Stop denying climate change.

BE YE GONE TOOTHLESS GODLESS KIKE JEW SCHNOZ YID BASTARD

I deny this thread.

dude, stop denying climate change, doubting science, and donate money to the democrats

>>81994147
>stop being a straight white cismale vanilla ice cream piece of shit

>>81994147
Stop denying ice cream sexuality

>>81994147

just fuck off smug political science guy

>Be skeptical of something the Liberal Media is skeptical of.
>"Skeptic"

>Be skeptical of something the Liberal Media is fully and dogmatically believes in.
>"Denialist"

I've never understood why self-professed "skepticism" is the fedroratheist equivalent of Nirvana according to their own speech-patterns, but as soon as you actually PRACTICE actual skepticism rather than group-think you're suddenly a heretic.

>>81994332
I'm an unabashed denialist of cryptids and magic. If that word upsets you, you probably aren't being honest with yourself.

Bill Nye the Reddit Guy

>Have political beliefs
>Label your political beliefs """scientific"""
>Now nobody can oppose your political beliefs, because doing so is now "Anti-Science"

Honestly it's genius solely because of how effective it is. The average football-watching Facebook-posting sheep is too terrified of being socially labeled "anti-science", so they fall the fuck in line.

Honestly Conservatives should start using this to their advantage. Why should Democucks and SJW's solely be allowed to use this tool?
Guns are a form of technology. Now anyone that wants to limit access to guns is "Anti-Technology" and "Technophobic".

Fuck off the earth is flat

>>81994147
nah

File: flat-earth-625x350.jpg (50KB, 625x350px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 625x350px

>>81994416
>Honestly Conservatives should start using this to their advantage.

Yeah, that'll work.

Stop being cis.

>>81994404
That's true after its oblique fashion. No wonder there's so much exhibitionistic anal soreness about him on /tv/.

>>81994332
>be skeptical of blatant bullshit
>"Skeptic"

>be skeptical of something that the overwhelming majority of scientific data suggests is true
>"denialist"

Fixed that for you faggot.

>>81994416
Did you know the people pushing for climate change denial are the same people who said smoking was harmless?

>>81994147
dude science lmao

>>81994147
Stop ignoring the only solution which would be exterminating every r-selected human with an IQ below 100 who's unable or unwilling to live in decentralized, self-sustaining permacultures.

[AUDIENCE WHOOPS AND CHEERS]

>>81994147
I will when California sinks into the pacific like you faggots promised.

>>81994399

"Denialism" doesn't imply mere disbelief, nignog.

It implies disbelief in the face of overwelming evidence that supposedly everyone else can see.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialism

You're only a "Magic Denialist" if you're denying the existence of magic WHILE three feet away a Wizard is summoning Succubi familiars to polish his cock while turning his stores of lead into gold.

>>81994147
no, i want humans to die off. the sooner that happens the better.

File: crowderface.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

>>81994486
based

>>81994147
I'll be dead before it matters so I don't give a fuck.

>>81994147
>muh climate change
>muh carbon
>muh overpopulation
>we can't stop paying africa to breed like rabbits tho das raycis

>>81994416
Global warming didn't become a political issue until anti-science politicians (all of which are Republican, coincidentally) started pushing to roll back environmentally-conscious policies.

>>81994514
>scientific data

Post it you good goy

>>81994332
>Be skeptical of something the Liberal Media is fully and dogmatically believes in.

Stop saying stupid shit like this when you know it's stupid shit, and you'll be a happier person.

File: 1463411988210.png (608KB, 538x824px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 538x824px

>>81994147
>wiping Florida from the face of the map
>a bad thing

File: Doctors Reccomend Cigarettes 2.jpg (194KB, 652x421px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 652x421px

>>81994525

Except they aren't?

I didn't realize doctors were the ones saying Climate Change wasn't real.

What I find more concerning is that the same group that told me smoking was healthy and that DDT was so safe you could literally spray it all over children are now telling me that it is an unquestionable scientific fact that the proper treatment for a delusional disorder is to chop the sufferer's cock off and shoot them up with Estrogen.

>>81994650
>Except they aren't?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute

File: pinksting.gif (190KB, 178x100px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 178x100px

>>81994597

>>81994147
Stop denying nuclear power is one of the most reliable and clean ways to produce energy, bill.

>>81994416

>strawman

denunciation of strawman

>>81994604

Global warming didn't become a political issue until the public got skeptical and special-interest groups and climate cultists started ratcheting up the sociological pressure.

Before global warming it was El Nino.
Before that it was Global Cooling.

People got skeptical/apathetic, and when the public stops care the money stops rolling in.

>>81994416
>take an apolitical issue and politicize it for them sweet sweet campaign donations and frame climate change as some liberal plot to have government tyranny stop you from experiencing the freedom of 120F weather and coal ash runoff in your drinking water, or something
>project and say it's the liberals who are politicizing it, because fuck liberals, right?

>>81994604

>IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACY

OK.

>>81994692
Who would disagree with this?

>>81994514

>everything i believe in is "something that the overwhelming majority of scientific data suggests is true"
>everything i deny is "blatant bullshit"

File: acdc.jpg (111KB, 685x800px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 685x800px

>>81994650

>I didn't realize doctors were the ones saying Climate Change wasn't real.

Ok

no wait

so

You think a cartoon doctor in a magazine advertisement for cigarettes from the 60s is evidence of real endorsement of cigarettes by the overall majority of healthcare professionals at that time?

>>81994650
>give them what they want
>when they're 30 and look even more like a monster they off themselves
It's a long term treatment anon

>>81994795

The Liberal Anti-Nuclear Lobby.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHI8KBq-lXM

>>81994742

It's just, who the hell cares? The Earth does what it wants, when it wants. If another Ice Age were to happen, liberals would blame humans. You're going to shut down the space shuttle program and then pump all the funding into this shit instead? Find me a resource that does the same thing as oil and can supply the world and I will switch to it.

>>81994795
BIll "it's only science when it agrees with my bias" Nye
also known as Bill "I've only agreed with the consensus on GMOs for a couple of years after being repeatedly BTFOd about it" Nye

>>81994852
>it's a conspiracy!
>e-even if it's not, who cares?!
lmao

>>81994681
>Heartland worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to question serious cancer risks to secondhand smoke,

A valid point.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2013/12/12/study-finds-no-link-between-secondhand-smoke-and-cancer/#471ab02865d4

>>81994708
>the public got skeptical

lol

You mean when the public started repeating what the shills told them

>>81994818
anon probably relies on prayer to cure whatever ails him

>>81994147
Stop pretending to be a scientists

>>81994852
>The Earth does what it wants, when it wants

No it doesn't you fucking retard, you sound like a hippy who thinks mother Earth is a real thing.

>>81994728

>take an apolitical issue and politicize it for them sweet sweet campaign donations and frame climate change as some monumentally apocalyptic threat that is an intentional conspiracy created by LE BIG OIL to prevent you from experiencing low taxes and underhanded government shut-downs of small businesses
>project and say it's the conservatives who are politicizing it, because fuck liberals, right?

Liberals are the ones getting physically angry every time someone points out a hole in the WE ALL GOING TO DIE IN THE NEXT TWO DECADES game. like the giant stack of predictions that said that California would be underwater in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, etc.

