Underrated actors.

>>81197983

A pity so many people think that movie is realistic.

File: 1.jpg (110KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1280x720px

>>81197983

>>81198415
irrelevant

>>81198415
Thanks Bill Nye

>>81198415
you mean realistic like garbage movies like gravity and interstellar? Scifi is not about realism. Go back to watching shitty cgi dramas you tasteless millennial.

>>81198718
Stories are about conveying ideas and concepts.

Should we tell children stories about other children finding success at jumping out of windows with just umbrellas to arrest their descent?

No?

Then why should we tell dangerous falsehoods to adults?

File: Screen-Shot-2016-02-10-at-1.59.03-PM.png (199KB, 400x268px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 400x268px

>>81197983
*Reddit actors

File: 1440068008908.jpg (42KB, 581x576px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 581x576px

>>81198754

File: nsdvxn7.jpg (72KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1280x720px

>>81197983

File: 1490362907478.jpg (36KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x375px

>>81198754
oh wow

File: sam_rockwell.jpg (307KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 750x500px

>>81197983

>>81198930
>>81198868

Hello post-modernists.

Hiding from value doesn't make it go away.

>>81198415

name one truly realistic sci fi movie

File: p11928964_b_v8_aa.jpg (190KB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 960x1440px

>>81197983

>>81198981
Agreed. He's great in Alpha Dogs.

>>81198980
>uses the term post-modernists
>doesn't understand what it means

>>81198718
You do realize that there are different genres of Science Fiction? Films like Moon, Interstellar, and The Martian fall under the "Hard Science Fiction" category its not meant to be viewed or perceived as "Fantasy" or "Science Fantasy" .

File: 2159d28f6c324b348d7cf982e6baf6f3.jpg (657KB, 1365x2048px) Image search: [Google]

657KB, 1365x2048px

>>81197983

>>81198754
Lol, you're retarded

>>81199160
>muh sub-sub-genres

>>81198415
what?

>>81199010
Marooned.

Go ahead and watch it. You won't.

>>81199045
It's someone who rejects value systems.

>>81199160
>Hard Science Fiction" category

In PR, yes. In reality, they're still space opera.

Moon is bullshit because lunar he3 deposits are at concentrations of 50 parts per billion and you'd need 150 million tons of rock to get 1 ton of helium 3 and that is not a net energy gain.

Interstellar deliberately discarded the realistic black hole kip thorne made and the plot hinges on an impossible solar system where impossible quantum love nonsense saves the day.

The martian's entire plot hinges on a wind storm that is physically impossible in the extremely sparse atmosphere of mars. Yes, the wind does get up to mach speeds, but its so thin it can't move shit.

They're all speculative fiction. Calling it "Science Fiction" or saying it's "more realistic" is just fooling the layman into thinking this shit is real, for no other gain than a temporary financial one.

Look up how many people die in car fires because people have watched so many movies where cars always explode and nobody tries to help them, and then tell me stories don't have an effect on the world.

Sam Rockwell
Hugo Weaving
Tilda Swinton
Michael Shannon
Ed Harris
Vigo
Casey Affleck
Cillian Murphy
Damian Lewis

>>81199391
Oh!
Ben fucking Mendelsohn
Keith David
Elias Koteas
Gary Oldman? Or does everyone agree he's good and doesn't get the recognition he deserves.
Robert Pattinson
Paul Giamatti
Andy Serkis
Jackie Earle Haley

>>81199371

have seen. i don't even know if you could call it science fiction. more like contemporary fiction set in space. didn't the apollo 13 fuck up happen like a year after release?

>>81199644
>Andy Serkis

i like you, anon

>>81197983
Pretty sure Hollywood is racist & I'm pretty sure John Geguizamo is an acting God.

>>81199644
>>81199722
Andy Serkis in the film about Ian Dury... Jesus Christ! I started to believe Serkis was actually Dury!

Serkis is an amazing actor - beyond all the green-screen shit.

>>81199705
>more like contemporary fiction set in space

That is my definition of hard science fiction. Reality - pure and simple, with no nonsensical plot contrivances.

It's exceedingly rare because people don't like stories about space, they like stories about oceans.

>didn't the apollo 13 fuck up happen like a year after release?
It was the following April, but people were tougher back then and didn't get triggered by the possibility of bad things happening.

>>81200070
>Reality - pure and simple, with no nonsensical plot contrivances.
do you consider The Right Stuff science fiction too?

>>81200219

No, i'd consider that either Military Fiction or Historical fiction. An original story is needed, i think. What happened in Marooned and what happened to Apollo 13 are extremely different.

It is an extremely good movie though.