Anyone watching this?

File: John Smith.jpg (94KB, 520x524px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 520x524px

>>82264004
Don't get pregnant white women! If you get pregnant and give birth to white children the patriarchy wins!

y-yes goys motherhood is bad! go out and get high powered jobs even though ever fiber in your body is telling you to settle down and raise a family!

>>82264172
>>82264119
So, no?

yes. very bad

It's good. Better than the book. Ofglen's backstory is great. Trailer makes it look like it is cheesy, and some of the voice overs are not necessary, but Elizabeth Moss is a delight. 10/10 would recommend.

I like it.

A few things annoy me.

>namedropping Tinder and Uber
>SEE? IT'S OUR WORLD!

>the constant radio chatter and armed guards
Yes, we get it, it's an oppressive regime. But this is supposed to be the heart of Gilead. It would be far more unnerving if it actually looked idyllic like the Nazi suburbia in The Man in the High Castle.

>>82265067
Yeah I kind of wish they'd zoom out more, with the cam but also the story, since they have so much more time to tell this, and that there were things besides namedropping Uber that let you feel that it was modern.

>In a dystopian near-future,

wow, so original

File: saudiheadloess-493899.jpg (17KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 590x350px

>>82264004
good acting. looks superb. story is ok. the references are all in-your-face. the premise of the show is:
Children of Men in the Kingdom of Saudi America.

Boring af