog from your head and its mostly rehashed "ideas" from the original movies. Its so fucking mediocre, even when you try make fun of it it ends up forgettable.

their taste and opinions are still shite

>>83063420
holy shit Andy got fuck huge, what the hell happened? I stopped watching screen junkies a long time ago.

>>83074194
That photo is something like four years old.

>>83063420
I can't stand that guy in the middle, he looks like he's always on meth, his veins on his arms look sick too

File: mainstream meteors.jpg (102KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 900x900px

>>83062066
>mainstream meteors

>>83070525
what does serial autist mean

>>83074532
I like that dog video he made, that's all I know him for

>>83063420
Mike's actually black? What the fuck

File: drumpf btfo.png (365KB, 579x579px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 579x579px

>>83063850
I would not be surprised and that would actually make their videos better

>>83074789
Underrated

File: 1491771167470.jpg (353KB, 1180x1180px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1180x1180px

It does make you think though.

>>83075904
Based review screw

>>83070252
please consider killing yourself

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odj6NHsWe00

I know which one i prefer...

>>83063420
Christ, what a manlet.

>>83061935
RedLetterMedia's Nerd Crew videos aren't a specific critique of any one show or series. The whole point is that there's a plague of these "geek talk" discussion panels because they get hijacked and subsidized by larger corporations for use as a publicity tool, and the idea that the people involved in them lack any real passion for the material and are driven by monetary gain alone. If the creators behind this one series took the Nerd Crew videos personally, I think it says a lot about their show, or at the very least how they think of themselves.

>>83076507
Yeah, I forget how RLM does this for the passion of film. All their videos are without ads and don't collect revenue, right?

>>83076563
Ad revenue pays jack shit

>>83063420
why is the guy in black grabbing that fat guy's dick?

>>83076563
They're mostly supported by Patreon. They're not doing like four sponsors every single review, or hanging up tons recognizable nerd shit like Captain America's shield and a Stormtrooper action figure, they sit on a shitty set and talk about movies for 30 minutes or so.

Is the system perfect? Fuck no, but it's a hell of a lot better than a lot of these talk shows.

>>83077123
Jay is a fag

LET

THE RLM FANS

WATCH

File: why do americans.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>83062636
>Why do Americans

Why don't you mind your fucking business before we freedom the fuck out of you

>>83062673
No

File: Jay_happy_merchant.gif (3MB, 239x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 239x320px

>>83070252
You dont deserve to live

>>83063470
autism

>>83062636
hes british

>>83072543
>five minutes

You either have severe autism or ADD. Probably both considering this is /tv/.

>>83065247
>>83080597
two kinds of people

>>83077491
So what I gather from this is that they receive free money plus the money they already make with ads and all that shit, and they still can't be bothered to get a decent set? Being cheap and collecting as many shekels as possible and their fans eat it up as authenticity? Christ, how pathetic can you be?

>>83067921
7 FUCKING LIMES!
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE he he

>>83063470
mostly just white people f.a.m.

>>83069425
>hurr durr if you can't make it better you shouldn't be able to criticise it
lmao literally every notable critic never made a fucking movie that surpassed anything they criticised.
That's not how the world works, child.
They are way better off than you in life

>>83062673

Yes they do. They do it more in other countries than they do in America. It hasn't been a popular look in the US since the eighties.

>>83062797
Why is Reginald so perfect, lads. Is he "our" twink?

>>83062876
Who the fuck still says "based" anyways? This isn't 2013, fatty.

>>83063120
>Literally who???
Exactly. They're trying to syphon views off of RLM by feigning outrage.

>>83061935
literally who

>>83063167
>prequeltards will never not be mad about Mike liking that movie.
Your perpetual asspain is uncanny.

>>83063324
That fat boy sure do likes his star wars, I tell you what.

>>83068658
It's a sociology version of "in practice" coming from the greek (citing Aristotle originally), literally meaning "practice".

Blame continental philosophy and faux intellectualism for its recent use.

>>83070587
Mike only wants to talk about Star Trek, but his patreons won't let him.

>>83071880
>That 'review' spent most of its time bashing the prequels
You really need to watch things before talking about them. Those movies were tepid diarrhea, and will remain so forever, anyway.

how the fuck can you guys care about this at all? it's the definition of vain drama

>>83087534
It's just shitposting.
No one cares
I hope...

