Supergirl

I want to loosen her balloon knot with my tongue

why don't you watch porn instead, you stupid dickhead?

The internet has turned you into a whiney faggot.
Stop watching television. You have the same opinion about everything now.

>>81779669
for me it's the Supergirl armpit shot, the most patrician of supergirl shots

>>81779632
I haven't watched it since it switched to CW. I just found it boring after awhile, and only interested in the action scenes.

Step 1) Stop doing things you don't enjoy
Step 2) Start doing things you enjoy

>>81779734
This. Why is acting like this cool to you people?

>sure am glad I am not a whiney little bitch like those SJW amirite

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVY2KwagyGE

>>81779787
look man I just watch for the five seconds or so she shows her armpits every episode, where do you think you are right now.

>>81779632

it gets better in season 2 when it goes to the CW, there's still obvious liberal themes but they are at least actual themes now (ayy lmaos as metaphors for immigrants) rather than just literally saying out loud "I don't want to work for white men"

>>81779836
>just turn your brain off bro XD

>>81779807
>she's not strong enough
>WHY, BECAUSE SHE'S A GIRL!???!

ugh. UGH.

>>81779990
>oh I'm not tumblr at all. Some would say I'm the reverse

>>81779734
>>81779805
>acknowledging the fact a show has heavy feminist and political propaganda is whining

File: superpower.jpg (352KB, 1338x1417px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1338x1417px

Drop it. Even chink cartoons is better.

File: file.png (397KB, 523x583px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 523x583px

are these the best legs in television

She has been the wearing the same pair of boots this entire time right? And has performed quite the physical activities in them. I would pay thousands of pounds for a whiff. They look so inviting...

>>81780235
yea and shes covered up more thana muslim though, why even make the show?

>>81779807
>I have difficulty making conversation with men under 6 feet tall
>fucks him anyway
Something's not right here...

>>81780327
Great, now I'm imagining a situation where actual Supergirl forces you to sniff her smelly boots.

>>81779807
Mother of God.

>>81779632
I just watch it for the precious Superpuppy

>>81780990
The show moved out of it as time went on once they realized people weren't having it

>>81780907

Anon, you make that sound almost like it's a bad thing.

>sg thread
>no neckposting

fix ur shit

>>81781405
No, fix ur shit

>>81780050
so stop watching it

it's a shit show for teenyboppers anyway, go watch some adult entertainment manchildren

>>81780151
No they aren't, and trying to disguise your weabooism behind racism isn't going to fly here, fuckface

File: 2956063-2519563-sg08a.jpg (65KB, 318x502px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 318x502px

>>81781359
Wouldn't it be though?

>>81781540
Anon, how about you take some tissues and some lotion and masturbate into the corner instead of trying to make this thread into your personal jerk off thread.

>>81779807
Having a show about a female superhero is feminist. There's no need to have characters randomly transform into bloggers and literally start telling people the show's themes IN THE FUCKING SHOW

"Here's your coffee sir, by the way SUPERGIRL IS A FEMINIST ISN'T THAT GREAT?"

The only reason they do that is to disguise the fact that, actually, the fact that they've made a show about a female superhero entirely about dating and relationship drama is fucking bullshit

>>81779632
I like watching her get punished
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtTKnkPTKi0

>>81781617
No, it's not feminist unless you say the word feminist, preferably more than once.

>>81781562
Sounds the start of a fun night to me.

>>81781540
Cuck posters are the cancer killing this site.

>>81781012
Krypto is in the show?
But Supergirl's pet was Streaky the cat

>>81782195
He was referring to Supergirl herself

>>81781477
it's propaganda and if left uncheck it can do way more damage than good. You know, sometime ago there was a television show that had a doctor calling homosexuality a disease, fags literally forced a network to be rid of that episode. Did they, just stop watching it because it wasn't for their demographic? Of course not. Much like in the 70s Doctors who called Homosexuality participants more likely to commit suicide and do drugs and so on, was literally attacked both verbally and professionally by fags and their supporters. Why didn't they just, leave it alone?

>>81781849
>show is all about "fuck yeah! girl power!"
>fantasy fulfillment character has to be rescued by a man.

>>81781521
what a cuck

>>81781438
NO FIX UR SHIT

>>81782529
No sir, I kindly and respectfully ask you to FIX UR SHIT

File: nexx.jpg (59KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1024x680px

>its a neck thread

>>81782566
FINALLY

shit status: fixed

>>81782566
You can clearly see it isn't

>>81779632
>swn fuck you in the ass with a strap-on while calling you a good girl

>>81782611
see
>>81781577

>>81782654
mmm yeah supergirl scorn me like the criminal scum that I am, rub your sweaty armpits on me after you've captured me. Imprison me in STAR labs like you've imprisoned my cock. Booyah.

>>81782769
STAR labs is on the Flash, not Supergirl. Supergirl has the DEO, even then it's for aliens

>>81779632
The only Arrowverse show I enjoy is The Flash. Legends I just don't find entertaining, Arrow is generic and boring, and Supergirl is silly and crams the empowered woman meme down your throat every five seconds.

When there's crossover episodes I don't mind so much, like Supergirl helping in Invasion. She's a decent character but when you make her the subject of a show there's 0 content except look how pretty she is and muh feminism.

If they wanted to make a tv show with a DC superpowered female lead they should have picked wonder woman or some shit. Having your main character just be the afterthought female version of a male character sort of undercuts the feminism a bit anyway.

>>81779669
>ywn tounge-punch her turd-cutter
jdimsa

File: 1458672135551.jpg (55KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x500px

>>81782611

>>81782566
>DAT COLLARBONE
BAW
GAWD

>>81779632
>I've been trying really hard to like this

I don't understand this. How can you possibly have enough free time to waste watching stuff you don't even like?

This is why garbage tv is allowed to exist. Watch something worthwhile that isn't capeshit.

>>81783468
So as long as ONE person watches these lies, that's one too many. Our purpose is to resist however we can. We will fight them until everyone knows who and what they really are. And is aware of the message they're trying to spoil the most impressionable among us, with. This is a purpose, so if you're not with us, then you're with them, and if you're neither. Step to the side and remain as you were for the interim.

>>81783468
In his defense he's on /tv/ which simultaneously can't stop talking about capeshit while shitting over anything remotely interesting.

Shame there wasn't any fappening videos.
Pics were decent tho.

>>81783849
And this, this feminist liberal propaganda, is, as you put it, remotely interesting?

File: Superfeminist.jpg (247KB, 892x1200px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 892x1200px

She seems like a good actress.

>>81783926
No, I'm not defending this shit show. I've only seen bits in passing. I'm just saying that anybody that frequents /tv/ much will be prone to watch garbage because /tv/ is garbage too.

>>81783970
>literally need to bring a sign to remind everyone that you play that role in that show no one has watched

>>81783970
Both her, and her god-awful show is a perfect match.


>>81784008

Because out of the more than half a million people who frequent this place monthly, they're all one type of viewer, one type of watcher, one type of individual. Both you and I, and they, are all the same person. I think it would be safer to say that some are for, and others against, and even more still are simply undecided, yes?

i've watched worse for less qt women

File: kara401982412.png (646KB, 474x816px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 474x816px

>>81784136
it boils down to this, yeah

>>81782345
There's a big difference between a show going "homosexuality is a disease", classifying all gays as mentally ill, and a show going "some white men are lame sometimes".

Good luck with your persecution complex though, I guarantee it'll only make you angry, afraid, and miserable.

>>81782518
Kk pedo, back to /a/ with your degenerate cartoons

P.S, I fucked your body pillow right in the seam

>>81784091
>Because out of the more than half a million people who frequent this place monthly, they're all one type of viewer, one type of watcher, one type of individual. Both you and I, and they, are all the same person. I think it would be safer to say that some are for, and others against, and even more still are simply undecided, yes?
I'm not pretending that everybody on /tv/ is the same person but the fact remains that the vast majority of threads on /tv/ are garbage.

Just look at the first fucking page.
thread about a nude picture of an actress

thread making fun of an autistic character in a childrens show

thread dedicated to spewing 2012 memes

thread about an actors choice of clothing during their down time

thread made for people to bitch about the fanbase of a comedy cartoon made for teenagers

thread about a podcast that's barely even related to movies or television

thread about if an actor hates where disney is going with the direction of a series of childrens films

shitpost thread about a soon to be released childrens films side kick character smiling.

thread about the number of post credit scenes in a superhero movie that's going to be released soon

1 thread talking about a talented actress

thread about alex jones

thread about a youtuber that primarily reviews media designed for children and teenagers to consume

meme thread about a youtuber

thread about a horror movie that nobody will remember in a year.

>>81782518
triggered?

