[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

So how dose it make you feel?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 118
Thread images: 11

File: RealDougWalker.jpg (40KB, 600x685px) Image search: [Google]
RealDougWalker.jpg
40KB, 600x685px
that The Channel Awesome You Tube channel will probably get a million subs by the end of the year. While some of your favorite channels won't?
>>
It literally has no effect on my life whatsoever.
>>
>>80939524
Just saw this fuckers Logan review

Fucking terrible man
>>
>living vicariously through strangers online
Nah
>>
>>80939524
I haven't watched them in over 5 years.
>>
>>80939733
What'd they say about it? Don't feel like giving them revenue
>>
ever notice how once the mods allow one person to shill for youtube hits, they all come out of the woodwork and post at once?

fuck off this unfunny, uninteresting cunt isn't /tv/ related.
>>
>>80939943
His entire review was pretty much "It's decent but extremely overrated"

Not only that but he seemed to not have payed attention to most of the damn movie since he couldn't figure out why the mutants were dead etc
>>
What are some actual GOOD YouTube reviewers?
>>
>>80940117
Channel criswall
>>
>>80939524
A guy that have been there since the beginning getting his first million in 2017.

That's not something to be proud of.
>>
>>80939524
I don't care. Subscribers is not what matters, it's views.
>>
>>80940821
To be fair he tried to start up his own site. Twice. His YouTube channel is relatively new, before that there were only unofficial channels.
>>
>>80939943
Basically it sounds like slept through the movie and went on about how overrated it is while even missing the most basic of plot points and character developments
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (72KB, 1046x789px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
72KB, 1046x789px
Does Doug still do those stupid skits? At least James is back to making pure kino.
>>
>>80939524
i unironically like the early 2000's and his last review of daredevil shits all over its tropes
>>
>>80940915
This
>>
>>80939524

Stopped watching eventually due to more and more fucking skits
Also this qt leaving was a final blow
>>
>>80940117
Ralph the movie maker, RLM (before I get screeched at) and Bobby Burns is probably the most analytical of the few I mentioned.
>>
>>80940117
Ashens.

Too bad he only reviews garbage... literally.
>>
>>80940117
Spoony
>>
>>80939524
I'm still not watching any of their videos, so it really doesn't matter to me. How can people even tolerate watching that crap?
>>
>>80939524
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IPY28pKBUk&t=10s

this one won't, unfortunately
>>
File: a04.jpg (873KB, 1654x992px) Image search: [Google]
a04.jpg
873KB, 1654x992px
>>80940117
Mike "ampf" Stoklasa and his wehrmacht of film.
>>
>>80942027
>Ralph the Movie Maker

That kid is the embodiment of autism
>>
>>80942431
>I didn't understand the theme of the movie so it's bad
>>
>>80942422
>why do people have different opinions and tastes?
>>
>>80942668
This isn't an actual criticism on his content, of which I do enjoy. Kill youself faggot, or actually discuss something.
>>
>>80942726
Some opinions and tastes are just utterly wrong, like yours. I'm guessing you watch this shit out of peer pressure and not because you actually enjoy it.
>>
>>80942431
Holy shit, this dude is horrible. Do you unironically watch this? No wonder you people are autistic.
>>
File: 1490369619484.jpg (8KB, 251x241px) Image search: [Google]
1490369619484.jpg
8KB, 251x241px
>>80942824
>some opinions
>are wrong
>t. 14 year old
>>
>>80942824
>Some opinions and tastes are just utterly wrong
This is the level of discourse on this board now
>>
>>80942906
>>80942947
He's right though, some opinions are just plain wrong.
>>
>>80943599
That isn't how opinions on media or art work...
>>
>>80939524
It's pretty pathetic that they don't have a million subs already
>>
>>80943630
Actually it is anon, you can be objectively wrong.
>>
>>80943630
No it is, if the opinion is uninformed it's tacitly worthless
>>
>>80943754
You can't be fucking wrong about your opinions on art or art mediums. Holy fuck. You need to be genuinely autistic to think this way. Go kill yourself please
>>
>>80943760
And you get to decide who's opinion on a medium is worthless right, kiddo?
>if an anon has an opinion I don't like, it must be worthless

