Looks like cyberpunkkino is back on the menu lads.

>>82542560
yo this shit looks poppin my nigga

I will literally eat up anything with Goose in it

>waiting 32 years for a film release

I'll pass.

File: 220px-Stan_and_Jan_Berenstain.jpg (17KB, 220x307px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 220x307px

Wasn't joseph gordon levitt the star one time for there?

Visually it looks cool, but it's probably going to be mediocre at best. It looks like they already spoiled 'le big tweest xD' in the trailer. I feel like I've already seen the movie.

>>82542560
Looks like plastic assembly line bullshit to me. And now Deckard isn't a replicant anymore? Fuck this movie.

Looks like they ripped off Stranger Things.

>>82544033
I'll rip off your panties and fuck your boipucci 'til it bleeds.

For a moment I read the thumbnail as "Blade Fuhrer".

>>82542560
>Giant Atari logo on buildings
>Coca Cola ads visible in background

It's little things like this that make me so excited for this movie. The continuation of the "future" ads from corporations in the first one shows that they are very committed to world building in this movie. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a giant Pan-Am ad too. We are finally getting another gritty yet striking sci-fi movie and I couldn't be happier.

They could have made everything shiny and pretty and updated but they did not and I love it for that already. Fuck, even Deckard's cruiser looks the exact same before it blows up.

>>82544021
He never was. Completely dstroys a main theme of the story if he was.

>>82544454

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfJRm0WssOE

It just looks like someone that normally makes capeshit is directing a Blade Runner fanfic script. Villenovella is super overrated.

>>82542560
meh i didnt like the first one and this doesnt seem much better

we need moar cyberpunk tho. and scifi. so i'll take what i can get.

>>82544528
Lol that's the first thing I thought of too when I was writing it. But it's just little things that make the world a living place.

They blow up Deckard's cruiser instantly and the rest of the trailer looks like it's trying to be it's own thing. There's nothing wrong with returning imagery and characters from previous installments of work as long as they make sense.

>the Goose is a Replicant
>spoiled in the trailer

Why exactly should I go see this movie now?

>>82544501
He pushes the concept of love on a female replicant since he doesn't think she could naturally understand it without force, then it turns out he's a replicant himself. It's better if he's a human being how exactly?

>>82544608
>we need more cyberpunk
>I haven't seen Blade Runner
what's wrong with you?

>>82542560
I mean, is Blade Runner actually even cyberpunk, or was it a noir movie with a cyberpunk aesthetic?

>>82544809
i said i have seen the first one ("i didnt like the first one")

>>82542560
>Ryan Gosling

Great the new blade runner is going to be someone with down syndrome.

>>82544608
>meh
>moar
>i didnt like the first one
>we need moar cyberpunk tho. and scifi. so i'll take what i can get.
when did we start allowing such obvious underage faggots to post

>cyber punk
>kino
Do you plays videogames and post on reddit too?

>>82544875
It was a noir movie with a sci-fi aesthetic. I doubt Phillip K. Dick or Ridley Scott had any cyberpunk preferences.

>>82544937
This is 4chan, m80. You want to talk to adults. Go to the adultstore.

File: 768501.jpg (49KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x480px

K crashes through a fucking wall in the trailer to save Deckard. That's probably the only part I didn't really care for as it's either very obvious he's a replicant or there is some out there explanation for it.

Also, the lounge singer looks a lot like Elvis Presley.

Why in THE FUCK do they keep putting Harrison Ford in these movies? Indiana Jones, Star Wars, now this? Just fucking go away for the love of God, I'm tired of seeing that doddering old Jew being trotted out for these soft-reboots. I'm half expecting them to remake Air Force One and have come out of the cockpit while the main character's back is turned and say "It's true, all of it, I kicked a man off this very plane".

File: e261fe0f806251c06304f67e58a91250_full.jpg (82KB, 1280x534px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1280x534px

whats goin on in here?

File: um6ijro[1].jpg (660KB, 3192x2124px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 3192x2124px

>>82545139
>Why in THE FUCK do they keep putting Harrison Ford in these movies?

Gee, I wonder why.

Fake nerds are butthurt that they weren't around when he was relevant, so now they want him in everything to feel like they truly belong in the nerd crowd. Or something. Basically, Hollywood panders to the reddit crowd(ie. GotG).

