Is he right?

Where's the risk if they're just gonna reboot it if it fails?

>>80845296
What risks?

>>80845296
Movie was fucking twisted dark. One of the characters has to use crutches at the end. I get chills just thinking about it

>forever changed
Aren't they just gonna kiss and make up in Infinity War so they can fight Thanos? Fuck off. I was actually surprised when Bucky had his arm blown off towards the end of Civil War but my intrigue was retracted when Captain America stopped incapacitated Iron Man with no one dying.

>>80845296
There were no risks. There was no real conflict. Marvel (MCU) movies are totally shit.

File: e4274cd23226fd7aed99782e3760a9c2.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>80845296
That's right! Iron Man's last name was changed forever

File: helicopter-style.gif (941KB, 602x337px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 602x337px

>>80845296
hahahahah
wut?

>>80845296
killing Supes and having a broken, not normie-friendly Bats for 80% of the movie. They could have just replicate Avengers with less silly humor.
THAT'S taking risks

>>80845296
Seriously though... what risks?

>a character gets crippled
>it will be okay because Tony will just build him a new exoskeleton

wow nice consequences

>>80845604
>killing supes
>he is back next film

THAT'S taking risks

>>80845907
Nigger he dies so many times in the comics you actually begin to lose count.

>>80845296

Yes! and by yes i mean no!
While it's true that there are other ways to take risk than killing characters Civil war risked nothing.

The movie was the definition of playing it safe and was inconclusive and unsatisfactory by itself purposely so they can explore the real interesting stuff on 10 tie-in movies.

It was more like a high budget tv show than like a movie.

>>80845960
thats the point. there are no risks in that moron. what the fuck are you even arguing then

>>80845296
Is who right?

>>80846017
I was being sarcastic you faggot

>>80845907
So killing Gandalf in the first one just to come back in the second film is bad now?

>>80845907
>he is back next film
Except he wasn't back in Suicide Squad

>>80845960
we aren't talking about the comics

>>80845296
>Characters forever changed
>literally ends with Cap sending RDJ a letter saying 'even though we fought I'm sorry we were both mad let's call it even steven seagal and be friends again'

It took 'risks' for the characters within the work, but there was very little creative risk.

>>80846082
Im not talking about lotr

>>80846082
the arguement was it isnt a risk dipshit. learn to read

>>80845907
>Cap vs Ironman
>yfw Cap dies
>movie shows a little glimpse of a possible comeback (of fucking course)

but no.
Enjoy your disney shit, pal

File: 1484233315107.jpg (260KB, 424x511px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 424x511px

>capeshit
>risky

Link the tweet
More people to find that shill on here :^)

>>80846137
>movie is called Civil War
>no one dies
seriously, man. They fucking killed one of the main characters of the film. If only marvel had the balls of killing Cap...

>>80845296
What risk is the person talking about?

Dora the explorer takes more risk going place to place because of that nigger swiper.

>>80846086
/thread/

>>80846192
i mean dredd is pretty much watered down capeshit half the time anyway

>>80845296
>risk-taking is not only found in the death of characters
yes.

>>80845326
Marvel could literally release three hours of RDJnr taking a shit and it'd gross $800mil

I like how there's the running joke of War Machine's Hammer tech being garbage and breaking easily.

>>80845296
no, absolutely not. There are no stakes in that fight scene. It was absolutely a waste of time. Someone dying would have at least made it seem like it ended up being a serious event. War Machine is up and walking by the end of the movie. Tony got a letter and a phone from cap. They couldn't even wait until the next movie to walk back any consequences. Nothing fucking mattered and nothing changed.

>>80845523
Haha, that guy is actually in a lot of Marvel movies XD

>>80846435
he hasnt had hammer tech since 2. what you talking about

>>80845960
Isn't it once? I'm not a manchild so I don't actually read comics after puberty, but I know Death of Superman was a bretty big deal in the 90s

>>80846192
They want to take risks, 1:1 recreate a good manga title.
Not saying its good, but off the top of my head.
>Gantz.
>Main characters get killed.
>"God" brings them back for 12 seconds to laugh at humans.
>Explodes them into nothings.
>Another main character gets exploded too for laughs.

Watchmen was a good title, risks for the characters in that, and there was no safety net of "I can survive anything." sadly the movie was shit and missed the point.

>>80846509
>I'm not a manchild so I don't read comics after puberty
Was that supposed to impress someone? Convey you're an adult? Lol fucking loser

>>80846506
Didn't he keep all the weapons that hammer made for him? All those guns are the same.

>>80846594
Iroman 3 he was wearing the mark 2. So no

>>80846574
What is it with Marvelcucks and ruining threads?

>>80845296
Man they were some well disguised risks because I can't think of one.

>>80846672
I dont watch marvel. But if I had to guess its because they're mad people dont enjoy what they enjoy

>>80846067
No you fucking weren't, there was nothing sarcastic about that at all, you spaz

>>80845296
If they wanted to take a risk, they'd leave Tony out of the next movie.

>>80846762
Dont talk to me like you're my equal. EVER!