Alien and Gladiator in the same universe?

>>82597942
woah, it's almost as if wheat fields aren't exclusive to one piece of land on this earth

Maximus went to the alien world to farm wheat with his family.

What the fuck is it with Ridley scott and his autistic obsession with wheat?

>>82597942
Just imagine the kind of yields of those alien wheat plants. Europe would never have famines. Maybe that explains why that civilization was so advanced.

>>82597942

>Colosseum
>Slaves
>Aliens
>Gladiators

i'd watch that ( not pay for it though )

So Gladiator, Alien and Bladerunner are all set in the same universe...woah

The Ridley Cinematic Universe.

>>82597942
Illuminating! Thanks for sharing!

>>82597942
yes, our universe.

>>82598452
They are actually retard. Wheat is a man-made plant.

>>82598584
Wheatverse.

>>82599046
>wheat is a man made plant
...excuse me? You doubling down on that, son?

File: 1488414573295.jpg (126KB, 600x423px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 600x423px

>It's a "/tv/ can't talk about a Ridley Scott movie without mentioning wheat" episode.

File: lfv877z.png (7KB, 1212x63px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 1212x63px

>>82599088

>>82599207
Yeah that doesn't mean wheat is "man made" you stupid faggot.

>>82598467
You should google symbolism of wheat or something. Basically wheat equals life.

>>82599241
It means wheat as we have been cultivating it for millenia was created through selective breeding and wouldn't have occured without humans. Which means if you land on another planet and see big ass wheat like in Alien, you know agriculture is a thing on this planet.

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (148KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1920x1080px

>>82597942
obviously

>>82597942
All Ridley Scott movies are, except Robin Hood, A Good Year and American Gangster unless he believes in reincarnation

>>82597942
N

>>82599299
>there would be no wheat without humans
Holy shit, this stupidity. That's like saying there would be no wolves if humans didn't exist because dogs are a thing.

>>82599466
You're wrong though. In that analogy, wheat is the dogs, not the wolves. Cultivated wheat was bred from wild grasses that were originally fucking useless when it comes to harvesting them for food.

>>82599466
thats a real quality state-funded education you got there mate

>>82599643
I'm not the one calling wheat man made, retard.

>>82599651

That's his point, dummy. If you'd had an education worth a damn, you WOULD be saying wheat is man-made, just like dogs.

File: 170px-Usdaeinkorn1_Triticum_monococcum.jpg (14KB, 170x170px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 170x170px

>>82599509
>>82599643
>>82599673
It is disingenuous to call it man made, if you don't get why, then I'm not the one with poor education.

>>82599673
>comparing the cultivation of natural wild wheat plants to the systematic selective breeding of wolves for specific traits over hundreds of years
Wew, lad.

>>82599884
>not knowing ANYTHING about the subject but still feeling the need to pretend you do

What a pathetic little faggot you are.

>>82599830

You ARE the one with autism tho. Yes, wheat wasn't created ex nihilo by humans, guess what retard, neither was anything else. Did humans "create" cars? Surely not, according to a twerp like you, they merely re-arranged matter until it was something we call "a car".

>>82599934
Are you comparing a car to a naturally growing plant that we cultivate? It's funny that you can't see how autistic you are. Calling wheat a "man made" product is disingenuous. It's that simple.

wheat is just as manmade as are orange carrots or huge wine-grapes or industrial scale farming of bananas

wheat has been "genetically modified" over the past 12000 years, and with 2-3 harvests possible over one year, that would mean 20000-30000 generations of handpicking suitable seeds that offer valued mutations

just compare wild untouched brands of wheat to what is produced on modern day farms

>>82599908
Why don't you read up on wheat:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat

The whole thing, not just a single passage. Please tell me how a natural wild wheat, cultivated into strands we grow, makes it "man made".
>inb4 y-y-you just no no educated wahhhh

File: 1481343245622.png (1KB, 296x258px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 296x258px

>>82597942

No.

>>82599966
>>82600006

You thick cunt.

