Guardians of the Box Office

>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTnyXA0qr8g
This is hilarious, you can see the panic in the shill's eyes and voice when the other fag starts talking.

>>82001634

>everyone was telling jokes from start to finish

set engines to warp factor quip overload.

File: goo-goo ninnies.png (38KB, 728x126px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 728x126px

>>82001579

File: meme off bro.jpg (150KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1080x720px

DUDE ... ME AND YOU.... RIGHT NOW .... MEME OFF!

Kek, I love how DC fanboys were actually getting their hopes up that this movie would get bad reviews because a handful of early reviews were kinda lukewarm. Talk about setting yourself up for disappointment.

>Vol. 2 is filler, to be sure, but if you like the flavor of these movies, you'll enjoy this second bite.

>Where the original Guardians felt fresh, Vol. 2 now feels familiar -- sometimes pleasantly so and sometimes not.

>Vol. 2 is filler, to be sure, but if you like the flavor of these movies, you'll enjoy this second bite.

>In its best moments, the movie is irresistible escapism of the highest order, a scrappy, wisecracking cousin to Star Wars circa 1977. However, Vol. 2 can cruise on autopilot for a touch too long at times.

>It stands out more than some of the more routine films of the MCU, but whereas the first can still fairly fight it out in the top few, this is decidedly more middle of the road.

These are "fresh" reviews, according to rottentomatoes.

>>82002625
>Talk about setting yourself up for disappointment.
it's what DC fanboys do best

>>82002680
Where do you see the problem with that? Those quotes you posted clearly state it's an enjoyable movie with flaws and that's exactly what the scores reflect.

BABY FUCKING GROOT
BABY
GROOT
GROOT GROOT BABY
BROOT GABY
WE HAVE THE 1 (ONE) AND ONLY BABY GROOT
B A B Y G R O O T
GROOT
MOTHERFUCKING BABY GROOT

baby groot

File: marvel shill exposed.jpg (63KB, 799x540px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 799x540px

DCucks on suicide watch.

>7.2/10
>fresh

When does this site considers something rotten, 5/10?

>>82002961
I think so

>>82002961
Lower than 6/10

>>82002760
They're mixed at best. Certainly not positive reviews. That's the inherent problem with rotten tomatoes scoring, which is either fresh or rotten, and criticism doesn't work like that. There are a lot of reviews that are in the fence, and who knows who picks what's to be considered fresh and what's to be considered rotten. To choose an easy target, if I say, "Transformers is not a bad movie but fans are gonna like it", would you consider it a positive or a negative review?
That's the problem I have with the amount of faith put in the rottentomatoes percentage score. People are getting too lazy to even read a fucking review and just look at the big flashy number which not only does not determine if a movie is good or not, it's even deceptive to whether it's gotten a good, a bad or a mixed reception amongst the critics.

>>82001579
>>$5000 has been paid into your account!

spotted the 3rd worlder

>>82002961
>7.2/10
>not positive

are you dumb or did the videogame reviews where "less than 9/10 = shit" ruin your brain?

>>82001579
Did I like it?

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzTJlIGH1yQ
>they split the reviews so they can give two different fresh tomatoes
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

>>82001579
i would shill this movie for $5000 who can i call?

>>82003244
>Film Gob

hello rebbit

>>82003244
Holy shit

File: 1492989855470.png (611KB, 1200x696px) Image search: [Google]

611KB, 1200x696px

>worse reviews

Means it'll be better than the first. Good.

>>82001579

Reminder that Warner Bros owns 30% share of Fandango and Rotten Tomatoes

Guardians Of The Galaxy carters to people who want something similar to Star Wars but without having to watch horribly boring shit.

>>82003244

Shills confirmed guys, it's happening

>>82001579
It was 93 before, it actually is dropping

>>82002961
What kinda retarded rating system would consider a 7/10 rotten? 5/10 literally means average on a 1-10 scale.

>>82003185
>I can't see the difference between a 7 or a 9 movie.

>>82003431
>It was 93 before
Yeah, and not all that long ago, either.

>5/10 literally means average on a 1-10 scale.
And yet anything below a 6 is considered rotten.

>>82003468
That's not the point though. Neither a 7 nor a 9 movie are anywhere close to rotten. Not sure why you are arguing that only almost perfect movie scores should be considered fresh.

>>82003244
It's 2 different reviews by 2 different people from the same site

You can argue about that (although it's not so uncommon, Forbes for instance does that all the time), but it's not 1 review written by 2 people and then split

http://www.gamesradar.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-2-review/

http://www.gamesradar.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-2-review/2/

File: i-it's gonna go back up, right?.png (249KB, 755x357px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 755x357px

WHY DOES IT KEEP DROPPING

HAS BASED GUNN LET US DOWN

>>82003594
LETS FORM A PRAYER CIRCLE GUYS

>>82003244
They are so in the open about this...its almost worth praising...about their shilling.

>>82003581
Also, one of them is from Games Radar and the other from the Total Film magazine, they just lumped into 1 article

>>82003244
The same review by the same guy twice. FUCKING. TWICE.

It's over. The gig is up. Goodbye Rotten Tomatoes, we never knew you

>>82003764
I know you guys just like being retards to shitpost, but still >>82003581
>>82003712

>>82003185
don't be rude to tourists

>>82003802
At 1:40. Yeah we know about splitting the review so they can cash two disney checks, but this is worse

>>82001579
Why do you hate this film so much?

