Serious Question

The italian one is innocent in the sense that it added "color" to the man to represent the detergent's coloring factor.

The japanese one lacks this extra layer and makes the black look inherently dirty and unwanted which then gets cleaned away.

the Italian one isn't racist because you can't be racist against whites or interracial relationships.


Is this 1950s? Why is it racist to imply interracial relationships are bad?

>>81318750
saying minorities are ruining the country and europe is "racist"

>>81318835
oh wow first response was 100% right

dang

>>81318750

Neither are racist. People have too much time on their hands to get their panties in a wad.

>>81318750

It's a Rorschach test. You are the one who is racist.

File: 1467701204129.jpg (126KB, 921x481px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 921x481px

>>81318912
Nah, fist response is just an SJW sent to this site from leddit.

>>81318750
Viva italia based il papa that's why

>>81319037
I don't know what this is, I don't care what it is, and I agreed with the first response. Thats it. I don't know how you would get a photo from a reddit page if you don't go on reddit

>>81318750
They are the same.

the difference is that the Chinese one is funny

File: 45645ka.jpg (661KB, 958x775px) Image search: [Google]

661KB, 958x775px

>>81318750
They are both racist. They just differ in who they are trying to make look bad.

japanese version makes blacks look like dirty shits that need to be cleaned

Italian Jew media controlled version Makes whites look like whimpy hairy poor little white bois that can't compete with what this site would call a "bull"

Black bad = racist
Black good = not racist

File: braaaap.jpg (229KB, 1293x1491px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1293x1491px

Serious Question

is this accurate?

File: Mindblowing.png (156KB, 750x285px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 750x285px

>>81319319
really tingles the ol noggin

>>81318835
Nonsensical post
So saying color is inherently better than non color is fine but saying dirt is worse than no dirt is not? Complete idiot.

Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:35:58 No.73231490▶
I think you should stop reposting year-old threads
>>
Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:36:07 No.73231498▶>>73231524 >>73231570
>>73231438 (OP)
I don't understand the Italian one.
Why you wash a guy in a laundry, and he ends up getting covered with shit after that?
>>
Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:36:27 No.73231502▶
>>73231438 (OP)
China has the right idea. wtf is up with Italy?
>>
Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:37:31 No.73231518▶
>>73231438 (OP)
Italians are total cucks.
>>
Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:37:50 No.73231524▶
>>73231498
real life -> desire

wow even i can see that and i am american
>>
Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:40:12 No.73231570▶
>>73231498
maybe detergent that enhances/doesn't fade colours?

idk
>>
Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:42:32 No.73231600▶
中国为家, 意大利为谁呀?
>>
Anonymous 04/06/17(Thu)12:45:04 No.73231653▶
One clip is for whites, one clip is for coloureds.

Are you all NEETs who get their laundry done by mommy? It's honestly not that difficult, that's why women are doing it.

>>81318874
>>81318874
>you can't be racist against whites
go back to r3ddit nigger

>>81318750
I'm mad at Italy for this. Thought they were better

>>81319471
I don't save this type of shit, but there's an anit-black fat nerd version of that cartoon where the script gets reversed.

They're both racist.

But SJWs only care about racism against non whites.

>>81318750
you can only be racist against white people
it's simple

>>81319568
He saved exactly because the opposite is happening to him and his waifu is getting banged by whitey

File: 1484178588433s.jpg (2KB, 122x124px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 122x124px

>>81319471

Black guy in the first one is actually jacked as fuck and has a desirable body. The second is just some Asian pretty boy.

File: 1491338972003.jpg (70KB, 600x589px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x589px

>>81319505
I'm not white, faggot. I just recognize evil / divisive tricks when I see them.

>>81319568
>but there's an anit-black fat nerd version of that cartoon where the script gets reversed.

yes, cuz some /pol/ weeb got anally blasted by a meme

"reverse memes" are the ultimate sign of butthurt after archiving and/or reporting.

it isn't
niggers are dirty

Very good point. One is "racist" because it besmirches blacks. The other isn't "racist" because it besmirches whites, and white men in particular.

File: 1488401182320.jpg (561KB, 2452x2839px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 2452x2839px

>>81319652
I believe you when you say you're non-white at least

mongrel subhuman

>>81319652
hey answer already

Are you the guy on the right?

https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/image/igkto7wtWT3kKgbbH8oTYg/
https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/filename/confusing/image/igkto7wtWT3kKgbbH8oTYg/
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/filename/pgggg/image/igkto7wtWT3kKgbbH8oTYg/

Because based on these I'm thinking yes

don't just reply multiple times :^)

>>81319659
Why do you hate white people so much? You probably are white so what the fuck is your problem?

>>81319519
How do you interpret that from his post? Are you looking to be offended?

>>81319651
face>body
girls literally orgasm from watching boyband music videos and they're all scrawny

>>81318750

I don't get the second one. His skin color didn't even change.

Only Americans give a fuck.

>>81319721
Oh sorry this was for you! >>81319471 >>81319505 >>81319693

>>81319659
Nah senpai, whoever made that meme was obviously pissed that """his""" gal was getting the white mamba and it his only way to express his sexual frustration and anger at white people

>>81319783
kek

"White Rhino"
"Great White Dick"
"Colonial Rod"

You're all faggots.

The Italian ad is selling a detergent that doesn't wipe the colour out of your clothes.

The Chinese one is selling a "whitening" detergent.

Neither are racist, they're just bad taste.

>>81319693
>mongrel subhuman
Try again.

>>81319865
Many people would argue that sexually humiliating white men isn't "racist," while slandering blacks is.

File: king.jpg (74KB, 529x399px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 529x399px

>>81318750
I feel like the 2nd is in response to the first am I wrong?

>>81320144
The first one was a chink copy of the second.

File: wow.jpg (242KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1024x819px

>>81319721
>>81319773
You didnt add the new archive link. We gotta keep the list growing!

I'll stop when you've collected 151 archive links. Get to work.

File: 4_fat_dot.jpg (86KB, 400x685px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 400x685px

>>81320186
That's funny Korea can't make anything original even racism.

>>81320260
That's too much chink to handle without a back brace.