>>82599977
>wheat has been "genetically modified"
Except this isn't exactly true. Cultivation doesn't change the genetic structure of wheat and it wasn't until very recently that we introduced genetic growth hormones into wheat and other farmable crops.

>>82600040
I guess you must be done then? Good chat. Reading is key!

>>82600074

You are a thick cunt.

>>82600052
>>except youre an idiot and crossbreading wheat to produce new genetic diversity has been going on for centuries. it was a crossing of russian and canadian wheatstocks in the 1950s that produced what we call "winter wheat" & made western Canada the "breadbasket of the world".
suck a dick dumbshits.

>>82600052
ugh, it's all about semantics again
handpicking suitable seeds that prosper in different locales where they would not naturally spread, and then continuing the same process over long enough time, and you are essentially somewhat close to "genetic modification", even if it means minor mutations over many centuries compared to quicker results in modern labs.

I honestly don't understand why I even entered the discussion... /tv/ is so shit these days this thread is IMO still above average, even if it is all about getting correct words regarding the domestication of wheat

>>82600172
>i dont know a fucking thing about cropscience biology

we can tell

>>82600150
Crossbreeding is not outright artifical genetic modification, kid. I'm making a distinction between simple plant crossbreeding with genetic restructuring, which we do now with a variety of crop yields.

>>82599241
Wheat is man made faggot

>>82600195
It's not.

>>82600217
There was no wheat before man

>>82600172
All you have to do is stop saying retarded shit about wheat...

>>82600188
well what would happen to /tv/ if people had to know about making movies before we can shit on them?

regardless, wheat is still a product of human civilization. most of current wheat types would not exist without human intervention

>>82600238
Yes, there is/was.

File: 1494240288870.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>82600247
>regardless, wheat is still a product of human civilization. most of current wheat types would not exist without human intervention
WILD

WHEAT

EXISTS

>>82600268
No there wasn't

>>82600123
You can stop posting anytime.

>>82600333

Whatever you say you thick cunt.

>gladiator happens
>the engineers see the horrors of the emporer and try to steer mankind on the rightful path
>engineer jesus
>years later kingdom of heaven, balain says he feels nothing because he is made of engineer dna
>alien takes place after this
>blade runner where robots are made to trick the engineers
does the theory have legs

>>82600307
> Wild wheat

Wow just wow what a fucking retard wild domesticated dogs exist too

>>82600307
no one gives a shit about wild undomesticated wheat man

that's like comparing modern apples to the original apples before humans decided to start the domesticating process

File: 1488670295294.jpg (62KB, 702x395px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 702x395px

>All this posting and arguing and niggas gettin learned about wheat in a ridley scott topic

File: Weizen1.jpg (46KB, 600x361px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x361px

>>82600320
>>82600342
>>82600362
>>82600366

Wasn't it confirmed that Blade Runner and Alien are in the same universe? DAVID and Replicants are basically the same thing?

File: 1440664482009.png (325KB, 560x559px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 560x559px

>>82600397
>in english doc

>>82600366
I don't say apples are man made, sweetie.

Does plastic exist in the wild? No, that's man made.

behold, totally not man-made

>>82600397
Dumbass wheat is a cross between different types of grass that doesn't occur naturally

>>82600414
Picture shows combos of wild wheats...

>>82600437
Yes, there are wild wheats that do exist.

why do people waste their time arguing with retards for 50 posts

>>82600307
You THICK cunt.

File: 1493871497851.jpg (45KB, 740x721px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 740x721px

>>82600437
>shown a picture of naturally growing species of wheat
>"BLARGGGGG NOOO IT MAN MADE DUHHH"

Oh hey, I thought this meme was dead.

>>82600532
See
>>82600397

>>82600150
i come to /tv/ to see people arguing about wheat farming. cheers to you both.

>>82600425

Sweet apples and wheat you can make food out of don't exist in the wild either, dumbshit.

>>82600529
Because this site is genuinely filled with autistic brainlets.

>>82600543
It's fucking wheat strain that grows in the wild what the fuck is so hard to understand

>>82600571
The funnier thing is how this was never a serious thread, but faggots are actually mad now about wheat being a plant.

