What would you say is the message behind his films?

>>81542703
Capitalism is bad.

>>81542703
her pussy looks aight here

Any more pics of Hathaway in that suit? Something about the way her chest looks in it really gets me.

>>81542913
I hated her visor. Overall she was super hot in this movie

>>81543314
There was not enough of her in the suit desu.

I can't decide if Nolan's iconic hairdo is cool or not

>>81542703
does nolan have a latex fetish?

>>81542703
Its not the size of the guy that matters, but the loyalty of his guns

File: 1489325584637.jpg (46KB, 600x396px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x396px

>>81544384
hairlets do not have much choice though

>>81542703
love

>>81542703
The message behind his films is that if you put enough forward then people will find their own meanings without you having to come up with anything yourself.

>>81544597
Is that Diogenes?

>>81542703
Style is more important than substance

File: this is a toy.jpg (89KB, 763x771px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 763x771px

>>81545779

The scene where he tells those guys trying to help that he isn't wearing hockey pads really cemented it.

Differs depending on the film, but they're hardly subtle. Inception's ending is obviously that Leo no longer cares if it's reality or not, a fake can be just as good or better than the original.

>>81546095
omg so deep

>>81546282
Honestly, I don't think you know what deep means. You probably misuse the word pretentious, too.

>>81546336
I know what pretentious means but deep doesn't really have as definitive a meaning. In general I am just expressing my disdain for Nolan's films because I think they are boring and of little substance.

File: 1413564844048.webm (2MB, 690x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 690x720px

>>81546393

>deep doesn't really have as definitive a meaning

That's deep.

>>81546393
It does. When we talk about something having depth, it means that there's a lot to explore when analyzing and discussing it. Its themes are apparent throughout its scenes and its conclusion merits debate. Nolan's films don't have the most depth, since he's appealing to a very broad demographic, but they're certainly not as shallow as most blockbusters.

Depends on the film. I think the dark Knight was a movie about terrorism and how it's handled, raising the question of whether what is being done to stop it is right or wrong and portraying the extensive power that the government has in their hands.

>>81546514

I thought it was about a billionaire taking time out of his day to beat up a clown.

>>81544287
At least there was that one really good shot of her ass on the cycle.

>>81546581
Thanks, Mr. Reductionist. Your comments are always so insightful.

>>81546514
Did Nolan switch opinions between it and TDKR? Dark Knight is very post-9/11 while Rises is distinctly post-post-9/11

File: Alex Pained.png (719KB, 666x666px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 666x666px

>>81546471
>they're certainly not as shallow as most blockbusters.

"Yeah it's a drive through but this greasy shitty burger is just better than McDonalds, so therefore let's talk about how it measures up next to Michelin restaurant food".

File: big belt 3.jpg (52KB, 555x787px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 555x787px

>there will never be a Nolan thread on /tv/ ever again without it descending into Baneposting.

/tv/s greatest achievement .. the destruction of this hacks credibility.

File: image.jpg (188KB, 518x389px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 518x389px

Raz and Bane are in the right.
Batman is a useful idiot and doesn't even know it.

>>81546658
Nah, it's more like comparing an Outback Steakhouse to a drive thru. They're both corporate chains, and neither is fine art, but one is definitely better than the other.

I dare you to tell me that Kong's lack of depth is even in the same league as The Dark Knight.

>>81546611

Post something sarcastic at me again and I'll get a bazooka and blow you up. Don't test me.

>>81546792
I'm agreeing with you bro. Just like how Citizen Kane is just about a billionaire who misses his sled.

File: Stop.png (687KB, 666x666px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 666x666px

>>81546773

Clearly flustered he continued, "no you don't see, this greasy shitty burger isn't just better than McDonalds, it's a whole step over shitty steak! While it's not haute cuisine, this greasy shitty burger is miles ahead of the McDonalds people usually get."
"There's nuance!", he insisted, as the pustulant sauce dripped from the sides of his mouth into his neckbeard.

>>81546857
You could have spent that effort formulating an argument

Why are Nolan haters so childish? Another thread, another episode of sperging

>>81542703
Well, I think the whole of it was a mockery to the stupid character and idea of Batman and the not muh comic book faggots.

In BB, Batman is introduced, he is a hero, pretty comic book heroic.

In TDK, Batman is shown as a Bush/nsa like antiterror freak. Showing that the whole concept of Batman as superhero is retarded, and that the same people who complain about Bush would clap and cheer for someone doing exactly the same thing if he wears a stupid cape and is called Batman.

The third movie goes even beyond that, not only showing that Batman fans are hypocrites but also denouncing the whole Batman character as useless and retarded. Fans get mad if batman kills, but never get mad if batman becomes a bush like character. But they also hate Bush!

So after 3 movies of having that batfaggot crying about no guns and no killing, the city is saved...by killing Bane shooting him with a gun.

Snyder, understood the satire of Nolan and decided to take it to the extreme. Batman not killing is retarded when he does much worse. So Batman will kill, and do even worse stuff.

Burton understood it, Nolan understood it, Snyder understood it. Why dont you?

>>81547053
Snyder just thinks killing is cool. He's a massive pleb of a director who made his name on special effects and action sequences.

>>81547053
Agreed, but I would even take it a step further, say Gotham represents the country:
In order to get rid of the deep (state) seeded corruption, the only real solution is to bring it all down (drain the swamp). Hence my original comment here >>81546717

>>81547053
http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/187605/A_theory_behind_Januarys_weak_Wii_U_sales.php

40-50% of Wii U's were returned