>>81784346
it's all m,en all the time tho, and you are a piece of shit commie scum for trying to disinfo with the false description

day of the rope can't come soon enough

>>81782345
Learn to commas or fuck off back to the war-torn sewer you rodents call a country

>>81784346
You see, Homosexual men are five times more likely to have an std, and 39% of all HIV cases are gay men, and, And gay men are more likely to spread HIV/AIDS than straight men. And they're more likely to be drunkards, drug abusers and child molesters, per capita. And they're less than 2% of any population.

Gay women, are more abusive to women per capita than men are to the tune of all abuses against women that are committed by a gay woman is 29% And among bisexual women, 37%. Yet, they're less than 2% of any population. And even funnier, they're more likely to be drunkards and drug users and in each instance,both sides admit to being under the influence when meeting or having sex,with new people.

Now imagine a Doctor, who sees that per capita, Gays are more suicidal, and they're more abusive and are drunkards, and are heavier drug users and are more prone to behave unnaturallly. That there's a clear sign of a mental disorder. Ever see a gay parade? Those people should be locked away until cured.

But of course now that the fags and the left controls the narrative, there's absolutely nothing at all wrong with fags, now is there?

I know a gay woman, she's the butch, and her bottom gave her several concussions and her bottom flirts on her, and she has broken her bones on more than one occasion. These people are diseased animals, anon.

>>81784526
Don't you have a muslim penis to suck, Britcuck, or are you swedish?

>>81784476
I encourage them to resist the status quo and the ones who controls the narrative however they can. Meme, them, or berate them or simply troll them. The goal is to shake their hgih towers and to introduce the impressionable ones into the conversation so that they too can see what's really at the top.

Ever notice of how in the great many meme threads the speakers of the truth tends to pop up and spit the truth then shrink back into the obscurity of anonymity. I rather like that.

>>81783970
that makes me want to grab it out of curiosity though

>>81784559
Source those claims, and we'll debate.

>>81784640
Nobody can understand what you're fucking saying. You're now speaking the truth, you're vomiting diarrhoea.

You're never going to be a lone voice of reason fighting the good fight against the big meanie left because you're an illiterate fucktard.

>>81784640
Maybe you should try sucking a penis, anon. It might help you work out those anger issues. Some sex is better than no sex at all.

>>81784640
>Ever notice of how in the great many meme threads the speakers of the truth tends to pop up and spit the truth then shrink back into the obscurity of anonymity. I rather like that.

What great truth is that? Peepee poopoo big guy 4 u?

WHO WAS TAKING THE PICS?

>>81784726
Gays are so damaged, that wherever they are, they're the same. I spent,literally, a month reading reports and asking a great many people of the validity of this. And you know what, You can literally, LITERALLY, ask any state's social services and police reports and hospital reports of the who, and the what, and they'll tell you. In fact, I saw so many documents that has been down played by the left. In especially of how black youths who are causing 50% of crime in the United States are almost always welfare babies or are associated or partnered with, someone who is still using or was a product of, state sponsored welfare. I'd say Google is your friend, but in this case, it's your enemy. Use Bing, and Use Duck, duck go.

have fun.

>>81784774
Some of us suffer autism, and even others still, dyslexia. It is what it is, but our message still gets out. It's okay leftie, the butt hurt will ease in time.

>>81784850
That the left is out to destroy the west. And to replace white young men, with disgusting immigrants who destroyed their own countries. But we're onto you, and we'll fight you however we can.
You see when a young man picks up his rifle to do what is right, he doesn't have to be a perfectionist in grammar, to kill the enemy and to die for his belief.

>>81779632
not only do you have shit taste, you are triggered easily

>>81784955
No, provide the sources for your argument. Provide links to these alleged statistics.

>Some of us suffer autism

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Opinion discarded

File: Dr. Phil.png (942KB, 687x871px) Image search: [Google]

942KB, 687x871px

>>81784953
>what are tripods
>what are settings to take multiple pictures after a certain amount of time
Are you retarded?

>>81784724
yeah but u are a beta who never gets laid, you never gonna grab her pussy hahahah

>>81784955
I'm not even a liberal, and you think arguing with me on a messageboard is fighting the left? Why do you think they need fighting? Every major government in five years is going to be right-wing, nationalist and conservative. Who do you even think is left to fight? Why are you fighting? What are you trying to prove?

You're not some hero rebel fighting against the forces of evil, you're trying to boost your own non-existent self-esteem by investing heavily in your own gender and race because you've got fuck all else to rely on - and you know why you've got fuck all else to base your self-esteem on? Because you're autistic, with zero social skills, friends, or romantic relationships. And that's sad. I wish the world was kinder to people with neurological conditions like yours. If it was, you wouldn't be so desperate to smear all gays as mentally ill to feel better about your actual mental handicap.

>>81785006
Provide proof? Why should I rob you of the joy of finding out for yourself. I will not aide you, leftie, I will not help you seek the truth. The Truth, Leftie, is there if you want to find it. But I will not help you, unless you first help yourself. Of course those of us who knows better laughs at your kind for being foolish..

>>81785006
Don't be cruel to the retard, his forum wars are all he's got. Let him think he's won.

>>81785114

Ok, here's some proof:

https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/apa-blogs/apa-blog/2016/03/homosexuality-as-a-mental-disorder-simply-not-backed-up-by-science

I win! Science says you're wrong :)

>tfw you have no support for your argument

Ahahahaha! Autist McNoproof!

File: 1439092302494.jpg (661KB, 958x775px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 958x775px

>>81785104
>Fighting the left is bad goy! Pretend it doesn't exist and they will go away! Even though media, news, and Trump's cabinet is full of radical leftists, there is NOTHING TO FEAR GOY ACCEPT YOUR FATE!

I want her superpowered vulva to exsanguinate my tongue before she crushes my skull into a bloody pulp between my thighs

Is that weird?

>>81785201
>Trump's cabinet is full of radical leftists

Nice try, false-flagger. I can spot a fake alt-righter from miles away.

>>81785104
In Revolutions, and when societies fall, you think the worded ones like yourself are the ones who gets to make the decisions that brings about change? It's the one who is the boldest who gets to control the winds of change. And just because Trump won the popular vote, doesn't mean the narrative has become the right of the Righteous ones. It's still firmly in the hands of the wicked ones. So long as its there, the fight isn't won until these people are no more.

>>81785137
You're all fools because the Truth doesn't have to hide, like you liars has to. How many violent crimes was committed recently and who was the perps, white guys or blacks? How many dykes beat the shit out of women lately?

The truth can't be hidden.

>>81785172
Yes, let's read Jewish written propaganda, surely it'll be honest.

all i want to do is masturbate but she keeps saying stupid shit, who writes this rubbish

>>81785172
I tell you to contact your local social services and women hotline statistics, hospitals, free clinics, women clincis and police reports for facts, and you cite some jewish propaganda. Idiots.

File: IMG_0337.jpg (19KB, 231x218px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 231x218px

>>81785239
Jdimsa

>>81785250
Were you beaten up by a lesbian anon?

>>81785338
>the facts disprove me, so, uh, they're jewish! waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

Teehee

Stay mad :)

File: Trump cabinet.jpg (202KB, 1200x799px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1200x799px

>>81785240
That is what you think... but look at his cabinet! He has sold out to isreal! America is now Isreals attack dog! BARK GOY, BARK!

File: Supergirl punch.webm (346KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 720x404px

Is she Wenger in or Wenger out?

>>81779632
When does this show get good? A couple of episodes in and so far it just seems like roleplaying for overworked office bitches.

>>81780235
It's incredible

>>81785422
Yeah? Jews can be right-wing too, anon. Being a Jew doesn't = being left.

File: 1485987361756.jpg (62KB, 421x421px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 421x421px

>>81779807
Christ

>>81785172
muh consensus
Why libs choose propaganda out of spite

>>81785422
Let me amend the question -

Were you beaten up by a Jewish lesbian?

>>81785399
they're not facts, who wrote that article, are they left leaning, who gave them the information they're reporting as 'facts' were those facts from people who statistically and meticulously followed through to the letter, did they have hidden agendas? to avoid all of that, you go to your local statistical data collectors and inquire. Dykes and gay guys are the same anywhere. You'll see.

>>81785370
They're diseased. If you take a look see, you'll see them as I see them. Fap to them if you wish, who doesn't. But just know that the reality is, they're diseased monsters.

>>81785493

Why do you choose to be conservative, then? Lack of consensus? Lack of proof?

That seems very unintelligent, anon.

>>81785520
I just checked with my local statistical data collectors, they said being gay wasn't a mental illness :(

>>81779807
Her boss is the most punchable person in the world.

>>81785537
We're here dealing with gays being unnatural. One issue at a time, and the one you're most afraid of, is the truth that we're right. You won't ask for statistical evidence because you're afraid of what it might suggest.

Not all women are bad, only dykes, not all men are awful, only fags.

Not all black people are bad, only niggers. Hell even black people hate niggers. I know many black people who hates niggers because, as they put it, they will either leave you broke, or dead.or raped,if you're a woman, or all of the above if you're unlucky.