>>83067921
>For a week
I see like enough foor for 3 day max

>>83063167
TFA>Rogue One

end of story.

File: 1492570612104.jpg (86KB, 708x667px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 708x667px

Is Jenny involved in any of this?

>>83087861
>pig face
>>>/trash/

i am not even big on RLM anymore but their nerd satire video are spot on

they truly are unfunny hacks

>>83067260
>admits after having more time to think about it, it wasn't as great as he said
I knew it was shit within the first 30 minutes. how can you not immediately notice the terribly rushed pacing?

File: jay.png (528KB, 490x479px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 490x479px

>>83061935

>>83088095
Because you wanted it to be shit, to match your recently acquired prequel apologist hipster bullshit. You adopt contrarian opinions from other people because it makes you feel part of something.

I'm still surprised collider is around, it seems like it should be losing money. They hit their peak in viewership early last year and never really went beyond it despite investing in so many new shows.

File: 1488426732650.png (479KB, 865x917px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 865x917px

>>83061935
>when you ___________ (enter a wall of text)

If you support Collider, you should just end yourself right now.
Campea hates every one of you.

>>83063338
have you seen the comments, the top one is usually "yay i have friends for 30 minutes again"

>>83062073
Sauce on vid?

>>83088599
>you wanted it to be shit
no, I wanted it to be good, which is why I spent hard earned cash to see it at the theater. I'm not invested enough into SW garbage to care about disney vs lucasfags or whatever. I just wanted to see something that was supposed to be "amazing" but I guess it was a matter of falling for false hype again. Not a good movie

>>83061935
What's this image from? Any anon got the sauce?

>>83087344

>Analyticbrofive

File: Resident_Evil_Retribution_-_Copy.jpg (45KB, 411x452px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 411x452px

>an internet fight
oh boy cant wait

File: 1495427605783.png (83KB, 339x329px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 339x329px

the absolute butthurt of the redditlettermedia cunts ITT is glorious, well done OP

I've understood exactly 0% of this thread can someone give me a quick rundown?

>>83090817
There won't be any fight. RLM are smart enough to avoid this type of shit. They don't care.

File: poll joseff wotson.jpg (316KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1024x576px

>>83062066
>maynestreem meatier

>>83090824
>meme reaction picture

your butthurt is seething.

>>83061935
stop making these shit walls-of-text pictures

>>83091092
one group of nerds made fun of another group of nerds and now they're unironically sperging out at each other in this thread. it's pretty funny.

>>83091571
>they're unironically sperging out at each other in this thread
Neither group of nerds in OPs pic are in this thread, you retard.

>>83091629
>he doesn't know

>>83091393
>meme response

whose butthurt is "seething", again?

>>83091741
Yours

>>83091741
>you responded

Yours, lol

VERY cool

>>83061935
>competition

Jej

>can't defend the quality of the content

interesting

>>83064076
Rich only seems that way because of editing

He's actually the least likeable of the lot

>>83093655
>Trust me! I'm in the know!
shut the fuck up

>>83093156
>content

It's a glorified ad by Douge-tier actors and spergs

>>83062797
Kevin Smith made Clerks.

What did RLM make? Space Cop?

File: IMG_2670.jpg (360KB, 1233x1548px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 1233x1548px

>>83090612
It's just a Review Screw meme, his twitter is based tbqh familia

>>83095734
Plinkett > Space Cop > Clerks

>>83095866
>This account's Tweets are protected.
>Followers: 6
So you're Review Screw, eh?

>>83063111
are you talking about Red Letter Media?

VERY COOL

>>83062668

Blade Runner is a boring movie and you don't understand how internet fame works. Tons of people struck gold and got millions of views once or twice; RLM gets hundreds of thousands of views per video because people enjoy their content.

Nobody thinks, "Oh, the guys who made the Star Wars prequel reviews just posted a new video. I better watch it!"

>>83070252
I'm not going to say that you should kill yourself, but you should reevaluate your life.

>>83097377
RLM has a very loyal fanbase. Look at their sub count and their view count. Nearly all of their videos get close to having as many views as the channel has subs.

Compare that to someone like Chris Stuckmann, who has close to a million subscribers, but most of his videos only get around 200K views or so, except for the big blockbuster popular movies.

