This movie was a bit of a mess. Thoughts?

>>82626598

Yeah it was. Dry and droll cinematography along with poor pacing. Didn't understand why people circlejerked this.

>>82626648
It was ugly as hell and edited very poorly. You could see a good movie in there somewhere.

>>82626598
When the Trogs chopped that dude in half starting with his dick n balls...

made me cringe a bit.

>>82626716
>ugly as hell and edited very poorly

i kind of prefer this instead of glossy quick cuts though. it means i'm paying attention instead of turning my brain off and excepting the flow of shit flying at my face

File: IMG_1136.jpg (460KB, 1200x1750px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 1200x1750px

>>82626598
Definitely inferior to this

File: bone.jpg (94KB, 1086x529px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1086x529px

>>82628190
I don't know man, I did miss some pop songs and bantz thrown in there; maybe Kurt Russell's character asking for orange slices or something. It was simply poor filmmaking for our standards

More like Boner Tomahawk though, amirite

The amputated blind pregnant women were a scary concept, and they just left them there.

>>82628424

didn't one of them kill them?

>>82626598

it had a 1.8 million dollary-doo budget. if it was starred idris elba and cost $80 million, people would say it was great

i liked it

>>82628599
It did have a scene in which the lady they just rescued completely unscathed chastises the protagonists because literally everything wrong with the world is the fault of 'you men'. That's pretty modern audience-friendly