>>81991886

File: Uno.jpg (105KB, 745x519px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 745x519px

Marvel wins again and there's nothing you can do about it

>>82003982
Yeah they can, they can call everyone shills.

>>82003910
It's called Karma, and she is the bitch. Long overdue in my opinion, too, after the unbelievably lopsided praise Civil War got. It's barely distinguishable from Weekend at Ultron's to me.

>>82003244
E X P O S E D

>>82004063
>It's called Karma
No, it's called Triggered.

2 threads had to die for your shitty triggered threads. What do you hope to accomplish? Everybody is STILL gonna watch it.

>>82001579
But if you really know the rule of rottentomatoes. If it's at 86% this early, there is only downway from here

MoS was at 93% on early paid reviews

>>82003883
Oh, I skipped that one because the guy is annoying

>>82004128
>Everybody is STILL gonna watch it.
Can you at least pretend you're not a shill?

Hope this movie bombs.

>>82004189
It's going to break 1 billion

>>82004128
It's not even my thread. I hope to see you in the next thread blasting a DC movie white-knighting just this hard. Not saying that you don't, mind you. I've enjoyed films from both franchises, but after the bullshit they pulled with Iron-Spider, I legitimately think I'm done.

ANOTHER POSITIVE REVIEW

>>82004169
Yes, I'm a shill. I get paid $7000 a day to make 1 post in a triggered thread.

I feel sorry for your parents.

>MCU MOVIE
Great visuals, but story is kinda lacking 9/10
>DCEU
Great visuals but story is kinda lacking
2/10 DCucks on suicide watch

File: DC_v_Marvel.gif (995KB, 500x429px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 500x429px

>>82004128
You mean when HDrip comes out and everyone shitpost about it on /tv/

File: next stop 96%.png (249KB, 752x362px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 752x362px

>>82003645
it's working!

>>82004239
Neither side has great visuals unless your eyes are set to child of videogame

>>82004239
Welcome to Disneyland

File: GotG - RT.jpg (90KB, 739x326px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 739x326px

>>82004135
>86%

Old news.

>>82004214
> I legitimately think I'm done.
That's fair enough. I'm not "white-knighting" amything. I don't like Marvel or DC. Every movie gets false votes now months before they come out, singling out this is retarded imo.

File: marvel world.png (672KB, 842x551px) Image search: [Google]

672KB, 842x551px

>>82004239
and now you know the truth

>>82004290
Movies I was thinking were Dr strange and sepuku crew

>>82004235
>I feel sorry for your parents.
Why? They know I'd never go to see a children movie about a dancing tree and much less defend that piece of shit on the internet. I may download it down the road but I wouldn't hold my breath even on that

>>82004321
also old news we 85% now

>>82002680
Why do people keep comparing GOTG to Star Wars? Guardians is quippy, jokey, and self aware. Star Wars plays itself straight the entire time with a few jokes here and there. Maybe Nu-Wars by Disney is like GOTG, but not the OT.

>>82004429
Because it was more like Star Wars than TFA was.

>>82004321
>almost as fun

Glowing praise, indeed.

File: 1490856791734.png (30KB, 860x371px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 860x371px

>>82004239
>>82004353
What are some great examples of pure unfiltered shilling?

>>82004235
Silly
4chan shills get paid $0.05 for post
It's the big reviewers that get paid $7000

>>82004590
This will never, ever get old.

>>82004235
>Yes, I'm a shill
Oh it shows

>>82004590
That is all true

>>82004429
"Fun" space adventure, Star Lord is kinda Han Solo like.

File: 3453467347.jpg (102KB, 559x579px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 559x579px

Marvel BTFO

>>82004590
>our heroes dutifully beat up the aliens while quipping to each other about this and that, but there never seems to be anything actually at stake
This has to be ironic. No one can lack self awareness this much

>>82004660
highest grossing movie of all time

File: 1493065326486.jpg (2MB, 4002x7365px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4002x7365px

>>82004590
On /tv/ warner

>>82004638
It was true when "The Avengers" came out, and when "16 Hours of Ultron" came out, too.

If you're truly that blind to irony and lacking in self-awareness, I'd advise you to look into that, because there's a good chance that there are some Buddhists in the world who wouldn't even be able to see you.

>>82004660
Not exactly a selling point for me.

>>82004590
Comedy.
Gold.

>>82004744
I don't care about irony or "hurr but they did the same!"

It's true. And if you hate Avengers or any other MCU crap because of those same reasons but defends the Justice League trailer, you also lack the self awareness.

File: 1492244863568.jpg (460KB, 1872x1040px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 1872x1040px

>>82004729
>he thinks that's shilling
Only Disney and Marvel are capable of it, anon

>>82004729
you are confusing shitposting with actual shilling

>>82001579
>already a consensus with only 40 something reviews
but sure, no shilling or bias AT ALL!

File: 148545299873.png (167KB, 300x347px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 300x347px

>>82004590
>that last sentence

>>82004823
They're basing that off a trailer. A. Trailer.

They actually went and saw "Avengers" and "Lunch Break at Ultron's" and still gave them glowing reviews. They're already warming up to shit on a movie they haven't even seen.

File: jew-laughing-at-a-goy.gif (2MB, 388x356px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 388x356px

>>82004861
This desu
Regular movies don't get a consensus until nearly 200 reviews at its premiere date
You might also wonder why most of Marvel movies look like shit with their enormous budget

>>82004832
Wrong. DC is the only one that needs to shill as there movies keep getting shit on. They have to shill like mad to get people to go see it.

