Why is everything Kubrick has ever done so amazing?

>>80945852
because he photographs the photograph.

>>80945852
His lolita is shit, so not everything

>>80945852
Someone hasn't seen Fear and Desire yet.

his early films and full metal jacket are shit

>>80945852
What's the point of this? Why not film in the street?

>>80945852
why didn't they jsut film him on the fucking street

>>80948064
he did that but built a new york street set at pinewood studios england.

this was done because cruise felt more comfortable doing his medium shot againt back projection.

>>80948192
>this was done because cruise felt more comfortable doing his medium shot againt back projection.

no it fucking wasn't, it was done because Kubrick hated travelling

File: 1390124731226.jpg (217KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1024x678px

post more behind the scenes Kubrick

dude illuminati lmao!

File: 1489245499843.jpg (111KB, 1240x1309px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1240x1309px

Fuck Spielberg for turning AI into a pile of flaming garbage

>>80948647
lrn2read idiot

the back projection shots were done because cruise felt more comfortable doing close/medium shots in a studio environment.

File: l_72684_61215c99.jpg (38KB, 607x400px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 607x400px

>>80951715
And no they fucking weren't.

They took place in NYC, and Kubrick wasn't about to fly there, so they projected NYC street behind Cruise instead.

>>80951715
that's front projection not "back" (i.e. rear) projection

>>80945852
>>80945852
tbqh i thought barry lyndon was a little boring

>>80948064
kubrick was autistic about lighting

>>80945962
Fuck outta here. It was a good comedy.

>>80952263
>autistic
You mean he knew how he wanted it to look and knew how to achieve it with what he was working with.

>>80948064
it was raining outside

>>80945852
it looked fake as shit in the movie tho

>>80952451
It did? I usually notice this stuff all the time and can't believe it was filmed like this.

File: barry-lyndon.gif (2MB, 326x184px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 326x184px

>>80952228

oh yeah well I respect your opinion but I disagree

>>80948064
Filming rights for a 2 min shot in new york would cost more than building an entire set.

>>80951882
but not every shot of cruise on the street is projection.
kubrick built a set.

>>80952208
no, its rear projection.

>>80951715
>>80948192

What, more comfortable? whats the difference? Dude was only walking down the street of New York, his characters emotion didn't exactly require groundbreaking method acting in these scenes? I also never noticed it was shot this way.

>>80952745
ask tom cruise?
wtf its like nobody here knows anything about filmmaking.

>>80945852
Because you are a fucking pleb, Kubrick and Lynch are pleb filters. They have not created a single movie worth it's weight in salt when played against real great directors (Ozu, Bergman, Goddard, Kurosawa)

Lynch and Kubrick are as close as Americans can come to modern cinematic greats. The only other directer that comes remotely close is arguably Welles.

You are American and they are American, that's why you like them.

>>80945852
Did Tom do his own stunts in EWS?

>>80951490
>has the black guy get axed for 78 takes
absolute madman

>>80952817
ah i see /lit/ has arrived

>>80948064
he still had all that shit from the moon landing so why not use it

>>80945852
anyone have a link to this scene?

>>80952569
god dammit your a fucking moron

>>80952817
>>>>/reddit/

>>80948064
He didn't want to move from his chair

>>80952976
get over it, buddy.

File: 1420502457767.jpg (464KB, 1000x749px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 1000x749px

Why is everything Kubrick has ever done so amaz-

>>80953114
>anon doesnt know abour aspect ratio's
>posting on a tv and film board

kys

File: Room237_Poster2low.jpg (2MB, 2021x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2021x3000px

have you guys watched this? what is this rubbish? 90% of these people are retarded or mentally ill

>>80952745
>>80948192
>>80948647
no. he wanted le weird dream feel to the scene. Also if you didn't immediately noticed it was a projection and cruise was walking on a treadmill, you're stupid and should watch more movies

>>80952879
>>80953022
Wow, now I just don't know anymore.

>>80948064
>>80948098
t. brainlets.

File: fbm.jpg (61KB, 400x388px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 400x388px

>you'll never watch kubrick's unfinished napoleon biopic

>>80953114
Filmed by a second unit, not Kubrick

>>80945852
Because he was a sociopath when it came to his craft, consistently mindbreaking people around him in the hunt for perfection
127 takes

File: shining-barf.jpg (84KB, 500x338px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 500x338px

>>80953268
yes, it's a total waste of time

For good Shining analysis, Check out Rob Ager's autistic site. It's actually fucking amazing.

>>80952817
you also are a fucking pleb, you like to talk about Godard but can't spell his name, and like to trash talk American cinema for the sake of contrarianism? I'm not even an American and it's clear to see that some of the greatest filmmakers ever have come from there (Hitchcock, Hawks, Chaplin)

grow up matey

>>80953925
>Hitchcock
>Chaplin

>American

> all these stupid theories
Money, you idiots. Money.
Is it more expensive to film in loco or on set? The cheapest it is.
It's the same thing nowadays with chroma key and cgi. Past decades cgi was superbly expensive, in such way that it was more plausible to equip and make up an entire army, or build a whole ship deck than actually do special digital effects. Nowadays it's the opposite.
This is a digital effect, just not computer savvy. If it had been cheaper to film in the streets (almost never is) they would have done it. Not even Kubrick can escape from that.

>>80953925
>greatest filmmakers ever have come from there
I'm not the person you're replying to, but you're embarrassing yourself.

>>80953986
>digital effect
Shit I meant special

>>80951692
Already been proven incorrect. Spielberg filmed Kubrick's movie,but Kubrick wanted Spielberg to film Spielberg's movie.

>>80952564
Isn't that against first amendment rights? Don't photographers have some sort of pass on public space?

>>80954022
I am the guy he was replying to. Holy shit did he embarrass himself.