Audiences are retarded, there's no way around it.
But who's fault is it? Is it the audiences for accepting and supporting the dumbest content that doesn't get their brain cells running?
Or the ones in charge of making movies (and other forms of entertainment), for being okay with making low quality movies that don't stimulate the minds of the audience, because it's easier and cheaper?
pretentiousness: the post
>>81298388
do we blame the mong for having down syndrome? no. not his fault. but lets talk about mommy & daddys drinking & should be too old to procreate but fir science bodies..
The problem is that the white male audience started pirating and stopped paying for movies.
So Hollywood has to pander to other more retarded demographics.
>>81298429
t. guy who watched every single movie about dudes in spandex beating each other off
>>81298484
This sounds very accurate.
Hollywood is ran by Jews
Jews only care about money
Audiences like vanilla shit like marvel movies
Vanilla shit like marvel movies make money
It's a vicious circle, but it's the Jews fault
>>81298484
ding ding ding
>>81298388
>controls means of production
>other one doesnt
idk man, seems hard to figure out who affects who here
There can be movies that try to stimulate the audience's mind and still suck. Batman vs Superman is a recent example
>>81299315
You could argue that the audience can be in control of what gets made and what doesn't if they just decide what to watch or not watch.
I actually liked Afta Erf to be desu with you