Best Youtube Reviewers

File: 5i7LY8T.jpg (25KB, 314x246px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 314x246px

I don't have to prove shit

YOURE NOT MY REAL DAD

Replace whoever the fuck is at the top with Doug Walker or Mr Enter

is the joke that rolfe is a idiot pedestrian whose "critique" surmounts to "this was cool..reminded me of being a kid" or "this sucked but it was funny!"

When James reviews old horror films, he's the best. When he reviews current movies it's always the same shit "Ehh, it was okay, I liked it".

>>81191297
>Doug Walker or Mr Enter

That's some top-notch bait you got there

Every Frame A Painting is the only one on that list not a retard.

OP is a retard, fact.

>no reviewbrah

>no Joey

0/10

Angry Joe is better than all in OP

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCP937VRfI4

File: 1481778133404.jpg (25KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 460x276px

>>81191356
Every Frame a Painting barely ever uploads, and when he does, it's simple shit that only appeals to entry-level movie watchers

>>81191406
Nice meme

>>81191456
Angry Joe is an "It was enjoyable" SJW

File: FilmReviewEnlightenment.jpg (323KB, 857x1527px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 857x1527px

>>81191259
You forgot the last panel there OP

File: IMG_3391.jpg (46KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1280x720px

>>81191259
Vintage pic related is absolute kino

>>81191339
To. Bee faire
Modern flicks can only be reviewed As "it's fun"
Or
"It's boring"

There is nothing else left to say about them

>hated seeing those "so nerdy" youtube panel shows
>rlm makes fun of them
neat!
>rlm does it again
uh oh
>rlm does it YET AGAIN

No, at this point you're not being ironic. You're actually just making the same video over and over about how much you DON'T care about a trailer being released while giving your actual opinion. It's not witty it's a cash grab. They are the same as the "nerd crew" they are making fun of just behind an exceedingly thin veil of nonchalant irony.

Can't wait until they do another nerd crew for the star wars 8 trailer. NOT!

File: 1490914373543.gif (751KB, 498x278px) Image search: [Google]

751KB, 498x278px

>>81191748
kek

>>81191856
t. brainlet embryo that only watches capeshit

>>81191540
You're an idiot.

>>81191957
>Reddit commenting on a comment about a eCelebrity that he knows nothing about it

Keep this on Facebook fag. James only reviews blockbusters and horror flicks.

I like Good Bad Flicks, he's upbeat and gives credit where it's due instead of sitting around sulking and being le ironic acid-tongued jaded critic wannabe.

>>81192046
What an amazing argument you presented.

>>81191925
>>81191748

Damn, I did forget the Nostalgia Chick. Whatever happened to her?

>>81191259
All four suck. EFAP is good at sounding smart, but makes mundane observations and demonstrates no deeper understanding of film. RLM is just entertaining. Their opinions are crap. Goodbadflicks occasionally highlights some good movies, but indiscriminately. James Rolfe is one of those guys people think knows something, but he doesn't. Sometimes entertaining.

I recommend the channel Horrible Reviews. He's lightweight but has okay taste and is pretty likable.

>>81192409
Damn, cool. Thanks for linking me to that channel.

As for James Rofle, why does he not know something? I've watched his reviews for the past decade and he seems pretty well read.

>Cancer is better than cancer

>>81192223
she occasionally makes shitty videos

wooah

File: jlaw ok.gif (919KB, 245x285px) Image search: [Google]

919KB, 245x285px

>>81191540

> Makes video about Ozu
> For entry level movie watchers

>>81191259
>Youtube reviewers
Yeah, because if I REALLY want someone to tell what to think of a film, I want it to be some absolute nobody from youtube rather than a knowledgeable film critic...

>>81192179
Can't argue with an idiot. No point.

>>81192223
She's still doing her thing on Youtube. She released a video pretty recently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syYCO0QVkZo

>>81192756
And where do you go to find a knowledgeable film critic?

>so dumb you need a "critic" to spell out why you should enjoy a film instead of forming your own opinions

I like good bad flicks

File: 1486162427986.png (132KB, 396x385px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 396x385px

>>81192898
>so dumb you need a "anon" to spell out why you shouldn't watch youtube critics instead of forming your own opinions

>>81192898
For me it's asserting my superiority over those that disagree with me and having my ego massaged when they agree with me.

For example:
>reviewer agrees with me
Absolutely BASED. Reviewer is /ourguy/!
>reviewer disagrees with me
What a brainlet idiot. They need to go back to their capeshit.

File: smug_critic.jpg (22KB, 300x279px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x279px

>>81192756
>His knowledgeability is evident by the long and complex words and sentences he uses.

I generally don't read reviews. But whenever I do, I look for someone who goes in depth about technical stuff instead of showing a clip and saying "haha that's dumb". From what I remember the bottom one is doing that.

Actually I never read reviews on modern films. I read about older and classics so I can get some trivial info out of them, read suggestions etc. Since they are old and classics they have been more extensively analyzed ad therefore are better.

I haven't found anyone on Youtube doing that. EFaP (an some similar channels) doesn't review, he focuses on details or a single element of a work.

>>81193285
meant for>>81192841

I would rank RLM at the level of dog shit
unfunny annoying cynic anti-humor that appeals to equally annoying redditors
mike is a shell of a man fueled only by pizza and alcohol

>>81191259
>Prove me wrong.

Easy, you forgot the most kino Youtube reviewer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aazkVxCGXgA

>>81193246
>>81191259
Where do the Channel Awesome reviewers rank on these charts?

>>81191848
He keeps going bald man and I don't know why but it just upsets me like his hair is actually pretty cool at that length he should keep it that way

File: 1491148200825.png (1KB, 302x112px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 302x112px

>>81192165

>youtubers

youtube should be stripped of everything other than lectures, historical videos and medical procedures. everything else is literal garbage

>>81191259
Those ratings are upside down, lass.

I want /v/ to leave

James has reached kino again

What a year

File: photo.jpg (69KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 900x900px

You're all plebs