>Tarantino has said that he plans to retire from filmmaking

>>81140620
Not really. I like what he stands for and appreciate him fighting for film, but his films don't interest me at all.

it really will be

sure his films are derivative and fedora, etc, etc
but at least he makes movies that are no reboots or capeshit. He makes the movies he wants to make and there's at least a shit ton of passion in every one of his movies.
I get why his movies can be indulgent and redundant but theyre not soulless products to print money like most of the bigger movies in the industry

>>81140708
This.

>>81140655
I'm looking forward to it. Quentin knows a lot about cinema, a whole fucking lot, but his later films haven't interested me all too much. That said, all his interviews are fantastic. I think I'll enjoy him much more in novel form.

>>81140708
It's a black male thing

>>81140740
Tarantino doesn't actually know much. All of his film "knowledge" comes from schlock, and exploitation films. Nothing wrong with it I guess, because those are the kind of movies he makes, just with higher budgets.

>>81140620
>Tarantino
>writing novels
Oh my god are those books going to suck

File: Taylor-St.-Clair-Feet-2180916.jpg (1MB, 2288x1556px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2288x1556px

>>81140620
please quentin retire and start a foot fetish kino company

>>81140823
It will be like stephen king but he will replace lolis with niggers.

>>81140976
And feet
Can't forget the feet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8z2nDlAvmZM

I love this series of videos he did.

>>81140976
What I fear most is that in every paragraph he's going to be doing an "homage" to some famous book, but unlike his movie addiction I doubt he's read all that much, so it's just going to deteriorate to him going through the library and randomly ripping off a scene from one book after the other.

>>81140976
>>81141014
>Feet
>Africans
Why must Quentin embrace the most shit tier fetishes?

File: 1325478671493.jpg (29KB, 418x398px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 418x398px

>>81141111

>>81140620
>muh film
Honestly, who gives a shit what format you're making a movie on on? Shooting on film vs shooting on digital doesn't magically make you a better director nor does it magically make a movie better.

>>81141111
Quads of true, foot fags forever BTFO

>>81141071
Oh i think he is well read in goosebumps.

>>81141111
its a black male thing quadfriend el one one one one farto

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz11gfvsGo0

Four rooms, usually overlooked.

>>81140620
By the time he's 60, digital will be able to simulate film so closely even autists won't be able to tell the difference (it's already close enough for normal people, but nobody tries because why simulate a shitty obsolete technology?) Filmfags are as bad as vinylfags.

better than trying to keep going and end up making a shit movie. hateful eight was borderline shit so hopefully next is good

tarantino respects his audience. he doesnt treat you like 12 year old, pander, or force feed the story to you like an idiot. he makes quality movies.

>>81141281
You can't simulate film or vinyl. I don't personally care and think both are mostly a gimmick at this point, but there is a special distinct feeling when watching/listening to analog technology.

Pulp Fiction is the only thing he's done that's even halfway decent and even then it's just a fad/gimmick movie at this point.

It's like cherry or vanilla versions of your favorite colas. Sure you might try it, and even have it more than one time. But at the end of the day it's still just a gimmick and you'll still be buying the regular version of your preferred cola.

>>81141424
Digital audio already exceeds the capabilities of the human ear, so the only reason it hasn't been done perfectly yet is because recording actual vinyl is cheap enough to make it not worth the effort. A high quality digital recording of a vinyl record sounds identical to a vinyl record.

Look at what's being done with image style transfer deep learning. Shoot a whole lot of motion control scenes with film + digital to get the training data, never bother with film again.

>>81140620
I honestly only liked 2 of his movies.pulp fiction and reservoir dogs. All his other flicks did nothing for me.

>>81141575
I think when it comes to film, it's more of an investment as an art form and as a director. I'm pretty sure that's why Tarantino spergs about this. You can't just send a shitty scene down the production line and let a bunch of digital artists try and save it. It's why most people don't acknowledge digital photography as art

>>81141424
I dunno about that vinyl man.

Really the only thing that's discernible are the dust/scratch pops and maybe some difference in bass/brightness, but that can be attributed to different hardware being used(speakers) and the EQ being set up different.

