Lucius Malfoy

>>83040494
>Would he have gotten away with it?
Yes, he had white privilege

>>83040494
it has a basic plot where only important events matter, those move the plot on to the next event and so on. everything else is filler

>>83040585
He's a dark British Jew in a jolting blond "hair unit", much as I hate to shit up your eugenics thesis.

>>83040494
DULLEST
U
L
L
E
S
T

>>83040494
If he had killed Harry he would have ended one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1479904927852.jpg (569KB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 1623x2886px

Yes yes well done, Slytherin, well done Slytherin, HOWEVER - there are some last minute issues we need to take into account.well, actually there's only one issue, and that's that Slytherin house is a part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>83040494
>Would he have gotten away with it?
In real life no. In JK Rowling's writing, I don't really know.

File: madpep.jpg (22KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 680x680px

>>83040901
>Lord of the Rings
>shit tier

kys

>>83040494
Decent thread, really sorry about the responses you got.

>>83041110
>Decent thread,
Let's not get carried away my man

>>83040494
Nah not if he killed Harry. But I have feeling if it was anyone else, no one wouldve cared. He probably donates garbage bags of gold to Hogwarts.

>>83041466
I guess it's a matter of taste but I like fun little cool threads like OP's which are cool and fun. And little.

>>83040494
Look an entire thread once again where the OP is a retard and so is everyone else. The line was ad libbed it coincidentially sounds like a killing curse.

Point is instead if saying wow what's up with that tone at the end or the direction? You said hey what's up with the plot. Fuck off plotfag.

>>83041061
Lord of the rings is shit and so is that pasta newfag

I did a rewatch of the series last month and noticed that too.

He would've shit his pants when he saw harry rise again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3VTffYJdCE

>>83041980
>Lord of the rings is shit

kys my man