Thread replies: 20
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6
Anonymous
Hollywood Finally Kills Sony 2017-04-07 09:53:55 Post No. 81377937
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Hollywood Finally Kills Sony 2017-04-07 09:53:55 Post No. 81377937
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Sony_Pictures_Television_(production_logo).jpg (9KB, 421x236px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 421x236px
The last independently owned (((Hollywood))) studio will soon be gone;
https://www.mi6-hq.com/news/sony-considering-selling-movie-and-tv-business-may-scupper-bond-25-deal-170125
Sony Corp is considering a possible sale of its film and television arms, according to sources.
Sony Entertainment (and its subsidiary Columbia Pictures) have been responsible for distributing all four of Daniel Craig's James Bond films under deals with cash-strapped MGM. Many commentators assumed MGM would 're-up' with Sony for Bond 25. Any potential deal is likely to be on ice now due to talks of a sale. That may leave the door open for other Bond 25 suitors such as Warner Bros.
"Every bank is pushing pitches," said one person familiar with the process to the New York Post. Another confirmed to the paper that banks have paid a flurry of visits to Tokyo to advise on a sale of Sony’s film and TV business.
CBS CEO Leslie Moonves has long signaled interest in acquiring the asset, though several Chinese bidders could be in the wings.
Sony Entertainment boss Michael Lynton is leaving to run Snapchat. Sony Corp has not appointed a replacement, creating further suspicion that a sale may be next.
>>
Or instead of it being a Hollywood conspiracy, it could just be the whole "endlessly releasing absolute dumpster fire movies" thing
>>
>>81377937
>That may leave the door open for other Bond 25 suitors such as Warner Bros.
Christopher Nolan directing Bond, here we come.
>>
It didn't happen soon enough.
>>
>>81378004
>"endlessly releasing absolute dumpster fire movies"
(((Who))) do you think was running the show at Sony?
Amazing how many flat-out retarded decisions these experienced long time Hollywood executives made?....
>>
>have people like Amy Pascal and Avi Arad fuck up profitable franchises
>Let the still have high ranking jobs because they are Jews
>Company folds
Good I see no downside to this.
>>
File: QIMhngz.jpg (105KB, 743x733px) Image search:
[Google]
105KB, 743x733px
>>81377937
WE DID IT BOYS
HAHA GOODBYE SONY AND THEIR STUPID SJW PANDERING
SEE IT GETS YOU NOTHING
>>
Based Warner Brothers
>>
>>81378034
God yes please
>>
>"independently owned"
>owned by Japanese megaconglomerate
antisemitism is a hell of a drug
>>
>>81378648
STARRING TOM HARDY AS JAMES BOND
MICHAEL CAINE AS M
JOSEPH GORDON LEVITT AS Q
ANNE HATHAWAY AS PUSSYLICIOUS
LIAM NEESON AS BLOFELD
>>
>>81377937
I don't see other outlets reporting this, I really want this to be real
>>
File: 137754165465.jpg (325KB, 786x1051px) Image search:
[Google]
325KB, 786x1051px
>>81378675
I'll let you do your own leg work and figure out who owns the rest of Hollywood.
>>
>>81377937
Is there not some law in Japan that makes it really difficult or impossible to sell Japanese companies to foreigners?
>>
>>81378885
Yeah, so what? There is no Jewish agenda. American Jews are 100% assimilated.
>>
File: 1407664537569.jpg (30KB, 400x388px) Image search:
[Google]
30KB, 400x388px
>marvel now gets full creative control of all spider-man and FF characters
We fucking did it bros
>>
>>81379092
I thought Sony bought an existing American company and turned it into their Hollywood arm. The movie studios are not a native Japanese part of the Sony Corporation.
>>
File: 1388627798465 (2).jpg (202KB, 1024x768px) Image search:
[Google]
202KB, 1024x768px
>>81379097
>American Jews are 100% assimilated
>>
>>81379785
Yeah you're probably right, it would most likely be classed as a subsidiary.
>>
>>81378034
There goes getting good action scene in a Bond movie.
Thread posts: 20
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6