>>81785537
I just hate gays. Maybe the Muslims everybody wants can kill them all.

>>81785610
Their are animal gays, so of course it's natural. It's a form of natural population control :P

>>81785568
No you didn't. Ask doctors who per capita had the most mental issues, addictions and bouts of anger, suicidal thoughts and so on, and per capita it will be gays, every time.

Which race overwhelmingly makes up prison populations in the United States?

>>81785630
When people cite animals, then I guess you encourage incest, pedophilia, murder, cannibalism, eating your own feces, robbery, rape and on and on it goes. And, lastly, any animal that ever engaged in faggotry, only did so because there was no mates around. put a mate there,they're back to what they do. Your move.

File: 1438342186275.jpg (14KB, 300x295px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x295px

>>81785502
>>81785476

I wonder (((who))) could be behind these posts?

>>81785610
Why would local statistical data collectors be collecting data on the whether gays are natural or not? How do you even collect that data?

>>81785630
My dog eats his own shit, I guess scat is natural too.

>>81785646
I did, they said it was autists.

>>81785613
This is why the left is so stupid and is why I kinda want the Muslims to infect europe. The Muslims, hate fags, literally hates them. Christians tolerate them but warns them, Muslims kills them, and yet they're siding with the Muslims. I say, let them have them. Watch, Supergirl is gonna enforce Muslims are good, Christians bad, any day now.

>>81785630
>>81785646
And gays tend to kill themselves even when they're supported by everyone including family. They still kill themselves.


>>81785740
Now you're just being stupid. they don't say who is unnatural. They collect Data. Per Capita, you'll find that there is one type of people prone to specific behaviors. Sadly, Mexicans are more likely to abuse their kids. I was disappointed by that because the Mexican folks I've met are so conservative and Christian.

>>81785744
Your dog doesn't get off to eating its own shit though does it?

>>81785489
What the fuck did I just watch.

>>81785776
you're a real comedian. You should try out for funny or die.

>>81785797
Do animals get off to being raped in the ass

File: file.png (331KB, 1278x720px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1278x720px

>>81779807
Wow that's pure garbage.

At least Arrow has fight kino.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFFyL7drj7s

File: Supergirl s01e10 this is a good plan.webm (3MB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x576px

>>81785812

A Glee reunion

>>81785792
Yeah, that type of person is old people.

http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2010/suicides.aspx

Are you saying being old is a mental illness? I'm sorry anon, but your lack of facts just don't add up.

I think you need to accept that if you genuinely want to win hearts and minds over to the alt-right cause, you need to shut the fuck up, because right now the only face of the alt-right I see is an incoherent, gibbering retard who's butthurt about being an autist.

You need a good-looking, intelligent, mentally capable human being to be your spokesperson, not a mentally challenged Serbian peasant.

>>81785820
Animals don't rape each other, silly.

>>81785867
I can't believe it, just in time!

All those dumb fucks just standing there.

File: ouch.jpg (50KB, 461x407px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 461x407px

>>81785935

>>81785867
jesus christ she's so useless, falling down from a small bomb/whatever

>>81785792
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/aspergers-diary/201303/new-research-autism-and-suicide

>The researchers found that the percentage of children with autism rated by their parents as sometimes to very often contemplating or attempting suicide was 28 times greater than that of typical children, though three times less than that of depressed non-autistic children. The four demographic variables were significant risk factors, as well."

There's only one type of people that need to be purged, anon.

>>81785964
That's clearly a human pin, and it's in the animal's head, not it's reproductive parts.

Please revise your understanding of human and animal anatomy and try again.

>>81786013
No, I'm the bird.

>The few superheroes I actually like only get shitty tv shows or movies

Only liking a few dc heroes is suffering, I just want a good Supergirl film/show lads.

>>81779632
>I've been trying really hard to like this shit
Why?

File: Supergirl S02E05 smug cunt not so smug anymore.webm (3MB, 1024x572px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x572px

>>81785980

>>81786056

You're an inspiration. Most pigeons can't even work out how not to kill themselves by flying into windows, yet you have a pin in your head and you've managed to grasp the subtleties of memery and forum posting.

You're a credit to your people, anon.

>>81786096
Nice strategy

File: wow.jpg (41KB, 427x474px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 427x474px

>>81786096
>get shot in the chest and goes 30 meters back
>super suit is perfectly fine

Wow people actually watch this?

>>81786208
Just feminists.

>>81786208
>super suit is perfectly fine
>super suit

Clue's in the title

>>81785935
ducks are rapist

>>81786096
>BIG WHITE COCK WILL NEVER DIE!

kek

>>81785909
Had to take another bath and I missed your response just now, happily I caught in time but facts, as I said, are the thing that frightens the left the most. Go right now, if you can, and call women hot lines and as for statistics of injuries or suicidal thoughts and assaults and ask them the sexual orientation of the perps. And more often that not, it'll be gay people. Gay people are crazy, and there are times they have trouble keeping the crazies at bay. And that's what you're after. So have fun, because I'm willing to bet my bottom dollar that I am 100% right. Because I know I'm right. I even spoke to several senior police officers and they admitted that gay women are, per capita, more abusive to their women, than men are.
One doctor admitted that not only gay men are more prone to have a disease but gay women too were reportedly always sicker than normal women. They also cheat more often than normal women. They're diseased. Truly, diseased.

>>81785982
And yet people with autism keeps it to themselves. NOT gays and their enablers. Ever see a fag parade. I only wish the boston bombers blew up their parades.

>>81781849
>bland, tasteless camera angles
>too many cuts
>pacing seems like the had to stretch what footage they had into a longer time slot
>token nigger

Absolute trash in every aspect

>>81785006
he also said dyslexia and he's evidently not dislexic. Also if he were autistic that would not be a proper attack on his argument. Apply yourself. He won't provide sources, that's the only thing he did wrong.

>>81785867
She really just turned a regular bomb into a frag grenade. Only plot armor protects the people from the incredible amounts of sharp objects flying about which she put there. Who the fuck thought this would look like a good idea, even with selective camera work?

>>81786817
I don't have to provide resources. One you're one minded you tend to see the truth quicker than other people. The truth doesn't change itself, it's always there. The conditonals change, and the way you're looking at the problem changes, but the truth is always real and it cannot be bartered with. Trust me. Please, Trust me. Gay people are warped in the head.
If you fap to them or use them to get off with fine, many people do. But as they are, they're damaged and so prevalent is their unnaturalness that you need only ask for those statistics. It's there for all to see. Please, believe me. I am not lying. I am honest.

>>81786817

He has autism. See (>>81786476)

The fact that's he autistic means that he's got an actual mental handicap and, thus, poor cognitive ability and limited emotional intelligence. His ability to grasp complicated ideas and situations is severely impaired, and as such, his opinion can safely be discarded, especially considering he cannot back it up with proof. It's a bit like being diagnosed with stupidity, I suppose.

The fact that he's incapable of recognising that, according to him, gays are sick and awful because they're mentally ill, by his own standards, means that he is also sick, bad, and awful (see >>81785610) and thus, in circular fashion, disproves his own argument.

He is also illiterate as fuck.

>>81786476
Please provide sourced and proven data. I have looked into the facts independently and none of the information I have found or posted corroborates your claims.

File: maga-00.jpg (12KB, 308x349px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 308x349px

>>81783970

File: warcrimesfuckingshit.jpg (27KB, 660x371px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 660x371px

>>81779807
>black men are not exactly encourage to be angry in public

>well then this will work out for the both of us

>>81786997
i agree with what you're saying 100% but
>not an argument
Once you're asked to provide a source to back up your claims you have to provide one or that's the end of the road. It doesn't mean you're wrong, it just means the conversation dies down at that point. The other guy doesn't have to "trust" you. Why should he?

>>81787009
>His ability to grasp complicated ideas and situations is severely impaired, and as such, his opinion can safely be discarded

No. The subject was not opinions, he made a whole lot of objective claims that can be true or false. At that point attacking the messenger just makes you look triggered.

>>81786476

I can't decide if you were raped by a gay man or cucked by a gay woman.

File: 1458659742756.jpg (28KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x300px

>>81785257

>>81787155
>i agree with what you're saying 100%

If you agree with what he's saying, then you must have access to proof for his points, unless your opinion is also baseless.

The fact you're criticising one person for going "autist!" and not the other person for going "fag! jew! muslim! lefty!" also makes you look fairly triggered yourself. Your issue doesn't seem to be that both of them are using specious strategies, but one of them is using specious strategies to attack your opinion, which has left you butthurt.

>>81785434
Is this the most pathetic "punch" ever caught on film?

File: 1454901023880477.jpg (71KB, 1021x1027px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1021x1027px

>>81779807
>actual money was spent to make this
>actual money was spent
>actual fucking money

>>81785831
Arrow is the epitome of trash-kino and just because of how cheesy it is I can't hate on it.

