itt: movies that are so kino that everyone mistakenly thought

>>81641208
prometheus

>>81641208
Yes
>>81642173
No

File: disaster movie.jpg (64KB, 351x500px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 351x500px

Legitimately one of the funniest movies I've ever seen. You just can't approach it like a regular comedy.

>>81642173
>>81642214
Yes

File: original.jpg (124KB, 340x463px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 340x463px

i still think it's pretty comfy

>>81642224
Because it doesn't have set ups, punchlines, originality, story, good performances, a talented cast, a coherent story, and relies entirely on you crudely shoehorned in references as it's sole well to draw humor from?
Your right it doesn't sound like anyone could ever approach this movie as a comedy

>>81642173
Prometheus was dope asf.

Idk why everyone is so butthurt over it.
It expanded the lore well.
Kind of like the star wars prequels.

File: open-uri20150422-12561-r9yaea_739f39c6.jpg (420KB, 1000x1409px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 1000x1409px

Better than The Wizard of Oz imo

File: The Great Kino.jpg (385KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1360x768px

The Great Wall was Kino af

Goodwill Hunting fighting Dragons.

>>81641208
I never thought why Waterworld was rated so bad when it came out. I saw it as a kid and I thought it was great. Mad Max on the sea.

>>81641208
Track down the fan made ulysses cut. You'll thank me later.

File: 51TXBBTT8RL.jpg (52KB, 341x475px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 341x475px

Am I the only one here who's seen this?

>>81641208
Waterworld is amazing.
>>81642173
neck yourself

>>81643694
desu, so long as it has simon pegg and nick frost, ill watch it

The Matrix Reloaded

>>81641208
Why is it these are always childhood nostalgia flicks that 30 year olds remember?

File: 1397173996341.jpg (105KB, 836x727px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 836x727px

>>81644065
>that 30 year olds remember?

Being this young

>>81644065
>I don't watch movies that haven't come out in the last 5 years.
You need to be 18 to post here, kiddo.

"It has no pace, sloppy continuity, bland characters... It's my contention that John Carpenter was never meant to direct science fiction horror movies. Here are some things he'd be better suited to direct: Traffic accidents, train wrecks and public floggings..." - Alan Spencer, Starlog magazine November, 1982

"A surprising failure" "Carpenter's most unsatisfying film to date." - Phil Hardy, Science Fiction (1984)

"Too phony looking to be disgusting. It qualifies only as instant junk" "A foolish, depressing, overproduced movie that mixes horror with science fiction to make something that is fun as neither one thing or the other. Sometimes it looks as if it aspired to be the quintessential moron movie of the 80's" - Vincent Canby, New York Times

"It seems clear that Carpenter made his choice early on to concentrate on the special effects and the technology and to allow the story and people to become secondary. Because this material has been done before, and better, especially in the original "The Thing"" - Roger Ebert

"This movie is more disgusting than frightening, and most of it is just boring." David Denby, New York Magazine

"The structure of the piece reminds unpleasantly of porno films..." - Daily Variety

"So single-mindedly determined to keep you awake that it almost puts you to sleep" - David Ansen, Newsweek

"A wretched excess" - Gary Arnold, The Washington Post

"The only avenue left to explore would seem to be either concentration camp documentaries or the snuff movie." - William Parente, The Scotsman

"What the old picture delivered – and what Carpenter has missed – was a sense of intense dread." Variety (In 1951, the same paper had said of Nyby's film: "The resourcefulness shown in building the plot groundwork is lacking as the yarn gets into full swing. Cast members fail to communicate any real terror.")

"If you want blood, go to the slaughterhouse. All in all, it's a terrific commercial for J&B Scotch." - Christian Nyby, director of the original

File: sure2.jpg (52KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 900x900px

>>81644111
>super man slowly lifts shit: the movie
>it's kino

>>81643858
I watched this. I forgot most of it thou. Was the boy rich, and he allways pretended to comit suicide, to scare off gold digers, and he loved the old lady?

>>81644271
Disagree. I loved the character interactions and the action scenes really aren't bad. The plane scene is GOAT, and so is the opening thanks to some sweet Brando narration. The original stuff in the score is also really good and this may be an unpopular opinion, but the scene where Lex and his goons beat the shit out of Superman on the Kryptonite island is one of my favorite scenes.

>>81644328
That's the gist of it. It's pretty much /r9k/ the movie, hearwarming and funny as fuck, really dry humor with a good message at the end.

File: 063.jpg (85KB, 1040x457px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1040x457px

>>81641208
>>81642173
these and this <--

>>81643628
What's wrong with her face?

File: Return To Oz.jpg (46KB, 250x400px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 250x400px

>>81643628
Anyone who saw this knew it was good

>>81641208
> written by joss whedon

>>81641208
The Bling Ring except a majority of critics liked it or really liked it

>>81643858
so weird it must be good

can I elect showgirls?