>>82597942
Yeah
Its earth
>goodfellas, alien, gladiator, beverly hills cop and Jönsson ligan is in the same universe

>>82600529
The mentality that "i win the argument if i make the last post" is pretty common so people just keep arguing so they think they "win".

Autism is one hell of a drug.

>>82597942
nah

File: wild banana.jpg (328KB, 567x425px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 567x425px

TOTALLY NOT MAN-MADE NO SIR

>>82600580
See:
>>82600397

>>82600425
>>82600567
>I don't say apples are man made, sweetie.
But that's the fucking point nigger. The big apples you can buy at the supermarket ARE man-made. Wild apples back before humans started cultivating them wouldn't look ANYTHING like the ones we have now. Most likely they'd be tiny and not anywhere near as good. So if you go anywhere in the universe and see an apple-tree with big red juicy apples on it, then you can tell someone on this planet cultivates apples because they didn't occur naturally.
Same goes for the wheat. Yes some strands of wheat existed before we cultivated them but first, they'd be in fields mixed with a shit ton of other plants, and they wouldn't look anything like modern wheat. The point being that when the crew shows up on a faraway world in Alien, and see a field containing ONLY massive wheats, it's a sure indication that it's cultivated.
You goddamn thick cunt.

>>82600238
There was no Hate either

>>82600615
I could be asking you the same thing.

>>82600644
Well, wild bananas are not man made.

smonk wheat

>>82600674
>Yes some strands of wheat existed before we cultivated them
...right, thanks.

>>82600674
>I'LL CALL HIM A NIGGER HEEHEE!
Still in that phase, kiddo?

>>82600738
You were still wrong in your original post.
Wheat as we know it nowadays is very fucking exclusive to Earth.
>>82600767
Not an argument. Read the rest of the post.

>>82600767
Nice argument
Very facts-based and intellectual

>>82600052
>Cultivation doesn't change the genetic structure of wheat

it actually does

how does it feel to be wrong?

>>82600798
>calling you a nigger is an argument
Autism, not even once.

this is a stupid, pointless argument
both of you just shut the fuck up

>>82600787
My original argument was that wheat was not man made, which is true.

>>82600810
I don't think you know what goes into cultivating then and how it differs from genetic modification.

>>82600839
wild wheat is not manmade

modern industrial scale farming wheat is very much a result of humans domesticating it, genetically engineering and modifying it over thousands of years

>>82600839
Your original argument was implying that finding wheat on the other side of the galaxy isn't significant, which is wrong.

>>82599466
>That's like saying there would be no wolves if humans didn't exist because dogs are a thing
It's actually the exact opposite of that though. Modern dogs were created through selective breeding just like wheat.

>>82600862
I wasn't that anon, skip.

>>82600738
No they fucking didn't all fucking wheat and wheat grass is the result of human activity directly or indirectly basic bitch wheat grass is a result of cross breeding and cross pollination

>>82600861
Yeah great, that doesn't make it man made. Especially when we have wild wheat. It's shitty word choice.

>>82600883
*teleports behind u*

>>82600887
>all fucking wheat and wheat grass is the result of human activity
No, it isn't.

>>82600853
certain plants are known for taking in genes from other plants, meaning where wheat was introduced, it would absorb certain qualities from other local plants due to crossover mechanism during pollination

this is why wheat farming is still quite regulated in western developed countries, to prevent potentially harmful crossovers from unwanted species entering the next generation of wheat seeds

>>82600939

It is it's impossible to trace its origin before civilization the other theory is that it is a " naturally mutating GMO" which is a bunch of shit

>>82600976
>It is it's impossible to trace its origin before civilization
Again, no. It isn't.

File: NataliaSomethingsFunny.webm (632KB, 650x366px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 650x366px

Hahahaha this is fucking great you all are retarded.

>>82600993
Have you tried eating a dick

>>82600817
>Heh I was almost forced to face the fact that my argument was bad but I see here that you said a no- no word hahaha tough luck pal

>>82601036
I'm just explaining to you that calling me a nignog isn't really an argument, buckaroonie. You do grow out of that phase eventually. I was 14 once too...