>>81787269
I could post some /pol/ meme images but it's not really /tv/ related. I thought I'd give you guys some argument coaching but that's about the extent of the effort I'm willing to invest here.

>>81779807
Can we at least all agree that SJWs are the REAL autists?

>>81779807
>difficult making conversation with men under 6ft
heeehee

>difficult making conversation with women over 80kgs
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>81787505
I agree with that.

>>81785867

Usually I'm not one to nit pick tv shows, but wouldn't that spray them with ice shrapnel?

>>81787595
>over 80 kg

A woman would have to be very, very tall to look good weighing over 70kg imo. I'm 1.78m and I looked normal, not too skinny, when I weighed 70 kg.

File: Supergirl S01e03 GO HOME SUPERGURL.webm (2MB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1024x576px

>>81787665

Yes, yes it would.

>>81787060
You mean you've looked into the run of the mill sources care of left propaganda. I'm telling you to get the milk from the cow, not from the local grocer. Go to Your Woman's Hotline, and Your Local statistic offices and get it directly from Your local Police statistical departments. It may take a few weeks. It took me a while to gather information by simply, Talking to people. I'm not like other people, And I pounded the pavement and found the facts, so can you. By going to Webpages ran by doctors who told little Jazz that it's cool to transition into a woman, is the reason why the west is slowly sliding into the abyss.
You can do better. Speak to your local social services and ask for their statistics, speak to your local police departments and your local woman's hotline. The truth is there, if you have the courage to find it.

>>81787385
Let me reciprocate with a little argument coaching of my own.

I repeat - if, as he says, homosexuality is a mental illness, and gays are "sick", "bad", and "awful" as a result of this posited mental illness, which invalidates their choices (the decision, not the inclination, to sleep with people of the same sex), then by virtue of being autistic, the anti-gay anon's own arguments are invalidated. His choices, decisions, and opinions are invalidated because he is mentally handicapped. He is a part of the problem, and like the gays, he would be doing the world, and his own movement, a great favour by killing himself.

There is nothing to argue against at the moment except a series of baseless assertions that are not supported with evidence. The main assertion under dispute is that gays are mentally ill. The evidence provided in counterpoint to this argument was a post made by the American Psychiatric Association stating that homosexuality was not a mental illness, to which the anon claimed it was "jew propaganda", without supporting his baseless assertion that it was a) jewish or b) propaganda.

I notice you did not call him out on this, which makes your argument coaching look extremely partial and thus, suspect.

However, as you may know, it is psychiatry as a school of thought that is responsible for classifying and defining mental illnesses as we know them today - the same concept of a mental illness upon which autismo anon is basing his argument.

If the American Psychiatric Association are indeed Jew Propagandists, then unfortunately the very concept of a mental illness is itself a product of that propaganda, and as propaganda, epistemologically unsound.

>>81787155

You can go anywhere, literally anywhere and find this information. Go to Jacksonville, it's there, go to Mississippi, it's there, go to Mississauga, it's there. I don't know about Yourope because they've started removing specifics like sexual orientation from their statistics and religion and so on.

Ask your local police records, and check in with your hospitals statistics. You'll see.


>>81787175
It doesn't matter. Truth is truth and won't change from being the truth because you don't want to put another nail in the gay coffin. Gay people are not normal. That's truth.

>>81787828
Why don't you provide links to the surveys done on a local level? I'm not sure if you know this, but there's no such thing as a "local statistics office". There is a national statistics office that derives its information from surveys that it conducts locally, but there's no such independent organisation as a "local statistics office", everything is part of a national institution.

Secondly, local statistics are not usually gathered according to gender, race, ethnicity or sexuality, they're just raw numbers based on type of crime and number of crimes recorded.

Thirdly, there is no such thing as a "local woman's hotline". I'm not sure where you're getting this from. Are you saying speak to the local office of a national domestic abuse hotline? Because there's no such thing as regional, independent domestic abuse hotlines, they're all run by national charities.

And those national charities base their statistics on the information provided by the local offices, which means that their statistics are no more or less valid than local statistics.

Finally, what some doctor has said on some website you haven't defined is not information, fact, or statistics.

>being gay isn't a mental illness

alright come on now, that's just a silly and stupid thing to say. I have no problem with gays, I could give 2 shits who anyone fucks or wants to fuck. biologically, reproducing is the point of your existence. so, not wanting to fuck the opposite sex, means there is something very wrong with your brain. same as if you are born with a broken dick something is wrong with your body. you can actually live a long, semi normal life with a broken dick, but that doesn't change the fact that something is very wrong with your body. and it's a big deal because you can't reproduce(before anyone starts talking about artificial insemination, you know the point i'm trying to make). It doesn't mean anyone needs to hate gays or treat them badly, but being gay is very much a mental illness. Just because academia decided they won't call it that to virtue signal, and maybe to try and curb hatred of gays, doesn't make it any less true.

>>81787922
everything i have said is supported by evidence. Gay women account for 29% of all abuses against women, bisexual women accounts for even more than that. Gay men are five times more likely to have an std and accounts for almost 40% of people HIV and they're more likely to spread HIV aids than straight men. Gay women are more likely to be drunkards and drug users than regular women, gay men numbers approachers theirs. Gays are more likely to commit suicide even in environments we're they're supported and encouraged. And they're more likely to abuse children. They're a scourge, but you lefties don't have the balls to ask YOUR LOCAL STATISTICAL DEPARTMENTS. Gays are debased wherever you find them, go To Florida, New York, Los Angeles, Jamaica, Haiti, The Bahamas, Canada, wherever you are, Check Your Local Statistics. You will see, but you'd rather I check some PC cited lefty, who'd say otherwise instead of Checking Your local Statistical offices.
You're the type of people who deny that niggers are a problem even though regular black people are normal every day people almost always worthy of praise. Niggers however are a problem and accounts for half of all violent crime. You'd deny this of course because it doesn't fit within your narrative. Wake UP!

>>81779787
>>81779734
if I could take the bluepill again I would in a heartbeat

>>81788145
I've spoken to Social Services, I've spoken to Police Officers. All of the above corroborates what I've said. You however won't research or ask the right questions because you are deathly afraid of the answers.

If you want a short cut, start here

http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality

>>81787961
http://spokanecares.org/domestic-violence-spokane.php

Picked one random town. All it offers are national statistics. The thing is, if all you're doing is speaking to people - and I don't think you're even doing that - and those people are actually just offering anecdotal evidence to your leading questions, the information is invalid.

Even if we accept that you have been told what you clai to have been told - which we can't, because there is no proof, whatever you've been told is invalid because we don't know the methodology involved to acquire the information, who you've acquired it from, if they've provided you with falsifiable, empirical data (i.e, surveys, records) or if they've provided you with anecdotal evidence, and so on. Nothing you say matters unless you can provide us with a survey that includes, as part of the survey, information about the methods used to obtain the information.

>>81788199
It's not supported by evidence because you're not providing it. It's supported by nothing at all. If it's so easily supported, point me to the local statistics. Point me to a local police office and the statistics they've published about domestic abuse that verifies your claim. If it's true about your home town, than post your home town's police office's date, or the name of your home town so I can review your claims independently.

>>81788329
He's right about Britain, they don't have local statistic offices.

https://www.ons.gov.uk

If you want to argue about America or your own home country, it's only fair that you provide the answers, because how can the other anon be expected to navigate an unfamiliar system?

All you need to do is point to one local police office's statistics to support your claim, and you're done.

>>81788216
Taking the red pill doesn't mean you're obligated to bitch and whine incessantly. You're enlightened, congrats, now shut the fuck up and maybe don't watch feminist tv shows if you don't want to be triggered

File: Singh.jpg (135KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 800x534px

For all its faults THE FLASH does this SJW-ish themes much better. They even made fun of the whole "because I'm a girl?" thing.

>>81788349
Go, and speak to the people on the ground. Asked to see their data of all the women abused in any given area. Ask the sexual orientation of the abusers. Ask the officers on sight of what they saw. This is semantics. You're just citing doctored propaganda that will always deviate from the path. You're doing what they're doing in Yourope. Rapes are committed, you're not allowed to see who the person's race and or religion is, they say they're swedish and they're male, and that's it.

Get on the ground and ask those hard questions you're afraid to ask.

>>81788394
And yet, you're still here. The evidence can only be found with conversations and dialogues with real everyday people, not make believe posters and their rhetoric on line.

>>81788439
Then you ask them, "Why is It I can't get stastical data on who is hitting women. If a woman is injured who hits her, a man or a woman. Okay, compared to men, how many women hit a woman. Okay, now we're getting somewhere. Of that number, how many of them were romantically involved. If you meet a brick hall that's when you raise hell. Why is it you're not allowed to say, who are you trying to protect here?

>>81788394
I don't have to publish anything. That's the beauty of homosexuals. Wherever they are, they will behave accordingly. Search and you will find the truth of them.

