Why doe everyone hate the David Yates films again?

File: beyond mad.jpg (53KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x500px

>>81050500
Why did she end up with Ron instead of with Harry? This is a serious crime against humanity and I'm offended.

they don't. Their audience is 12 year olds and the imdb ratings prove that they are appreciated by it

>>81050500


You know exactly why

File: literature tiers.jpg (3MB, 1600x2874px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1600x2874px

Because they are the very dullest installments in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>81050500
Because Half Blood prince had a brown shit filter that sucked the magic all out of Hogwarts

>i-its supposed to be dark

75% of the movie was cringy teen romance

>>81051305
Wasn't a fan of the Order of the Phoenix filter and visuals as well but it wasn't that bad.

File: main-qimg-c4eb2f4d1b3701f3374271228d0776ae[1].png (25KB, 500x193px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x193px

wtf did he mean by this? This is the worst revelation I've ever seen

>>81050526
>Why did she end up with Ron instead of with Harry?
So they could all be related and one big happy family at the end of one of the dullest franchises in bla bla bla.
>This is a serious crime against humanity and I'm offended.
No, you're just a faggot.

Because I'm not some tasteless mongrel that reads nerdwriter

>>81050500
6 and 7.1 are two of three goat movies, with the other being 3

7.2 was a disappointment though

File: Draco and friends.png (687KB, 1166x470px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 1166x470px

Was Draco a cunt or was he insecure?

>>81050703
I literally don't.

>>81050500
We don't, Deathly Hallows Pt. 1 was true cinéma