Marvel can put out shit, and people will still see it because they've built up enough good rep. DC on the other hand has no good rep. There movies keep getting progressively worse.

>>82004861
Same thing happened to BvS which is why the consensus is far more positive than the 27% warrants, idiot

>>82004832
>>82004839
>i-i-its shitposting
Hmm
Were you around for the Dredd shilling or the first purge flick? Or were those "shitposting" too, plebs?

>>82004935
It's apparent that both side are buying reviews. You must be an idiot if you think one side is better than the other

>>82004999
>both sides do it
>IT'S BIASED

fucking retard

File: topcritic.jpg (23KB, 722x89px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 722x89px

>>82001579

File: Vladimir_bro.jpg (14KB, 406x422px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 406x422px

>>82004933
>>82004935
>>82004956
Marveldrone at its absolute damage control.

>D-d-dc pay for reviews tooo

>>82004832
>the mods had to put up a sticky
The answer is just make a Disney general and force them to shill away there. That's how we contained the GoT problem and it worked

>>82004660
Ouch...thats pretty savage

>>82004933
Dude, you don't draw 2.4 billion in your franchise's first three films without a considerable amount of good will from the public.People like these characters and more and more people are coming to understand the sort of story DC is telling. It's considerably more interconnected and lore-based.

>>82005024
I am not the guy that you replied to, you mong

>>82005091
then get the fuck out of our fight, pal

>>82005049
We're you here for those movies or not, post star wars 7 tourist.

>>82004429
I thought the creatures and planets and overall production design were great and "felt" more like SW than TFA, but you're right the tone it self was more like TFA.

>>82005074
3 movies that had the BIGGEST 2nd week drops ever. People kept going back thinking "this one will be good" and then were left disappointed.

People don't like their movies as the reviews and general audience reaction will attest.

>>82004933
Suicide Squad just outsold Civil War in video sales, those movie already had their audience. If you look the catalog just before a disney flick is released you'll see who's shilling that implying you're not a shill which obviously you are

>>82003764
I gave up on them 10 years ago. Its been pretty obvious shilling for a while now. How has it taken so long to realize this? Is it the power of snyder-kino?

>>82005184
Yeah, they outsell Cap 3 on domestic sales, but Cap 3 is still slaughtering the fuck out of all DC on global sales.

Stop shilling. DC fucking sucks, and will continue to suck until they drop the hack Snyder.

>>82001579
>Shill review successful!
>$5000 has been paid into your account!

Fucking nice. Where do I sign up?

>>82001634
>What's going on guys
The magic words that make me close a video

>>82001634
Mark isn't a shill, just a pleb.

>>82005167
>3 movies that had the BIGGEST 2nd week drops ever.

They also had a world-wide simultaneous release. Good idea or bad idea, it's why Marvel doesn't do it - the drop can be spun as a big negative, especially if you've got a vested interest in doing so.

>>82002511
This part made me mad originally, but after a second watch more recently, it kind of made sense. The act of dancing was so foreign to him he couldn't believe what he was seeing so he had to stop to observe it. If he had just destroyed the planet, he would never have known the the faggot from earth was doing and it would be really annoying.

Also he didn't think he had anything to be afraid of. He believed he was more powerful than Thanos even at that moment. Too arrogant.

>>82003244
Fucking God.... Its true... all of it...

>>82005376
No, they have a large drop because there movies are shit. No staying power as no one really goes back to see it again.

You shills try to spin a movie having a massive drop as a good thing.... lol.

>>82005352
He looks shellshocked for most of the vid.

>>82005184
Not just that - watch how many weeks out negative memes start getting forced around here. If it's Sony or Warner, you can damn well guarantee you're going to see them. If it's a Disney flick, it's all but guaranteed to be positive marketer-friendly shit. Slickly produced, too. Too slickly for just a casual fan to be doing.

And I love DC's characters, too. You won't find me devoting time and effort into shitting on the MCU with endless gifs and macro images, especially not with things I made myself. That sort of dedication denotes a paycheck or some masterclass autism.

>>82005049
No they just pay for Oscar's.

>>82005297
>Yeah, they outsell Cap 3 on domestic sales
Good thing you admit you were wrong, shill. Now please stop embarrassing yourself

>>82005477
First off, it's "their," junior. Second off, you don't see numbers like they've gotten without some repeat business.

>>82005477
After the drop they still make more money than most MCU movies. Suicide Squad made like 15 millions more on its second weekend than Doctor Strange on its second weekend

And then it's the outselling Avengers movies that introduce Spider-Man in bluray/dvd sales thing, of course

>>82005613
You don't see 2nd week drops like theirs on movies that were good. BvS had a record breaking 71% second week drop. The movies open strong as everyone seems to give DC second and third chances, and then the movie fails.

>>82005755
You have a unique definition for failure.

>>82001579
The first one was the best Marvel flick yet, even that's not saying much. It was a 7/10 at the most. Probably a 6. I can only hope this one is as good.

>>82004744
>It was true when "The Avengers" came out, and when "16 Hours of Ultron" came out, too.

It wasn't though, because in the Avengers we had already been introduced to all of the protagonists, the main antagonist, and this team-up was a cinematic event like none that had come before it. What does Justice League offer? A concept that's no longer new? A sequel to film that was shite by the same cast and director? Justice League needs to sell itself yet it's generation less hype than a Thor sequel.