>>81994514
>scientists agree there's more than two genders
>if you disagree you're against science

Good goy

File: Screenshot_2017-04-24-08-02-53.png (181KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1080x1920px

>>81994795

>>81994949
>like the giant stack of predictions that said that California would be underwater in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, etc.

Who said that? Scientists?

File: 34673.jpg (96KB, 799x598px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 799x598px

>(((science)))
>muh always showing just the last 100 years of data to scare the brainwashed zombies

global warming/climate change is an industry unto itself and they want worldwide "carbon taxes" on top of that. it is an insidious thing far beyond that even.

you won't understand wtf i'm talking about unless you look into these things for yourself. so, you can do that (takes effort)... or blindly continue to go along with their agenda. whatever.

did you know having ice cap is an anomaly? did you know that the earth has been ice cap free for ~90% of its existence? did you know by definition ice caps only exist during ice ages? did you know we are at the tail end of a CURRENT ice age now? did you know the caps extended as far down as missouri/kentucky just 20,000 years ago and have been receding ever since that peak? did you know the caps are going bye-bye even if every person on the planet disappeared 20,000 years ago?

THE OCEAN'S RELEASE *ALL ON ITS OWN* IS FAR LARGER AND MORE IMPORTANTLY *OUT ACCELERATING* MANS CONTRIBUTION

THE OCEAN IS RELEASING MORE DUE TO WARMER TEMPS (WARMER WATER = IT'S A FAR LESS EFFECTIVE C02 SINK)

IF HUMANS NEVER AROSE CO2 WOULD BE INCREASING AT ALMOST THE EXACT SAME RATE AS IT IS RIGHT NOW

THIS HAPPENS AT THE END OF EVERY ICE AGE

STOP BEING SO FUCKING GULLIBLE AND LAZY

LOOK INTO THINGS FOR YOURSELF AND STOP TAKING WHAT THE MSM, EPA.GOV AND NASA.GOV ETC. TELL YOU AT FACE VALUE, YOU LAZY SHITS. IT IS ABOUT POWER AND CONTROL.

ICE AGES AND PERMANENT ICE *ARE AN ANOMALY*

BY DEFINITION AN "ICE AGE" IS WHEN THE EARTH HAS PERMANENT ICE SHELVES

WE HAD ICE A MILE THINK IN CINCINNATI JUST 20,000 YEARS AGO

THE PLANET IS WARMING AND THE CAPS ARE METLING

THAT MEANS = MORE CO2, SEA RISE AND WEATHER PATTERN CHANGES

WE CAN'T STOP OR ALTER IT, WE WILL ADAPT JUST FINE

STOP BEING SCARED INTO TAX SCHEMES AND GLOBALIST POWER PLAYS YOU DUMBED DOWN ZOMBIES

File: 1484505033130.png (176KB, 560x530px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 560x530px

>tfw agree with /pol/ on virtually everything except Climate Change

Average temperature is rising, glaciers are disappearing, Great Reef is almost dead, deforestation destroys 1000s of species, CO2 concentration is increasing, etc. etc. and yet those idiots believe that whole of scientific community lies about climate change because of reasons.
Fucking idiots.

>>81994975

That wasn't a disagreement with the statement in question though, learn to read you shitposting idiot.

File: Doctors Reccomend Cigarettes.jpg (150KB, 375x500px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 375x500px

>>81994818

>You think a cartoon doctor in a magazine advertisement for cigarettes from the 60s is evidence of real endorsement of cigarettes by the overall majority of healthcare professionals at that time?

No. The ACTUAL healthcare professionals that recommended cigarettes as "harmless" are though.

Are you fucking stupid? You think because an ad used an illustration of a doctor, that doctors didn't generally approve of and sometimes recommend cigarettes before the mid-1950's?

Considering you type like a fucking retard Redditor it wouldn't be surprising.

>>81994708
El Nino occurs in a single region. It and global warming are and have been observed concurrently.
As for "global cooling" it was only ever predicted in a handful of scientific papers, which were then published in popsci magazines to increase readership. It was never a widely believed among the scientific community.

>>81995012

>can adapt to sea level rise, ocean acidification and a host of other problems that are hard to predict
>can't adapt to taxes

lol

>>81995017
Only the Americans.

>>81994828

>It's a long term treatment anon

I'd say quite the opposite when they off themselves by the dozens before they're middle-aged. It's quite the short treatment, actually.

There's a reason there are no elderly trannies.

>>81995031
No, it's even more stupid since you can't detonate nuclear power plants.

>>81995038
>No. The ACTUAL healthcare professionals that recommended cigarettes as "harmless" are though.

Oh yeah. Name them then.

>>81994896

>DUDE IT'S ALL SHILLS LMAO

But I'm sure your side of the issue is totally devoid of "shills", right?

File: 1485930163434.jpg (2MB, 1891x4901px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1891x4901px

>>81994514

>>81994473
>attempts to connect flat earthers with conservatives "just because"
nice strawman you just did a great job at proving the other anon's point of delegitimizing your political opponent by falsely labeling them anti-science.

>>81994986

>Who said that? Scientists?

Yes. Read a magazine or watch the news at some point.

File: GLOBAL-WARMING-HOAX.jpg (152KB, 864x864px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 864x864px

>There are people believing the Climate Scam

-No evidences suggest that global warming is 100% real
-2008 Winter was the coldest ever registered
-Bible don't mention it

Stop giving credit to organized con artists

File: merchant.jpg (118KB, 680x722px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 680x722px

Don't forget to pay your coral bleaching tax you filthy carbon lifeforms.

>>81995017
>>tfw agree with /pol/ on virtually everything except Climate Change
See here >>81994533 for /pol/'s final solution to the climate question

>>81995075

No but you can use enriched uranium to make a bomb which would be detonated, you fucking idiot.

File: 1493002442245.png (652KB, 940x960px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 940x960px

Dude it won't work Shit Nye the meme fag guy. Climate changes all the time. Naturally. Before humans were shitting the air.

Now Ill agree that Humanity lately may be speeding up that change. And doing nothing may be "bad". But the ideas these "scientists"would fail or do more harm.

Things like solar and wind dont work as well as you'd like. Nuclear could work but idiots who play Stalker and COD4 think every nuclear plant will go off. And oil works fine but we are too busy buying from foreign asshats and not using the oil in our own lands

Take pipe lines. Libtards will say it's horrible. That the pipes will destroy the lands. Yet they have little to no proof of this happening. And while they smack away pipe lines they will not smack around Saudia Arabia oil.

Also even if half the world went 100% green China alone would still be spewing out more pollution than green energy could save.

>Also if climate changes maybe itll just kill the faggots like college pasty faggot commies who cant work for shit. Plus humanity has survived an ice age.... Plagues. Wars. And you think some warm weather and rising sea levels will destroy the world

>>81995122
Disagreeing with the scientific consensus is the definition of anti-science. There's no way around it.

>>81995102
>your side

hahahaha

>>81995133

Which ones?

>>81995012
Why is virtually every conspiracy theory linked to Jews in some way?

>>81995197
It's the Russian hackers these days, keep up.

well, we can all take solace in the fact that if the climate change deniers get their way they will all die as well.

>>81994147
Start denying these dubs.

