What the fuck kind of ending shot is this?

I still don't know

The dullest in history.

Brainlets don't understand the magical puberty symbolism. Americans should be banned from watching high brow English & European shows because Americans are basically animals that enjoy bright colours, bland greasy food and loud noises. Go suck a broom!

>>82887710
>When you go 2 fast

>>82887710
>EUPHORIA

Someone post the pasta, you know which one

>>82887710
Always thought it was fucking weird. I guess that's the last moment of happiness he'd ever have in his school experience.

Deh

>>82888314

>>82888305

>>82887710

I wanna struggle snuggle this little guy in his boi puss but other then that yeah it was a stupid ending shot.

>>82887710
Its a metaphor for how fast hes forced to grow up. I swear this board gets dumber and dumber every hour.

File: Luna2.jpg (469KB, 1200x1731px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1200x1731px

Nutted but Luna still suckin

It's the reverse of how Dementors suck your soul; flying makes him happy, it gives him a soul.

It's pottery, it rhymes.

>>82888414
pupils

The third film was the best one.

>>82888567
this. still badly executed though.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 1623x2886px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1623x2886px

It's actually a deeply symbolic representation of Radcliffe's attempts, to no avail sadly, to escape one the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1494263747886.jpg (25KB, 475x284px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 475x284px

>>82887710
>BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANE

>>82887710
I swear the third movie is catcher in the rye
Half the people love it to an insane degree
The other half can't stand it and are baffled people not just love it but consider it the best in the series

>>82888414
I really wish they had ended up together or at least dated
Or fuck at least been better friends. It's like Harry has an attachment syndrome with herm and Ron and can't spend time with people other than them

>>82891808
The first line segue is always the best

>>82892331
>It's like Harry has an attachment syndrome with herm and Ron and can't spend time with people other than them
Yeah it's called bad writing

>>82892381
What's funny is Rowling said she regrets, out of everything, not putting Harry with Hermione. It's like she watched the movies too many times and forgot they fucked with Hermione character

>>82892331
They were just outcasts that found each other. You never had a small trio or foursome of friends when you were little?

>>82892538
I literally didn't have a single friend until high school and even then I don't think they counted because I never interacted with a time outside of school

>>82887710
It's the "I won the LOTR/HP war" face.

Iv never seen the actual movie. Somebody post the scene

File: force awakens ending.png (449KB, 850x391px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 850x391px

What does this shot convey?

it's supposed to look like a book you idiot

File: 1455302882451.jpg (1MB, 1588x2862px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1588x2862px

After watching this "film" I longed for an ending shot no matter how ridiculous. I’d have even accepted being in the middle of an ending SHOOTING if it meant freedom, an escape from this miserable charade - could there be a more appropriate end to one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

File: 1478746805813.jpg (86KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 600x580px

>>82891808
>It's actually a deeply symbolic representation of Radcliffe's attempts, to no avail sadly, to escape one the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises.

top kek, this pasta is great

>>82891808
>>82893238
huh it keeps evolving

>>82891808
>>82893238
That "No!" will literally always make me smile

>>82893106
>daddy?! I thought you were going to buy cigarettes?! Didn't you find them? L-look I found this lighter for you!
Bascially it's a movie for girls with daddy issues, which is quite smart because that is a growing demographic.