>>81788439
This. If you don't have the information on hand, then you should do, because you're trying to change people's minds, and you can only do that with facts.

If you don't provide this information right now, anon, you've come into a thread trying to convert people to your line of thinking, and all you've achieved is to make that line of thinking look delusional.

You've achieved the exact opposite of what you intended to do, because you didn't post evidence.

It makes it seem like either there is no evidence, or if there is, then you haven't read it, and either way you look like you're full of shit. Post the fucking facts.

>>81788634
If some one says to you, to ask your local officials for facts for or against, why are you seeking proofs from online rhetorical majors? NO seriously, ask people who are there and deals with what's going on. I DID AND DOING SO CHANGED ME ON A PROFOUND LEVEL.

Some one bitched of what I was after and I responded with, If A is ten times more likely to do something wrong, Don't the public have the right to know that A is dangerous?

>>81779807
>I have difficulty making a conversation with men under 6 feet tall

MANLET BTFO

this is /ourshow/

>>81780235
I guess if she were a Korean pop idol...

>>81780327

>Implying she sweats.

How is this thread so long but the nudes have not been posted yet?

>>81788734

But they're not ten times more likely, and you have no proof that they are.

>>81788898
Blue board.

>>81788959
Gay women are what, 2% of any population and yet in the United States they account for between 27-29% of all abuses against ALL women. Per capita that's what, 1000%. What's that in percentage, Anyone? In the Bahamas, Violence against gays are almost always perpetrated by other gays. The only murders Gays suffered was nearly overwhelmingly committed by other gays. And brutally so. One guy, a famous interior decorator, Harry Taylor was brutally killed by other gays. A gay woman was trampled to death then ran over repeatedly with a car. Another gay woman was pulled up to a ceiling then set on fire. Gays are monsters!

>>81788734

Actually, I have done the door to door at my local police station, and I can tell you that the majority of domestic abuse cases that they dealt with were from divorced heterosexual couples. They stated they dealt with very few same sex couples, but they also speculated that that was because a) the town didn't have a high population of gay or lesbian couples and b), anecdotally, they felt that most gays and lesbians wouldn't report it even if they had experienced it.

But here's the problem. First of all, domestic violence prevalence can't be used to prove that a particular sexuality is a mental illness, because then heterosexuality is a mental illness. If you look at rape statistics, far more women are raped than men. Does that mean that straight men are all violent criminals?

Second of all, you have to account for the possibility that a local survey isn't reflective or representative of a national situation.

Even if what you're saying is correct, then it's countered by what I've found in my independent inquiries. The point is, asking officials randomly doesn't prove anything. I wouldn't hold up the fact that my police office report a majority of heterosexual domestic abuse situations as proof that gays and lesbians are more civilised than heterosexuals, because that's not what those records prove.

The only way to prove it is to look at national averages, because at least then you're accounting for disparity in populations, and all the other factors that could influence a local office's findings.

>>81789212
>Actually, I have done the door to door at my local police station, and I can tell you that the majority of domestic abuse cases that they dealt with were from divorced heterosexual couples

That's to be expected since straight people make up 95+% of the population.

>>81789139
I thought you were relying on local statistics, yet you've just said "and yet in the United States they account for 27-29% of all abuses against ALL women".

Which means you're relying on a national survey. The information you're relying on hasn't come from the cow, or even the grocer, it's come from the head office of Walmart.

You dun fucking goofed, son. You dun goofed real fucking bad.

Your argument is relying on the national average of the USA in general. Provide the link.

>>81789195
>>81789240
>>81789270
What's this all about? Is it supposed to be the actress from the show?

>>81789319
>im 12 years old what is this

File: 1491785337308.png (454KB, 583x548px) Image search: [Google]

454KB, 583x548px

Based Anon

File: 8bF74WD.jpg (61KB, 890x876px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 890x876px

>>81782345

>>81789139
>>81789326

rekt

why are /pol/tards so dumb? Why would they go into a thread to advertise their wrongness?

Sad!

>>81789212


Yes, places where gays are nearly non existent will have lesser numbers of incidents reported, if, as you pointed out, they were to report the incidents at all.
But if There's fifty fay couples, 30 women, 20 men in a given area, and of that number, there were 15 couples and of that number, the women, there were 9, and you were call in two about, 1 case of abuse, every other week, well that there would be upwards of 15% of that group, the 9, who engages in domestic incidents. However, statistically, there'd be as much as 3 dyke couples, of the nine, that regularly has some form of domestic abuse. Of this much, I can promise you.

If that town of yours has a population of 300 people but a major town has upwards of 30 thousand with there being as much as 300 gay people of which, more than 20 dyke couples has a domestic dispute occasionally, that means out of that 300 gays, you have 40 people engaged in some form of domestic dispute and that would be upwards of 15% of the total Number of reported cases, But, according to the norm, Of that 300 gays, there's be upwards of 80 women who are engaged in some form of domestic abuse situation.

But, as you said, you did census in a small town.

>>81781849
This is so bad it's unbelievable, I think I saw better shit from power rangers 10 years ago

>>81789326
>>81789913

No, I'm telling you, right now that you will find 29% of abused women to be in a fag relationship. You however, are terrified of that fact.In fact, there was a lovely thread about the very same thing ON /pol/. And this was long after I had gathered my facts.

Here you go, Read

http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality

This is but a taste of the truth, have you the courage though.

File: 1458031174007.png (466KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1280x720px

>>81779632
>I've been trying really hard to like this shit despite the constant feminism


Why try to like something you don't like?
I mean if you were saying 'I don't like this' and you haven't even watched it. Then stop being a bitch and give it a try. If you just need an excuse to watch it because all your friends like it... Focus on the Martian Manhunter story lines. They're the best thing about this show next to Supergirl being cute as fuck.

Red Kryptonite Bitch Supergirl is best Supergirl.

>>81786096
My fucking sides

File: LENADOMME-3.jpg (64KB, 960x480px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 960x480px

>>81781012
Supergirl is the perfect puppy for Lena to own.

You thin-skinned tonally deaf retards don't understand that the show is actually very sexist.

>>81781849
>My cousin didn't have a get out of jam free card when he first started, neither should I

Her death, anyone else's caused by her failures not to mention any destruction, that's all chill aaayyyy. Is this just a game to this dumb alien bitch then?

Is this the kind of show that supports her stupidity in its writing?

>>81785257
There needs to be more of these.

>>81786096
Great wide open view of her pantsu.

>>81786468
Did he blast her with panty-wettening energies to make her succumb to White Cock?

>>81785831
>that stupid sound effects of punches

fucking garbage

>>81779632
the porn tape was they only good thing about supergirl

>>81786709
Show needs a good director for these scenes who knows how to work around budget limitations.

Filming at angles that conceal the bad bits, focusing on shots that can work. Into The Badlands is a great example.

>>81789969

>but IF this and IF that and IF the other and if if if if if if if if if if if -

If only you had facts. If only the hypothetical situations you described actually existed outside of your own head.

You do realise that the only fair and balanced way is to compare national averages, because at least they would account for the disparity in populations, even if just by acknowledging it?

Local data is insufficient, and your guarantees are meaningless.

The thing is, you're obviously mistaking your personal experience for a universal truth, and something awful has obviously happened to you as a result of a gay man or woman's actions. I genuinely feel sorry for you, because your damage is obvious.

If it makes you feel at all better, whoever did that damage is likely extremely damaged themself. And bear in mind, that their sexuality is not the cause of their toxicity, but more likely their experience of being gay or lesbian in a world which teaches people to hate themselves if they don't want to lick the right pair of genitals.

There's no information on the methodology, which is problematic, but you might find this interesting. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/CDC_NISVS_Victimization_FINAL-a.pdf

It doesn't say how they selected the men and women they surveyed, or what separated them aside from sexuality (income, religion, nationality, race, etc), or how they assessed the respondents, and as a result we can't really generalise their findings, but nonetheless, interesting.

Also, please bear in mind that they don't identify the gender or sexuality of the perpetrator when it comes to rape. However:

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?s_cid=ss6308a1_e

>For female rape victims, an estimated 99.0% had only male perpetrators. In addition, an estimated 94.7% of female victims of sexual violence other than rape had only male perpetrators.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?s_cid=ss6308a1_e

File: 1467082027292.jpg (85KB, 707x500px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 707x500px

>>81790058
y is her neck covered up

>>81790473
As I said, domestic Abuse cases as in one dyke beating on another is 29% The reports literally said, 27%, other reports said 29%. Funnily enough, those reports are not readily available. Are they? It makes one wonder if there's some kind of cover up. Still, boots on the ground is the only way to go.

>>81779632
I only watch the parts with her thighs.

>>81790607
If boots on the ground is the only way to go, stop citing unfounded national statistics as though they are meaningful.

