post movies women will never understand

Approved

>>82258214

The Wizard

File: wzEHdk.png (7KB, 373x357px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 373x357px

>>82258261
doiesn't seem to fit the criterium

the last samurai

>>82258357
>>82258214
IMDb staff usually have the worst taste.

File: 1444593235849.jpg (62KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 600x600px

>>82258214
>1 female under 18 gives it a 10/10

>>82258214
look at those salty post-wall hags

File: Heat (8).jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>watching Heat with axewound
>"anon why is he holding his hand? I thought they were enemies"
Every time

Can you name a single movie that women actually DO understand? Protip: I don't think you can.

Have you ever tried watching a movie with a woman? I don't know if it's hormonal or something, but their minds are literally unable to focus on anything. Have you ever read even the most respected of female critics, Pauline Kael? Her reviews were mostly just inane ramblings, filled with mean-spirited hysterics.

Have you ever known a woman that had a deep and varied appreciation for any art? Digging around obscure music genres or old filmographies, just for the sake of it and love of the medium, not for potential social status and superficial validation?

When a male cinephile watches a movie, he reflects on the themes and subtext, deconstruct the mise en scène and cinematography in order to analyse how the director's choices affect the mood and characters arcs, question the ethos it proposes about its subject matters, judge its authenticity, come up with a list of intertextual references that deepen his understanding, examine the narrative structure as if he were in the writer's head to get his creative process and where he's headed, all this while sensorially appreciating the aesthetics, marvelling at the layers in dialogues and noticing many odd details, pondering how this film overall fits into its auteur's oeuvre, observing what it does similarily and what it does differently... as well as its place in film history, amongst many other active ways of studying and appreciating art... meanwhile women can barely follow the plot.

>>82258971
I know you're right about Pauline Kael. Stupid bitch couldn't get a single fucking thing right about cinema

Ghostbusters

>>82258473
it is natural for men like you to crave the validation of their existence and get depressed if they fail to feel relevant, responsible, dutiful.
The best way for a man to cater his need for approval is to serve some woman (and some of her children) through emotional&financial support, which he sees as ''a childish useless submissive woman'' [or whore and he feels betrayed by her]
Men are pleased to contribute to someone else life, to support their family.

Why women are a good way to feel relevant? Because women love to be provided for and each woman will always find a man ready to please her.
[for most men, the best feeling of feeling real is when the girl moans from your cock in her pussy, or for the most impotent, their tongue in the pussy]

THe problem for men is that they are disposable in the eyes of each woman, since all men wish to serve the few women who talk to them.
Men must thus invent several ways to please women, invention and creativity which strengthen their feeling of being worthy, relevant, in touch with reality.
Men are too impotent to find other way to feel real.
Once that the a woman replaces a man by another provider, the man gets very upset and depressed.
THis leads men to think that they are better than women, stronger, smarter and that they must built a life outside women. Some men manage to indeed built an empire, but they will always loose it for some women.
Women give meaning to men and betas, no matter how successful outside women, will always give up everything for some relationship with some woman who claim to fancy them.

>>82259204
wtf

>>82258214

which movie?