Fury is 100% historically accurate

Lasers weren't used in WW dos

>>82039625
Tracers.

nice bait

>>82039920
Bait? What bait? Read wikipedia and educate yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fury_(2014_film)#Portrayal_of_history

File: Fury_2.webm (1MB, 1280x545px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x545px

>>82039633
>>82039625

>>82040615
damn...the prequels look like THAT?

>>82040615
I see no issues with this. Nor any other part of the movie. It's perfect.

>Shoot a king tiger tank in the ass.
>Make a four inch hole.

>AT gun crews can't land a single hit at like 200 meters

>A M4A2 managed to take 3 Kwk43 shots at that range
>historically accurate

Wew.

>>82040683
It was a Tiger, not a Tiger II.

>>82039633
your mother's a tracer

>>82040615
PEW PEW LASERZ

>American GI serving in WWII
>Hitler Youth haircut

Lol I haven't seen the movie but you're wrong based on the single image from it you posted.

File: Fury-1[1].jpg (831KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 1024x683px

>>82040683
>King Tiger

Pardon me, it's the Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausführung H turret number 131, the only existing and working Tiger surviving to this day. This movie went the extra mile to feature it in the film.

>>82040683
Even if it was a Tiger II (it wasn't) the 76mm gun on Fury (the others had 75mm's) with APC round would penetrate the rear armour.

>>82040700
Germans were shitters, that's why they lost the war.

>>82040615
They could have toned it down just a bit. The last shot showing the ricochets is spot on.

>>82040772
The tank Fury was a M4A2 tank they had that could work. That Tiger is at the British Tank Museum, right?

>>82040800
It would penetrate the fucking sides. Hell, the 76.2mm of Fury could penetrate the Tiger from the fucking front at the range they were fighting.

And the Tiger has a fucking armor layout of 100/80/80, it's just as thick on the sides as it is on the fucking rear and fuck, if you were shooting at a Tiger, you'd want to put a shot into the turret or the sides to kill most of the crew, not the fucking engine where it does nothing and the shell just gets lodged in there.

>>82040836
That's a realistic shot, it's exactly what would have happened. The problem is?

1. The Tiger left it's defensive position, which was pointless. The Tiger was basically a moving bunker.
2. The M42A (Fury) would not have survived 3 shots.

>>82040898
The logs bounced off the shot. Puny 88 can't handle the good ol' logs of freedom™ and liberation™ blessed by God and the red, white and blue!

It's completely historically accurate

>>82040868
Errr, it could with the APC ammo, but only at the manlet. And only at ranges like in the film. In reality? Tigers and Panthers were a problem for the Americans; they didn't have anything that could deal with them very well. The British managed due to Fireflys.

Hitting the engine could result in an explosion, that's why you did it.

>>82040836
Probably the only realistic moment of this entire shitshow.

Now post webms of the last 20 minutes.

>>82041000
The mantlet of a Tiger is more than 130mm thick... The front of the hull is 100, 101 effective because of the very, very slight slope.

>>82040615
IS this real?

>>82040565
Looks like he put some effort into it, but that section on the article doesn't make it sound like something all that special.

>>82041060
It means that it all happened. Even the disputed last scene. This makes it the most accurate war movie ever made.

>>82040753
Neat. Seems possible if you had luck bestowed by God.

>>82040854
Both tanks are from that museum I believe.

File: Screenshot 2017-04-25 at 1.13.39 PM.png (98KB, 421x311px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 421x311px

>>82040836
So the guy on the right is deaf or something? He had absolutely zero reaction to that.

> The last stand of the crew of the disabled Fury appears to be based on an anecdote from Death Traps, where a lone tanker was "in his tank on a road junction" when a "German infantry unit approached, apparently not spotting the tank in the darkness." This unnamed tanker is described to have ricocheted shells into the enemy forces, fired all of his machine gun ammunition, and thrown grenades to kill German soldiers climbing onto the tank. Cooper concluded: "When our infantry arrived the next day, they found the brave young tanker still alive in his tank. The entire surrounding area was littered with German dead and wounded."

IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED, SUCK IT NAZI SHITLORDS

Why are blatant bait threads like this allowed? It serves no purpose. It's just spam.

>>82041395
because this isn't r*ddit and you might actually learn something you didn't know?

>>82041346
Why was he in a tank by himself?

>>82041484
Because he knew he had to kill every last Nazi to make Uncle Sam proud.

>>82040772
It might be the only one that is still operational if people wanted to drive it, but its no the only one left per se

>>82041012
No, nobody needs to be reminded of the final part of this movie

>>82040836
>brainlets saying this is "accurate"

if it were accurate, brad pitt would be dead in that shot. You dont even have to be a tank expert to know that you dont take out the rear tank first

>>82041576
Brad Pitt got shot in the heart and he survived, he got killed by grenades. Everyone needs to be reminded about that.

