You're dismissed.

>working on favourites from template
>thread expires before i can post it
why is this board moving sooooo fast

File: Madame Vice Admiral.jpg (54KB, 602x554px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 602x554px

>>81716864
>You're dismissed.
You're fired!

>>81717257
Why hasn't Dukat spoke out against his endorsement by Terra Prime?

File: Even Khan Noonien Singh didn't sink to using eugenic weapons.jpg (115KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 800x500px

>>81717306
Is it true that when Dukat authorized the MOAB, he thought his guls were talking about a Bajoran MILF?

>>81717257
>getting pissed on by bajoran whores


Gul dukat? More like gul dukaka

File: TNG WoK Uniforms.jpg (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

Would it still have worked?

Anyone else excited for Discovery?

File: STD will be good or it will be bad or it will be somewhere in between.png (79KB, 241x341px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 241x341px

>>81717668
I'm not optimistic but I'm not pessimistic either.

>>81717257

i would vote for a cardassian, no question asked.

>>81717723
Upvoted

>>81716864
do it

>>81717723
I'm normally neutral too but I can't help but be excited for new Star Trek.

I was not excited for the JJTrek releases because they were rehashes, but even though Discovery is yet another prequel there are new characters and ships and situations and I'm almost a bit giddy about it.

Fuck yeah, STD.

>>81717723
This desu, could go either way

File: HarryKim.jpg (17KB, 350x400px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 350x400px

>sacrifices so much for his crew that the harry kim we know by the end of the series isn't even the original harry kim
>still an ensign

>>81717971
>characters voluntarily kill themselves on the transporter on a daily basis
>having an issue with Kim's authenticity

>>81718068
>Star Trek says that transporters in Star Trek don't kill people
>you spend your time insisting that Star Trek must be mistaken somehow
Okay.

>>81718143
Thomas Riker

>>81718461
>Star Trek explains that Thomas was created by an anomalous energy field in the planet's atmosphere, not by the transporter
>you spend your time insisting that Star Trek must be mistaken somehow
Okay.

>>81718533
Pulaski's transporter trace restoration.

File: question.png (98KB, 612x491px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 612x491px

>>81718068
What about the episode where we see Barclay's perspective as he transports and he's clearly conscious the entire time?

>>81718604
Barclay's trip through the transporter where he stays conscious the whole way through.

You can find all sorts of weird and contradictory shit in Star Trek, but when the writers tell you that some shit is more correct than the other shit, then you shouldn't waste your time insisting that Star Trek is wrong.

>>81718615
>>81718667
https://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Transporter_phobia
This exists for a reason, friends.

>>81718749
>Transporter use carried an inherent risk, since transporters disassembled and reassembled matter at the atomic level.
Holy shit

>>81718807
Which is, of course, completely different from making a copy of someone and then destroying the original.

>>81718461
My theory is Thomas was accidentally pulled from some parallel universe.

>>81718837
How do you define dissassemble?

>>81718984
Do you want to split hairs now?

File: number5.jpg (22KB, 400x286px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x286px

>>81718984
DISASSEMBLE =SQUISH! DEAD!

>>81718837
>Which is, of course, completely different from making a copy of someone and then destroying the original.
The more I sit here looking at this stupid post, the angrier I get. You seem to be conflating the shit-tier "Think Like A Dinosaur" Outer Limits episode transporter mechanics with every claim that transporters kill people, when even Memory Alpha disagrees.

I'm fucking insanely angry right now.

>>81719237
Right. Yes. Memory Alpha. Even Memory Alpha agrees that transporters don't kill people.

So why do you keep wasting your time insisting that transporters kill people?

>>81719358
Molecular disassembly.

>>81719401
Which it accomplishes without killing the person.

>>81719422
lol

>>81719449
Inside the fictional universe of Star Trek, that's how it works.

Same with the warp drive. Same with the universal translator. It's bullshit in the real world, but in Star Trek it works.

And you're wasting your time by arguing that Star Trek doesn't match reality, because... duh.

>>81718068
But all breaks in the stream of consciousness is death for the person currently in control of your body. You're just borrowing it until the next guy needs it

>>81716864
You're disassembled.

File: I want to live.jpg (10KB, 470x264px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 470x264px

>>81719893
Translator's Note: This means de-Tuvixed.

>>81719527
>wasting your time
Doesn't this intrisically confirm that transporters kill?