>>81995159
>shifting goal post
while pointing out the obvious no doubt.
grouping flat-earthers with conservatives to label that group is you creating a strawman and then beating it down by calling it anti-science.

>>81995083

>Please name each specific individual doctor used in an advertising campaign from 70 years ago.

Fuck off. Google exists. Do it yourself.
You'd ignore whatever I posted and shitpost anyway.

This is a widely-documented ad-campaign that many people still alive TODAY remember. Fucking Google it yourself and quit wasting my time.

>>81995159
Shouldn't people question scientific consensus?

File: 1493004488861.jpg (157KB, 640x744px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 640x744px

>>81995159

What science. Its been proven wrong plenty of times and people like Al Gore "muh inconvenient truth" was a way for him to make millions off carbon tax

All this shit is political and money driven. Liberals/demoshits want to blame YOU on pollution so they sell you expensive taxes. Want to force solar or wind that wont work like they say. To make money

If more pollution and legit being China made liberals more money they would tell you "Pollution is good kids. How dare you deny pro pollution"

>>81995150
No, you can't use uranium to make a bomb which would be detonated, at best you can use uranium as the product of dispersal of a bomb. That is, you can make a radiological weapon, not an atomic weapon.
Even then, her opinion is beyond stupid given the level of security behind this stuff. It's as stupid as complaining about centers which research bacteria and viruses.

File: Farage_Baffling.gif (2MB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x240px

>>81995230
>believes C02 is to blame
>doesn't kill himself and his loved ones to stop them producing C02 throughout their lives

>>81995151
>Implying the biggest drive for foreign oils is coming from hippy libs and not hummer-driving, energy wasteful conservs
>Implying China isn't overtaking the alternative energy market and making us look like troglodytes for being dependent on inefficient and increasingly costly dead plant matter that WILL get too expensive to drag out of the ground, no matter how many pipes you pollute our own lands with

The planet will be fine, but our crop systems, our fresh water supply and pretty much everything we depend on to have a comfortable society can be swept away and you'll have to post sad frog pictures by smoke signal you fucking fool.

>>81995197
They're the easiest scapegoats because all of the theories have some basis in reality

>>81995268

Sorry, the burden of proof is on you friend

>>81995159

"Scientific consensus" isn't "science". It's popular opinion.

Science isn't about a "consensus". It's about facts and what can be PROVEN. If you have to rely on a "consensus", you don't have enough facts to prove a case and thusly shit is still open for debate.
Scientists and even non-scientists with a scientific background have written heavily about this before it became Secular Heresy, including Michael Crichton.

File: 1485785512671.jpg (296KB, 704x806px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 704x806px

>>81995058
>can't adapt to taxes

File: how_it_happened.jpg (967KB, 4621x2914px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 4621x2914px

>>81995197

Make me

>>81994844
>just in europe
people still take this retard seriously?

>>81995299
>No, you can't use uranium to make a bomb which would be detonated

You absolutely can, literally one of the only two atomic bombs ever dropped on people used Uranium you fuckwit. Stop talking absolute shit.

File: 1479396193103.jpg (76KB, 1200x628px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1200x628px

>>81994147
Another lizard looking libtard. Why do all libtards look that? Maher, podesta, biden, fucking all of them, not to mention all libtard women are horrifyingly ugly.

Who the fuck follows these freaks?

File: JIDF.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>81995319
>>81995226
Glad you're on patrol today!

>>81995349

yes anon, i too watched Borat

>>81995470

That's probably not true, but if it is, good.

>>81995150

>No but you can use enriched uranium to make a bomb which would be detonated, you fucking idiot.

You can also take a solar-cell reflector and sharpen it into a knife and use it to stab the President, cuck.

Potential misuse does not and should not contaminate the use of the technology itself.

Again, if """climate change""" is SUCH a grotesquely apocalyptic issue, why do you granola-munching cucks oppose the only realistic solution of meeting the growing demand for power while not also increasing carbon-emissions?
It makes you sound pretty disingenuous.

Probably because you aren't trying to stop """climate change""". You're just using that as a leverage-topic to shill for some other form of energy that's more expensive, less practical and generally a giant waste of money.

>>81995417
>literally one of the only two atomic bombs ever dropped on people used Uranium you fuckwit
No shit, thank you for telling me basic facts that have nothing to do with what I said!

If climate change is such a serious problem shouldn't we rush to cease all global travel, trade and migration. And stop trying to save every starving African?

>>81995530
Yes, don't forget to nuke china and india

>>81995508
>Potential misuse does not and should not contaminate the use of the technology itself.

Yes it should. For example, cars require a license to drive, and I bet you don't complain about that. Stop talking shit all your life.

It's not "save the planet" it's "save the humans"

>>81995521
>No shit, thank you for telling me basic facts that have nothing to do with what I said!
>No, you can't use uranium to make a bomb which would be detonated

lol stop posting already

>>81994147
you wont die if the planet is 5 degrees hotter

>>81994944

Yeah so dinosaurs, volcanoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, ice age's, meteor's. What's to say that none of them will happen again? What if right now the Earth is still warming up from the last ice age? What if the heating of the Earth is just part of the cycle? Stop being a fucking faggot hippie and stop giving a shit about global warming, or as you faggots call it when it's abnormally cold, climate change.

>>81994147
Now that they're mixing science with identity politics I think I'll become a christian.

>>81995594
I'm talking about power plants, so when I say "uranium", i'm talking about LEU, not HEU.

File: Satania TAKE IT EASY Head.jpg (44KB, 582x575px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 582x575px

>If you're not utterly terrified of the ocean-levels theoretically rising a foot over the next 150 years, you are le anti-science denialist man.
>If you are scared of the BLM chimps chanting "MORE DEAD COPS" as they walk down your streets or the Muslim fundamentalist """refugee""" next store parading signs demanding Sharia Law, you are le paranoid racist man.

Fucking priorities, Liberals.

>>81995554
Also don't forget we'd have set aside all our modern technology. Nothing produces more carbon than mining the minerals for our electronics and stuff.

>>81995601
>Yeah so dinosaurs, volcanoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, ice age's, meteor's. What's to say that none of them will happen again?

You think Dinosaurs are going to happen again? Shove your head into a garbage compactor you fucking imbecile

>>81995601
>comparing dinosaurs to earthquakes
The conservative intellectuals in this thread are blowing my mind.

File: megalosaurus-reconstructions.jpg (255KB, 620x679px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 620x679px

>>81995159
>Disagreeing with the scientific consensus is the definition of anti-science
>if you question current consensus you are anti-science
>BUR SCIENCE DENIER HERETIC!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=46h-LfNWPn8
For those who haven't seen it yet.

>>81995657
>HEU is also used in fast neutron reactors, whose cores require about 20% or more of fissile material, as well as in naval reactors, where it often contains at least 50% 235U, but typically does not exceed 90%. The Fermi-1 commercial fast reactor prototype used HEU with 26.5% 235U. Significant quantities of HEU are used in the production of medical isotopes, for example molybdenum-99 for technetium-99m generators.[8]

File: 1445021380017.png (742KB, 556x756px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 556x756px

>>81994147
>being this white
more like Bill Nye the Patriarchy Guy

>>81995662
No need, our stuff is clean. China's isn't

>>81995708
There is no need for nuclear power plants to use HEU. Objecting to nuclear power because of this is like saying we should abolish cars because cars without airbags and safety belts are sooooo dangerous.

