Better than the first.

>>81280221
hmm

>>81280221
na

>>81280221
ye

>>81280221
no. pacing is really bad.

I think the flashbacks were. Main story, debatable.

>>81280221
Patrician

>>81280221

It suffered from sequelitis.

Taking elements from the original successful movie and going "remember this???"

Robert Deniro suddenly saying "I make him an offer he can't refuse" in english when the characters were talking in italian to each other, and without Brando's delivery or charisma.

The family dinner scene, and oh, grandpa is buying presents hahaha silly grandpa, that's why he isn't here, oh here he comes, let's all go offscreen to meet him.

Those two are the most obvious ones and from the top of my head, but there's probably more plus other issues independent from this that I'm not addressing.

As good.
Both together are a masterpiece.

Lighting is fucked.

>>81280221

Yeah, it is.

It's one of the very few legitimate answers to the trivia question 'What movie sequel is better than the first film?' Because there are only a very few.

III was underrated kino and a better film.

>>81283439
>The family dinner scene, and oh, grandpa is buying presents hahaha silly grandpa, that's why he isn't here, oh here he comes, let's all go offscreen to meet him.

That scene was brilliant, man. The scene was about the children, and the beginning of their disconnect. Pop being offscreen was completely irrelevant.