That's not to say you shouldn't listen to vinyl and only have digital recordings because it is nice to pop a record on now and then and it does invoke a more careful listen I think, and the reason for that is because you didn't just search the album on youtube and listen to it whilst browsing the current fat-kino thread.

>>81141517
Cola sucks ass and so does your soda analogy. What the fuck are you even talking about? If anythingthe drink would be some cocktail mixed with 2 or more experimental sodas that may or may not taste bad.

He needs to make his John Brown movie already. It would be a good movie about the greatest hero in American history and it would trigger /pol/ hardcore, double victory right there

>>81141876
cuck

>>81140620
I'm honestly surprised and dissapointed his films don't feature a lot of white girl/black guy action

I mean, Reservoir Dogs have nothing
Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown have one, but in both movies they don't even kiss a black guy. Am I remembering that right? Kinda weird.
Both Kill Bills also have nothing, If I remember correctly
also Death Proof, Inglorious, Django
Hateful Eight has a gay interracial scene, but, it's a gay scene.

I mean how did this happen? You let me down Quentin.

>>81141517
>Tarantino
>"fad/gimmick"
Are you honestly so stupid as to retroactively attribute all the Hollywood fads from his movies as his fault? His movies are popular and start fads, not contribute to them, you tryhard moron

>>81141876
>Search John Brown on Wikipedia to remember who he is
>Brown's actions prior to the Civil War as an abolitionist, and the tactics he chose, still make him a controversial figure today. He is sometimes memorialized as a heroic martyr and a visionary, and sometimes vilified as a madman and a terrorist.
>Madman
I hope it's called that. Just for the meme.

>I didn't go to novel school, I went to novel

>>81141517
What did you think about Kill Bill? I don't like the rest of his movies but Pulp Fiction is pretty good and Kill Bill is one of my all time favorite movies.

File: IMG_20170324_103941.jpg (134KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 960x960px

>>81141111
LOOOLLLOLL

Footfags btfod
Quads of imperviousness

>>81141111
>>81142987
lol yup thats when i leave the thread. later idiots.

File: 1490924292221.jpg (13KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 384x384px

>>81142156
>tfw related to John Brown

>qualityfags
who gives a shit what it's shown or filmed on?

>>81140620
good riddance desu

>>81140620
>He is skeptical of the film industry going digital
lmfao what is this nigger so scared of?

>>81143279
It's scientifically provable that films filmed on film not only look better but is better overall.

eventually he will see some new digital movie that pushes detail and resolution beyond 35mm or IMAX, then he'll come out of retirement to copy that movie

>>81143317
35mm, the most common film format, has resolution equivalent to about 6K digital. 70mm is better than 8K but when did you last see 70mm? And who gives a shit when it's still 24fps garbage? Digital already does 120fps so film BTFO.

>>81140620
Wait, he isn't 60 yet? Jesus Christ did he get hit with a death ray.

>>81143613
You actually made very valid points and I back down.
If you were to consider me worthy, you could present your cock and I'd gladly gobble on it.

File: not possible.png (994KB, 1235x832px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 1235x832px

>>81143057
>t. triggered footfag
stay btfo
PRAISE KEK
USA USA USA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZJDYlxkM-c

>>81140620
>makes a big fuss about film
>uses 70mm for Hateful 8
>barely shoots any of the beautiful mountains and films it almost entirely in his cuck shed

Say it with me /tv/ H A C K

File: 1424853689386.png (103KB, 447x459px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 447x459px

>>81144050
>70milly has to be used for meme mountain shots

>>81144050
it was very deliberate that they did it this way idiot

And it worked quite well, The Hateful 8 is a fucking stageplay, it's not an expansive Western

>>81141517
Pleb Jackie Brown is objectively his best film.

>>81144131
agreed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57ge-WVuEY0

File: afro qt.jpg (44KB, 450x562px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 450x562px

>>81144081
>lets set the film in the mountains
>but only show them when it's the nigger dick sucking time

>>81144127
It was a shitplay.

>>81144176
His best films are grounded and turn down the goony nerd shit.

>>81144278
its set in a cabin that is situated in the mountains.
the cabin and the people in it is the important bit.

how much of a an autist are you really?

>>81144350
If 70mm was standard then it wouldn't matter. But if you're going to special effort to use uncommon technology then it's crazy to waste its potential. It would be like shooting 12 Angry Men or some other talking-based film at 120fps.