What do you like then? If I don't agree with it, that means it is worthless by your aspie logic and therefore I should dismiss it.
>>
>>80943754
>you can be objectively wrong
>on which youtube personality you like
You need to be 18 to post here
>>
File: 2661111.gif (473KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
2661111.gif
473KB, 480x360px
>tfw I've been watching TGWTG weekly since early 2008 when he only had 1-2 vids up.
>tfw I saw Nostalgia Chick and Angry Joe before they went on to other bigger things
>tfw I remember when Jesuotaku and that comedians son weren't trannies
>tfw I remember belly laughing at NC's antics in 2008-2009 like when he trolled harry potter fans
>tfw I remember when he started getting too big for his britches, around the time of Suburbian Knights
>tfw his production values went up but the charm was lost
>tfw other, newer youtubers started doing his shit better
>tfw To Boldly Flee was self-satisfied shit but hey everyone makes mistakes
>tfw He announced a new series and that TGWTG would become a high-production value "channel" with loads of different new shows and personalities!
>tfw I saw the writing on the wall but kept watching
>tfw he releases Demo Reel #1
>tfw you remember what the TGWTG boards were like the day Demo Reel #1 came out and were there to take part in the mockery/shitposting
>tfw TGWTG pretended nothing was wrong for a few weeks and kept with demo reel
>tfw he eventually resorted to damage control and brought back NC
>tfw all his other big names have been jumping ship, dying, or getting sex changes. Now it's just Doug and his unfunny paid extras
>tfw NC is still haunted by the ghost of Demo Reel with unfunny skits/extras and taking itself too seriously
>tfw in his death throes Doug has tried to latch onto SJWisms and other, newer, but far more popular reviewers like Chris Stuckmann and RLM
>tfw he still gives that same empty, sad smile that hes been giving since around 2011
>tfw I still watch him each week as I have for almost a decade now
>>
>>80943950
If I make a review of something I half remember and then call it overrated, yes, feel free to shit on my totally unqualified opinion that is literally worth less than a 6 year old in the same cinema who paid attention
>>
>>80944074

fucking kys please. you probably make all these obnoxious shill threads.
>>
>>80944089
There is no such thing as a "qualified" opinion on a goddamn movie you retard. Art isn't objective. I don'r normally say this, but go back reddit you fag.
>>
>>80944198
>There is no such thing as a "qualified" opinion on a goddamn movie
Yes there is, it's called be bothered to watch the fucking thing, which Doug can't be fucked to because his retarded faggot fans are people like you who eat his shit
>>
>>80944269
1. I am not a fan of 2
2. Again no, there is no such thing as an objective qualification for art criticism. Your argument is just "nuh uh".

Stop posting you dumb brainlet.
>>
>>80944405
So you're saying if I only see half a movie my opinion is just as valid as someone who saw the whole thing?
>>
>>80944269
Anon, you sound retarded.
>>
>>80942027
Isn't Bobby burns like with cinemasins?
>>
>>80944851
Not anymore I dont believe. He just makes fun of stuff now
>>
>>80944760
I highly doubt any of the reviewers you complain about have only seen half of the movie they discuss and even then, it may be a shitty poorly-informed one, but that doesn't give it any sense of objectivity. I would only agree with you if we were talking about someone not seeing the movie at all. In which case, they can have an opinion, but it won't be based on anything.

You sound like a triggered baby so I will give you the benefit of the doubt here and hope you aren't stupid enough to think that anything about art mediums has anything objective about it. Since, it doesn't. There is no official "qualification" to judge a film. Ironic, coming from a retardo board that thinks the Star Wars prequels are "kino".

