Is this accurate?
Review Screw single-handedly saved this board.
>>82565444
literally who
>>82565371
Or maybe... I just like his movies...
>>82565444
Trips confirm unfortunately
>>82565602
The guy whose meme is on the OP.
>>82565371
He's like Michael Bay in that he favors a unique visual aesthetic of bombast in lieu of any storytelling depth.
This pisses off many people who want analyzable content in their films.
I definitely don't think he's a "deep" guy or anything, but it's clear he has a passion for what he does and he wants to engross people into his movies, by any means possible. His Jesus imagery is very heady-handed, but it at least makes sense when he uses it. I like his style and I like his movies, but he's far from "the best director of this generation."
>>82565721
any more from this guy?
>>82566466
>>82566548
THIS SO MUCH
>>82565371
No, he's visually talented and that's why even marlel is plagiarizing his style now. Also stop spamming this shit please
http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/image/qPknl-9cJDsZ23cwY96_-Q/
>>82566548
>when your virginity is so apparent it comes through in shit memes
>>82565371
No. It's a disgusting run on sentence.
>>82566548
tumblr writes erotic fanfiction about any two characters who make eye contact.
>>82566548
shieet
>>82565371
Lol that's not what allegory means.
>>82565371
>that last part
Holy projection Batman!
>>82565371
>>82566588
this is the only other one I have saved but I know he's made a lot more
of course not!
>>82566652
>>82566702
Women aren't going to be able to totally relate to relationships between men, so they often characterize said relationships as sexual because they see men as sexually aggressive. No?
>>82566633
Hell, even Star Wars is now copying Zack Snyder.
Many people don't want to admit it, but Snyder has a very visually pleasing style that many directors are now copying. They'll trash his movies, and then go steal his directing style.
>>82566972
Actually I've never seen anyone in the industry shit talking Snyder, Cameron said he liked him for instance. People trashing him are always numale cucks like this Review Screw and the Collider crew
>>82566885
No, women just literally cannot understand life past being an incubator for semen.
>>82565444
/ourautist/
ZADDY PLEASE FILL MY LOO
>>82567141
wtf he's actually right
>>82567141
Stop posting your own comments, sperg.
>>82566835
>That filename
Nigga don't act like you aren't Review Screw himself
>>82566885
or they just find two dudes hot for the same reason some guys like lesbian porn?
like the fuck I hate when feminist bitches over analyze porn to make it all "HURHUR MEN CAN'T INTO ROMANCE AND LOVE LIKE PERFECT WOMEN SO THEY JACK IT TO UNREALISTIC PORN"
sometimes a dick is just a dick, freud
>>82566686
>manlettryingtobeintimidatingandfailing.jpg
>>82567141
>all these words to say "i don't like it" because he has zero arguments
>he cut the part when he says nolan is his favourite director to post this shit here
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>82567915
What did he say?
>>82566817
>Whedon
>Marvel
Am I being memed?
>>82567141
Pretty good deconstruction to be honest.
>>82566817
weird that dc movies are more diverse than marvel ones
>>82568102
Fuck off review screw
>>82567836
review screw ama
>>82567817
I just follow the autist on twitter and he regularly screencaps comments he makes so I save them if they're good just to trigger cucks of your kind
>>82567141
>he cut out the part where he called christopher nolan the king of auteur filmmaking
LMAO
>>82565371
>>82565444
>>82566548
>>82566835
>>82567141
Stop forcing yourself
>>82565778
>This pisses off many people who want analyzable content in their films.
>>>/reddit/
>>82568408
No he didn't, that was actually his edited comment.
>>82568409
Take your meds bro. Just saw these in another thread and saved them
>>82567063
this. a lot of people ackowledge his films are good visually, they just admit his films failings come down to direction and storyand they are right. and this is coming from someone who likes bvs. as much as i like the film it has its faults.
>>82568191
>hes proud to be wasting money on trash
american was a mistake.
>>82565371
Yes. Thought I'd change "elitist" to "would-be elitists". 1. You need the plural. 2. There are no real elitists.
>>82568191
SS is objectively bad, the other two are 8-9/10. Good for you for actually buYing physical copies
>>82565637
Nah
>>82570242
Then why do they have the same filename every time thread post them? You'll never be the 4chan celebrity you so desperately want to be no matter how hard you try
>>82572838
It's probably just one autist saving his pics and spamming them to trigger /tv/, which has worked considering you keep replying
>>82567141
>he edited out the part where he says Nolan deserves the throne of modern movie making
Holy shit KEK. Not that the rest of the review is less embarrassing but still
>>82570213
>Review Screw tries to save face
>>82573062
This