FINE DAY SUNDAY

In my opinion, best day of the week.

File: Trump Russia.jpg (22KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x225px

No leaks on Sunday

No dubs on Sunday

>>82996960

aye

>>82995389
based uncle salt porker.

File: 67d0ae7d2f480468c79aa19126b07bbc.png (54KB, 246x101px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 246x101px

>>82996960
>>82997407

>>82997511
nice

File: 1479852904059.jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

>FINE DAY! SUNDAY!
More like dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>82997511
rekt and chekt

FUNDAY SINE SAY

>>82997653
I didn't actually read any of your post beyond the first couple of words. I just want to say I hope for your sake you copypasted that instead of typing up all that shit that nobody is going to read.

>>82997653
Autism at its finest

>>82997653
>that picture
Please be bait

File: 1485502911760.jpg (453KB, 1114x1440px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 1114x1440px

Is sunday THE day of the manchild?

>>82998061
>not recognizing the stalest Quinty pasta
Fuck off back to reditt, /v/ or wherever the fuck you were shat out from

>>82995389
>>82996725
>>82996960
It's still Saturday

>>82998061
First day on /tv/?

>>82998061
That's my OC, got a problem la?

>>82995389
Is that Uncle Monty?

>>82997653
>"No"
>instead of "No!"
you messed up the dullest pasta in the history of pastas

>>82997653
Is Harold Bloom literary critic kino?

>>82999044
Yes, he was the armond white of literary criticism.

>>82998120
This makes me cringe no matter how many times I look at it.