>Harry Potter 1 was 15 years ago
So were you.
i used to work at universal studios in orlando
they let draco and his friend in the employee areas guy cause management didnt want guests bothering him and disrupting the park operations
wore flannel plaid shirt and red jeans
ill never forget standing behind him and his friend in line for a good 7 minutes silently staring at his clothes waiting to get my macaroni salad and going back to the breakroom to eat it
>>82586436
Why didn't you dry hump him, to assert your dominance, doggo?
>>82586506
>BARCC!
And its still one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>82586257
is that all?
the way people go on about it i thought it was way longer ago
>>82586603
Stretched is said 7 times in the books. None of the times are related to legs.
Didn't give a fuck then, don't give a fuck now.
>>82586506
we're explicitly told at orientation not to talk to celebrities as it could ruin their guest experience
was my first job and i didnt wanna get fired, but i saw a bunch of employees lowkey taking pictures of him
What was the best and what was the worstbook?
LOOK
AT THE TOP
OF HIS HEAD
>>82586603
Didn't Quentin produce this garbage list?
Haha I'm 22 as well
>>82586257
harry potbelly is for fags. Who cares?
>>82586938
>all that money
>Doesn't get hair restoration
He looks like Harry Kane if Harry Kane finished his education
>>82586938
DAMN!
>>82586938
>Anglos