File: Rachel - Blade Runner.jpg (532KB, 1000x997px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1000x997px

>>82542560

Entire thing looks way too sterile.

The first was gritty. It looked like a shitty place to live. The masses walking around in a polluted jungle of concrete and steel. Feels like they lost the atmosphere of the original.

File: 1489613278833.gif (2MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x500px

Will films ever go back to filming on actual film instead of digital. I guarantee this trailer would look so much better if wasn't digital. The CG is so obvious.

File: brdog.jpg (86KB, 687x707px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 687x707px

nice pupper

>>82545299
Nope. Costs too much and it's just easier to be a lazy faggot.

>>82545037
Memba when I could report this and Snacks would ban&? I memba,

Trailer looks like they haven't fucked this up yet.

>>82545371
what was it again, for this film. 200 Million dollar budget? These film studios have massive budgets and they funnel it all into video game tier CG. They could save money on actual models if they weren't so damn lazy and had no passion for their own work.
God, I wish Hollywood would sink in a massive earthquake.

File: 1440539423922.gif (3MB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 240x180px

All the grittiness looks to be gone and replaced with generic Out Run/Vaporwave themes. I can't wait to pretend this doesn't exist.

File: image.jpg (46KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 960x640px

What type of stupid sculpture is this?

About the new trailer, the only moments I liked is when the old soundtrack plays.

I don't know, I have to watch it but it's difficult this movie would be loved because it has to compete with one of the most mythical and nostalgic movies from the 80s. A cult movie that has become a classic with the years.

Also, Batista > The Rock. That guy is getting good roles.

File: 1460521798263.jpg (9KB, 225x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x250px

>>82542560
>all those action shots
It's like they completely missed the point

>>82546011
Refn should have directed it

>>82546011
Maybe you missed the point...of a trailer.

HINT: GET HYPE

>>82544084
Hot

>>82546011
I thought the same. I hope they didn't missed the point that Blade Runner is about the feels, the ambient, the melancolia...

That's the reason why the first movie was a failure at the cinema. Because people thought it was a boring movie.

I also thought that the first time I saw it but it's a movie that gets better with the time. And when you understand what it's about the movie and what it want to show then is a great movie.

>>82544021
>>82544501
I think he was a replicant because it's heavily implied in the film but that doesn't matter. The idea of him not being human enriched the main thematic arc of the film because it was about understanding the human condition and appreciating life. Deckard in the beginning doesn't obviously, then as the story progresses he sees that rachel even though she's synthetic is actually the same as him. But then he has the dream of the unicorn and is left the origami unicorn at the end. This strongly hints that he may or may not be human, but he doesn't care because he just decided that life is precious and if he can feel and be with the one he loves it doesn't matter anymore.

Now that he is an old man in the new film it cheapens the thematic arc of the entire first movie and is basically a cash grab for brownie points with the original fans. It basically makes the first film pointless because he doesn't have the self reflection as the film ends.

This film will ruin the legacy of the first one,it already has.

>>82546242
We can always forget about it if this movie sucks and pretend that only Blade Runner exists.

why couldn't they just make a new story in the same universe? they did a ton of world building in the first blade runner only to just continue a story that didn't need to be continued. why not go off planet and show the tannhauser gate or something that fans actually care about?

>>82546495
>show c beams glittering in the dark near the tannhauser gate
>it isn't that breathtaking
Fucking Roy, what a fag

File: 1413954783446.jpg (23KB, 691x483px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 691x483px

>>82546242
It doesn't matter if he was a replicant or not, only that he COULD have been. That ambiguity is the whole point of the question the film asks about what it means to be alive.

Answering it ruins everything and reduces it to just a bunch of stylish pictures...which coincidentally is exactly all that the sequel appears to be.

>>82546495
>the tannhauser gate
What is that? A nebula?

Also, I like your idea of making new characters and not bringing back Deckard. A new story about the same themes could have been a good idea.

But hey Ford is still famous and he wants money.

This movie, wrching an old Deckard could have the same effect than watching an old Terminator with white hair in Genysis...

>>82546598

we might see it in this new movie, and if it sucks i'll be so hurt

>>82546669

its never explained, but most people think that its some kind of massive stargate/wormhole installation that can take ships wherever they want to go. i just can't believe that they have this rich universe and this is the story that they decide to tell. have a similar detective character investigate murders on a hostile planet. have a strong womyn replicant sexbot become a spartacus-like figure. just fucking do anything other than what they're doing right now, jesus

>>82546665
Thats what I said, the implication is what makes the film a classic.