>>82041346
>Death Traps
>trusting that book
It is made up of almost entirely fiction and the authors own opinions. The Shermans were actually fairly decent tanks, not the molotv-cocktails on tracks that is presented in the book.
Anything coming from that book should be taken with a truckload of salt.

>>82041708
Anything written or made by Americans, G-d's chosen nation on this planet Earth is true fact. Americans never, never, never ever lied when it comes to telling history.

>>82039596
So four Americans can hold off 650 Germans call of duty style? Ok, friendo.

File: ready for the bbc.jpg (72KB, 469x600px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 469x600px

>>82041801
well, the germans were cucks

>>82041801
Dude, it's written in a book. The memoirs of a fucking Sherman tank crew vet, so it happened.

Also we all know Germans are cucks and massive shitters, if they were halfway decent in WW2, they would have won. But did they win? Nope!

>>82041801
650 ? I thought they were 1000 ?

>>82041905
It was only 300. That's realistic, 300 fucking cuclkord shitters could be cut down by a single Sherman.

>>82041847
I think they lost because of poor strategy, not because of the skills of their individual troops.

>>82041801
>>82041905
>>82041970
It was 6 gorillion germans. They were the ones holocausted.

>>82041982
Poor strategy, shit weapons, shit individual soldiers who couldn't fight for shit, shit planes, shit tanks, literally shit everything.

>>82041982
>>82042105
You're both brainlets

>>82042105
>shit tanks

Ok. Now I know this is bait.

>>82042162
The very opening scene of Fury has literally ZERO destroyed American tanks, only Panthers and Panzers. If anything the title card is a big fat lie, American tankers weren't outarmored or outgunned, German tanks were steaming pile of turds.

Checkmate.

>>82042162
overengineered pieces of shit could have ironed out and kept building better PZ IVs, but nooo, the syphilitic autist had to be be all 'muh wunderwaffen" and waste resources on his autistic big boxes

File: 1491926819925.jpg (28KB, 747x724px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 747x724px

>old man standing next to tank with tank commanders head in site
>shoots old man because that what le evil german soldier would do
Why do Americans believe in such garbage?

>>82042153
Then why did hitler an hero? Was tired of winning?

Always confuses me when this thread comes up and like 15 people know loads and loads of shit about tanks and their capabilities and specs

>>82040652
lol

>>82042380
wiki pedia is easy to use

>>82042312
I also love how Brad Pitt literally immediately knows where the shot came from.

MURKA! And people unironically think this movie isn't just blatant propaganda.

>>82042380
because wehraboos love to come up with reasons as to why the Germans lost even though their uniforms and tanks looked "cooler"

>>82042380
I play World of Tanks

>>82040808
Blame it on Shitler.
Protip: don't let amphetamine addled dictators call the shots for the military, especially if he says to invade russia with the hopes that it will be all over before winter.
And if you're going to do that, then dont ALSO declare war on the US because your slant eyed "ally" sneak attacked them.
WWII was won by three things. Bad decisions by the opposition, russia, and dat counterintel game.

>>82042380
The roman empire and tanks brings /his/fags and /k/omandos out of the woodwork.
God bless them all.

>>82042528
Germany's shitty logistics certainly contributed as well

>>82039625
Tracer rounds. Germany used green tracers throughout WW2.
>Fun fact: Star Wars got their red/green laser color from WW2

>>82039596
Didn't they changed the ending because the real end fight sound ridiculous unrealistic? I mean, in reality the guy basically wiped out an entire army alone on a burning tank with a MG. No one would buy that shit.

>>82039596

Forget about its historical accuracy. I can't get over the fact that Brad Pitt and his chiseled face is playing a rough and tough dough boy. It totally takes the realism out of it for me.

>>82042864
I think they based that ending from the infamous Battle of Raseiniai (Too much World of Tanks), I'm not sure tho.

>The lone Soviet tank
>A single KV-2 heavy tank, at a crossroads in front of Raseiniai, managed to cut off elements of the 6th Panzer Division which had established bridgeheads on the Dubysa. It stalled the Division's advance for a full day while being attacked by a variety of antitank weapons, until it finally ran out of ammunition.

>>82042864
Did they? Nice, I guess they had to give the Nazis some space because they were so fucking shit as enemies. In all honesty they shouldn't have. They should have just stuck with Brad Pitt killing 300 SS alone.

>>82042962
His autistic obsession with executing the SS really smelled of jew writers too