"Studies report that homosexual couples have significantly higher incidences of violent behavior. For example, a recent study by the Canadian government states that "violence was twice as common among homosexual couples compared with heterosexual couples".[55] According the American College of Pediatricians who cite several studies, "Violence among homosexual partners is two to three times more common than among married heterosexual couples."[56] In addition, the American College of Pediatricians states the following: "Homosexual partnerships are significantly more prone to dissolution than heterosexual marriages with the average homosexual relationship lasting only two to three years."[57]


In June of 2004, the journal Nursing Clinics of North America reported the following regarding homosexuality and domestic violence:

“Domestic abuse is under-reported in the gay community...
Male-on-male same-sex domestic violence also has been reported in couples where one or both persons are HIV-positive. Intimate partner abuse and violence include humilation, threatening to disclose HIV status, withholding HIV therapy, and harming family members or pets.[58]"


http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-224-x/85-224-x2010000-eng.pdf
http://www.acpeds.org/category/position-statement?CONTEXT=art&art=50
http://www.acpeds.org/category/position-statement?CONTEXT=art&art=50

>>81790777
I'm not trying to be difficult. If people want to be fags then that's their right. Don't dress it up as normal, is what I'm saying especially when statistically it's anything but. I remember one doctor describing of how he had to deal with prolapses and other anal infections with gays the likes of which he had to never deal with, with ordinary women.

As i said, people can fap to whatever they want or get off to whatever makes them happy, but accept the truth. There's something wrong with them. Personally I feel bad for them. They're controlled by a force unseen or something that compels such erroneous behavior. Poor dears.

Thank you for looking.

File: LenaDomme5-1.jpg (41KB, 960x480px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 960x480px

The show needs more ryona and predatory females after Kara, and less preaching.

Supergirl could be the best fetish TV show since Batman, they are missing so much potential.

File: 1491362107681.jpg (18KB, 558x529px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 558x529px

>>81779807
>I have difficulty making a conversation with men under 6 feet tall
top kek

>>81790914
Nobody said anything about normal. Statistically speaking, they're not the norm, in as much as they are a minority.

But we're talking about if homosexuality is a mental illness, not if it's normal.

The only thing conservapedia suggests is that its comorbid with other mental illnesses, such as "depression and sadness".

>>81791150
>>81788183

not the guy you are arguing with, and i have no clue if the statistics he is talking about are true. but homosexuality absolutely is a mental illness. You just have to use your brain for 5 seconds to realize it. See my post above. Not a big deal, no reason everyone has to have children in the current year, we have enough.

>>81788183
Nah mate, gays are a method of population control. It also occurs across a lot of species.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

http://community.lovenature.com/wild/why-do-some-animals-exhibit-homosexual-behaviour

It also has none of the hallmarks of a mental illness, so you can't characterise it as a psychological disorder. See APA post on it in this thread.

Call it abnormal if you want, that's fine, but calling it a mental illness is fucking retarded 'cos it ain't.

File: 1489654497013.png (579KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

579KB, 1280x720px

>>81790746
There are people on this thread talking about gender politics instead of Kara's thighs. Sigh.

>>81791794
Dawkins has said it isn't population control, because there's no way for the genes to favor population control to be passed on to the next generation.

HOWEVER.

Lots of animals engage in same-sex relationships and sexual acts, including our closest cousins, the Bonobos.

Sexuality is typically talked of as a "spectrum", meaning that while some men and women will have a strong preference for one gender , most will be capable of attraction to the other, even if this attraction is highly limited.

Secondly, if reproduction was the be-all and end-all of all animals, how do we reckon with sexual activity in animals that yields no offspring, and also social hierarchies that prevent certain members of a social group from breeding?

>>81791794
>It also has none of the hallmarks of a mental illness
>renders you effectively infertile because you won't even try to have real sex
>instead you get sexually aroused by the wrong sex and are even willing to risk rectal injuries and catch HIV to live out your perversion
>correlates with all sorts of other mental illnesses

Sounds like a mental illness to me.

>>81782566
Can she defeat the cock !?

>>81791981

Straight people get HIV and have anal sex too.

Did you know that? Have you never had anal sex, anon?

And which other mental illnesses does it correlate with?

>>81789195
Why is this faggot letting her touch his balls ??

File: laughinghooers.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>81791981

>he thinks having anal sex is mentally ill

Low test virgins have no place here

>>81792154
Not him, but
Gay men are three to five times more likely to get HIV AIDS than regular guys. People who cut themselves comes to mind. Your ass is for shitting. Yet, gays are constantly tearing up their asses just to get off. That's sick.

>>81792154
At irrelevantly low rates, stop grasping.

>Have you never had anal sex, anon?

No, I have not, and this is coming from someone who thinks it looks hot in porn. I have very little desire to try it out irl. If a girl offered I would consider, but I wouldn't suggest it. Not worth the mess and awkwardness over lack of hygiene, smell, why would you want all of that? Sincere question: Are you a fag?

>And which other mental illnesses does it correlate with?

All of them, basically. Depression, drug addiction, bipolar, you name it.

>>81792250

>he thinks having sex with a woman is gay
>see above image

>>81792260
>romanticizing anal sex
>virgin accusations

Projecting porn addict detected.

>>81792283
>micropenis
>having sex

>>81792275

>Sincere question: Are you a fag?

Sincere answer - I am not. Sincere question: has a girl ever offered to have sex with you, in any hole? Do you think having anal sex with a girl is gay? If you think it is gay, why do you masturbate to it in porn?

>All of them, basically. Depression, drug addiction, bipolar, you name it.

Those illnesses don't even correlate with other. Tell me. In what ways does homosexuality correlate with depression? What are the symptoms it shares with all these mental illnesses?

File: 1458020464687.png (458KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 1280x720px

>>81790480
Because she knows you can't stand it.

>>81792310
Seriously, you porn addicts need to take a break. I have a 7 incher and that guy is average, probably closer to 6 inches than 5, and more importantly his girth looks normal. Not only is that not a micropenis, it's not even "small". You've got issues, bro.

>>81792364
That dude is 10cm

>>81792310

Sorry about your micropenis, anon :(

>>81792301

>legitimately triggered when somebody accuses him of being a virgin

Truth hurts :^)

>>81792364
>girth
2.5 inches tops.

>>81792337
I have had sex plenty of times, and no, of course it's not gay to have anal sex with a woman. But a particular obsession with normalizing anal sex (regardless of further context) strikes me as gay. Anal sex is the default way for gay men to have sex, whereas for straight people it's a rare novelty thing that most people literally never do. Most women don't have anal sex even once in their life.

>In what ways does homosexuality correlate with depression? What are the symptoms it shares with all these mental illnesses?

Do you know what the word "correlate" means?

>>81792364
She's skinny as fuck in there, that why the pitiful cock resembles average. It's fucking small

>>81792413

But you literally said "rectal injuries" was an irrational risk that gay people took, ignoring that a) you can have anal sex without incurring rectal injuries, b) you can have vaginal sex and incur injuries, and c) anal sex isn't exclusive to gay people anyway. You brought up anal. I pointed out why your argument was reductive and not particularly insightful.

>Do you know what the word "correlate" means?

I do know, yeah, but I assumed you had mistaken the meaning yourself, because otherwise you're a) not making a point or b) making a very stupid point.

Depression also correlates with teenage girls and old people. Is being a teenage girl a mental illness? Is being an old person? I mean, that's the thing about correlation, isn't it? It's not cause and effect.

The thing is, what definition are you relying on for "mental illness"? Because mental illness itself is a psychiatric term, and the American Psychiatric Association has gone on record saying homosexuality isn't a mental illness.

So are you relying on a definition of a mental illness that is entirely personal?

>>81792604
A vagina is designed to take cocks and be ejaculated in.
Rectums are meant to defecate.

>>81779632

I feel like it would be really easy to make a good feminist show, but writers these days suck, and it leads to the impression that leftist-themed shows necessitate being bad.

Heroes was a great show, and racially diverse as hell, for example. But that was before the 2010s..

>>81792665

A mouth is designed to chew food and taste things, but I've fucked plenty of mouths in my time. Are you saying you're against blowjobs? You're morally opposed to blowjobs? Or are you just scientifically opposed to blowjobs? Is getting a blowjob a mental illness? How about hand-jobs? Foot-jobs?

>>81792717

A lot of shit from before the noughties was more diverse than stuff is today. Look at Independence Day, for example, if you want a movie - as far as shows go, BSG, Voyager,

>>81788479
Bluepilled af

File: homosexuality, a mental illness that leads to physical illness.jpg (3MB, 3100x1855px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3100x1855px

>>81792604
>the American Psychiatric Association has gone on record saying homosexuality isn't a mental illness

Yeah. They buckled to political pressure.