>>82546598
if we're lucky it will get nothing more than an obscure mention in some documents shown on screen or something.

>>82546011
They weren't trying to get the point. They're trying to make a nice trailer and good marketing around it to get dumbasses in the seats the weekend it comes out so they can make money. This movie will be as forgotten as the latest capeshit movie.

>>82542560
Is this the pinnacle of vaporshit?

>>82544454
yeah because in the present time we constantly get the same ads as 30 years ago

File: 1415079213460.jpg (25KB, 587x295px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 587x295px

>>82544454
Is internet shilling a worthwhile endeavor?

>>82547298
It's the Coca Cola and Atari logos. Both havent changed in real life either. How does it feel being retarded?

>>82546011
Probably similar to the Drive trailer.

>>82547496
Its going to flop anyway ala ghost in the carnitas.

>>82544006
lol

>>82545336
is a electric pupper?

File: New canvas.jpg (247KB, 856x596px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 856x596px

this is not blade runner...

Amazing trailer, I'm hype

File: blade runner 2049.png (925KB, 1357x567px) Image search: [Google]

925KB, 1357x567px

I'm a style over substance man and it looks nice.

>the original
>shot on film
>Anamorphic 35mm full frame look

>the sequel
>Flat digital ALEXA spherical look (cropped)
>not even Alexa65 or digital anamorphic

Damn it, Deakins

>>82552653
>dat color contrast
Deakins is going to get the shit out of that oscar

>>82545228
shitty imitation is never gonna meet, let alone surpass the original in terms of A E S T H E T I C S. Just forget it.

the whole thing is just too /r/bladerunnerfans

>>82545299
>Will films ever go back to filming on actual film instead of digital

Film is dead. Recently they've closed the last couple film labs in my town for good. Both for stills or motion.

>tfw I'd have to process my last few rolls of Fuji and Kodak on my own or ship it to hell knows where.

>>82544662
You honestly think they would reveal that if it actually mattered?

Guaranteed its established very early and we see some GitS a.i philosophy stuff

>>82545299
Not until the industry crashes or Tarantino forces it upon everyone

>>82545521
Let it go, no one cares, except for PTA and Nolan. I'd say Cuckoldino too, but he is retiring soon, anyway.

>>82545589
>generic Out Run/Vaporwave themes
If only. This is just amateur soundcloud-tier bad.

Score by Vangelis was magical, but I'd happily settle with chillsynthwave/vapor OST, just not this garbage

>>82542560
>literally a video game
mark my words, this will be Denis' first shit movie.

>>82546073
no shit

File: image.jpg (33KB, 542x403px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 542x403px

I feel like this is going to go the same route as Ghost in the Shell

>MUMS GUNNA FREEEEEK

No thanks

>>82552740
And the Oscar goes to...

Lubezki again! (Roger Deakins on suicide watch)

>>82546185
it almost like remaking Tarkovsky, BUT THIS TIME WITH XPLOSIONS!!!!!

>>82552979
>malick flick
Haha he'll be lucky if he gets a nom

>>82546787
>old Deckard
THE REPLICUNTS
THE MEIN-KAMPF TEST

IT'S TRUE. ALL OF IT.

>>82552979
it's Hoyte van Hoytema's year.

Deakins gonna take another L.

>>82545982
>What type of stupid sculpture is this?
one that has no place in a cyberpunk movie.

>>82552763
>shitty imitation
It's funny they showed Elvis impersonator on stage in one of the shots

>>82545336
>>82552459
>they are still bringing nods to the novel like his pet """real""" animal

>>82545033
PKD is considered proto-cyberpunk and is probably the biggest influence on the genre

>>82553228
- DO YOU LIKE OUR WHITE MALE?
- IS IT ARTIFICIAL?
- OF COURSE IT IS.
- MUST BE EXPENSIVE?
- VERY.
...

>>82543900
Goose has a pretty good track record for some reason.

>>82553228
I guess he saved enough dosh to get one.
Hope it won't die like the second sheep in the novel. Fucking replicant scum

>>82552678
should have been filmed in IMAX, only practical sets, no CGI, no green screen.

