PLINKETT BLOWN THE FUCK OUT

>>82307254
HA HA FUCK RLM

Remember that guy that wrote that 100+ page essay rebuttal to Plinkett's TPM review?

And then RLM just laughed at the guy for being such a huge nerd and he deleted fucking everything?

>>82307391
That's RLM's shtick though. Complete insincerity.
They always "win" because they ridicule instead of engaging.

>>82307391
I remember than autist trying to commentate on Plinkett's entire review using old kids cartoons as reactions.

>>82307254
Fucking Christ, how many RLM threads do you plan on making today?

>>82307254
>the villain saying "join me" was really cliche
GEE IT'S ALMOST LIKE THIS IS A FUCKING SPACE FANTASY MOVIE ABOUT WIZARD KNIGHTS TAKING DOWN FUTURE SAURON AND NOT A SERIOUS SCIENCE FICTION MOVIE

>>82307441
Why would they engage with literal autists?

>>82307391
Rich doesn't drink.

>>82307541
>gets completely btfo in a perfect essay that tells why you are wrong
>"h-heh autism am i right?" *deletes everything*

Pathetic, RLMdrones deserve to get crucified

>>82307510
Is this the Virgin Rage they keep talking about

>>82307703
t. disney's star wars essayist

>>82307683
What does that have to do with anything?

>>82307541
>Why would they engage with literal autists?
I mean why do you?

>>82307254
rlm can do no wrong, op

>>82307758
Everything.

>>82307703
>>82307441
lol its him

hes here

>>82307739
>t. disney's star wars essayist
RLM love the new disney star wars movies
They hate the prequels and the EU
nothing wrong with that.

File: jon arbuckle on 4chan.png (16KB, 496x144px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 496x144px

>>82307254
What compels a person to spend god knows how many hours picking apart and analyzing a children's movie that was made almost half a century ago?

>>82307254
This was posted 3 times on /co/
Nobody liked it there and nobody likes it here.

>>82307254
i'm reading the original 108-page essay. i'll be back in a while

>>82307803
>>82307739
FUCK OFF, they were in the wrong but since they think they are le ebin youtube stars and they get some views suddenly they can't be wrong, fucking fat faggot should hang himself.

>All this obvious grasping at straws

The Plinkett criticisms weren't just general nitpicks for the most part, but pointing out giant fucking flaws and missteps in the production process.

File: ackchyually.png (21KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 700x700px

>>82307890
>>All this obvious grasping at straws
Where?

I guarantee you if Mike narrated the pacing problems in ESB with an air of authority you'd be calling the editing "objectively bad".

shut up coca-cola fish

>>82307857
who are you talking about rlm or him?

>>82307441
did mommy forget to change your diaper now?

>>82308092
both

>>82307254
Fuck off cocacola fish

>>82307922

>There's no sign of life but dats stupid cause plans aren't life

Also you're a fucking RLM obsessed faggot

Can't the prequel reviews just be a funny thing? Does it really have to be a fucking huge flamewar? Fuck off spergo

>>82307254
does anyone actually find that monotone voice he makes funny?

>>82308279
Fuck you and your mother you piece of shit

>>82308294
Very.

>>82308216
FYI: It's "colo claw fish," a reference to Star Wars: The Phantom Menace -- an acknowledged classic and one of the most successful films of all time.

>>82308279

Reddit quotes the shit like it's the fucking Bible

It'd be great if it was just a funny thing, but when people bring it up in movie discussions, then it's going to get dissected

>>82307880
>Remember that 108-page essay that guy wrote 7 years ago?

>>82309195
sure thing cocobean coleslaw fish

>>82307801
IDGI

>>82307477
77

>>82307796
They "criticized" Rogue One for exactly the same things they praised TFA for. They're literally deranged.

>>82312187
>They "criticized" Rogue One for exactly the same things they praised TFA for.
No they didn't. Is this a meme at this point or are people in these threads really this stupid? They criticized R1 because they thought it had boring, unlikable characters. They liked TFA because they thought it had likeable characters.

>>82312238
But Daisy Ridley is a bad actress who played a bad character.
Felicity Jones is a good actress who played a bland character.

There's no contest.

>>82312388
That is not what they said though

>>82312238
you're a meme

>>82312407
They're plainly wrong though.

>>82312455
That is not the argument.

>>82312388
>hey guys, I have no understanding of how opinions work!
Thanks for sharing.

>>82312475
You're right. I'm not that guy though and I was just throwing out my really good opinion.

>>82312498
You're welcome.

>>82307391
Source of them laughing at the guy?

>>82312770
It doesn't exist. There was some old Plinkett update video where he made a joke about someone writing a 100 page rebuttal, but that was it.

>>82312238
Tbh, they're right. If TFA does just a single thing right it's that its main characters come off as sympathetic. Their dialogue is garbage and their arcs make no sense, but they certainly trigger an emotional response.
R1 just has depressed, depressing, bland mannequins.

>>82308314

Enjoy virginity bro

File: FaceApp_1491944446807.jpg (238KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1280x1280px

>>82309358

Then get off Reddit fag

>>82313408
>but they certainly trigger an emotional response.
Not at all.
The ONLY time was stuff with Han.

>>82307541
Because you pay their wages