>>82005711
Really? You mean a movie with Will Smith, a movie that has the Joker and Batman, and everyone's favorite meme girl Harley did better than a d-list character? Color me fucking surprised.

These are DC's BIGGEST fucking names, and they're barely holding up to Marvels 2nd string heroes.

Batman Vs Superman should have outsold EVERY. FUCKING. MARVEL. MOVIE. It is the two most recognizable heroes in the fucking world. And it gets beaten. Why? Because it's shit. Only Snyder could take a movie that should have sold itself and been epic, and turn it into crap.

>>82005819
It was a failure. Especially when DC heads predicted 1.4 billion. Add to that the astronomical costs of 410 Million to make it.

If Batman Vs Superman can't break 1 Billion, then it's a failure. They're the two most well known heroes in the world.

>>82005837
>a cinematic event like none that had come before it.

Take it down a notch or two. All they did was throw together an ensemble cast of heroes, "prequels" or not. That's nothing new. Westerns have done it, Star Wars did it, Lord of the Rings did it, hell, the old Universal Monsterverse did it. It wasn't exactly all that innovative a concept, so feel free to dislodge Feige's dick from your mouth any time now.

>>82006000
lol if you think any of that shit resembles what they did.

First of all LoTR wasn't a solo adventure turned epic team up. None of the shit you mentioned was.

>>82005845
That's right, the third movie of an allegedly failed franchise annihilated a Benedict Cumberbatch movie ripping off Inception that was the 14th movie of a succesful franchise.

In 2016, DCEU and MCU made about the same money on theaters in the US, with the same amount of movies and the same budgets and the DCEU made more money in blurays/dvds. One introduced all their characters (or their franchise versions) except Superman and the other had 13 movies establishing the universe before. You have to be a special kind of shill to paint one as a failure and the other as a success, but then again, you ARE a special kind of shill aren't you?

>>82005837
Batman is popular enough that pretty much anything you make that has his name on it will bring people in. It would be pretty exceptional if they finally reached a point where that isn't the case. That's probably true for the rest of the characters and DC in general to a lesser extent, but some of them I think are more "known" than "liked" (basically the same reason I assume fantastic four movies are always bad), and there's so much overlap between batman fans that I doubt they really count for much. Other than that I don't really see what keeps people going to these movies

>>82005845
Spider-Man is the world's most ubiquitous hero and has been for a long-ass time. By the standards and rationalization to be found in >>82005964, that makes Civil War, a movie that had every single Marvel character except the GotG in it *and* Spider-Man an abysmal failure simply by virtue of having all that star power and momentum and still only just barely breaking a billion.

>>82006150
>Spider-Man is the world's most ubiquitous hero and has been for a long-ass time
That's Batman.

>>82006112
Oh, but it does. The only people trying to spin it as some awesome cinematic achievement are the same people sucking each others' dicks over sucking all the marrow out of the bones of their cash cow and cucks like you still lining up to see the sham.

It ain't Marvel. It ain't been Marvel for quite a while now.

>>82006000
>None of the shit you mentioned was.
The Universal ones were, same as the Japanese monster movies.

>>82006116
Once more... Dr Strange is a D-lister. That he even made that much money is fucking surprising. He's not know around the world. Unlike, Batman, Joker, Superman, Harley, etc.

The funniest thing is that they don't even have to pay shills. I doubt any of the faggots in these threads get payed anything, they just try to out-contrarian the other contrarian in a never ending cycle of shitposting and failed logic.
In the meantime, we're still given awful regurgitated shit from both WB and Marvel and there's no end in sight.

>>82006278
>Harley

You're actually claiming Dr, Strange's footprint to be smaller than Harley Quinn's? That dude has cultural exposure going all the way back to the 70s, same with the Hulk. Dude's had comic runs in ever decade since the 60s as well as stand-alone cartoons.

>>82006278
And literally no one knew those blue guys from Avatar and the movie made a third of the MCU franchise total gross in one movie

>>82001634
fucking embarrassing

>>82006398
Yes. MUCH, MUCH smaller. Harley blew up. FFS they cosplay her in China and Japan.

Like Deadpool she went from relative unknown to a worldwide sensation.

Strange on the otherhand has always been around, but his comics were never big hits. They sold, but Harley could sell multiple titles at once.

>>82006434
Moving the goal posts now I see.

Marvel wins again

>>82006492
No, you did. Now you're talking about popularity of the characters (point BTFO by Avatar) when you were talking about BvS "failing" because it didn't make as much money as you expected (point BTFO by Suicide Squad crushing Dr Strange, and not only him, Winter Soldier and many others)

>>82006571
Marvel always wins

File: Strange Cat.jpg (110KB, 736x920px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 736x920px

>>82006451
And Doctor Strange is cosplayed cross-species. Your point is irrelevant.

>>82006116
>MCU
>gross: 1,831,022,890
>budget: 415m
>BD/DVD: 73,073,995 (CA:CW)
I couldn't find data for Dr. Strange

>DCEU
>gross: 1,618,860,248
>budget: 425m
>BD/DVD: 70,961,140 (SS), 72,708,946 (BvS)
Don't lie, anon.

>>82006451
Yes, she did, after the fucking movie came out. Are they dressing up in the black and red harlequin costume, or the "Daddy's little monster" white trash one?
It's obvious the MCU is way more successful than the DCEU, but you don't need to be a fucking retard.

