OFFICIAL THUNDERBIRDS VEHICLE POWER RANKING
>1. Thunderbird 2
>2. Thunderbird 1
>3. Thunderbird 5
>4. The Mole
>5. FAB 1
>6. Thunderbird 4
>POWER GAP
>900. Thunderbird 6
>901. Thunderbird 3
I like T3, fuck you
Why would you rank 5 higher than 4?
Also, where's Skyship One? It looked comfy as fuck.
can someone post them all because I can't remember what they look like, except for the one which is literally a big drill.
>>81329543
>>81329500
Thunderbird 2 was the worst. It was a fucking transport.
>>81329578
>transport
arent they all that
>>81329578
Why did they turn T2 into a flying easter egg in 2004?
>>81329534
4 is awful, he has to get permission from Virgil to even go out on missions.
5 at least always has an important role to play, though I feel very sorry for John as he is stuck up there with no one but occasionally Alan for company.
Thread theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g3yLsewp74
Why did they keep him around, lads? All he did was give The Hood an easy way to fuck around with them
>>81331283
Remind me what this guy's deal was again
>>81331357
Quick rundown?
I really hope this thread is a result of me recommending Thunderbirds to some anon in a thread yesterday. Anyway The Mole is number one followed closely by Thunderbird 2.
why isn't trump building shit like this yet?
>>81331913
Speaking of killer robots...
I like to think that him and Mattis already have pushed through the DARPA RFP's for the IRL version of The Moose from chappie.
Something that can scamper around urban areas cutting down roof gunners with it's point defense minigun while lobbing cluster bombs at orphanages and dismembering insurgents with its knife-sharp hydraulic talons, all controlled by some junior officer sipping a coffee coilatta in an office park outside Kansas City, would be the perfect urban submission tool for Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria.