>vulgar auteurism
verhoeven and carpenter are the best filmmakers since the 1930s
get over it
>>81038033
this is such a reddit opinion
>>81037939
I want to sniff. sniff. Hershlag's haggis.
What is the greentext reffering to?
and we will be at the throes of that
>>81040073
Vulgar auteurism
>>81041536
don't be lewd
>>81038033
i don't entirely disagree with this and i don't even give a fuck. who out of their art film phase here
>>81041578
What did you watch in your art film phase?
>>81037939
Proponents of that "movement" can go a little too far. That said, the general gist I can get behind. At least somewhat.
>>81041611
everything
>>81041668
Examples?
>>81041702
GOD WILL BE BORN SOON
WITNESS A CHOSEN CHILD BEING PREPARED IN ITS CHOSEN WOMB
WORSHIP
WORSHIP
WORSHIP
>>81041751
As far as I know those are not movies, art films or otherwise.
>>81041702
a good chunk of tspdt while branching off into whatever subgenre. 70's flicks are probably my favorite movies. i'm just not one for stuff that deviates too far from narrative and the more obscure you get, the more it seems to do so.
>>81041965
>tspdt
>art films
>>81041702
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
DELET
>>81041702
hershlag
>>81042811
very nice
Is Natalie a vulgar auteur?
>>81044739
She's an auteur but she's not vulgar, she's a nice Jewish girl.
Important
>>81046086
Who is this autistic man?
>>81046120
Paul W.S. Anderson
>>81045159
Auteur Hershlag