Do you pay to see it?
why or why not?
>>81549916
YES.
I think they're genuinely the 2 funniest women in Hollywood... that might not be saying much, but it's true.
Saw Sisters for the first time the other day, loved it.
>>81549916
only if they get naked
little tired of lesbians for now tBQH
>>81549916
No.
Not political, but while these two used to be pretty great, they are both blown out, and haven't produced anything really funny in years.
I've just kind of given up on the old 30-rock/Parks and rec days
>>81549916
no, have had more than enough (((lesbian))) propaganda.
I would complain about it relentlessly on /tv/ when it is first released saying it's SJW brainwashing feminist degenerate bullshit, but then end up watching it on cable a few years later and secretly enjoy it.
>>81549916
No, not really into the kinds of comedies that Hollywood has been churning out.
Although I put 2:1 odds I end up fapping to a webm from it at some point
>>81549916
>you mean two 50 year old out of shape actress are going to pretend to be lesbians?
I love Marxism now
le "funny" and "hot" old ladies
A challenger appears.
>>81549916
No.
Because I'm not a beta virgin that can be manipulated by pussy, especially not nasty old pussy from either of those two skanks.
>>81551486
(((Hollywood))) doesn't make all the lez shit for dudes, they make it to fuck w/ young women.
>>81549916
Fey really needs other people to work off of by herself isn't funny, just awkward. Poehler could work as a 'David Spade' sort of character, smarmy but still gets shit done.
I'm not paying for that shit. I'd watch the webms on here if there was anything worth watchingIf you know what I mean
>>81549916
>about them being lesbians?
No
>happen to be lesbians, movie involves actual plot?
Sure
>>81551446
If its a rom com, no.
They could probably play a convincing couple though.