Is this the han solo spin off movie? Like before TFA? Who's good looking Gosling?

>>82542560
Calling it now goose os a replicant based on deckards dna

Jokes and memes are funny until you actually start to show how much of a tasteless fedora you are that you are interested in a reboot/remake/sequel of a classic movie.

BladeFedora2049 will be nothing but cancer, on this board and off, just drawing drooling plebs here like the final seasons of Breaking Bad. This is bad news.

>>82553337
The art of optical printer effects is long lost, mang. I agree with the rest about IMAX and the sets.

Oh jared leto is in this too. He was really good as the joker. So badass and evil!
Since its not SW related should i watch bladerunner first? Or is this a remake?

They should have had Fincher direct it and tell a whole new Story. No old Deckard, no endless references to the first movie, just something new.

File: 1492489459697.jpg (167KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 2048x2048px

Not memeing or anything but can i get a quick rundown on Deakins I am hearing in this thread
Is he a cinematographer or something?

>>82553448
its truly a shame. but there must be some old geezers that can still do their tricks.

i mean how difficult would it be to try and do a multimillion budgret cyberpunk blockbuster with ZERO cgi? not even for the blood, not even for making up little shit on post. just a raw cyberpunk movie.

>>82553698
from what i gather from the BR trailer, hes just a reddit cinematographer.

you'd have to be a fuckin' retard to check out anything related to ridley "full george lucas" scott at this point

needless to say I won't be having anything to do with this shit rehash of a good movie

>>82553548
I'm genuinely disappointed he's not wearing BLEACHED hair/wig

>>82542560
This looks great. I think the trailer probably shows most of the "action shots" from the movie and there won't be as much "action" in the real thing (which is good. I think that's more about attracting the >DUDE GUNS AND EXPLOSIONS AND SHEEEIT crowd to actually go to the cinema.

>>82553663
Finger is too busy with World War Z sequel

>>82553702
>but there must be some old geezers that can still do their tricks.

Doug Trumbull is still around (the original VFX supervisor and inventor on projects like 2001: A Space Odyssey, Close Encounters, Blade Runner, etc. But the rest of the team is gone and theres next to no one to replace them. Again, the craft is gone.

File: 2342342.jpg (60KB, 944x668px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 944x668px

>>82542560
>Old man Ridley Scott

No thanks. he lost his magic. Alien Covenant is fucking shit.

>>82553698
he's a digital hack now, used to be 35mm cunnyisseur. fucking traitor

File: bfeef3a2fddc208f6059a0c004d59aff.jpg (189KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1920x1080px

>>82553702
>i mean how difficult would it be to try and do a multimillion budgret cyberpunk blockbuster with ZERO cgi? not even for the blood, not even for making up little shit on post. just a raw cyberpunk movie.
>i mean how difficult

Very

The less Riddy boy is involved the better chances this movie has. So far the trailer looks too blockbuster for Blade Runner but still looks amazing, just too tonally disconnected from the first movie

>>82553702
>i mean how difficult would it be to try and do a multimillion budgret cyberpunk blockbuster with ZERO cgi

I'd legit watch that

>>82554485
>attracting the >DUDE GUNS AND EXPLOSIONS AND SHEEEIT

that's exactly the problem

>>82554793
>Blade Runner
>prime Sean Young as love interest

>Blade Runner 2049
>average slut beaner as love interest

Nah

How can /tv/ even compete???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P99qJGrPNLs

>>82553698
top kek, what's the image from?

File: transsexual replicunts.jpg (1MB, 1920x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1600px

Mackenzie Davis as Daryl "Pris" Hannah is the only redeeming factor of this steaming pile

>>82555233
/pol/tube

File: zEhbbul.jpg (40KB, 348x266px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 348x266px

Blade Runner and PKD's book had very specific and profound things to say about the modern condition. Will this movie have things to say about postmodern condition? Or does a shiny but soulless sequel made for money and nothing more carry that message in and of itself (i.e. the medium is the message)?

>>82555141
>trailer from 2013
it's dead

>>82542560
That trailer is fucking shit. With every next one, my hype dies a little bit. Is this Villeneuve dropping the ball?

>118 posts and 55 IPs
>almost every post is a variant of "it's le SHIT"
Someone is buttmad Villeneuve continues his streak of zero bad movies, seems to me

>>82555303
like all modern (((sci-fi))), it doesnt criticizes shit, they are just a vehicle for the same tired visuals. remember when the future had a different look and philosophy depending on the author? nowadays there is an "official" future, the gits 2017/br 2017/total recall reboot one.

