Hannibal

I haven't seen the show, is it really worth watching & why?

I honestly like William Petersen the best as Graham.

>>80752194
Same.

File: joker laughing.jpg (37KB, 440x386px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 440x386px

>you now remember Hannibal Rising

The thing is that Hopkins plays a version where he doesn't have to hide that he's Hannibal, as opposed to Mikkelsen

>>80752139
It is worth the visuals alone. And Mads is way more charismatic as Lecter than Hopkins.

>Mikkelsen

No.

Maybe if they'd cut down on the homogay shit, but the show was fucking terrible. Then again, what to expect when you let a faggot actually think it's people?

>>80752043
Mads seems better because he carries a shit show, but Hopkins is more iconic and memorable.

>>80752585
Fuck you.

>>80752585
Was the weebshit in the books as well?
It seemed out of place.

Childhood is liking The Slience of the Lambs
Adulthood is realizing Hannibal Rising is true kino

>>80752139
Been watching it recently, I'd say it overall probably isn't worth the watch. It is just too farfetched, grandiose and frankly too vulgar to feel convincing as a psychological thriller.

>people defending the tumblr homo-lust show

LMAO

is jack crawford supposed to be a dumbass or is the show version just like that?
i barely remember the books/movies

They all kinda bring different things. I don't remember how the guy was in Rising though.

I feel like Brian Cox's Hannibal was pretty subtle, but he didn't have much screen time. He came off as a quietly eccentric/intelligent dude that you wouldn't instantly suspect but given context you can go "yeah I can see that now". Which is terrifying.

>>80753088
this isn't a Sherlock thread m8, do one

Hopkins
Petersen
Dennis Farina
Noonan

>>80753600
Cox played it too "sane" imo

In captivity, he was too normal, didn't seem deranged at all

Hopkins and Mads had that insanity within for sure

>>80752043
>Best Lecter: Mikkelsen

rëddit has arrived

>>80754764
I love Hopkins' performace but Cox accurately portrayed a psychopath.

>>80755033
No he didn't. He portrayed a sociopath who killed his wife to collect the insurance money. That was the problem.

>>80753600
>I feel like Brian Cox's Hannibal was pretty subtle, but he didn't have much screen time. He came off as a quietly eccentric/intelligent dude that you wouldn't instantly suspect

>>80755033
>Cox accurately portrayed a psychopath

This sums up his performance basically.

I don't actually have a favorite. I don't particularly care because they all have their merits. When people say Cox was too boring or sane I have to disagree.