>>81994632
He's right though. Furthermore if climate change really is man-made, what does the debate fucking matter? The third and developing world pollutes without a care about rising sea levels (it's fucking nothing, by the way) or CO2 emissions and all it's really done this entire is put the first world in the back seat in regards to industry and production/manufacturing. China and India are allowed to dump toxic sludge into everyone's water supply and cause more green house gas effect than the rest of the world combined but you won't say shit about that, faggot.

File: Liberal Protest.jpg (319KB, 2000x1335px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 2000x1335px

>>81995418

There's something about being a zealot SJW "progressive" that just sucks the life out of you and makes you look like shit.

I don't really understand the science behind the process, but the evidence is abundant.

Something about dedicating your time and energy to waging war on both facts and white males just shrivels your skin, sinks your eyes, greatly reduces or increases your body's fat-deposits, ruins your skin-texture, ruins your hair, etc.

It's why people(?) like Briana Wu look like disease-ridden hommunculi desperately trying to emulate human behavior.

Somebody post that comparison photo of Moldlylocks before and after she was brainwashed by shrieking SJW terrorists in college. Shit is shocking. It's like one of those "HEROIN, NOT EVEN ONCE" mugshot photos-comparisons.

>>81995763
>Objecting to nuclear power because of this is like saying we should abolish cars because cars without airbags and safety belts are sooooo dangerous.

No it is not like saying that at all you spastic.

>>81995530

Yeah but that wouldn't contribute to the extinction of White people, so fuck that.

>>81995058
Im not paying more in taxes. I live inland I dont give a fuck about ocean levels but I do cafe about politician s stealing my money.
Fuck Islands, I work for a living

>>81995765
I love stupid posts like this.

>"even if there is damage and we cause it, why does it matter?"
>"BUT WE ACTUALLY DON'T DAMAGE IT THAT MUCH, BY THE WAY"

So fucking transparent.

>>81995806
Yes it is, moron, because it's saying "some ways of doing X are bad therefore we should ban every way of doing X".

>>81995765
>China and India are allowed to dump toxic sludge into everyone's water supply and cause more green house gas effect than the rest of the world combined but you won't say shit about that, faggot.

Literally everyone says shit about that all the time you imbecile, it's one of the most commonly cited issues by dullards like yourself against the scientific fact of climate change, as though any problems with dealing with it have anything at all to do with whether or not it's true. Fucking kill yourself.

File: SJW's and Science.png (748KB, 939x947px) Image search: [Google]

748KB, 939x947px

>>81995747

His Whiteness and Maleness have apparently actually harmed his career.

Liberals always eat their own.

>>81995666
>>81995667

>Taking a single example out of the 6 things I wrote and discrediting it

Liberals.

>>81995779
That guy with the sign looks like he's been caught in a rare moment of self awareness. Like he saw the camera pointing at him, casually wondered how he looked, and then thought "oh yeah, I actually look weird as fuck to pretty much the entire world." Then he heard the click of the camera.

>>81995842

>I live inland

Yeah somewhere in the mountains I presume

I don't understand why both the left and right think in black and white so hard.
What purpose is there to deny climate change?
I hate how both sides think only one side is 100% correct and the other is 100% wrong.

>>81995847

There's nothing self-contradictory in what you posted.

Why did you think that was a contradiction?
Are you bad at reading?

>>81995530
Because it's still possible to save what we have left without flipping society on it's head. The problem is, people don't want to. They would rather wait until it isn't a choice just to be extra super duper sure that it isn't a hoax.

>>81995903
Care to explain how dinosaurs and earthquakes are related? At fucking all?

>>81995856

If cars could be turned into nuclear weapons, they would be fucking banned you cocksucking cunt.

>>81995662

>expecting Liberal millenials to go 8 seconds without updating their GoogleFacebook app on TweetBlogger from their iSperg 7.9783 model without a working headphone jack

lol, not gonna happen, grandpa! XD
people need to see photos of what food i order at Starbucks!!!1!

>muh libruls

It's so easy to understand the psychology of denialists. Their rejection of well established science isn't rooted in any argument or evidence, but merely pure partisanship. In their minds Global Warming is associated with liberals, and they just can't let liberals "win". As such, they will go to any extreme to save face, they already chose their side and have to stick with it.

>>81995903

Yeah what's wrong with that? Why can't I discredit one thing you said? Am I not allowed to discredit the stupid shit you say? Why not?

>>81995935
>There's nothing self-contradictory in what you posted.

So admitting that man-made climate change is real while dismissing whatever damage we may have caused (without even posting proof of this, mind you) isn't contradictory?

>>81995918
>when you're scared of le evil ocean swallowing you up but then are condescending to people smart enough to live far away from said ocean

>>81994416
This. Honestly I'm not even /pol/

>>81995979
>well established science
LOL

File: The pol Defense.png (2MB, 1443x810px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1443x810px

>And do you remember Bill Nye?
>The Science Guy that blew all our nips off as kids and made us love science
>Well now he's telling young kids trannys are part of evolution
>Making him
>A BITCH

>>81995956
You can't even understand analogies but you call other people retards?
There is no need to make powerplants that rely on HEU to work, which means that banning every nuclear power because HEU can be used as a weapon is as stupid as saying that we should ban all cars because cars without airbags are unsafe. Just ban cars without airbags, just ban powerplants which use HEU. Even then, HEU will still be produced in order to be used in nuclear medicine.

>>81995937
>Because it's still possible to save what we have left without flipping society on it's head.
Looking at the state of the current society what you're selling doesn't have an appeal.

>>81995984

I hope you don't whine when the snow on your mountain melts and your house gets washed downstream, Cletus

>>81995915

He's probably there at the behest of his Female Overlord.

If he didn't come to the Anti-Trump parade and pose for Facebook Selfies with her, she wouldn't have given him a consolation-blowie after she got done getting plowed by Jamal.

SJWism is the last refuge for men that can't get any but desperately want it.

>>81994604
>Global warming didn't become a political issue until anti-science politicians (all of which are Republican, coincidentally) started pushing to roll back environmentally-conscious policies
How much does that solar company pays you goy?.

>>81996026

Will they ban reactors that use HEU? Will they anon? Do you think they will?

What about dirty bombs?

>>81994147
I'm not gonna deny climate change but I'm not going to deny that trannys and those that think they are the opposite gender are nothing but mentally ill faggots either.

Fuck him and his degenerate propaganda as well as Netflix.

Only a fool would listen to any of the "facts" in this thread

>>81996118
but now if you deny trannys are normal you are in the same camp as climate deniers

>liberals playing 4d checkers

>>81995937

>Because it's still possible to save what we have left without flipping society on it's head.

Ending mass-immigration from Third-World countries into the west would not "flip society on its head".
In fact it's about the only way Europe could unfuck itself at this point.

>>81996135
thank you for your intup divine leader

>>81996052
>when your position contradicts itself and you still got to project your retardation onto others
Maybe take a walk to calm down, buddy

File: 1482497281442.png (631KB, 681x681px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 681x681px

>>81996159

>>81995983
Posing a hypothetical about something ("IF we WERE causing climate change...") isn't the same as asserting that thing as real ("We ARE causing climate change").