>>82554981
But there'll only be a couple of shots in the film where it happens is what I meant. Like there's only a few action scenes in context, ie being chased. And these are put in the trailer. But then most of the movie is the opposite. A pure kino.

more reddit crap by a director with literally 0 (zero) good movies. based venezuella filtering the patricians as always.

File: cyberpunk.gif (2MB, 500x223px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x223px

Why does it rain so much in the Blade Runner universe (and cyberpunk/future noir in general)? Acid rain from pollution?

>>82542560
I just want my goddamn sheep defenestration scene ffs

>villeneuve
>PTA
>nolan
/tv/ contrarians are going to work around the clock this year

File: 1494281707364.jpg (446KB, 2864x1200px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 2864x1200px

>>82542560
it sure is

>>82546857
>have a strong womyn replicant sexbot become a spartacus-like figure
that's Gibson, not Dick

>>82547155
>This movie will be as forgotten as the latest capeshit movie
I hope so

>>82552740
>blue and purple
>color contrast

normally i wouldnt be so triggered by how wrong a stranger on the internet is, but the original movie used lots of blues with oranges as a contrast. it made it looks great, not many films employ color as effectively as the first bladerunner. blue and purple arent color contrasts you fucking tard.

>>82542560
>they have to wheel harrison ford out of cryostasis so he can grind his bones moving slowly across the silver screen
why not just leave him out of it?

>>82552740
that's not Deakins, that's the cgi dude's computer

File: dadoes4-2.jpg (262KB, 604x362px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 604x362px

Friendly reminder that Buster Friendly and the androids's animosity to Mercerism in Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep? was a veiled criticism of Jewish secularism, and the innate animosity to sincere religious expression that Jews inevitably tend towards

>>82544900

Don't worry he didn't graduate high school

>Harrison Ford
Why?

>>82555918
Nostalgia-pandering for fanboys that really just want to watch a soft reboot of the original

>>82555702
the automatic rain generator satellite broke

>>82555702
pathetic fallacy

>>82555872
Where can I subscribe to your blog. Seriously

File: 1477451575314.jpg (137KB, 800x1131px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 800x1131px

>bladerunner 2049
>still no running on blades
D R O P P E D

>>82545371
>>82552814
So Nolan filming on film is just a meme ?
He films on film but it still gets digitally rendered ?
Filming in film is just a meme ?

>deckard dies
>they paid ford 5 million just to appear and die
>ryan is a replicant finding answers non violently unlike roy
>fuckig trailer already hints it
>le take ocer the world villain with the joker with his replicant army
>batista for some reason
Looks like shit
Its as if they nwver read the book or watched the first one

>>82545982
>Batista
I'm glad he's getting roles
Seems like genuinely decent guy

>>82555141
it's interesting how the new movie ripped off the spinner from that game with the upsloped backend

>>82556244
>Its as if they nwver read the book or watched the first one
they probably saw the first half of blade runner and feel asleep because no quips.
They probably don't even know there is a book

>>82555314
>Villeneuve dropping the ball
>implying he ever picked it up

>>82555702
in the new one it's not just pollution, it's MUH CLIMATE CHANGE going all sorts of fucked up ways

who did they whitewash this time

>a 2019 sequel based on misinformed 70s futurism set in 2019
Whay were they thinking? In fact, what were they thinking in the first place setting a sci-fi movie of this kind less than 50 years in the future, let alone doing it again?

>>82555739
>we want giantess fetishists audience from clip4sale JOI viewers

>>82556200
>Filming in film is just a meme ?
it's muh . a e s t h e t i c s . meme

i completely get it, though, i'm one of those nostalgiafags

>>82556365
this

why didn't they show Gaff in the trailer?

>>82556414
There are no black people in this film because it's set in the future.

>>82553214
It's exactly the type of cheap, plaster over wireframe shit that chinks make all the time. 32 years isn't enough time for those people to develop a sense of taste.

>>82556488
I like films that have filmed on film too, but these new movies even Nolan who supposedly uses film doesn't feel like it's filmed on film. Is it because they film it on film, but they digitally convert anyway to add CGI.

>>82556430
Kek. I was thinking this when I saw her name.

