What buzzwords makes you instantly dismiss a review?

>style over substance

saying something like this shows that you don't even have the most basic grasp of what cinema is

>Diversity

>>81134142
>10 reasons why...
>Twitter is pissed about ____ and here's why

etc etc

>violent

>>81134177
Only when style becomes substance it is worthy of the main spotlight.

If style is just a peripheral element rather than the focus, if it is getting a lot of attention, and YET still feels like it's meant to be a background, it means the filmmaker didn't have his priorities in order.

When style is meaningful it ceases to be merely style, and it becomes substance.
But only then.

"Style over substance" is a perfectly valid criticism for a film that fails at delivering its message through other means while retaining beauty, while beauty itself ISN'T the main conveyed message.

Any of the SJW buzzwords, then I know it has been reviewed by a person with room temperature IQ.

File: 6i5OadT.jpg (65KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1024x576px

>>81134661

File: 1485253983643.jpg (65KB, 680x818px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 680x818px

>>81134142
>the good Drive poster is some limited edition bullshit that costs a fortune

>>81134142
Pretentious is fine as long as they can explain why they think that

>>81134142
That's so pretentious of you OP

>>81134142
This
>>81134177
This too
>>81134186
This times two
>>81134203
This

All of these make me instantly think less of the reviewer as a human being

>>81134142
>Donald Trump