Also, no, that wouldn't be contradictory. A person can believe that humans are causing climate change, AND that the damage caused by climate change is negligible, without holding conflicting views.

>>81995979

>muh cunservativs

It's so easy to understand the psychology of religious zealots. Their rejection of well established science isn't rooted in any argument or evidence, but merely pure partisanship. In their minds Binary Gender is associated with conservatism and Christianity, and they just can't let conservatives "win". As such, they will go to any extreme to save face, they already chose their side and have to stick with it.

>>81996118
>>81996159

Have either of you actually listened to any arguments against your position?

>>81996106
>Will they ban reactors that use HEU? Will they anon? Do you think they will?
Dude, we're talking about ways things can be, do you remember? The crazy lady saying all nuclear power should be closed? The lady who was an antivaxxer at a certain point and has repeatedly defended omeopathy.
>What about dirty bombs?
What about them?

>>81996222
Have you?
Because avoiding tranny propaganda is basically impossible, they try to sneak it in everything they can.

>>81996220
>>muh cunservativs

Nobody in this thread has said that though, so your "witty" retort kinda falls down

>>81996159
>everyone that believes climate change is a liberal that loves trannies
Nice 7D checkers you got there.

>>81995942
>>81995982

How about you reply to literally anything else I wrote in my post?

File: china-bad-pollution-climate-change-7__880[1].jpg (35KB, 880x586px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 880x586px

>>81996219
>AND that the damage caused by climate change is negligible
You literally mention polluting third world countries in your post.

>>81996263
>Have you?

Uh yes? What's my position anon?

> tranny propaganda

You call it propaganda but how do you know it is?

>>81996266
I don't believe that, but (((they))) want us too.

>>81996276
How about you start explaining how dinosaurs are related to earthquakes.

>>81996280
I didn't know pollution was caused by climate change

>>81996276
>How about you reply to literally anything else I wrote in my post?

Because you're obviously stupid so I'm not going to read it. You should have put the dinosaur bit at the end.

>>81996234
>What about them?

You don't think that's a risk?

>>81996222
I just listen to an argument saying people believing they are something else besides what they were born as is evolution.

>>81996280

Except the picture you posted has shit to do with actual "global warming".

It's a picture that has something to do with how China belching-out airborn pollutants has turned their air to cancer.
And unlike "global warming", with air-pollution you can take a sample of air and scientifically prove beyond a shadow of a doubt how much or how little poison is in it.

Were you under the impression that "pollution" and "global warming" are the exact same thing? Because they aren't.

>>81996325
>pollution doesn't contribute to climate change
>pollution isn't man-made damage contributing to climate change

Conservative intellectuals.

>>81996297
>What's my position anon?
I don't know.
>You call it propaganda but how do you know it is?
Biased information used to promote a political goal is called propaganda. Noticing that the information given is always biased and misleading to some degree means is how I know it's propaganda.

>>81996280
Wasn't my post.

But that anon said that rising sea levels were nothing, and made no judgement on the severity of third world pollution.

File: 1452650943095.jpg (43KB, 444x512px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 444x512px

>>81995979
Bruh there is no proof that humans are the ones causing climate change, in fact there is stagnating evidence that humans are actually doing nothing to the climate. The earth goes through natural cycles. But yeah lets guilt everybody into making the US anti-competitive and dump billions into wasted research. Just like how liberals in Europe guilted their citizens to bring in a bunch of rapists who aren't actually from war-torn countries. But MUH feelings MUH guilt. Liberal logic.

>>81995765
China is literally the top investor in green tech.

>>81996280
>thinking air pollution in China has anything to do with climate change
you're the type of person that will take a picture of any type of environmental pollution and correlate it to climate change aren't you.

>>81996280
Liberals are the real racist. They don't want countries like China and India (and even Africa) to progress. These liberals only care about their convenience

>>81996369
Sure it is. But a risk is just potential damagg * probability of that damage to happen. So what you need to do is compare risks of different energy sources, for example by looking at their track record.
And it turns out, per TWh, nuclear power has called the least amount of deaths.

>>81996428
>thinking air pollution in China has nothing to do with climate change
Then again, you're denying climate change, so.

>>81996384
>chinks having to breathe polluted air is a result of climate change rather than proper waste management and lack of polluting laws.

>>81996387
>I don't know.

Then why are you asking if I have or have not listened to arguments against it? Why would you ask that without the context of what it is I believe? You sound like you're missing a chromosome or two.

>Noticing that the information given is always biased and misleading

But how do you know it's biased and misleading without listening to their arguments?

>>81996433
I'd prefer countries like China to breathe before attempting to do anything else.

File: Wut Aqua.jpg (184KB, 763x598px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 763x598px

>>81996264

>Nobody in this thread has said that though

Holy fuck that reality-denial.

Fucking read a thread before commenting in it, nignog.

>>81994170
>>81994473
>>81994514
>>81994525
>>81994604
>>81994632
>>81994681
>>81994728
>>81994896
>>81994923

The entire climate-cult side of this thread has their arguments based on "MUH CONSERVATIVES, MUH REDNECKS, MUH TRUMP-VOTERS".

>>81996481
>I prefer African kids dying rather than use gmo

>>81996472
>Why would you ask that without the context of what it is I believe?
Because regardless of what you believe you should listen to opposing arguments.
>But how do you know it's biased and misleading without listening to their arguments?
Who says I haven't?

>>81996384
>pollution doesn't contribute to climate change
Where did anyone say that?

>>81996439
>And it turns out, per TWh, nuclear power has called the least amount of deaths.

That point of measurement is unreliable to use in a comparison, simply because increasing nuclear to the same abundance as coal and oil will increase the associated risk in a non-linear fashion.

>if you are not for the unaccountable EPA regulating the environment, you are a climate-change denier

>>81995017
You're forgetting that climate change denial starts at big oil companies lobbying congress, and then works its way down the chain to your average American.

>>81996419

Yeah, and look what they have to show for it.

Why are americans still debating climate change as if public opinion had a say on the state of the science?
So far the evidence point toward AGW overwhelmingly.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It's all right here. Just look it up.

>>81996528
>Because regardless of what you believe you should listen to opposing arguments.

Yes I know anon, that's why I asked if you had first.

>Who says I haven't?

Well I asked you and you avoided answering the question

>>81996525
I unironically do.

>>81996525
>it's a conservatives pretend to be liberals for the sake of meme arguments

I'm really impressed by your strong, consistent views. I thought you faggots didn't even care for foreign aid.

>>81996384
>>81996446

>any pollution in any form = climate change

Holy fucking shit.
These are the people who want to raise your taxes.

>>81996560

>the EPA should be accountable to the polluters

lol

>>81996446
The smog in China isn't a result of climate change dumb-ass. The argument of whether or not the air pollution in China contributes to climate change is moot from the fact that you framed the disgusting air in Beijing as a direct effect of climate change rather than a cause in an attempt to portray the "catastrophic effects" of climate change when in relativity it is the catastrophic effects air pollution .

>Then again, you're denying climate change, so.
>hurr durr you're anti science, so don't refute me k.
But then again you're probably a babbling retard, so.