>>82006613
I literally said in the US you fucking shill, Suicide Squad wasn't released in China

Grosses:
DCEU:$655M
MCU: $640M

File: cry.jpg (19KB, 438x374px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 438x374px

Whyyyyyyy, why does Marvel always wiiiiiiiiiin?

>>82006761
>cherrypicking
Now that's sad.

>>82006613
What two MCU movies are you talking about in 2016 if not CW and Dr. Strange?

>>82006787
>domestic gross is cherrypicking
>comparable terms are cherrypicking
Shill harder

>>82006800
You referring to this part?
>I couldn't find data for Dr. Strange
If that's the case I only meant DVD/BD sales.

>>82006605
>Dogmamu I come to bargain

>>82001634
>the moment it sets in

>>82006787
You're the one cherrypicking, you fucking dolt. Dude said what he had to say in plain English and you ignored it like the cuck that you are.

>>82006841
>>82006866
>domestic gross is cherrypicking
Yes, you're literally ignoring worldwide sales, that's the very definition of cherrypicking.

>>82006850
>Wong? Just one name? Like Meownce?

>>82003244
this guy is annoying as fuck, conflating information and openly cherry picking blurb quotes without reading the reviews. Is this the extent DCucks go?

>>82006786
this thing called TALENT

>>82006886
He compared across a common market. You chose not to. Spin that however you want it. Personally, I'd suggest you spin it straight up your ass.

File: 1386027865009.gif (2MB, 333x194px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 333x194px

>>82001579
DC fags wish they could get a score this high.

>>82006935
Same review twice dude. Seriously

What's your favorite guardians tie in commercial geico or hanes fresh iq?

>>82006946
I know that's not it, I've seen CW.

>>82006886
Because they aren't comparable, SS not being released in China and all. Also business wise it makes more sense because the studio cut is always higher in the US market

>>82006978
CW has nothing but DC shows that's why you don't see any talent

>>82006951
>>82007010
He cherrypicked a single market. I showed the overall numbers.
You can go back to crying
>muh d-domestic!!!!!
>m-muh china!!!

>>82006972
it was clearly an error as the second review was removed, you can check for yourself

>>82007041
>>muh d-domestic!!!!!
>>m-muh china!!!
Meme arrowing doesn't really affect you goal post moving though

None of these movies mean anything.
I feel empty thinking about them.
I feel empty that I will probably go see it with my friends.

File: Katana.jpg (59KB, 480x405px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 480x405px

>>82007041
Enjoy those Chinese cuckbucks, man. You can thank them and the sell-outs at your "brand" for fucking us all over on the Ancient One.

Meanwhile, at DC . . .

>>82007038
What?

File: batmanwins.jpg (57KB, 773x366px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 773x366px

>>82006971
Batman always wins

>>82007118
Good thing I'm not moving any goals.
Cherrypicking a market while ignoring half~ the overall sales is just retarded. Also, I'm glad the "SS made more money than CW in BDs" meme also died.

>>82007164
I'm glad we reached an understanding.

>>82007256
>Cherrypicking a market while ignoring half~ the overall sales is just retarded.

Makes pretty damn good sense to me, seeing as how those markets your're talking about bring back about a third of their box office at best.

>>82007256
>I'm glad we reached an understanding.
Me too. It's always refreshing to see someone like yourself admit to being a cuck.

>>82007256
>Good thing I'm not moving any goals.
Good, then I'll post it again with numbers this time:
>
In 2016, DCEU and MCU made about the same money on theaters in the US, with the same amount of movies and the same budgets and the DCEU made more money in blurays/dvds. One introduced all their characters (or their franchise versions) except Superman and the other had 13 movies establishing the universe before.
>Grosses:
>DCEU:$655M
>MCU: $640M

Also
>Also, I'm glad the "SS made more money than CW in BDs" meme also died.
It didn't, SS made more money than CW is video sales, the website isn't updated but it was a couple of millions away and Suicide Squad was the 4th top seller of the last week they have data:
>http://www.the-numbers.com/weekly-bluray-sales-chart

>>82003449
Its called a grading curve nigger.

Being half-right is about the same as directing the movie blind. 50/50 is literally random odds.

It implies while there is nothing offensively bad, there's nothing incredibly good either

>>82003114
>That's the inherent problem with rotten tomatoes scoring, which is either fresh or rotten, and criticism doesn't work like that.
Obviously. RT score is just for plebs, for whom it's easier to comprehend than normal score would be.

>>82007151
>I feel empty that I will probably go see it with my friends.

Sounds like you've got mental issues.

>>82007458
>Sounds like you've got mental issues.
Well I do, but I feel bad that despite the fact I hate these movies on a fundamental level, I'm still going to see them.

>>82001579
>people still see capeshit after decades of nonstop milking

File: e2f.jpg (34KB, 480x568px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x568px

>>82007252

Sometimes!

>>82004935
>smothers a potentially powerful story -- and some of America's most iconic superheroes -- in a grim whirlwind of effects-driven action
>positive consensus
what bizarro earth are you from?

>>82007487
Don't go. If you can't turn your brain off, literally, as in stop following whatever the fuck is going on and just laughing when other people laugh, these flicks are absolute torture.

>>82007487
>the fact I hate these movies on a fundamental level

You sound like a really crappy human being.

File: 224.png (181KB, 343x417px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 343x417px

Guardians of the Galaxy 2 is basically what would have happened if after a New Hope, rather than raising the stakes with the Empire Strikes Back, they just made another movie with same tone as a New Hope.

