>Looks like we ain't getting a sequel to this awesome kino...
It was genuinely good. I legitimately believe this didn't succeed because it was too kino and didn't pander to the lowest common denominator like Bayformers.
>>82950975
They took their time developing the story. It wasn't just action. That surprised me.
>>82950759
shill thread?
>>82950759
>>82950975
>>82951049
Your movie was fucking awful you retards, no one is buying this shit.
>>82951231
quoted for truth
>>82950759
Absolute garbage movie, fuck off
>>82950759
Good. The trailer looked horrible.
Maybe China will save it.
>>82950759
$100,000,000 Production Budget
$84,862,570 Made Domestically
Only lost $15,137,430 Domestically
$54,004,497 Made Foreign
$138,867,067 Made in Total as of May 19, 2017
Currently has Made back Production Budget plus almost $40millon profit in total
NOT INCLUDED - ADVERTISING COSTS
>>82951347
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=powerrangers16.htm
>>82951296
>The trailer looked horrible.
Agreed. The movie was better than it let on. I went to see it on a rainy day off and was surprised by how good it actually was.
>>82951347
/tv/ led me to believe more money was spent on advertising than the actual production budget itself
>>82951444
Usually not more. Most often in the 70-100% of production budget range for big blockbusters, 100% if they're pushing it like for a muh cinematic universe kickstart.
Anon there is doing bad math for (you)s, domestic gross is 60-70% profit, foreign ranges from 25-60%. Even being optimistic on the foreign % and saying 60% profit across the board, that's only 84mil taken back on a 100mil production, so already a loss, then there's the assumed 70-100mil on marketing. This shit was a guaranteed 100mil+ loss, and so unremarkable /tv/ barely even gloated over its JUSTing.