>In the three years leading up to the 1973 APA meeting, the previous national meetings had been repeatedly disrupted by gay activists. Then in 1970 gay activists protested against the APA convention in San Francisco. Certain sessions were broken up with shouts and jeers, prohibiting any rational discussion or debate. These scenes were repeated in 1971, and as people came out of the "closet" and felt empowered politically and socially, the APA directorate became increasingly uncomfortable with their stance.
>Ronald Bayer, in a work sympathetic toward homosexuality and the gay rights movement, recounts: "Using forged credentials, gay activists gained access to the exhibit area and, coming across a display marketing aversive conditioning techniques for the treatment of homosexuals, demanded its removal. Threats were made against the exhibitor, who was told that unless his booth was dismantled, it would be torn down. After frantic behind-the-scenes consultations, and in an effort to avoid violence, the convention leadership agreed to have the booth removed."
>Militant homosexual groups continued to attack any psychiatrist or psychoanalyst who dared to present his findings as to the psychopathology of homosexuality before national or local meetings of psychiatrists or in public forums.
>In 1973 the APA’s nomenclature task force recommended that homosexuality be declared normal.

What convinced the psychiatrists that these people were "normal" was how they would shut down all discourse and threaten everyone who disagreed with them.

https://www.quora.com/Why-was-homosexuality-classified-for-decades-as-a-mental-disorder-by-the-worlds-largest-scientific-and-professional-organization-of-psychologists-the-American-Psychiatric-Association-APA

File: 1474939935617.png (15KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 640x480px

>I'm not a liberal, just lighten up dude lmao

>>81792141
Even Supergirl cannot defeat the cock.

>>81793125

Not the guy replying to you, but literally everything in that pic is explained by the male sex drive.

If women suddenly had the same sex drive that men do, the exact same things would happen for heterosexuals.

It doesn't make those problems any less real, but it does mean that they're not inherent to being gay, and instead inherent to a certain situation (high sex drive and unlimited partner supply).

The crux is that gays will always be in this situation, while straights almost never will be.

>>81793404
1. The middle column has absolutely no relation to sex drive.

2. Left column is not explained by sex drive either.
Partner count: You can have a high sex drive and stick to one partner. Long term relationships are more often ended by the woman.
Infidelity: Men and women cheat roughly in equal amounts nowadays, it was only lack of opportunity that kept women from cheating in the past.

3. STDs: Anal sex is more likely to transmit STDs. Even if straight people had more different partners they still wouldn't see the same infection rates. The problems in the third column are mostly caused by anal sex.

>>81793404
>they're not inherent to being gay, and instead inherent to a certain situation (high sex drive and unlimited partner supply)

But wouldn't that imply that in a "natural" relationship these kinds of problems or incidents are self balancing? Like an animal being introduced into habitat to which it is not native may breed out of control because of a lack of natural predators.

reminder that all political ideology/alignment was rendered completely irrelevant in 2010, as citizens united ended democracy on a global scale

File: homo pedo same thing.jpg (152KB, 959x467px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 959x467px

>>81792604
Here's another interesting find:
>Nicholas Cummings
>former President of the American Psychological Association and one of the people who led the movement to have homosexuality declassified as a mental illness

Guess what this pro-gay advocate said in 2005:
>the profession of Mental Health, psychology, psychiatry is dominated by social-activist groups
>when the APA conducts research, they do so only "when they know what the outcome is going to be...only predictably favorable outcomes are permissible."

This is the former president of this organization speaking! And he's still pro-gay and pro-"diversity" etc!

>While researching his book Destructive Trends in Mental Health: The Well Intentioned Path to Harm, Cummings and his partner Rogers Wright sought participation of a many fellow psychologists and were flatly turned them down, fearing professional retaliation such as loss of tenure, loss of promotion, and so forth.
>"We were bombarded by horror stories ...Their greatest fear was of the gay lobby, which is very strong in the APA." stated Dr. Cummings.

http://loonybird.com/gay_apa.htm

So there you have another piece of the puzzle. Pro-gay former APA president thinks the gay lobby is the most powerful group pressuring psychiatrists today, and that the APA is generally under total control of "social activist" lobby groups. No objective research is being done, only what produces desired results is permitted, else you get blacklisted. Are you having fun yet? Here's an idea! Let's have gays adopting kids!

>>81790123

This. So fucking this. With a little sliver of kryptonite on a collar.

>>81779777
It's a shame. It was shaky at first, but I really liked the second half of the first season. Then it went to CW and turned into just another shitty CW show. Melissa Benoist is wasted there now.

>>81793125

Most of those sources I saw on conservapedia, and most of them were bullshit. The fact that the Netherlands has legalised gay marriage is the only thing cited as proof that the country itself is more tolerant, yet progressive pressure on a government does not reflect the attitudes of the entire population. Secondly, Netherlands culture is not isolated from American culture. Most Dutch people watch American television, read American news, and play American games. It's not like the Netherlands is a happy little bubble unaffected by the rest of the world.

Secondly, the picture pulls in a bunch of unrelated bullshit to imply a baseless critique of homosexuality. Somehow, promiscuity is a bad thing? Somehow monogamy is a good thing? Notice that the section is titled "fidelity". Most sex occurring outside of the relationship is actually approved by the partner, and includes threesomes.

How does the syphilis rate factor into the homosexual lifestyle except so far as to say they need to use prophylactics more often - and that the likelihood is that they don't use condoms because there's no risk of pregnancy.

If you're the same guy I was originally replying to, then you started out by saying "I could give 2 shits who anyone fucks or wants to fuck", yet, magically, here's a chart condemning homosexuals because they sleep with too many people.

None of this is an argument against homosexuality, or for homosexuality as a mental illness. There's no nuanced treatment of the causes, either.

>>81789195
>>81789240
>>81789270
See you in a few days anon.
Good on you though, I've received bans for posting these same images.
By the way they were probably the only decent ones from all of the fappening folders.

>>81791020
The day I was her banana titties was the day my soul died.

>>81794449
>Somehow, promiscuity is a bad thing?

Yes, it is for really obvious reasons you cannot possibly be unaware of. Quit being obtuse.

>Most sex occurring outside of the relationship is actually approved by the partner, and includes threesomes.

Irrelevant, just like anal sex. In the real world couples normal are monogamous and have vaginal sex. Earlier someone brought up oral sex, regarding that, listen to married men "joke" about how their wife hasn't sucked their dick in years. That's also reality.

>they don't use condoms because there's no risk of pregnancy.

There's a much worse risk, HIV, but they don't seem to care. Hint: It's part of their mental illness.

>If you're the same guy I was originally replying to

No.

>None of this is an argument against homosexuality

Neither the FACT that homosexuality is only no longer classified as a mental illness because of violent, illegal threats and a systematic lobbyist takeover of the APA, nor all the FACTS painting a rather grim picture of the real destructive and self-destructive nature of homosexual behaviour put any dent in your delusional white knight attitude towards fags. That's remarkable. Either media indoctrination pulled a hell of a number on you or you're a fag and merely defending your own feelings.

>>81794211
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD1tg1a2_88

Here's a really interesting find!

2015 :)

File: 1492382372599.jpg (91KB, 640x707px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 640x707px

>>81779807

>I have difficulty making a conversation with men under 6 feet tall

>>81780151
Why do I always see infographics like these that claim weeb cartoons are the epitome of art.

And then they're designed in the most utterly infantile way possible.

And i refuse to believe that isn't intentional Its just pandering to an extremely low common denominator who need to be able to jerk off to pedo-bait "waifu" girls.

If it was about thoughtful content it should reflect that in its design.

>>81794449
>Somehow, promiscuity is a bad thing?

Yes, it is for really obvious reasons you cannot possibly be unaware of. Quit being obtuse.

>Most sex occurring outside of the relationship is actually approved by the partner, and includes threesomes.

Total asspull on your part. What's a relationship worth if none of them last over 3 years? The damage control, just wow.

>they don't use condoms because there's no risk of pregnancy.

There's a much worse risk, HIV, but they don't seem to care. Hint: It's part of their mental illness.

>If you're the same guy I was originally replying to

No.

>None of this is an argument against homosexuality

Neither the FACT that homosexuality is only no longer classified as a mental illness because of violent, illegal threats and a systematic lobbyist takeover of the APA, nor all the FACTS painting a rather grim picture of the real destructive and self-destructive nature of homosexual behaviour put any dent in your delusional white knight attitude towards fags. That's remarkable. Either media indoctrination pulled a hell of a number on you or you're a fag and merely defending your own feelings.

>>81794895
I said he's "pro-gay".

>my opinions were misrepresented

Nobody cares about opinions. Nothing he says in the video contradicts my post.

>>81794894

I'm not being obtuse. Prove monogamy is a good thing. If sex is all about reproduction, then isn't reproduction with multiple people - eg, promiscuity - a good thing? You never answered if you were pro or anti blow job, btw. Which is it? Are you anti prophylactic?

Oh, and -

What about the FACT that you can't cure homosexuality?

http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexual-orientation.aspx

>ad hominem

Disregarded :)

>American psychiatry, as with clinical psychology, has suffered from "scientific heterosexism," an idea that rests on the very unscientific assumption that heterosexuality is "normal" and all other form of sexuality - such as homo- and bi-sexuality - are aberrant. If that were not bad enough, psychiatrists and psychologists have created empirical-supported treatments designed to correct these so-called sexual aberrations.