Modern Hollywood has lost the ability to balance Comedy and Tragedy, and will either lean so hard on one it ruins the other, or vice versa. The fact that I get a more emotionally balanced and fulfilling superhero story out of a fucking Japanese kids show, WITH better action as well because they still do practical stunts is pathetic.

>>82007514
RT is hopelessly partisan and not remotely neutral. Deal with it.

The fact the staff are the ones assigning fresh/rotten to reviews that neither endorse nor condemn the movie should have been enough to clue you in.

>>82007609
>they just made another movie with same tone as a New Hope.

So, the Force Awakens.

>>82003422
based

>>82004209

Is iron man in it? No. Be lucky to make over 800 mil

>>82007562
>You sound like a really crappy human being.
They're brainless, they're emotionless, they're derivative, they're repetitive.
As >>82007609 mentioned, there is no balance between comedy and tragedy. ALL tension is destroyed with shitty quips. Find three Marvel movies with mildly different tones. I can't deal with it.

>>82007646
Exactly. Now do you think Star Wars would have become so popular if after a New Hope, you got the Force Awakens as the second movie

File: 1478553116045.gif (2MB, 320x256px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x256px

>>82003114
>Certainly not positive reviews
kek
You reek of butthurt, you poor child.

>>82007718
I mean FUCKING WHO WROTE THIS
Star Lord learns that there's a literal graveyard filled with his dead half siblings that his father tried to use for his purposes and all died and that he could have just as easily just ended up in that corpse field and you know how Star Lord "beats" his Dad who has done this? BY SUMMONING A GIANT FUCKING PAC MAN. What the fuck were they thinking?

File: 1476998437192.jpg (32KB, 287x356px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 287x356px

>>82004239

>DCEU
>Great visuals but story is kinda lacking

File: hqdefault.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>82007412
MCU first few movies featured C and D list characters.

DCEU first movies feature the worlds most popular characters and villains.

DCEU barely made more than C & D-List characters

>>82007937
Sure, if about a billion dollars more counts as "barely" to you.

>>82007937
>shitskin shill can't read
We're talking about 2016. First three DCEU movies made almost $700m more than first MCU's (more than "barely", you see)

did anyone screencap my prediction of an 82 RT score like I asked?

File: 1481376094043.gif (3MB, 700x285px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 700x285px

>>82008065
Keep checkin' them numbers, dcuck.

>>this lol if anything this movie is going to be just okay at best, which happens sometimes with marvel movies

>>82008271
Who the fuck cares about you?

>>82004239
>DC
>great visuals
pick one. I would've said "great anything" but DC does have at least 1 good thing, which is literally just batman and anything related to batman

File: mfw.jpg (36KB, 300x360px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 300x360px

>D-d-d-dCuck movies are better
>RT is p-paid shilling
>m-m-m-m-muh oscars
DCucks on suicide watch LMAO

>>82007075
This is true.

File: IMG_0427.jpg (39KB, 697x340px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 697x340px

Accolades abound.

File: IMG_0428.jpg (40KB, 1541x154px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1541x154px

It's like pottery.

>>82006000
None of the franchises you list did the same thing. This wasn't simply an assembled group of heroes, this was a four franchise grand crossover event. This had never been done before, and even Infinity War will struggle to recapture the sort of hype that surrounded The Avengers when it came out - and Justice League won't even get close.

>>82006150
Now really, given that $1.1bn is a fuck load of money.

>>82009357
>Schilling

kek

>>82006398
>You're actually claiming Dr, Strange's footprint to be smaller than Harley Quinn's?

Of course it is. Harley Quinn is a fan favourite and features semi-heavily in the cartoons on TV.

>>82007937
Cast actors with charisma and D characters become A characters. Cast actors with no charisma and A characters become D characters.

under 40 days for the next DCuck butthurt overload

>all this autism over capeshit
You really are the funniest board, /tv/.

>>82003185
So much this. 5/10 on a fucking 1-10 scale is average. I hate that 7 or 8 are "average" now.

We have to go back.

i just posted something on /r/movies can someone go over there and check to see if the post is visable or not? the title is

[meta] Be careful of what comments you trust about Guardians of the Galaxy

>>82002625
>>82002725
How does it feel knowing that numbers are nothing to a Oscar

>>82011563
>hair and makeup
hehe

>>82002725
Can we get a crying wojack wearing a DC hat? I suck at art.

File: Snyder Nails It Again.webm (3MB, 720x299px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x299px

>>82004239
One day you'll realize how awful Snyder's visuals are.

The color grading alone ruins the image.

>>82004429

The pacing, dialogue and character interactions were reminiscent of Star Wars.

>>82011794
>the first time he shoots with the pistol

That's fucking awful
No connection between the shooting and the target scenes

>>82011794
The choreography makes the gunfu in Ultraviolet look like KINO.

>>82003244
why is this so zoomed in on his disgusting dog hair of a beard

>>82011871
>Ultraviolet look like KINO
he's right you know.png

>>82003114
You didnt read one damn review. You loathe RT and then hedge your bets on the 2 sentences they post from each review.

File: Pac-Man_Pixels.png (85KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 250x250px

DUDE MY DAD KILLED MY MOM ON PURPOSE AND FRIED ALL MY STEP SIBLINGS, SO I SUMMONED PAC-MAN TO BEAT HIM

HELL YEAH! STAR LORD THE MAN

>>82011794
This is full of good ideas fucked up by Snyder's mediocrity as a director.

