What did Villeneuve mean by this? Is he setting himself up to

>>82578719
>Scott said years ago that the first shot of the sequel will be a dead tree in the wasteland, held by wires
Well how about that.

>>82578811
Didn't he also say there would be a harvester or else? I mean, there sort of is one in the background of the pic.

>>82578811
I remember something about zooming out from a pot of soup cooking in a farmhouse and then eventually a flying car comes in and arrests the person living there. I think that's from one of the extras in the blu ray. I always that would be a cool opening

File: y-you too.gif (967KB, 245x250px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 245x250px

Does this mean we'll get Goose flailing about like a tard as his family and the men in white try to get him into an amberlamps?

>>82578811
Please don't embarrass OP
he thinks he isn't entry level plebcore

That scene reminds me of the original script opening where the Blade Runner visits a farmer and it turns out the farmer is a replicant and gets "retired."

>>82578986
Are you the guy that gets irrationally angry whenever someone mentions Tarkovsky on /tv/?

>>82578719
Should've included a picture of the tree Alexander and his son plant in The Sacrifice

>>82579836
This is just reaching
Top looks more like Fury Road

File: screen-shot-2015-06-04-at-10-17-44-am.png (587KB, 2550x1070px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 2550x1070px

>>82580209
>Top looks more like Fury Road
it's macbeth

>>82578719
Anyone else thinks the movie looks too cean? i mean it could only be the trailer but...

>>82581359

Yes definitely, and many people think it does. Could be partly the fact it's shot on Digital or that the lighting also is not very Blade Runner-like. The original colour scheme was typically blues, oranges and yellows where as this seems to have just about everything.

>>82581413
Could there be more post production changes since it's still five months from release and we're seeing a very close to final version?

>>82581359
Villeneuve's cinematography is much cleaner and minimalistic than Ridley Scott, he doesn't really like a lot of elements in the same frame as just about every single one of his post-Canada films show. I'll have to agree it looks odd when it comes to something like Blade Runner, but then again, it might also work in bringing out a different vibe since most of the film doesn't appear to be set in Los Angeles this time around. I guess the minimalism looks better in empty, desolate places like in the image you're quoting.