this isn't as deep as people think

maybe it's you who isn't as deep as you think

it isn't as good as people think

>>82626971
I know. It's deeper

It also has no trains in it unlike the movie poster

>>82627313
Is this a joke. They're buildings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXRlGULqHxg

>>82626971
How deep do you think people think it is? It brings up interesting questions and discussion, that's more than most films.

>>82626971
Maybe in 1982 less people were used to examining the nature of their reality.

>>82627184
/thread

>>82627340
Interesting questions and discussions like
1) Was he a replicant (yes)
2) Can machines ever be considered human (no)
And that's it. That's all of it. REALLY FIRES UP THOSE NEURONS.

>>82628194
Yeah it's not that stimulating of a film, still better than most though.

>>82628194
>1) Was he a replicant (yes)
not obvious before DC, and you can discuss if it would've been better if it turned out he wasn't one (my opinion).
>2) Can machines ever be considered human (no)
I disagree, which at this point would start a discussion. There's also more questions like if it's ethical to create sentient AI, who was the villain if there was one, is this a likely future etc.

>>82626971
We didn't think your mom's gaping vagina was that deep but we were wrong LMAO

>>82628194
Replicants are not machines.

>>82626971
Your mother is deep

sage