There is no such thing as objectivity to art. If you believe there is, you have actual autism, are baiting me or a literal child.
>>
>>80944935
He also has film critique and video essays.
>>
>>80941205
Yes, with his retarded "friends" and they're still not fucking funny. Also the semi-attractive bitch got fat.
>>
>>80943888
>You can't be fucking wrong about your opinions on art or art mediums.
Of course you can, and nobody has ever had the brass balls to call anything doge does "artistic." I think perhaps you meant "autistic."
>>
>>80944074
I find it gross that channel autism retards feel comfortable here, have been for a couple of years. This has gotten so bad, this shit is now copypasta.
It was a mistake letting them in and they've ruined the board with their weapons-grade autism.
>>
>>80945654
>Of course you can
I don't know how many ways I can tell you "no". Art is not objective. Why can't you come to grips this?
>>
>>80945727
>MUH HUGBOX REEEE
>>
Dunkey already has 1 mil
>>
>>80945729
>you CAN'T you CAN'T you CAN'T!
Shut the fuck up, autist, art can and is quantified and evaluated all the time. Art critics have existed for hundreds of years. Go have your sperg-out elsewhere.
>>
>>80945826
Ironic, considering what we're talking about. How does it feel to be human shit, lad?
>>
>>80945861
I think your problem is that you don't understand what "objective" and "subjective" means.
>if I agree with certain film critics
>that makes their opinion objective
Literally not how any of this works you reddit-tier faggot
>>
>>80945903
>everyone is the same person
>>
>>80945861
>art critics
>objective
That other anon was right, either you are absolutely autistic or baiting.
>>
>While some of your favorite channels won't?
I can't imagine a world where UgandaPizzaPolice gets a million subs
>>
>>80945861
>from the same board that goes "DURRRR BASED ARMOND TEEHEE WOAH!"
>>
File: 1404791217677.png (141KB, 796x631px) Image search: [Google]
1404791217677.png
141KB, 796x631px
>>80939524
indifferent.
I watched this guy as a kid, I assume most of his audience is the sam, probably something around 13-18 year olds. This is like the only group you can go after and expect to get a million+ subscribers.
>>
>>80940117
kaptainkristian
>>
>>80939524
He's just really cringy. I've met two people who like him and one is my cousin who is autistic and has no friends and the other is this weird kid at my school who is really cringy and claims to hate the mainstream, but just likes what Doug says is good
>>
It took him this long?
>>
>>80940117
soulbrothanumber3

honestly the only intelligent and well versed person i have come across
>>
>>80940117
Oancitizen/Brows Held High is probably the most scholarly of the TGWTG-style movie reviewers, but he's a bit of a pompous cunt.
>>
>>80949426
he honestly has quite poor taste in spite of having a wider knowledge of film, still good if you like to watch a few off the ball films and want recommendations mind.

>>80942027
>Ralph the movie maker
i sincerely hope that you're fucking joking
>>
>>80939943

He and his brother talk about it for 50 minutes even though his brother didn't see it and Doug obviously wasn't paying attention. Biggest waste of time of my life.

I usually like their movie "reviews", but every now and then there's a movie they dislike because they didn't understand it or missed the point completely.
>>
>>80949528
Nothing wrong with Ralph, aspie
>>
>>80949636
Are you the same retard who has been complaining about Doug all thread? Fucking Christ.
>>
>>80949826

No, that was my first post in this thread.
>>
>>80949738
He's a fucking idiot with only a slight amount more of a understanding of film making than Doug Walker.

Even the dog fucker YMS is more insightful then the faggot.

>aspie
quit projecting
>>
Can someone guess how much does he make in a month?
>>
>>80944074
Nigga, I was there when he had a channel for every video he made.
>>
>>80950007
I'm gonna agree to disagree. I'm sure you will continue to screech about the "wrong opinions" though.
>>
File: ethan and hila.jpg (81KB, 750x423px) Image search: [Google]
ethan and hila.jpg
81KB, 750x423px
>>80939524
If these guys lose their lawsuit, how fucked is Doug?
>>
>>80950229
Literally who
>>
>>80940117
RedLetterMedia
>>
>>80950229
What does Doug have to do with their lawsuit?
>>
>>80941169
>>80949636
>Doug not understanding a movie
He's like that in most of the reviews I've seen.
>>
>>80940117
RLM
YMS

He's a dogfucker who loves to nitpick but he's pretty funny and sometimes his analysis is interesting/insightful.
>>
>>80950403
His whole career is based on his understanding of fair use. If Ethan and Hila lose their lawsuit, Doug would have absolutely NO leg to stand on.
>>
>>80950873
They both do different things under Fair Use and both of them are correct.