>>82601018
>implying sucking a dick is bad
Have you tried reading a book?

>>82598459
>wheat are family stars playing

>>82601018
>HURRR DURRR EAT A DICK HOMO TEEHEE
woah, mid 2000s called.

>>82601017
>implying faggots who don't even know wild wheat exists aren't the only retards.

>>82601094
This, cocksuckers are making the world a much better place.

File: improved-inputs-graphic.jpg (58KB, 704x300px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 704x300px

hmm, I wonder how this is possible

perhaps human intervention?

>>82601071 #
I'm not even the anon you were replying to in the first place. You're right, calling someone a nigger isn't an argument. He was calling you a nigger because you sound like a nigger. Then he followed it with an argument, which you chose to ignore because he said nigger.

>>82601224
>He was calling you a nigger because you sound like a nigger
Still not an argument and I'm not even remotely black. Shouldn't you be in class right now? This your study hall, junior?

>>82601200
>literally nobody said there wasn't human intervention.

File: 0004400002923_A.jpg (39KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 380x380px

Wheat is man-made.

This is the most autistic thread I have ever seen.

>>82601224
There was no argument though.

> Crop Origins

> The ancestors of wheat were small-grained, wild grasses of the Fertile Crescent in the Middle East. There is evidence that hunter-gatherers had been collecting grain from wild wheat populations for thousands of years before they were introduced into cultivation. The first step in the development of modern wheat was a natural hybridisation that occurred at least 10,000, and up to 40,000, years ago between a wild einkorn wheat (Triticum urartu) and a wild goat grass related to Aegilops speltoides (the original ancestor no longer exists). The new species created by this hybridisation was Triticum diccocoides, wild emmer wheat. Emmer, and to a lesser extent einkorn, were the first cultivated wheats. Emmer wheat (T. diccocoides) is the ancestor of modern durum wheat (Triticum durum) whose rather coarse granular flour is used in making pasta.

> A second hybridisation occurred in prehistoric times between emmer (T. diccocoides) and another species of goat grass (Aegilops tauschii). This hybrid gave rise to the new species Triticum aestivum, the ancestor of modern bread-making wheats.

>>82601282
Go back to rebbit if you're this triggered by someone saying nigger.
>>82601333
Everything after the first sentence of his post is an argument.

>>82600853

I don't think you understand that selecting for certain traits changes the frequency of alleles in a population changing the genetic make up through generations.

>>82601424
>calling me nigger isn't an argument"
>"BLARGGGHHH WHAT ARE YOU TRIGGERED NIGGERINO? TEEHEE YOU REBBIT BLAAARRRGGGHH"
please just get out already.

>>82601424
>Everything after the first sentence of his post is an argument.
Then you can't tell what a shitty argument is.

> The diploid progenitors and close relatives of modern wheat radiated from a common
ancestor about 3 million years ago (MYA) and gave rise to the Triticum and
Aegilops taxa (Fig. 18.2).

> The Triticum group consisted of the A-genome diploids T. urartu Tumanian ex Gandylian (2n = 2x = 14, AA (the capital letters represent the genome constitution)) and T. monococcum ssp. aegilopoides (Link) Thell.

> (2n = 2x = 14, AA). Johnson and Dhaliwal (1976) determined that they are valid biological species.

> Also evolving from the common seven-chromosome ancestor were
numerous diploid Aegilops species including Ae. tauschii Coss. (2n = 2x = 14, DD)
and a progenitor to the Aegilops Sitopsis section, which gave rise to the S-genome
containing Aegilops species including Ae. speltoides Tausch (2n = 2x = 14, SS).

> The only domesticated diploid wheat is einkorn (T. monococcum ssp. monococcum
L., 2n = 2x = 14, AmAm), which was domesticated from ssp. aegilopoides
through the acquisition of a non-brittle rachis (Fig. 18.2). The evolution and formation
of the cultivated forms of polyploid wheat followed two basic lineages, both of
which involved two amphiploidization events.

