Will Blade Runner 2049 be better than that shit ghost in the shell

>>82571129
Yes. The question is whether it will be good.

Ghost in the Shell was good you Redditor.

>Villenmeme
>Gosling
>De Armas
BR2049 is already DOA

>>82571129
My literal shit is better than that shit.
And BR2049 will be nowhere near as good as the original but will still be entertaining.

>>82571632
>>82571129

this ghost in the shell was actually good. Why are weebs so mad? Half of the people complaining probably never even saw it

>>82571632
Digusting filthy pleb, away with you return to reddit with your dumb stupid mind.

>>82571129
Yes, but not by enough, and it will hurt more because original contributors are involved.

>>82571129
>Denis Villeneuve directing
>Roger Deakins as the DP
>Hampton Fancher again on the screenplay
>Johan Johannsson on the score
>Ryan Gosling as the main protagonist
>Ridley Scott as the executive producer

Ofcourse it will be better than fucking Ghost in the Shell.
It will be nowhere close the original, but GITS doesn't have a single name in the crew as good as these.

>>Denis Villeneuve directing
Hack that makes edgy shit for the /v/eddit crowd
>>Roger Deakins as the DP
His films with Villenmeme are far worse than his films with the Coens and Mendes
>>Hampton Fancher again on the screenplay
Only did 4 films and he's almost in his 80s
>>Johan Johannsson on the score
Kek
>>Ryan Gosling as the main protagonist
Can't emote for shit
>>Ridley Scott as the executive producer
Has been that hasnt made a good film in 26 years

>>82571632
>/tv/ in nutshell

It's a sequel of a cult classic from 35 years ago, that doesn't really need a sequel.

What do you think?
Doesn't take a genious to see what will happen. Even if it turned out OK, I very much doubt the fanbase could be pleased.