>CGI from 1993 is still the best we have ever seen How?

File: 7ZsTP.jpg (312KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1920x1080px

>>81168376
t. yify

here's a better quality shot.

lighting

>>81168376
Mix of practical effects blended with CGI.

That CGI is objectively worst than today's CGI but the scene is better shot and plays with light and rain to make it seem more realistic

Back then it was a craft and it took ages to make. Now it's all outsourced shit for korean companies and shit like that, done nearly automated with no special care and only a few months to end.

JP was in production for a long time. Those Marvel movies start shooting one year to be released in the next one. They all look like shit.

>>81168534
>>81168579
These. CGI is at its best when its blended with practical effects, like in early CG movies and The Force Awakens.

>>81168376
Because Spielberg knows what he's doing.

>>81168475
>can easily distinguish where the fx artist put the rain plane

lol no

>>81168611
>and The Force Awakens.
Should we tell him?

>>81168611
When is this technique in TFA?

>>81168376
Because they established what you were looking at with animatronics first, and then hid the ropey CGI in darkness and rain. The CG isn't better, it's just used better.

File: animatronics.jpg (44KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x360px

Animatronics with animated legs.

When they did leg closeups those were physical props as well.

>>81168475
That isn't even the same movie.

File: f37b355b92ce84b29f66cf65e06b19e8.jpg (276KB, 795x600px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 795x600px

>>81169173

>>81168376
The best cg is shit you don't know is cg. Shit in the final harry potters

>>81168376
What PS2 game is that?

>t. Blind Queer

File: creature-shop-star-wars-the-force-awakens-700x394.jpg (72KB, 700x394px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 700x394px

They reconstructed a 1:1 model of the millennium falcon for use as a practical effect mixed with cgi. Same technique is used for various props throughout the film.

>>81168579
This. A dark, wet scene is ideal for the phong lighting model to look realistic.

>>81168376
They used good models instead of CGI from scratch, that makes a difference but takes more time.

>>81168475
RIP Eddie the didn't deserve you.

File: image.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>81169173
So we're really praising Animatronics, and not CGi.

>>81168997
>t. Guy who doesn't watch behind the scenes videos

File: Star Wars- The Force Awakens VFX Breakdown - Before and After (2015) [HD].mp4_snapshot_04.49_[2016.12.28_17.07.21].png (429KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1280x720px

>>81170138
t. guy who fell for the "PRACTICAL EFFECTS" meme

>>81169173
The T-rex in OP's shot was 100% CGI

>>81171802

No, it wasn't.

File: The Making of Jurassic Park.mkv_snapshot_35.09_[2017.01.14_19.28.09].png (383KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 640x480px

>>81171831
Yes it was

>>81171831 < BTFO by this > >>81171868

File: IMG_3067.png (250KB, 638x267px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 638x267px

>>81168376
>implying

>>81168913
In English, doc!

>>81169173
That's a big dinosaur.

the head isn't CGI. The CGI doesn't start till the neck. The CGI from the neck back is shit.

File: 1452378929446.gif (266KB, 240x127px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 240x127px

>>81172033
muh kino husbando, forever and always, davy jones is my true nigga

>>81172075
For you

File: jurassicparkstones.jpg (137KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1280x720px

>>81168534
>>81168611
>>81168579
>>81169173

Like others have said it works because they knew when to use what type of model/cgi/puppet etc .CGI for distant shots, animatronics for up close (try finding a modern movie that would use a physical model for the triceratops), and so on. It also helps there was a still an industry for these things in the early 90s thanks to stan winston still being alive.

the only claymation still left in the film is the Brachiosaurus.

>>81168376
if Jurassic world 2 has a full size rex animatronic i'll cum

some shots look great some not so much

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7RfNogjM4g

>>81168376
look at its feet m8, it's not perfect

>>81173378
His name is Davey Crockett, you fucking retard

>>81168475

>warn your friends about bringing the baby trex back to the rv
>try to save them when the rv gets pushed down the cliff by the trex
>multitasking while using the winch and the rope
>friends are yelling to hurry up
>get ripped in two pieces while still holding foot on the pedal
>your friends don't even mention you ever again in the rest of the film

>>81175572
>T-Rex chomping a Velociraptor and roaring triumphant while the banner with "When the Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth" falls in front of him
I'll never not get goosebumps at that scene.

>>81175572
>the dinosaurs look more convincing than Laura Dern pretending to be 23

>>81171831
Lol stupid fuck

>>81168376

Lots of Jurassic Park involved practical effects.

>>81176572

I always felt that way too. Really the least deserving-to-be-eaten of the characters.

>>81171831
EVERYONE HATES YOU, ASSHOLE.

>>81177333

Most deserving was Vince Vaughn, no question. Literally everything that goes wrong on the island does so because of him.

>>81176872
You know she was only 25 when the movie was filmed right?