(What Went Wrong?)
>>80864214
game of thrones and skyrim
it always bothered me because bilbo's map portrays smaug with 4 legs
bilbo drew smaug with 4 legs even though it only had 2 in the movie
Nothing.
>he was actually a four-legged dragon because we just had him stomping through Erebor in all of those flashback scenes," Letteri said. "But we realized that once you saw him performing — we especially got this from watching Benedict perform. He got down on the grown and starting slithering around like the way Tolkien described Smaug in the books, which is as a big worm.
>>80865375
>T-TOLKIEN WANTED IT THIS WAY!!!
>he was drawn with four legs
Retarded movie for retarded people.
Is this autism general?
>>80865375
>4 legged animals cant slither around
>tolkien himself literally drew him with 4 legs
what a fucking shit show
>>80865469
It doesn't matter, film is different from literature. Filmmakers gain creative freedom, and they live and die by it.
The character suffers no detriment in the sacrifice of forelimbs in order to become more closely associated with his namesake and dialogue.
Sleep now, Christopher.
>HIS HAT ISN'T BLUE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>80865659
>>80865375
what are you faggots even talking about with this "dialogue" and shit. did you read the book? smaug is a fat ass fuck whos extremely arrogant
he become fat and lazy from doing nothing in the mountain for so long
hes not some skinny snake slipping around
>dragon has legs and wings because he's a symbol of control over both land and sea
>Hackson made him crawl on wings instead of slither
>ended up looking like a bottom bdsm bitch
The moment I completely dropped these movies forever
>>80864214
I actually like the latter. I think the wings arms make the movement more interesting than just lumbering around on four legs.
Nerds need to get over this bizarre complex about how their fantasy creatures need to walk.
>M-muh dragons vs wyverns
>>80864214
Smaug looked fantastic and was the best part of that shitty film by a mile.
>>80869286
Yes, but he wasn't a dragon
>>80867238
wasn't Hackson.
del Toro was the one that made that decision back when he was still set to direct
>>80869711
Hackson decided to go along with (((them))) which is worse