This was still a debate?
>>
>>80950957
Ethan and Hila are being sued, so apparently it is still up for debate.
>>
>>80950131
play coy all you want, you're still a underage faggot
>>
>>80950229
If they lose he might as well put a shotgun in his mouth and end it all.
>>
>>80939524
um, good? I still watch nostalgia critic, and I've watched every episode of it.

Not sure why is that so weird.
>>
>>80952206
But why, though?
>>
>>80952647
Because I still like it. He dipped in quality after he came back with skits in reviews. After some years the skips went from shit to...tolerable.
>>
>>80951148
>if you like what I don't like, you a faggot
Screech harder why don't you?

Or go to rebbit where they all have the same opinion you brainlet aspie.
>>
>>80949390
He's a fag for deleting the Arthur dubs. Needs to get over himself.
>>
Any update on the rising sjwism on their channel?
>>
The more he tries the worse he gets. WTF
>>
>>80953846
What do you expect when his previous job was being a janitor?
>>
>>80950229
They wont most likely though. Phillip defucko and a few other's have been constantly shilling for them to pay for their lawyers.
>>
>>80939524
Just because he has a million subs doesnt mean his content will focus more on the movie than some lame skit or that theyll even be active
>>
>>80940117
Channel Criswell for movies and Joseph Anderson for video games (although Anderson takes a while to post).
>>
>>80944074
>tfw I still watch him each week as I have for almost a decade now
That is without a doubt the saddest and most pathetic thing I have ever read in my entire life.
>>
>>80950668
>he's pretty funny
Not really, no. Nice try, Adam.
>>
>>80940117
pewdiepie
>>
>>80939524
>probably get a million subs by the end of the year.
>probably
>8 months from now

How long has that channel been around? Oh 2 years I see.

lmfao way to go douche

>favourite channels

lord
>>
>>80939524

Does that mean Doug is finally improving? Did he stop being the Nostalgia Cringic?
>>
>>80940915
He's been on YT for ten years but because his reviews were pretty much plot synopsis with clips of him screaming and trying to force memes they were taken down for copyright.
>>
File: Rocco1.png (216KB, 500x285px) Image search: [Google]
Rocco1.png
216KB, 500x285px
>over a decade of this shit
>barely hit 400k
>>
>>80940117

I guess if you like normie point of view RedLetterMedia.

>>80942257

This fellow also speaks the truth.
>>
>>80939524

Surprised he doesn't even have a million. The NC is one of the most well known internet "celebs", and when you see how many shitty channels have over a million, you'd think this guy would have more.
>>
File: IMG_5291_20170118_012816.jpg (12KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_5291_20170118_012816.jpg
12KB, 225x225px
>half the thread disappeared
>>
>>80949636
Remember when in his "The Purge" review, he gave the leader of the gang the wrong name (he wasn't named originally)?
>>
>>80956870
What?
>>
>>80956839
He was off of YouTube for most of 2006-2010.
>>
>>80956924
This thread was longer, had Latzaposts and discussions on Jesuotaku. Don't know why the nods deleted those posts
>>
>>80957057
You are thinking of the Linkara thread that reached bump limit and fell off the board.
>>
File: 1415155021572.jpg (11KB, 362x352px) Image search: [Google]
1415155021572.jpg
11KB, 362x352px
>>80939733
Man, I remember when he started his gay "Sibling Rivalry" thing and it was like his Siskel and Ebert fantasies at first. He had three camera set up to focus on both or whoever was speaking and it was edited with this in mind. But it looked like shit. The set they used, the lighting. The closeups were extreme closeups instead of normal upper body shots. They haf planned reviews with some back and forth. It was like shitty Half in the Bag.

I'd like to think he realized how shit it was and just went away with it, but I know he has no self awareness and so it's more likely he just got lazy and went with the "record me and my brother unedited and raw talking about movies when we do not at all have the chops to do so". Even Third Reichal Stoklasa and Gay for Pay Jay realize they need to edit their banter.

Also holy fuck on another note Angry Joe's reviews of movies are fucking cringeworthy I now realize what exactly a youtube commenter looks and sounds like in real life.
Thread posts: 118
Thread images: 11


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.