> These events resulted from the hybridization of two different species followed by spontaneous chromosome doubling
of the F1 hybrid through the functioning of meiotic restitution division (non-reduced)
gametes. One lineage began with hybridization of T. urartu (Dvorak et al. 1993)

> and Ae. speltoides, or a close relative thereof (Sarkar and Stebbins 1956; Riley et al. 1958), which led to the formation of the wild emmer wheat T. timopheevii ssp.
araraticum Jakubz. (2n = 4x = 28, AAGG) containing a pair of A genomes from
T. urartu and a pair of G genomes, which are considered to be a divergent form of
the S genome of the Aegilops progenitor (Rodriquez et al. 2000). T. timopheevii ssp.
araraticum has a brittle rachis conferred by the Br13A gene.

>>82601581
So it's man made

>>82601581
So dogs are man-made?
How about black booties and arab eyes?

>>82601533 (You)
>>82601572
I never said it was a good argument. But saying it's not an argument at all is simply not true.

>>82601709
>hey my argument is weak but but but...it's still an argument so acknowledge me senpai!
No, retard. Get out already.

>>82600397
I just wheat bonded ur sister?

>>82601726
I'm not even the one who originally made the post.

>>82601647
>t. can't read

>>82601700
No It clearly says That Wild Emmer the proginator of modern wheat is a result of a cross between two cultivated forms of wheat ancestors which are t.urartu (pic related) in the middle east and Ae.speltoides

>>82601771
So why give me your two fucking cents on a post that is barely an argument?

File: t.urartu.png (502KB, 661x676px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 661x676px

>>82601805
forgot pic

What the fuck is going on on this thread

>>82601709
>if I believe really hard that something is an argument, through meme magic my wishes will come true
Just because you believe something to be an argument, doesn't make it true you absolutely stupid faggot.

/tv/ - Agriculture and Botany

>>82601805
which means it's man made

>>82601805
Dang :(

>>82602009
Holy shit kid...

>>82601754
underrated

So is wheat man made or not?

>>82602169
Well if I understand this clusterfuck it's man made by genetic manipulation but it's naturally man made?

>>82601932
We need more autistic threads like this. I haven't laughed this hard in a while.

I cant fucking believe this thread. What a treat.

Holy shit you fucking autists. Wheat as we know it is man made due to generations of selective breeding. Wheat is not man made just as a grain. BOOM. DONE.

>>82602401
What about pickles tho

>>82602401
The answer is just wheat is not man made, done.

Man made but not man made as a cucumber

File: definitely man made.jpg (63KB, 550x413px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 550x413px

So this is the birth wheat posting?

File: IMG_0553.png (621KB, 381x1080px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 381x1080px

>>82602429
Sweet pickles are man made

>>82597942
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ds054OF7hY&t=121s

>>82602401
No it's more complicated than that. Google: Evolution of Polyploid Triticum Wheats under Cultivation:The Role of Domestication, Natural Hybridization and Allopolyploid Speciation in their Diversification PDF.

The quick rundown is that the quote "wild wheat" genus "Triticum" is native to The Middle East and the Fertile Crescent So we can determine that none of that shit will grow outside of the Middle East so there is no "wild wheat" outside of the Middle East. But this quote" wild wheat" is not proper wheat per se but are wheat pre cursors and their cultivation resulted in proper wheat which lead to the actual wheat that is used today

>>82602491
But it is

That would be corny

File: 1494283161106.png (256KB, 498x486px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 498x486px

>>82602570
>dictionary definition of wheat
>pictures posted of wild wheat
>literally quoting the history of wheat
>all ITT
you are just being obtuse about this poor word choice at this point.

But on the bright side, I'm glad I've helped create a meme.
>t. the original wheat shitposer here

File: 1493230336479.jpg (246KB, 400x800px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 400x800px

>>82599830
>I'm right and I don't need to explain why because if you don't understand you are SILLY

>>82602681
But it has been explained

>>82601404
>Wild Wheat
We're talking regular wheat here nigger

File: 1478898097858.png (1MB, 1079x725px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1079x725px

>>82602549
that video is stupid as fuck
the Marcomanni wars were not fought in northern Germany, but rather in Austria, with the Marcomanni living in modern day Czechia but invading Roman Noricum/Raetia

literally couldn't watch further than that

>>82602565
But it did end up growing outside of the Middle East/Fertile Crescent that just happened to be where it started. And I think the original point still stands, wheat as just a grain was made by nature and wheat as we know it know was made by man.

