reminder that nolan approved this look at that shitty design,

File: 1490069487498.jpg (4KB, 124x125px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 124x125px

>>81161262

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (58KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 1280x720px

>>81161262

>>81161230
I will never understand what made Nolan think that CGI was appropriate for that.

>>81161510
It looks badass, that's why

>>81161230
I think his design is very cool, and it's not like you're given very many clear looks at his face in the film

>>81161535
It looks like shit. When you look at it again in five years you'll understand.

>>81161262
does that make Bane the hothead?

>>81161510
>>81161230
They wanted to go for a more realistic look, but apparently it freaked test audiences out too much.

>>81161662
It looks great

File: file_606237_terminator-genisys-picture-10.jpg (20KB, 640x320px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 640x320px

>>81161230
Its not that bad compared to many newer flicks

>>81161230
how do you "design" a burnt face?

>Aaron Eckhart refused to have half of his face burned off for the role.

It's no wonder Nolan kill off Dent.

File: 1490883302639.jpg (2MB, 2096x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2096x3000px

>>81161989
better than that shit in op's pic, just look at the neck area, it looks like a sticker being stretched

>>81161230
cgi always looks like shit some years afterwards. Polygon ceiling and all.

>>81163004
When did people stop using makeup and go for CGI, anyway? CGI never looks better than good makeup and almost always looks worse. Is it THAT much cheaper?

>>81161230
Looks great, what are you memeing about?