This was disappointing. I wanted to love this, but it was just

>>81192741
yeah, i've seem many people on tv saying this was a masterpiece and shit like that.
it's a good movie, kinda passable.

i think it's like 3-4 very active posters that keep yapping about this being a masterpiece

it's nothing great
>>81192858
because they've seen sub 1k films and haven't even begun watching the auteurs

>>81192741
>Anyone else feel the same?

Yeah, I went into the movie expecting a big wild west adventure.
but looking back it was very low budget and bland characters.

Still not bad, but I expected something more epic.

Wiki says "horror western". What is the horror here?

>>81192938

The part where they're hacking away at his cock n balls.

>>81192938
The only part that felt kind of horror was the small segment when Deputy and Sheriff were imprisoned and the chieftain shows up and roars. It did feel really hopeless there, as well as the execution scene. It immediately stopped being horror though, when Patrick Wilson came to save the day.

>>81192741
It wan't amazing but it constantly remained good throughout the whole movie.

I torrented it with no expectations
I liked it
Didnt know it even existed
I would give it a 7/10

>>81193425
I'd rate it the same. It was consistently good, just I expected it to be great.

>bland film in general
>wasting Kurt Russel
>wasting Patrick Wilson (king of making the best of boring parts)
>Lost guy sucks
>uncompelling story
>boring cinematography

This looked like a $1000 budget student film

Matthew fox was the reason i watched this film. I was pleasantly surprised at how good it was.

>>81193808
2/10 edge