>>82601404
the human intervention came into play with creating the hybrid faggot thus Wheat is man-made

>>82602536
In on wheat posting thread

>>82602754
>NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER
woah, he's back. Simply ebin.

>>82602769
Wheat (as we know it) is pretty much man made but the wheat plant species genus is natural in origin

>>82602799
That doesn't make wheat man made, son.

>>82601700
Wheat = man-made
Dogs = not necessarily man-made just some

>>82602870
You're just gonna have to explain which specific wheat you're talking about

>>82601322
This is the best thread /tv/ has had since the OG Power Rangers marathon threads.

>>82602893
Scroll up, dingus.

>>82601826
you can't really quantify an argument it either is or isn't nigger.

wheat is manmade

to claim otherwise would be like saying gorillas are humans (they grow in the wild hue hue hue)
but, there is a big difference between modern humans and African large apes; just like there is a gigantic gap between the ancient proto-wild-"wheat" and domesticated wheat in agricultural production

File: file.png (20KB, 341x326px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 341x326px

>>82597942

>>82602893
The way I see it is like saying that fuel is man made or natural. Like Fuel itself is man made but the sum of the parts that make up fuel are natural for example timber is natural and coal is natural but when they are burned for fuel it becomes a man made process same goes for the wheat

>>82600361
It could but this thread is about genetic semantics now. Try again next time, my dude.

>>82602929
>still calling anons nigger
>everything either is or isn't an argument
>nuance doesn't exist
What shit logic; at the very MOST, it is a weak argument. At the best, it's absolutely not.

Your intelligence astounds me.

>>82602893
Shredded Wheat

>>82602705
And your explanation has demonstrated that you are wrong.

>>82603019
>Shredded Wheat
definitely man made

>>82602929
>you can't quantify an argument
You mean qualify.

>>82602945
Put me in the screencap

>>82602982
Like everything that exists?

>>82602401
well I think that was pretty clear everyone knows grain isn't man-made faggot

>>82603025
>if I ignore the explanation, there isn't one
Sure pal.

>>82603060
depends on which grain you're talking about and you're just shifting the goalposts now

File: image.jpg (163KB, 700x750px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 700x750px

Good....good

Gonna kick start this thread again.

Oranges and lemons were man-made.

>>82603210
>Image already posted
>Joke already done

You failed twice in one post

>>82603200
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110118101600.htm

Pretty much all domesticated plant is "man made" in one way or another

>>82603248
okay :''(((

>>82603114

The alien should be using its tail to cut the wheat

File: IMG_0555.jpg (137KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 600x800px

>It's a man-made thread

File: alien-covenant-poster-snip.jpg (16KB, 637x474px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 637x474px

Stop wheat posting.

>>82603072
Just keep telling yourself that houses are natural formations cuckboi

>>82603342
>whipping out "cuckboi" now
14 or 15 years old?

>>82603339
No you man-made devil.

>>82599830
You got special education because you are a retarded person

>>82603400
Woah, great argument.

>>82599966
Imagine being this autistic

>>82603431
>HUR DURRR YOU AUTISTIC GOTCHA!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einkorn_wheat
Different guy
I don't get how this does not count as a type of wild wheat?

>>82603257
Nigga what is this, 2009?

>>82603046
>He doesn't know about shredded wheat trees.

>>82603006
>weak argument
You're using that word wrong again.

How about this you fucking morons?
Its not man made or wild anymore, it's fucking domesticated.

>>82603090
how does it "depend" name one grain that is man-made

>>82600370
I get it, aliens are crickets who kill wheat and Ridley has sexual interests in wheat?

>>82603689
How about wheat was made by xenomorph wizards. So it's not man made or naturally occuring.

>>82603056
Same

>>82603744
Yes

>>82603453
Does it hurt to call other people autistic while hiding the (obvious) fact that you have autism?