Contradicting their own medical training, the American Psychiatric Association for much of the 20th century argued against the idea that homosexuality was biologically-based, claiming instead that it was a response to environmental conditions interfering with "normal" psychosocial maturation (Terry, 1999). This belief led the profession to develop a disease-based model of homosexuality that remained on the books until recently. The original DSM (1952) listed homosexuality as a "sociopathic personality disorder." It was later upgraded in 1968 to a "sexual deviation" but it was not until 1973, after the APA's proclamation against homophobic diagnoses, that homosexuality was removed entirely from the diagnostic manual.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/therapy-matters/201104/scientific-homophobia

>>81795023
You posted his opinions, so you obviously cared about them. His opinions were misrepresented, and you're citing the opinions that WERE misrepresented.

Bee Tee Eff Oh :)

>>81795049
>Prove monogamy is a good thing.

Monogamous parents have successful, healthy children. For a glimpse at the alternative just check out any ghetto. No dad, no degree, no job, instead crime, STDs, lower life expectancy, more mental illness (even the ones the gay lobby approves of!). Don't make me explain why people can't fly. Google something for once.

>What about the FACT that you can't cure homosexuality?

If it's genetic or epigenetic then we can absolutely "cure" it. If it's genetic detect it and abort the fetus. If it's epigenetic find out how it occurs (probably still in the womb) and either fix the conditions so it doesn't happen or once again abort.

If it's caused by environmental factors aka gay relative molestation then we're back to it clearly being a mental illness and we should reexamine if maybe there is a therapeutic cure. Therapists seem to believe they can at least mitigate the effects of anything that happens throughout someone's life, including sexual molestation. Why wouldn't the same treatment work on gay-molested people?

>apa source

I just showed you that that organization is a joke.

>>81795074
He makes it absolutely clear that nothing was falsified. They only "omitted" / "removed" (his words) parts of the interview. Those are his sincere views, merely stripped of some politeness he would like to add to diplomatic with the gay lobby.

>>81783970

Oh god was she fucking there?

I went there with my friend to check it out.
It was a clusterfuck. Women can't do anything.

>>81795487
Like all the CW women were. And some of the CW men too.

You're all stupid faggots. Now shut the fuck up about it.

>>81779632
They used to deny the white genocide agenda , they used to say it was a crazy conspiracy theory.

Now they celebrate it, they openly attack people for being white in mainstream TV. Just change 'white' into 'black' with all this shit and look how racist it they would claim it is.

White people are a minority on this planet and they are the sole creators of civilization and every fucking invention they use to attack white people.

They want white people dead because white people are the only ones that could ever stand up to them, they have no problem at all controlling black people, they don't want a job and Independence black people are content with welfare and very easy to control.

BLM is black people being used and controlled by jew. It is that easy for them, they wouldn't hate white people if they could so easily control them.

>>81792732
You degenerate family destroying cunts never evolve your talking points.

How does acceptance of homosexuality promote a good and healthy family focused society? But of course you don't want that, you just want every disgusting carnal desire to be fulfilled and will let the human race burn to ash so you can have your 'fun' .

I want all of you scum dead.

File: animeplace.gif (2MB, 266x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 266x240px

>>81780151
Even tho I agree Madoka is god-tier, good animes like Madoka are a outliner

Animes in general are cancer, copy-pasted cheap crap

>>81779632
OP, I think it's time for you to PUT ON YOUR BIG GIRL PANTS AND OWN. YOUR. POWER!
>MASSIVE DROP
>...to people gossiping and like, no fighting at all, despite it being an advertisement for capeshit
Are women this terrible or are they wholesale cringing the same as us?

Any women lurking /tv/, can you honestly tell us that you cringe whenever this commercial plays or are you retarded?

>>81785489
I wanted to kms during this whole episode

>>81796148
>White people are a minority on this planet and they are the sole creators of civilization
What? Brown and Yellow people created civilization while white people were still fucking Neanderthals.

QUICK! I need the sexy webm of her flicking peanuts in a bar

>>81795460
I thought you didn't care who fucked who, now you want to abort gay fetuses?

And nothing you showed me proved that the APA was a joke, just that Cummings was :)

None of the websites you're forced to site prove your point. Quora is a user-edited site, and the particular article you cited provides zero citations for its many claims.

In fact, there is nothing in that article to describe why homosexuality should be considered an illness at all. It doesn't cite the medical studies that support the assertion. Can you?

>>81793714

1. It does, frequent orgasm depletes testosterone and other hormones. T levels peak after a week of no orgasm, I'm sure gays are able to have sex every day if they wanted.

2. People get bored of one partner if they do it enough and often enough. This is true with hetero couples in rats, and is true with humans. Of all men with the means to attract several women, few of them are monogamous.

3. This is true, but we see the same (but weaker) trend in females, for the same reason; vaginas get infected more easily, and the median women is able to sleep around more than the median man.

Everything in that pic may be true, but it's not particularly meaningful.

>>81793818

Sure, but what is "natural"? You could argue by the same logic that modern civilization is "unnatural" because it pollutes the earth and turns the friggin' frogs gay (also unnatural) and allows humans to breed out of control.

In the context of passing on your genes, it's definitely less advantageous on the individual level.

>enter Superslut thread to fap
>Anons are having some gay argument. Literally.

fuck you

>>81798582
fuck you leatherman

I'd rather talk about gay people than fapping to some regular stacey

>>81780764

When people try to offend you unprovoked, it's always because they feel threatened by you.

Girl making fun of you for being 5'8" = she wants to fuck, and she's trying to conquer her sexual feelings.

>>81798457
With the exception of the turning frogs gay bit that is pretty much how I feel.

>>81783827
>we

>>81794937
>And i refuse to believe
>If it was about thoughtful content it should reflect that in its design
You're ignoring cultural differences in art style and beauty standards.

Also the designs for the dark-world witch-verses (It's been years, I don't remember what they are called anymore) are objectively good art, period.

Since you're so dismissive of something you haven't watched (Show reveals it isn't what it appears to be by episode 3 and only grows from there on) it's probably going to be too much for you to deal with to be honest.

The point of the show was that it's not actually a cutesy show for little kids, the entire appearance is a trick.

File: Supergirl s01e16 BREAKING NEWS unsubbed.webm (3MB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x576px

>>81797789

>>81786122
Dude. You're a jerk. Leave him alone.

>>81779787
Why is having morals and standards cool? I don't know. It's probably not really "cool" it's just part of our strong personalities. You wouldn't understand.

I hate this show. The protagonist is cute as fuck, but written like a toxic feminist.

Melissa Benoist is a NeverTrump feminazi cunt too sadly. She cheated on her boyfriend with the Superman dude on the show.

>>81801300
>believing magazine gossip
mmm post pics of your pusy

I love how the writers on this show, through all their liberal pandering accidentally made it canon that Hillary lost twice in the Supergirl universe as well.

>>81800601
>that final shot of her
my lord she's so sexy

>>81800502
>The point of the show was that it's not actually a cutesy show for little kids, the entire appearance is a trick.
But it doesn't look like a cutesy show for little kids, it looks like a fetish show for pedophiles. Where's the trick in that?

>>81780729
Her delicious body has nothing to do with the fact she is a badass superhero!

>>81785867
>She falls over
>humans closer to the explosion are unaffected
?

File: 173eb260441b3db3b748a5bfc9af2033.jpg (28KB, 564x546px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 564x546px

>>81779632
Young Supergirl is the hottest Supergirl.

>>81800601
I want Evil Kara

>>81790058
I wish I could see more evil Kara senpai

File: 91498c4f64ccdf876c39395884ebb269.jpg (5KB, 236x133px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 236x133px

>>81790058
Red K episode is always the best episode just like in Smallville
Silver Kryptonite when?
i just wanna see Kara getting all paranoid & sweaty thinking everyone's out to get her.

File: 1432777930_d13fe95ee5_o[1].jpg (38KB, 431x242px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 431x242px

>>81804385

Need to abuse the parallel worlds stuff more and show a badass 90s edge Supergirl

>>81804035
You actually mean cute, because if you actually meant she was hot that would make you a pedo.

I was grinning like an idiot throughout that Flash crossover. Other than that this show is pretty damn awful.

>>81806066
Wait, you're not one of us?

Is it worth watching this series? I don't give a fuck about capeshit in general but i get a bit of a buffy vibe from the webms and i really like buffy, thx.

File: 1459277059277.png (43KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 160x160px

>>81792361

>>81806828

No.

>>81789195
>>81789240
>>81789270

>FUCKING A WHITE MALE

File: photo 12-45-15.jpg (300KB, 1017x902px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 1017x902px

>>81780235
wrong
Rhea Seehorn has the best legs