BANE?
>>81630457
He can't keep getting away with it.
>>81630418
It's to silhouette the landscape and the people, dummy.
>>81630418
>hey /tv/ my undercontrasted edit i made in 15 seconds in a pirated copy of photoshop is better than the pros working on a major hollywood film
this board never fails to deliver the autism
>>81630457
COMPUTER, ENHANCE
>>81630418
>its a neet talks about the filter episode
Professionals do exist.
>>81630544
>>81630457
>>81630418
>Whoosh
>>81630497
Yes but they didn't used to do it [the past] so I HATE IT
>>81630544
>the filter
It's exposure
>>81630544
Wrong image
>>81630544
>here are images where a color cast is created by lighting
wtf I love grading now
>>81630497
yet other scenes are underexposed as well
Realistic colors look boring and make the costumes look cheap
>>81630598
DULLEST
>lately
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B34sntIgI4g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-I4VIR5yGg
>>81630418
Well, they said it will be a dark movie, maybe they referred to the colors
>>81630418
I bet you learned about exposure a few weeks ago and suddenly you think you're a photography master.
It's a silhouette you dumbass, they are done with almost pure blacks.
Also your pathetic attempt to "correct" the picture has blown out whites and less hard contrast.
The point of photography is not just to make the "most natural realistic" picture you ignorant cunt.
Also I bet you are one of those "THAT'S ORANGE AND TEAL UGHHH" posters who learned about it six months ago, while it was implemented from the start of the use of color and basic color matching.
These color correct threads on /tv/ are pure cancer, bunch of fat neckbeards turning the curves up in their cracked photoshop of an already color corrected image pretending they know better than the whole group of colorists who were responsible for such a big budget movie.