>>81144350
>make a big deal about it being in 70 mm film despite 35 being perfectly suitable for this type of project
>don't utilize the medium to it's full potential

Say it with me anon, you'll enjoy it. H A C K !

>>81140976
Pretty sure Stephen King doesn't like lolis.

>>81143613
Digital lowers the cost barrier so it enables hacks to film stuff. Just look at all the hacks who think they're pro photographers nowadays.

>>81144442
>>81144478

he DID use the technology you muppets. just because you can shoot mountains and nature and stuff doesn't mean you have to fill your flick with masturbatory shots of snow covered mountain peaks.

that would be the equivalent of those instagram girls taking pics of their feet all day fucking long.

he used it to capture more of what was going on in the cabin than would have been possible with 35mm.
that means he utilized it and did it well.

>>81144609
>he used it to capture more of what was going on in the cabin than would have been possible with 35mm.
>that means he utilized it and did it well.

Yeah he utilized it to film masturbatory shots of Sambo getting his dick sucked by a Cracker. It would have made no difference had it been filmed in 35 to capture "what was going on in the cabin", and it doesn't change his masturbatory justification for using 70mm.

>>81144774
>It would have made no difference had it been filmed in 35 to capture "what was going on in the cabin"

sure it would. not as big of a frame which means less things in the frame, and the idea was to have a lot of the actors in frame at once which again, would not have been possible with 35.

the cock sucking part was relevant to the story.

>>81141111
FOOTNIGGERS ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>81141111
>>81143666
The digits declare the will of kek

Footfags BTFO!

File: Bush face .gif (2MB, 513x337px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 513x337px

>>81144862
Are you fucking baiting me? Well done, here's your (You), just in case you're not. The size of the film doesn't determine how much you can fit on it dip stick. It's the camera and lens that do this.

>>81144862
The frame size has no relation to the film size. Literally the only point of 70mm is a sharper image, which is wasted on visually boring indoor scenes. Outdoor scenes are ideal for 70mm because you always have a shitload of detail outdoors.

File: 1425786816181.jpg (34KB, 448x545px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 448x545px

>>81145049
>>81145086
you're right. i was confusing it with lens!

>>81140708
>he makes movies that are no reboots

you're right, they're not technically reboots, just rip offs of westerns and old chink films

File: 1464128252867.gif (317KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 150x150px

>>81141111
footfags=obliterated

>>81144862
>>81145086
Smaller film is shittier for low light conditions
Look at your own hackery before you call the master a hack

>>81140620
If he doesn't do Kill Bill 3 I'll kill him myself

>>81140757
Tarantino is an honorary nigga

>>81140620
>auteur
he's a good exploitation film maker, he is a craftsman and nothing more. He's not even as good as Kubrick (and Kubrick is BARELY an 'auteur'.

>>81145672
>implying there aren't auteur exploitation films
>implying Kubrick was anything but a hack

>>81145565
Seeing as you can get LED lights with >95CRI now there's no excuse to shoot in low light. Even if you're doing something like Barry Lyndon, use simulated LED candles and CGI real flames over them. All optics relevant to filmmaking are linear so multiplying all light source brightnesses by the same value lets you use smaller or less sensitive film with no visual difference in lighting. (or higher framerate or more depth of field, which is a better use for the extra light)

>>81145863
>CGI real flames over them
can't wait to watch this movie.

>>81145863
It's never exactly the same when it comes to analog media
>>81145911
kek

>>81145911
>he doesn't want to see a deep focus version of Barry Lyndon

>>81140788
really? you come across as an edge master.

i understand his movies a reworked classics. but if you've ever seen or heard him talk about cinema you find the proof.

>>81145565
But the movie didn't have low light conditions.

>>81146096
post something where he's not fawning over some low budget blaxploitation

>>81146156
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0whZic8xNc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsUOHbhsq1I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoaQ-giW2rI

To say he knows nothing is kinda rash.

>>81140620

So one more for Cucktin then he's going to call it a day?

>>81140620
Overrated hack

File: Anderson ultimate Brain.png (743KB, 854x922px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 854x922px

>>81146699
>he's best friends with Paul Thomas Anderson
Not even surprised.