>>82603660
What are you even saying anymore, faggot? That arguments can't be weak? Are you dumb?

>>82603689
Like dogs?

>>82603744
I was thinking David grew the wheat there to feed Shaw.

>>82603783
No, because I'm not autistic.

guys how can we destroy 4chan?

Is runing my life....

>>82603693
Just fuck off

For the final fucking time If it is a fucking domesticated cultivated plant then it is likely the result of thousands of years of fucking crosbreeding, selection and mutation which could never occur naturally if the fucking plant was left alone to its own devices therefore it is man made. Case fucking closed.

>>82603796
Yep, ever seen a wheat leash?

File: IMG_8172.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

Is Tastee Wheat man made?

>>82603815
Which he did by making xenomorph wizards too magic wheat into existance throughout time.

>>82603815
Bitch is so needy she needs a whole wheat field.

>>82603846
But that isn't what man made means...

name me some other wheatkino guys

>>82603846
>result of thousands of years of fucking crosbreeding, selection and mutation which could never occur naturally

Well it could actually with time and genetic chance.

>>82603925
Fuck off

>>82600370
I'm not surprised at this point due to the amount of butthurt and petty whining about prometheus.

>>82597942

>space romans

This will be the coolest shit.

File: 15616367_ml-wheat-field.jpg (427KB, 1678x1119px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 1678x1119px

100% natural and untouched by mans hand

>>82603965
But I'm right.

>>82602380
>>82602380
DAVID PLANTED THE WHEAT BECAUSE HES PROGRAMMED TO LAARP AS HUMAN, HE WAS EVEN EATING WHAT LOOKS LIKE SOUP RICE FOOD IN PROMETHEUS. THE AUTIST PLANTED WHEAT TO HARVEST FOR HUMAN LARPING

WEWHEAT
E
W
H
E
A
T

>>82603976
yeahhhhhhh make a draft with your idea and send it to Ridley, sure he will read it.

Send it to [email protected]

File: 1454514995974.jpg (55KB, 604x517px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 604x517px

>all this bait

just another example of the failures of American schoolsystem, unable to provide proper education, regarding WHEAT

>>82604158
Realistically however it would be the Engineers that planted it because they probably helped invent it DUE TO ANCIENT ALIENS VISITING ANCIENT CIVILIZATION AND BEING PRAISED AS GODS

>>82604186
He'll probably make a film too.

>>82604235
They're engineers not farmers anon.

>tfw they land on the Farmer homeworld

>>82604224
Only failed students here are those faggots who think wild wheat doesn't exist.

>>82603962
I think there's wheat in 300.

>retards SERIOUSLY think man made this

Bet they think the earth was LITERALLY made in 7 days and there is a magical skydaddy looking down on us

File: 3.jpg (310KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 1920x1200px

>>82604391
pic related

So why isn't that axe woman from Prometheus in this new film? I thought her and Assbender were going on some journey to find the engineers?

File: IMG_0556.jpg (57KB, 817x427px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 817x427px

>>82603962

>>82599088
It is retard.

>>82603056
Die in a hole, redditor

File: 335a7139d23653f3a9f794032f33ceb0.jpg (29KB, 600x315px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x315px

>>82604325
Yeah, 300 is definitely wheatkino, pretty good scenes with golden goodness

>>82604428
Apparently she will be, she's just not the main character.

>>82604617
Look through the thread, kiddo.

File: FieldofDreams6.jpg (39KB, 620x375px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 620x375px

Wheat is pleb tier, corn kino is where it's at

Wheat is man-made.

>>82605028
it's f*cking NATURAL

File: IMG_9957.jpg (47KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x375px

>>82597942
Didn't nick cave write the script for the gladiator 2 where he time travels?

>>82605028
How can a plant be man-made?

>>82605157
Selective breeding over many, many, many years to produce a plant that would likely never exist naturally without human interference.

>>82605155
Yes

>>82605401
>likely never exist
Wild wheat does.

>>82605433
I was talking in general.

>>82605457
In general, it does.

>>82605482
Yeah, but not before man made it.

