Remakes better than the original

File: maxresdefault-1.jpg (176KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1280x720px

>>83018203
It's not a remake, it's a different interpretation of the book.

But yeah it's superior to the first film imo, even though nobody agrees and depp was admittedly shitty

However, it may not be holding the title of best wonka film for long if pic related has anything to say about it ;)

how come johnny depp always plays characters the same but is in a different getup?

>>83018518
Because Tim Burton allows it

>>83018203
>>83018478
Fuck the both of you, the remake was so fucking bad, Johnny Depp should be embarrassed

Not many thats for sure

The ending and Charlie's character were so much better on the first film, why do you think otherwise?

File: 1494532469004.gif (4MB, 261x261px)

4MB, 261x261px

>>83018203
>the fat shaming from the grandparents
It's funny because there'd be hundreds of buzzfeedesque articles about this film if made today

>>83018614
The 70s version is hokey as fuck. Put yourself in the mind of a kid and you'd prefer the new one easily.

Great visuals, great soundtrack, funny supporting cast, and Deep Roy

First > Shit >>>> Remake

>>83018614
>>83018757
Not a fucking remake retards. It's a different interpretation that is closer to the source material

>>83018853
It's a shitty remake that tried to capitalize on the popularity and success of the first one and it wound up being absolutely terrible.

Ghostbusters

>>83018614
He's physically incapable of embarrassment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhSROXv6k9U