A soft reboot

>>81309440
try again Jack

>>81309440
FUCK YOU IT'S FOREVER

>>81309440
Reminder that he praised TFA for being a soft reboot. Never watched them again after that. Their defence of TFA was them officially jumping the shark. It's wasn't because I disagreed with them - they'd done plenty of reviews I'd disagreed with before. It was the nonsensical, inconsistent arguments they put forward to defend and praise TFA - praising it for shit they'd criticised other movies for. The prequels being bad didn't mean they needed to defend the next Star Wars movie that came along.

>>81309567
they admitted Disney paid them desu

>>81309567
They wanted to like TFA so badly that it blinded them to how bad it really was. It reminds me of a certain young jedi who just wanted to protect the chancellor.

File: 1486191713899.png (575KB, 534x528px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 534x528px

>>81309440
>It's like that Star Trek episode when

>>81309624
Not surprised.

>>81309748
Jesus Christ, Rich is looking BAD these days.

>>81309567
prequels fan detected. Die in a bonfire, millenial

>>81309567
>praising it for shit they'd criticised other movies for
Like what? They enjoyed the characters and the tone. How is that inconsistent with the guy who also liked Jurassic World?

>>81310094
(You)

>The prequels being bad didn't mean they needed to defend the next Star Wars movie that came along.

>>81309567

>You can't like things in certain movies and dislike them in others.

Sure thing.