>>81996562
>You're forgetting that climate change propaganda starts at big solar and wind companies lobbying congress, and then works its way down the chain to your average American.
It goes both ways goyim

>>81996551
>simply because increasing nuclear to the same abundance as coal and oil will increase the associated risk in a non-linear fashion.
But that's just false and we know that by looking at how many deaths nuclear power causes in places like France, where nuclear provides a great deal of energy, and compare it to places where nuclear provides a lot less energy.

>>81996630
>The smog in China isn't a result of climate change dumb-ass.

No but they do share a cause.

File: 1469730329274.jpg (80KB, 766x960px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 766x960px

>>81995702
that's not even the worst bit...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8

>>81996601

>I thought you faggots didn't even care for foreign aid.

Considering Conservatives consistently give more to voluntary charity donations than Liberals ever do, I'd say you're talking shit while knowing jack shit.

>>81996572
Climate change denial is rooted in partisanship. To them, it isn't a scientific issue, it's about their team winning.

>>81996630
>>81996617
>>81996428
>deliberately misinterpreting a post for easy quips

The guy I quoted said man-made damage was negligible. I showed a picture that pretty much disproved that. I never claimed pollution was caused by climate change, I don't know why you keep pushing that strawman.

>>81996640
Except big oil is already well established, whereas clean energy (especially wind) is expensive and terribly inefficient sometimes.

>>81996654
Are you intentionally trying to be retarded or are you legitimately retarded?

>>81996646
>But that's just false and we know that by looking at how many deaths nuclear power causes in places like France

That's a false equivalence, firstly because France is a small country and not the entire world, and the infrastructure at risk that would supply the entire world doesn't exist yes, and secondly because nuclear as a commercial energy source hasn't existed for as long as fossil fuels.

>it's a conservative doesn't believe science because muh taxes
Because you don't agree with the policies put in place doesn't mean the science behind it is wrong. You'd know if you put a little of effort to look into it, and you'd look less like an idiot if you were able to come up with a plan for it instead of handwaving it away because reality doesn't align with your politics.
Issues like this made me walk away from the libertarian/conservative internet free space.

>>81996665
>Considering Conservatives consistently give more to voluntary charity donations than Liberals ever do
Really earning that cuckservative title

>>81996665
>Considering Conservatives consistently give more to voluntary charity donations than Liberals ever do, I'd say you're talking shit while knowing jack shit.

Oh good I'll bring this up next time a conservitard makes a thread about how liberals give money to africa because they're cucks or something

>>81996703
You quoted in your own post

>AND that the damage caused by climate change is negligible

Thus you responded by posting a picture of a somehing that is not caused by climate change

>>81996562

>IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACY

Actually my opinions on climate-change come from the hysterical, hypocritical and conformist behavior of climate-cultists and the consistent tendency of the phenomenon to change its name every decade in order to keep the Moral Panic up and in the media.
Oh, and the consistently wrong predictions of """researchers""" doing PR-work for their firms that want that sweet, sweet government dosh.

But by all means, keep telling me I am ACTUALLY the psychic mind-controlled puppet of some imaginary white cis male billionaire boogeyman. That way you don't have to ACTUALLY deal with the fact that fellow Americans aren't all on the same bandwagon you hopped on.

>>81996709
>Are you intentionally trying to be retarded or are you legitimately retarded?

Nothing I said was wrong.

>>81996661
>bill nye at 1:58
Ah yes, "science."

>>81996787
>Actually my opinions on climate-change come from the hysterical, hypocritical and conformist behavior of climate-cultists
So not scientists. Got it.

>>81996787
>Actually my opinions on climate-change come from the hysterical, hypocritical and conformist behavior of climate-cultists

Oh ok so

>IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACY

glad we cleared that up

>>81996710
Sure France is small but it produces a lot more nuclear power than lots of countries and the death aren't exponentially higher, which means that it's not that obvious that if we were to increase the overall production of nuclear energy then deaths would sky-rocket.
They didn't skyrocket from 1960 to today, and the total amount of nuclear energy we produce annually is several times higher, so...

>>81996710
France is the largest country in the EU

>>81996703
>The guy I quoted said man-made damage was negligible. I showed a picture that pretty much disproved that. I never claimed pollution was caused by climate change
on an unrelated note to your damage control for trying to frame China's air pollution as an effect of climate change.
Well then why isn't Nye holding seminars in China, India, Brazil, pretty much all of the developing world? Why is he lecturing the first world when it is the first world almost exclusively that actually gives a damn about using clean energy and renewable resources?

>>81996589
Well I have, so...

>you should just accept science on blind faith and never think about it or question it
No.

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-24 at 12.05.52 PM.png (1MB, 2214x1406px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2214x1406px

>>81996562
Oil companies are AGW supporters

This is a way of artificially increasing the price of oil so climate change wackery works in their favor

>>81996797
its also denying the fact that you attempted to portray air pollution as an effect of climate change rather than a possible cause.

>>81996725

>CONSERVATIVES ARE GREEDY AND DON'T WANT TO SHARE THE WEALTH #FUCKWALLSTREET
>Actually when under the scrutiny of peer-reviewed studies, people who self-identify as "politically conservative" are giving far MORE money to the needy than the self-professed "generous" liberals ar-
>HA HA FUCKING KEKS CHARITABILITY IS FOR SUCKERS HA HA

>>81996757
>Oh good I'll bring this up next time a conservitard makes a thread about how liberals give money to africa because they're cucks or something
Not even /pol/ say something close to this shit. And foreign aid most of the time ends in a pocket of some corrupt fuck

File: energy.png (50KB, 352x314px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 352x314px

>>81996859
>it is the first world almost exclusively that actually gives a damn about using clean energy
Stop this meme.
What are your sources? Where did you take that information from?

>>81996889
That's not surprising, oil companies hate coal companies, they're competition.

>>81996829

>media-campaign with an agenda = CONSPIRACY

Fox News confirmed for actually being fair & balanced then.
The idea of bias in the media or media with an agenda is a "CONSPIRACY THEORY".

>>81996895
if people are starving on the streets of a first world country i honestly don't think it's the job of a charity to do something about it it's the job of the government to look after all it's citizens

too many shady as fuck charities around and most donations are tax deductible.

File: xh68AKT.png (10KB, 308x78px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 308x78px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46h-LfNWPn8&t=0s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8&feature=youtu.be
VANILLA ICE CREAM B T F O

>>81996878
No, you should read scientific literature.
Not listen to bloggers misrepresenting data and quoting fake news like Crowder or Alex Jones.

>>81996562

>You're forgetting that climate change denial starts at big oil companies

Including the big oil companies that PROMOTE climate-alarmism and are pledging to do what they can to fight it?

>>81996846
>it's not that obvious that if we were to increase the overall production of nuclear energy then deaths would sky-rocket

Future events aren't something you can use a metric to predict. Atomic bombs didn't kill anyone until 1945 did they? Then all of a sudden deaths skyrocketed.

>>81996967
>what is PR

>>81996896
>Not even /pol/ say something close to this shit.

Yes they do

>>81996967
I believe your shitty kind calls that "virtue signaling"?

>>81996889
And at the same time Exxonmobile keep giving money to climate-change deniers.

