What is the best trilogy?
>>81129237
Guaranteed replies
people who unironically like star wars or indiana jones should be gassed
>Jurassic Park 1 that low
Yeah i mean it only changed cinema forever, no big deal
>>81129292
born in 1983. Those films were family movies. I saw them with my dad. I hate how disgusting millennials think it's "nerd movie" when really it was meant to be seen with the whole family
LOTR and the Dollars trilogy. Neither have any flaws.
>>81129312
how?
The Last Crusade is objectively the best Indiana Jones film.
Temple is pooinloo garbage, Crystal Skull is actually more enjoyable than Temple if you view it as a parody, and Raiders is 7/10.
>>81129453
>millenials
>>81129356
I agree somewhat
A family with young children, too
>>81129453
Not him but it was first film with decent CGI at the time. remember at the time was early 1990s. It was also the biggest grossing movie ever at the time too.
>>81129237
Of those listed? Lord of the Rings, and then Star Wars is a close second.
>>81129237
Most of those aren't even trilogies.
>>81129513
>what is T2
Not him and I'm not trying to discredit JP, but T2 was the one who really made a big impact for CGI.
>>81129484
This
>no Die Hard
op is a retard
>>81129237
Sure the first matrix is good and better than the others, but no it isn't that fucking magnificent.
Bring it down to jurassic park 1, lower even.
>>81129237
>attack of the clones better than any lotr movie
Nope.
>>81129237
Mad Max is the best of the trilogy
>>81129237
LOTR 1 and 2 are better than 3 though, that image is wrong.
Return of the King is trash
>dude Aragorn fighting a giant troll again lmao
LotR is 9.5/10 9/10 8.5/10 no other trilogy is that high
star wars a close second with 8/10 9.5/10 8.5/10
>>81129869
phew almost forgot it was April 1st
>>81129237
>the first Jurassic Park lower than any Star Trek, X-Men or Superman film
>the first Jurassic Park as low as it is