>Ridley Scott wheat thread
>236 replies later

What is /tv/'s endgame?

So, after five long hours of serious debate and deliberation, what's the final verdict /tv/?

Is wheat:
A.) Man-made
B.) Not man-made

???

>>82606037
A

>>82606037
B

>>82606189
>>82606212
oh, dear

>>82606212
t. cuck

File: a.png (28KB, 298x81px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 298x81px

>>82606254
t. brainlet

is shortwheat man made?

>>82605433
that's the exception

>>82606037
A

>>82606386
No, modern wheat is the exception faggot.

>>82605546
Wrong order...

>>82606500
No, man made it and now it grows in the wild.

>>82606037
A)

there is really only one autist who can't get his head around it and keeps going on about wild wheat

>>82606037
wild wheat or modern wheat?

>>82606563
No. That is factually wrong.

>>82597942
show me the origin of this meme

>>82606037
A

>>82607813
Continuing from this.

>>82606868
wild wheat or modern wheat? what the fuck are you talking about you fucking goon. You mean wheat we have took and selectively bred to produce a higher yield, or wheat strains that have not been selectively bred? ITS THE SAME FUCKING THING.

Upon more thorough investigation, some of you pack of cunts are under the impression that any thing humans have selectively bred is man made, you're wrong, completely wrong.
Furthermore you also think that "wild wheat" and "modern wheat" ( it hurt my fucking head typing that) are two different things. They are different strains of the same fucking plant.

TL;DR selectively breeding plants to produce a more efficient yield doesn't mean the plant is man made. "wild wheat" is a strain of wheat that has not been subjected to selective breeding, while "modern wheat" has been. That's not man made wheat you cunts.

>>82606037
A

>>82606037
B you fucking retards

This is the new traps are gay kind of debate?

>>82608374
Yeah but its even simpler than liking traps = you're gay

its as simple as wheat is not man made

>>82599046
If it's manmade then how did Xenomorphs make it?
Checkmate atheists.

>>82608450
This argument is just a fucking circle, nobody is going to conceed.

>>82608450
But you aren't gay if you like traps. Bi at most.

>>82606037
A

>>82608681
If I reply to your post will you die?

In conclusion modern day wheat is man made, fuck off brainlets.

>>82609125
See
>>82607813
>>82608055

Debate is over, retard.

>>82609322
Retard, the whole fucking debate is just around semantics.

>>82609438
It's not, unless you are poirly educated.

>>82600708
My wild bananas made me a man :^)

>>82609480
*poorly

>>82597942
More like Alien and Blade Runner

>>82604391
>>82604418
how retarded are you

>>82606037
A

>>82607813
>If you think thats man made you are in serious need of a education.


You people are arguing semantics. Wheat cultivars as they exist can certainly be described as 'man-made'.

>>82609856
Well, that much we mostly agree on but the distinction is between Modern Wheat or Wild Wheat.

File: 7e7.jpg (62KB, 600x516px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 600x516px

>>82597942
cant you even be creative with your shitposts?

>>82609625
hello brainlet!
tell me more about the wheat you made today

>>82610674
>>82610729
Typical B posters

File: mfw wheat is man made.png (4KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 183x275px

>>82610873
uhhhhh me make wheat today - brainlet

File: costanza alien 1317105158860.jpg (14KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 250x250px

>>82598467
>2017
>not having a wheat fetish

File: thatguy.jpg (27KB, 321x322px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 321x322px

WAIT WAIT HOW ABOUT ALIEN VS GLADIATOR?????

>>82606037
A

>>82611097
kys

Eternal /wheat/ general when

>>82611252
Now that the majority have decided it is man-made (A's) it will probably go away. If you see a denier report them.

>>82611437
>majority has agreed it is man made
No....
>>82607813
>>82608055

^refute this.

>>82611437
>report people factually correct who disagree with me

File: FB_IMG_1494089817022.jpg (33KB, 720x551px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 720x551px

>mfw Bunch of autists waste hours arguing about wheat on a television and movie board

File: IMG_0557.jpg (54KB, 567x298px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 567x298px

>/tv/ discussing wheat