>>81996951
>too many shady as fuck charities around and most donations are tax deductible.
This desu. Few honest people left anon, dark times indeed

>>81996572

>Why are americans still debating climate change

Because it's not a concept that can be conclusively proved. And anything that can't be conclusively proved is open to debate, and debate is what intellectually healthy people do.

You're probably not used to this in Europe, where the Government & Media Overlords decide what gets discussed and what doesn't, and anybody who falls out of line gets jailed for offending someone on Twitter, or at the very least smeared in a media-campaign by a media that just so happens to be taxpayer-funded.

>>81996895
>>CONSERVATIVES ARE GREEDY AND DON'T WANT TO SHARE THE WEALTH #FUCKWALLSTREET
Never said that. Stop feeding niggers, you cuck

>>81996971
Yeah but there weren't any nuclear bombs before then, I'm saying we've already seen the amount of nuclear power increase significantly and the rate of deaths in the 60s is basically the same as the rate of deaths in the 00s.

>>81996220
Good job proving my point

>>81997031
>debate is what intellectually healthy people do.
This is not a political debate. It's a scientific one. And evidence concluded so far that AGW is the cause of the current global warming.

I don't give a shit about your political opinions.

>>81994147
NEVER!

>>81996919
>What are your sources? Where did you take that information from?
>posts a graph that depicts China and India contributing more than the United States and Europe

>>81996951

>too many shady as fuck charities around and most donations are tax deductible.

Yeah it's not like the government could ever house corruption or anything.

There is no man made climate change...it's like Evolution, it's a MYTH!

File: 1270905486755.jpg (18KB, 392x358px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 392x358px

>>81994473
>im a free thinker

your god is not real shut up racist

>>81996919

How long has China been investing that much money in "Green Energy"?

Compared to, say, the United States, which has been dumping money into it since the fucking 1970's?

>>81997073
Yes, that's what I did. Are you ok?

>>81997004
they give money to practically anyone. thats how research in industry works.

its completely different from the focused scope of academia. most big companies go full million monkey theorem and fling shit at walls till something sticks. its literally what lockheed martin is doing with fusion, putting a bunch of engineers in a giant fucking warehouse and having them independently work on dozens of different fusion prototypes till someone gets something right.

>>81996951

>i honestly don't think it's the job of a charity to do something about it it's the job of the government

Yeah, fuck voluntary charity.

Charity should exclusively be conducted by putting a gun to someone's head and taking their money to spend on the poor. No choice involved.

>>81997031
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
Here is empirical evidence of man-made global warming. This is a hard measurement using scientific tools. It is not open to debate.

>>81994416
The part you fail to realize is that his stance on climate change is backed by the vast majority of scientists in the field. The people who are saying "lol it's getting colder sometimes climate change btfo" are literally saying that they're just as people with PhD's in the field. It is literally "anti-science" if you disagree.

>>81996993

>DUDE IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACY LMAO

Wait, I thought you kept saying your OPPONENTS were the conspiracy-theorists? Which is it?

>>81996919 #

How long has China been investing that much money in "Green Energy"?

Compared to, say, the United States, which has been dumping money into it since the fucking 1970's?
Should developing country like China care more about improving their people's life or liberal virtue signalling?

>>81997109
>since the fucking 1970's?
Indeed, how much?
Have you looked into it?

Do you still claim that only the first world cares about it, when China has skyrocketed its investment into it in the past decade to the point they're the first contributor?

>>81997003

>getting triggered over the public calling-out celebrities and companies when they virtue-signal

I love how the left supposedly HATES those big business 1%er scum until they start preaching leftist moralism.
Then they literally can't choke-down enough big business cock.

See: North Carolina and the tranny bathroom movement.

>>81997156
You're just gonna go ahead and pretend you've never bitched about virtue signaling before? Okay.

So how comes it's only Americans and a couple of third world countries that deny climate change and evolution?

File: your tax dollars at work.png (911KB, 693x528px) Image search: [Google]

911KB, 693x528px

>>81996951
lol. you completely underestimate the wastefullness of your government. i personally burned 3 million dollars in usable/recyclable lumber during my time in the military because of retarded red tape.

pic related, you can see the old burn pit from space.

>>81997004

>spending money to promote Climate Change Alarmism while at the same time also giving money to Climate Change Denialism

ExxonMobil is playing some seriously complicated 5D Chess here.
How fucking deep does this conspiracy go?

>>81997202
Because our government isn't socialist (yet) and we still follow the word of God.

>>81997146

>Here is empirical evidence

Lots of causes have evidence. Evidence isn't what concludes a debate. Proof is.

Do you have proof? If not then the debate is still open and you're a faggot that doesn't understand science.

>>81997166
Or perhaps the world doesn't revolve around american political squabbles.
Global warming is a scientific fact, and China acknowledged that. Perhaps you should read up a bit.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
You could start here. Plenty of pretty pictures to look at.

>>81997053
>Yeah but there weren't any nuclear bombs before then

Yes there were, they tested them for a while before they used them. If you showed a nuclear bomb to a caveman, would he predict the outcome of using one?

>I'm saying we've already seen the amount of nuclear power increase significantly and the rate of deaths in the 60s is basically the same as the rate of deaths in the 00s

And what I'm saying is that the future is unpredictable. If you had data that said the death rate was stable over maybe 150 years, I'd probably be more comfortable. But 40 years isn't a very long time in the grand scheme of things. Who could have predicted the Industrial revolution and the deaths that resulted because of that? Who could have predicted the Fukushima incident? An earthquake AND a tsunami hitting a nuclear power plant? Impossible, they would have said. But it happened anyway. And the result of nuclear accidents are far worse than with any other form of power generation, which is why people are worried. Now if you increase the global network of infrastructure related to these, the likelihood of accidents occurring greatly increases.

>>81997202
Protestant culture.
Lack of education.

>>81997202
>So how comes it's only Europeans and a couple of third world countries that believe everything that media wants them to believe?

>>81997182
NCer here, you are retarded. Even in a red state that voted completely for the GOP we kicked out the governor stupid enough to introduce the bathroom law because our state has lost millions.

>>81994404
underrated

he's literally a god to them up there with Bernie Sanders

File: bernouts.jpg (26KB, 476x414px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 476x414px

>>81997221
>Because our government isn't socialist (yet)
>>>/reddit/

File: Crested Ibis-chan Fan Macro.jpg (37KB, 471x522px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 471x522px

>>81997066

>This is not a political debate.

It very clearly is, cuck.

>>81997211
No need for >le 5d chess meme.
They're doing the same shit big tobacco has been doing since science started looking at tabacco induced health issues.

>>81997202
ever think that maybe we don't deny it, we just don't want to cripple our economy to fix it?

our country already subsidizes the defense of the entirety of europe.

>>81997244
go home Irish scum

>>81994147
EPISODE 3

>Bill Nye parachutes on the stage
>Audience going wild
>"Haha conservatives amirite?"
>Audience claps and cheers
>"We've got a special gues today"
>Audience gasps
>Blue-haired land whale waddles on to the stage
>Audience claps harder
>"Haha christians are so dumb amirite?"
>Audience claps and laughs hysterically
>Corporate sponsored McDonalds "progressive burgers" are handed out between takes

Repeat ad-infinitum

>>81997278
I am not a socialist, I actually think Bernie and his supporters aught to be placed in prison for treason...same with Killery and her supporters. Democrats/socialists are traitors as they aim to bring down the US.