>>82012011
It's fun to watch it play out, I have my ticket ready.

Marvel lets reviews come out two weeks ahead of release. DC's Justice League and Wonder Woman will be sequestered until Thursday at midnight!!!

>>82012066
I can already see the amount of butthurt threads if the first review for those is rotten

And then the praying circles

>>82001579
I just watch Jeremy from those "youtube critics" and he gave it like 3/5 based on his ratings.

>>82011794
The example I was thinking when I made the post as sucicide squad

>>82012112
Disney's paying the big bucks to get those first few rotten reviews in quickly for WW

>>82005522
Kek

File: 1397209176611.jpg (16KB, 446x364px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 446x364px

>>82003244
>people are allowed to repost the same reviews not only from the same publication but also the same article
Why is RT getting away with this?

>>82012045
Kek

>>82001579
>86%
>shill reviews
They usually give shill movies scores in the 90's.

>IT'S NOT TIME TO MAKE A CHANGE
>JUST RELAX, TAKE IT EASY
Only legitimate great part of it
First one was way better and I'm sad to see that Marvel seems to have dried Gunn's creativity already

>>82012011
I like how this is not some convoluted way to shitpost about what happens in the movie by cutting and pasting some of it, but an actual part of the plot

>>82001579

BUT WHAT IF IT'S ACTUALLY KINO?????

not gonna watch it, but not gonna preemptively criticize it either.

>>82001634
>not listening to the true reviewer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QupTPGVn1pM

>>82014145
I am so fucking stupid.. that was from the first movie his review.

please ignore the comment

>>82008065
The first 3 DCEU movies made that much money because Marvel made Superhero movies relevant again.

>>82009357

>Stand alone sequel

What?

This is a fresh review.

"This sequel turns up the volume on the action and spectacle for a fun and frequently thrilling ride, but can't help but feel like a disappointment in comparison to its predecessor."

Now if it was DC this would be rotten.

I can't understand why this type of shit is so important to people, capeshit is for kids, it's truly a world of fucking manbabies out there...

>>82014349
You know how people have been comparing it to "What if after a New Hope, they just made a New Hope 2 instead of Empire Strikes Back"

We're being serious. This film is literally "We made as safe a movie as possible"

I CLAPPED WHEN I SAW THE RACCOON!!

>>82014285

You know The Dark Knight came the same year as Iron Man and made over a billion right? And before that we had Spider-Man and X-Men. Capeshit never really went away

>>82014409
No, No. It's "I CLAPPED WHEN "X" SONG PLAYED" or "I CLAPPED WHEN PAC MAN APPEARED"

What bullshit will be the postcredits scene?

>>82014489
Starlord jerking off while peeping on Thor sucking off Black Panther's dingus

>>82014444
>>82014409

I FUCKING LOVE GROOT "I AM GROOT" RIGHT GUYS?

File: 17spnoj6yjsv1jpg mickey kirby.jpg (177KB, 800x911px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 800x911px

ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EW1dQzbM95c

THE HITS KEEP COMING! AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP
AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!AND THE HITS KEEP COMING!

>>82014395
It's what happens during the decline of Christianity, they need surrogate myths in capeshit because the alternative is atheism which is unrewarding.

>>82014368
>It's fine but worse than the first one
>OMG HOW IS THIS FRESH

>>82014413
It's been pretty much a constant companion since the mid-90s. Which was first after the Bat-collapse that Singer brought us - Blade?

>>82013035
People don't post to RT. RT goes after the reviews.

>>82005411
>but after a second watch

it made the scene worse on second viewing

>>82011625
>oscar still an oscar

MARVEL DOES IT AGAIN

>>82014932

I think it was Spawn. That came out a year before Blade. Spawn was a big deal in the 90's

>>82014395
This.

Also no matter what other people say.... it is contributing to the death of cinema. After all people have a limited income, and the more kinds of movies we have of this that they'll spend $$ on, the less likely they'll spend it on a somewhat original/non-franchise film.

In 20 years, unless Hollywood has a renaissance like it did in the late 60's/early 70's like 80% of movies released will be under the House of Mouse label, while 95% will be based on some franchise in general.

Sad times... but hopefully we get a 1970's film quality out of it again, though I doubt it.

>>82015016
not all oscars are created equal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgaBveqoR6E

>>82001579
>hasn't even seen it
>already shitting on it
It's almost as if you have an agenda somehow. Do snyderlards live in perpetual butthurt mode?

>>82001634
Very Cool

>>82015099
>the cape flame is reignited by a character from independent

Spawn was the Chosen One who brought balance

>>82011069
its funy because im aussie and got to see the movie almost 2+ days early

its worth it trust me

>>82015162
When you see negative memes being forced about Disney movies months before release, why don't you come talk to me?

>>82015131

I think the lack of Oscars in the MCU is very telling that although they do a lot of things well in their movies nothing is exceptional

>>82015297
>When you see negative memes being forced about Disney movies months before release
Yeah let's judge movies based on the memes they generate, you web 2.0 mouthbreather.

>>82015341
Go ahead. Go find a meme getting forced about a Disney movie 4 months before it's released. Go see if anyone's autistic(or well paid) enough to force one day in, day out for months on end.

We'll all wait patiently for your reply.