>>83096766
He won't accept my follower request

>>83096766
Nah I'm one of the few that gets to follow him though

>>83067921
Who's this cunt think she is? My family of FIVE used to be on food stamps, and we ate like kings then. SNAP gives you WAY too much fucking money.

>>83098209
Nobody believes you

>>83098209
>used to
world economy (america especially) is in the toilet friend

>>83098255
>A hurr durr we need to give people on food stamps even MORE money

>>83098551
>hurr durr let poor peeple starve and duke it out
>DARWINISM AMIRITE MY FELLOW ENLIGHTENED ANONS

>>83062673
done right, it can look OK at best. when it's some fucking neckbeard with a fetish for star wars wearing a guardians of the galaxy graphic t shirt underneath a nylon jacket from M&S it looks like shit

>redditlettermedia does nothing but praise the MCU and shit on its competitors while also shitting on people who do nothing but praise the MCU
Can someone explain this to me please?

Me, personally, i don't think this was very cool.

>>83098572
I used to be on stamps too, I was hardly starving.

>>83062325

Their Schmoedown series is surprisingly entertaining and sometimes they break interesting industry news. Other than that: eh.

>>83098772
>>83098551
>>83098209

Are you 2 gonna start quoting The 4 Yorkshiremen Sketch now? Fuck off

File: rlm.jpg (53KB, 406x665px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 406x665px

>>83081748
>he doesn't make $18k/month talking about movies

>>83098675
Mike didn't like Captain America Civil War. They rarely "praise" Marvel movies. They just happen to enjoy them more than DC films because the DC films have been fucking awful so far. Anyone that thinks RLM has any allegiance when it comes to these comic book movies is an idiot.

>>83098824
Calm down Mike.

>>83061935
>minds it's own business
>it's
faggot

>>83098819
What is the split on that? I'm guessing Mike gets half, Jay gets 30%, and everyone else splits 20%.They edit their own shit I'm assuming.

>>83098805
Muh stamps

>>83098989
How would any of us know what they do with their money? What does it even matter?

>>83098989
Sources say that Rich Evans owns the company and takes all the money and then makes mike and jay review shitty movies in order for them to get their cut

>>83098989
I imagine a good deal of it goes on business expenses.

>>83062501
I love RLM. I've been binge watching Half in the Bag and they seem like genuinely good dudes. I don't always agree with them. I tend to side with Jay more than Mike, but they sound like guys I'd hang out with.

>>83061935
Can anyone post the link to the video in OP's pic? I don't watch Collider and I don't feel like sifting through their stuff just to find it.

>>83099499
It's just a still from a random Collider video. There's no Collider video where they act butthurt about RLM if that's what you're looking for.

me personally, i am very outraged

>>83076563
>movie reviewers monetizing their YouTube videos and accepting money from fans is ethically equivalent to movie reviewers accepting money from movie studios to shill the studios' movies
Really makes me think.

>>83061935
>you're show doesn't consist of quick editing
>you're show
>you are show doesn't consist of quick editing

RLM safely confirmed not BTFO

>>83098551
That's rite whiteboi, I need more money for the stamps so I can go take your sister out on a date and let her have a taste of this BBC.

>>83099071
If they write their own stuff, they should split.

>>83098819
That's pretty meager for a business.

who is the manchild on little picture?

>>83061935
wtf I hate movies now

>>83099071
mike and jay are the only ones who get a cut and Rich is on a fixed salary. He's said so himself on prerec streams

>>83098907
>>83100598
The best thing about this is that anons can't refute with anything so they make petty grammar corrections.

>>83102602
>mike and jay are the only ones who get a cut and Rich is on a fixed salary
That would mean that Rich gets a cut too, dumbass.

>>83103013
a cut means scaling pay of whatever the greater whole is, a percentage. A fixed salary is a salary, he makes the same amount no matter how much they make a year.

How embarassing for you, dumbass.

>>83061935
Getting assblasted by the nerd crew says more about how they know their content is shit than RLM being jealous of them, they assume its them and not any other podcast that the nerd crew is satirizing due to their insecurity

>>83061935
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmr8DcotTZs

>>83102796
This

>>83095734
.
>You can't criticise people who make shit because you haven't made anything better

Fuck off with this meme. Kevin Smith made Yogahosers, that doesn't make his criticism on anything less valid