>>81997280
No, science is not political.

>>81997296
Kek

>>81997146

>http://www.skepticalscience.com

Thank God it has "skeptical" and "science" in the title. Otherwise how could I be sure it was in fact science, and coming from a skeptical perspective?

It's like Politifact. You know it's factual because it has "fact" in the name.

>>81997235
>Do you have proof? If not then the debate is still open and you're a faggot that doesn't understand science.

Nice bait lol

>>81997330
Not an argument.

>>81997311
>I actually think Bernie and his supporters aught to be placed in prison for treason

Man I hope you don't have children

>>81997152

>vast majority

Libturds keep saying this over and over again. What constitutes a "vast majority"? Also, what constitutes a "scientist"? The guy measuring PH levels on comparative samples of cat-pee shouldn't be allowed to weigh-in on this topic.

You just heat "majority of scientists agree" and swallow it like a good cuck.

I can't help but notice that "scientists" aren't the ones screaming and dancing in the streets holding signs and taking off their clothes. Liberals are.

>>81997239
>But it happened anyway
Yeah, and nobody died because of the radiation.
But look, all of this is beside the point. We can't have reliable power production solely through renewables, so we need to have something else that something else can either be the thing that looks like the safest thing we've ever had, or oil and coal which are the worst we have. Now choose.

>>81997235
You're presenting a false premise where both sides of the argument are on equal footing.
I have science. You have conspiracy theories.

>>81997237

>Global warming is a scientific fact, and China acknowledged that.

WELL THANK GOD CHINA WEIGHED-IN ON THE ISSUE. MUST BE REAL THEN. I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT A FACT IS OR NOT UNTIL A DYSTOPIAN COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT WEIGHS-IN ON THE ISSUE.

>>81997383
>The guy measuring PH levels on comparative samples of cat-pee shouldn't be allowed to weigh-in on this topic.
That's why the paper on scientists opinion was only conducted on a sample of people that produced paper on climate science.
"Vast majority" is 97%.

>>81997393
Anon please. If it isn't mentioned in the bible it's not a fact.
See evolution.

>>81997330
>Otherwise how could I be sure it was in fact science, and coming from a skeptical perspective?

Perhaps you could try reading it, instead of assuming its contents from the title. Ironic, considering your post.

>>81997202
The only Americans who deny it are a subset of Republicans

>>81997331

>i literally don't know how debate works
>everything i don't understand is bait

Typical cultist sheep.

>get a degree in mechanical engineering
>make a career out of calling yourself a scientist

>>81997392
>Now choose.

I choose the 3rd option. Neither.

>>81997317

Bill Nye begs to differ.

File: 1474886434722.jpg (1MB, 4030x4096px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4030x4096px

>>81996118
>>81994961
>>81994514
>>81994173
>>81994170
>>81994187
>>81997031
>>81997001
>>81996956


stop denying the gender spectrum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wllc5gSc-N8

>>81997433

Who are you quoting?

>>81997435
Back in my day, the fake scientist had the decency to go by MR. Wizard.

>>81997435
>this
he's an actor
nothing more

>>81995272
Yes. But if they have no evidence to back up their ideological rhetoric they should shut the fuck up.

>>81997393

>dismissing the issue with smug deflection

OK cool.

>>81997452
Bill Nye is not a climate scientist, nor is Al Gore or Alex Jones.

>>81997202

How come it's only Europeans and a couple of third world countries that suck-up everything promoted by the media and then have a nuclear shit-fit when people try to think for themselves?

How's that "diversity is inherently good" and "there are 5 billion genders" dogma treating you, by the way?
I'm sure it's greatly reduced rapes and self-inflicted genital-mutilation.

>>81997202
because trying to combat climate change is useless because it's inevitable with a growing population and a dependance on dirty energy
no matter what reddit tells you only certain parts of the world can live off clean energy

>>81997478

>I'll call him smug, that should show everyone he's wrong. People hate smug people

>>81997517
>when people try to think for themselves?

Nobody is thinking for themselves though, they're all talking points they heard from other people

>>81997435

Honestly this.

Liberals need to stop thinking any cuck that gets a STEM degree is now a """scientist""" when many of them are not only less informed, but measurably stupider than most white-collar workers.

File: 1485391372611.png (386KB, 604x604px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 604x604px

>>81997466
wtf I hate binary genders now.

>>81997555
>measurably stupider than most white-collar workers.

You've measured Bill Nye's intelligence compared to most white-collar workers?

>>81997517
>when people try to think for themselves?
Because that's not how science work you mong.
If you can't produce any evidence while dismissing the work of actual scientists because "muh opinions matter", why are you talking

>>81997478
>issue
Are the validity of reproducible observations considered an "issue" to Americans?

>>81995159
Saying something is science without repeatable mathematic models to back it up is anti-science.

>>81997606
But models are a good part of climate science. In fact it's one of the first thing people criticize about it even though they've been proven rigorous

>>81997606
>repeatable mathematic models
>required for science

300k starting I presume

I love how if you're skeptical of the impact-level of Climate Change, or opposed to the extreme measures proposed to "fight" Climate Change, you're automatically a "denialist".

There are fucking degrees of agreement and disagreement, Liberals.
But not creating a false-dilemma means less religious fervor and less tax-dollars. A "moderate threat" to the environment doesn't generate enough buzz, so it's got to be an apocalyptic threat that requires everyone to pay super high taxes and never eat steak again.

>>81997517
>How's that "diversity is inherently good" and "there are 5 billion genders" dogma treating you, by the way?
Who came up with both, Mr 56%?

>>81997641
>it's got to be an apocalyptic threat
Which paper are you quoting lad

>>81997641
>I love how if you're skeptical of the impact-level of Climate Change, or opposed to the extreme measures proposed to "fight" Climate Change, you're automatically a "denialist".

I love how you just make things up to make your political angle look more tangible.

I think that's called strawmanning or something

>>81997574

Bill Nye literally wants to put people in jail for skepticism.

He also was flabbergasted by the fact that non-carnivores sometimes have sharp teeth, despite supposedly being a "science guy" and preparing for the specific debate-topic of biology.

The dude is a legit clown.
A week at the average white-collar job would have him fired because he accidentally microwaved a stapler in the breakroom.

File: 6i5OadT.jpg (65KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1024x576px

>>81997393
>posts no research to back his claim
>I have science. You have conspiracy theories.
that sentence must have sounded really cool in your head

>>81997696
Good for him.
Now, are you telling me your whole stance on science is defined by how much you hate Bill Nye?

>>81997690
"make things up"
Climate change is a made up thing.

>>81997696
>Bill Nye literally wants to put people in jail for skepticism.

The Nazis wanted to exerminate the Jews but they all had pretty high IQs.

NOW ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION CUNT

>>81997740
Read up the reply chain a bit further.

>>81997588

>reproducible observations

Climate change calculations typically aren't reproducible you mong.
Climate change isn't like measuring air-contamination or something else that is typically measurable. It relies on large-scale models interplay within a chaotic system. And when that happens it becomes more about prediction rather than measurement.

If the results were "reproducible observations" then California and Shanghai would have been underwater 15 years ago. But they weren't.