>>81140620
>...Presenting Quentin Tarantino's 11th Picture

File: 1488552554836.jpg (45KB, 590x350px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 590x350px

>>81146792
The cucktino has probably got only one left in him yeah what if he opened up a kino school

>>81141712
I liked Reaervoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, Django Unchained and Hatefull 8 little bit.

>>81140620
>Will /tv/ be sad when the auteur makes his final kino and leaves cinema forever?
No. I respect someone who can't admit that they have a shelf life and they should not exceed it. 95% of directors have a period where they made all their best stuff and ran the tank dry creatively and should have just stopped. But nooooooo, they just had to keep pumping out garbage well into their 70s and 80s. Fuck those directors.

>>81149089
>Quentin Tarantino...
>IS BACK!

>>81140620
>>81150697
no no

it's like this


by acclaimed directior robert rodregeiz

qqyunbtaitub tirutitoriliee

why is he so autistic about this. who the fuck cares about the format a movie is shot on if the movie is good.

>>81142156
> Bluray version called Madman: Absolute edition

File: film-aspect-ratio-2-combined.gif (29KB, 840x372px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 840x372px

>>81145114
The aspect ratio has an influence, but 70mm and 30mm both have the same ratio.

>>81141024
What other videos did he do?

File: tarantula.png (1MB, 1022x936px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1022x936px

>tarantino does scene in snow
>snow is natural looking and white

>hackaritu does scene in snow
>LOOK AT HOW BLUE I CAN MAKE MY MOVIE LOOK HOW BLUE IT IS IT'S LIKE MICHAEL BAY WITH GOOD PHOTOGRAPHY SO BLUE EPIC AND GRIM

Tarantino is unironically one of the best, most authentic filmmakers working today. And that's not a testament to how good Tarantino is. It's a testament to how fucking stupid filmmakers are right now in pandering to stupid fucking plebs that want shit to look ugly as piss because they can't digest the tone of a film unless it's physically filtered in with blue vomit.

>>81140620
Of course, he's one of my favorites, even though he wasted his potential post Jackie Brown, but H8 was classic Tarantula kino.

File: 1489200525844.jpg (85KB, 620x856px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 620x856px

>>81140620
>in order to focus on writing novels and film literature

Translation: porn flicks of black guys getting jerked off by white women's feet.

>>81151473

The bottom shot is superior in every way possible to the top, however.

>background is so white it makes the character in the foreground look black

I'll be glad. With him gone, cinema can begin to grow as an art form again.

File: uytrfg.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>81153422
>pleb digging the generic blue filter Hollywood hipster look
GTFO famalam.

if you go to exploitation film screenings there is a significant chance you've seen a print that belongs to him at some point, if not often

thanks quinten

>>81140620
Hateful Eight was shit so i'm glad he's leaving

>>81141276
>That Trump handshake

>>81140620
>writing novels and film literature
HAHAHA!
He'll fail miserably.
Don't get me wrong, he will sell some books but the quality of the novels will be absolute shit if he doesn't use some talented ghostwriters.

>>81140914
who is thisssssss

>>81141187
It's film director autism.

File: 1409932624949.webm (3MB, 1992x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1992x1080px

>>81141187
>Honestly, who gives a shit what format you're making a movie on

People who care about the visuals? Digital just doesn't look as good as film.

>>81140620
>>81140620
Tarantino from best to worst:

>Hateful 8
Really a fantastic movie with interesting characters all around. It takes a lot of skill to have one set for 2 and a half hours an still be interesting and fast paced. I think a lot of people hold the nigger dick sucking scene against it and I would too, but the guy had his nuts blown off 15 minutes later, poetic justice.
>Django
>Pulp Fiction
>Kill Bill 1
>Inglorious Basterds
>Reservoir Dogs
>Death Proof
>Jackie Brown


And sure his films are deliberately derivative. But they are genius, the screenplay and directing. He's a master story teller, just because he makes low brow entertainment, doesn't make him NOT a genius at it.

He's as good as Scorsese with consistently epic brilliant filmmaking, it's just his will never be as appreciated from it being deliberately low brow.

>>81155332
I forgot Kill Bill 2, put that just above Jackie Brown, the first was so much better.