>>82556601
IT'S TOO BAD WHITEBOIS WON'T LIVE
...
BUT THEN AGAIN HO DOES

>>82556633
All those whitebois will be lost in BBC... like tears in rain...
Time to die.

>>82556601
more like they can't have black people in a movie that's about slavery when it's not about black people

>>82556622
Nolan tries to use as little DI as possible, but even he can get away with doing things like 20 years ago, some of the infrastructure is just not there anymore.

That said, I'm rock hard just thinking about DUNDUNDUNDUNKIRK, which was filmed entirely in 70mm + some scenes shot on extra large 15/70 IMAX. Very big KINO in every sense of the word.

File: 1487782705565.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>mfw only read the book
What am I missing out on?

>>82555305
how can you retards not get it. they released the teaser to attract employees to work on cyberpunk.

>>82555825
I bet you think black and yellow spandex looks good, fggt

>>82544021
>And now Deckard isn't a replicant anymore?
He never was a replicant to begin with. Stop believing in Ridley Scott's fan fiction

>>82556420
>In fact, what were they thinking in the first place setting a sci-fi movie of this kind less than 50 years in the future, let alone doing it again?

$$$$

>>82557146

the best atmosphere and world building in the entire scifi genre

>>82557134
I had a 70mm IMAX close to me, then they converted to a digital theater.

At least I got to see TDK, TDKR, and Interstellar in 15/70.

The original was so full of detail and grit. Underneath all the neon the city was just a filthy place. 2049 looks so clean and sterile. I don't give a fuck about le beautiful vistas, it doesn't look real. Incredible how they managed to create more believable landscapes 30 years ago than today.

File: blade_runner_mini.jpg (315KB, 1280x854px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1280x854px

>>82557630
https://imgur.com/a/mv8qf

NEVER EVER again

>>82542560
looks like a meme movie that's been taylor made for reddit to me lads

>>82557741
why did this have to end

Why has 30 years passed and people are still wearing the same kind of clothes?

>>82558838
and using the same iconic trendy nerdy guns? Did you noticed that the gun is the same from the first movie???

>>82558838
fashion always comes back 20yrs later
>>82558879
that is actually Decards gun, Goose has his own newer version but obviously gets Deckards gun after he dies

>>82542560
>Looks like cyberpunkkino is back on the menu lads.

Happy with that mate

>>82542560
the shit is the equivalent of star wars

WOW THAT THING YOU LIKED

WELL HERE IS MORE OF IT

absolutely gay. all style, no substance, retrowave faggots are cancer.

>>82558977
this, fuck. I'm bored of this movies made "for the fans". The fans are idiots, I want to see an original vision

>>82544130
I'd pay to see that

>>82544454
Do they give you notes to type from or something?

Movie looks like garbage to me. Only things they got right visually are very facile, surface design elements. I would bet there are no visionaries like Syd Mead involved in this movie's design process. Just "me too" industry concept artists copying shapes and colours from the original film in Photoshop and 3Dcoat, without any real insight into the decisions that underpinned that aesthetic. The realness, the noir quality, the layered, cluttered sense of claustrophobia contrasted with wide-open vistas such as the spinner flight or Tyrell's boardroom are gone. Everything is too clean, too polished for the decaying earth Blade Runner was set in. The anachronistic adverts are the final cherry on top, they feel like a studio committee decision in the same way Disney forcing AT-ATs and X-Wings into each new Star Wars film does. These are things people know, and all that.

I've seen all of Villeneuve's other films barring Arrival. Enemy and Prisoners don't suggest to me for a moment he's a good fit for this material. He deals in an underlying horror of mundane images, not the bravura sense of elevated reality Scott brought to his early works.

>>82546857
Sony are involved, that should tell you everything.

>>82545033
Read the fucking book. There are a lot of cyberpunk themes in it.

>>82557741
I've seen Blade Runner projected from film on the big screen. It's impossible to describe just how good, and real, these models look compared to the CGI shitfests we get today.

>>82546011
It actually looks like they did a similar thing with the GitS Movie. They have a few action scenes, maybe 5 minutes of it on the whole, but the Trailer looks like they shooting all the time and stuff explodes like in Rambo III.
But even OGF and Drive looked like action films in the Trailer.

File: 57626106.gif (3MB, 412x304px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 412x304px

>>82557741