>>82015279

>Trust an Aussie

lolno

>>82015314
you act like suicide squad is the first shitty movie to get a technical oscar.

>>82015508

I don't give a crap about Suicide Squad. With 14 films you would think Marvel could achieve an award by now even if it were for a lesser category.

>>82015490
You implying we didnt have your back in WW1 and 2 you unstrayan anzac cucking fucken cunt?

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-25 at 04.16.54.png (733KB, 1376x848px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 1376x848px

Only 10% better than this gem!

Well memed fellow redditors!

Another box office smash!

>>82015611

You didn't have my back

>>82015583
... why? Meaningless technical awards are and have always been meaningless technical awards.

>>82015583
The MCU doesn't need an Oscar, it already has the prestige from the public ;)

>>82015437
>Go ahead. Go find a meme getting forced about a Disney movie 4 months before it's released. Go see if anyone's autistic(or well paid) enough to force one day in, day out for months on end.
Yeah let's judge movies based on the memes they generate, you web 2.0 mouthbreather.

>>82002511
would it have been better if he distracted the bad guy with a rare pepe?

>>82015748
>10% better
>American education

>>82001634
Kristian has always had the better taste, even if they both are sellouts.

>>82004590
>What are some great examples of pure unfiltered shilling?

Basically any Justice League thread.

saw film gob's latest video and he points out that there's two fresh reviews scores from 1 review

>>82005049
Marvel's at the stage where they don't really need to shill anything. They just say "hey, we have movie" and put their name on it, and watch the cash roll in. Famous for being famous and all that.

>>82016099
They deleted one

File: 1442404318045.png (67KB, 250x192px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 250x192px

>>82015826
fuck off mate aussies are eternal bros u facken mistrustful anon cunthole dikhead ai

>>82003244
>>82016099
>>82016241
>Now every DCuck on the planet will parrot that they repeated a review because Reddit Gob said it even though it was simply a mistake that was corrected

File: 22e65b1b-567b-47d6-86ee-3891362980f8..jpg (144KB, 565x352px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 565x352px

>>82016268

>>82007820
>there's a literal graveyard filled with his dead half siblings that his father tried to use for his purposes
>Star Lord "beats" his Dad who has done this? BY SUMMONING A GIANT FUCKING PAC MAN
This sounds classic James Gunn writing m8

>>82007820
Is his dad's name Martha?

How annoying is Baby Groot?

>>82017459
He's basically one of the favored "tension defusers." You want a scene with tense emotional depth, WELL GET READY FOR BABY GROOT TO FUCKING SMASH IT. That's the entire movie. You have to go in understanding that this film is going to be as serious as any of those awful Parody films from the mid 00s.

You'll have a scene that should be used to build up complex emotional situation and then Baby Groot will do something 50% of the time or someone else will say something. It's a film where a man confronts his father for murdering his mother by "summoning Pac Man"

Think of your favorite action movie from the 80s or 90s and think "Yeah, that's how the Conners should have beat the Terminator, by summoning Pac Man. Ripley should have fought the Alien Queen in a Pac Man robot. The Emperor should have been blasting Luke with little Pac Mans before Vader stopped him"

>>82017677
Pac-Man fits Star Lord, though.

Hey guis...the Pacman thing is a meme right?
That doesn't actually happens...right?
R-right?

>>82017816
>Pac-Man fits Star Lord
No. No it doesn't. You've just learned what a scumbag your dad was and your foster father figure has just motivated you to fight back and what you use as your weapon isn't some connection you built between the two of you, but some shitty fucking game you played 20 god damn years ago before you were even taken to space where you've spent most of your life because OH SHIT I KNOW PAC MAN SO I WILL CLAP WHEN I SEE IT.

STAR LORD IS AN 80S KID.

YOU KNOW, WHEN PAC-MAN WAS POPULAR.

IT MAKES SENSE FOR HIS CHARACTER AND FOR THE TONE OF THE MOVIE.

STOP BEING JADED PIECES OF SHIT.

IN B4
>Hurrr memes reddit

>>82017923
>>82017924
I'm not going to pay money to see this shit...

File: mission BREAKOUT!.jpg (531KB, 2000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 2000x1500px

look what they did to tower of terror

>>82001579
>86%
I just woke up and this made my day, what the fuck was Marvel thinking with those poop jokes, glad to see them get absolutely wrecked.

>>82017924
This, Its a Comedy Space opera where the Main character is stuck in the 80s. No shit he summons PacMan

>>82016351
bugga

File: 1463443903108.jpg (20KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x360px

>>82018181

>>82014112
The crigniness and the patreon links down there almost make it look like a parody of comics made by autistic manginas and tumblreenas, but it's probably a real deal and you are probably a real shill posting here without awareness we all think you're cancer.

>>82017924
>Wants to shitpost too
>talks like a pretentious landwhale newfag

Way to out yourself, shill. 0/10.

>>82017923

Wait it's LITERALLY Pac-Man? I thought it was just going to be some yellow crusher or something.

>>82020907
He literally makes a Pac Man out of rocks to fight his dad.

It's up to 87% Marvel friends

>>82021210

That sounds like shit

>>82007718
>there is no balance between comedy and tragedy. ALL tension is destroyed with shitty quips. Find three Marvel movies with mildly different tones.
This is the problem with the MCU. It was really fucking atrocious in Dr. Strange. Trailer made it look like it would be more serious than the other movies and it does start out that way but then it just turns into "Quips: The Movie Part 14"